Marissa (@mpolotan) header
Marissa (@mpolotan) profile picture
Joined June 2010
Photo by Marissa (@mpolotan)Photo by Marissa (@mpolotan)Photo by Marissa (@mpolotan)Photo by Marissa (@mpolotan)Photo by Marissa (@mpolotan)Photo by Marissa (@mpolotan)Photo by Marissa (@mpolotan)Photo by Marissa (@mpolotan)Photo by Marissa (@mpolotan)Photo by Marissa (@mpolotan)
What can I say? Toronto high school kids are pretty cool!
19
335
11
2,139
17,888
hindi naman kawalan ang mga Marcos loyalists para kay Christian Esguerra.
1
39
atorni, di naman sya tatanggalin sa posisyon kung saka-sakaling ma-convict ( at least not automatically). makukulong sya. pwede ding i-impeach after conviction
1
41
@@swainslake i quote tweeted cause the main poster blocked me responding and it seems you did the same. Sounds like some people can't take the heat. The topic is anti-trans legislation that JKR funded. That is the post that I responded to and you tried to rescue. tsk. tsk
1
61
hold on, you are saying the SNP bill is anti- trans? Are they no allies of the trans movement in Scotland. You are really trying to make a case that JKR is an ally of the SNP? You are living in some lalaland if you truly believe that.
24
Did a quick google search and the bill is not passed. Are you saying JKR's money has influence of the SNP? That would be a laugh. The ruling party unable to pass an unpopular bill is not the same as funding anti- trans legislation. You really need to get a grip with language.
unavailable
1
61
Oliver, same goes in Canada, Australia, the US and pretty much countries in the world. The SC interprets the law until the Parliament or Congress enacts another law or another SC decision overturns the decision. In the case of EA 2010, the law was not changed by the SC. 1/
Replying to @mpolotan @foxtides
But unlike most systems, in the UK an interpretation from a court sets a legally binding precedent and whilst Parliament can undo that precedent with an act, until that happens, for all intents and purposes the law has been changed. (“Pretty sure” =/= know for certain)
2
57
The SC merely clarified the definition of men and women in the context of the law, EA 2010. Best to read the decision that is publicly available.
16
When you allow a male bodied individual, however he indentifies, to a female only space, the same space stops being a safe space for women. That is a violation of their right to safe space as provided in EA 2010. 1/
Replying to @mpolotan @foxtides
"Losing their rights" Rights aren't pie. You aren't losing any rights to trans people. Not that y'all actually give a fuck about rights or safety, or you'd realize how you facilitate the rape and assaults of trans people. Or you do know and are just fine with it happening.
9
4
3,816
loses a spot to compete for scholarship or other entitlements offered to female athletes. When you move a male prisoner into the female prison cell because he identifies as a woman, you place a female prisoner in a vulnerable situation. I can go on and on with examples on how 3/
2
110
women & girls maybe impacted by policies that are well intentioned but not well thought out. Trans people can thrive and participate in society without infringing on women's rights
3
97
women only spaces and compete in female sports and take advantage of female affirmative action initiatives. So now real women and girls are being placed in difficult spot. Time to speak out to end this craziness. Trans identifying males can go about their lives without/2
1
23
invading women's spaces
19
is he really? he works with scientists in preparing the materials Paradox Institute produces. He is basically echoing the views of well known biologists like Richard Dawkins, Colin Wright, Carole Hooven, Emma Hilton, Jeremy Coyne. The list goes on and on. As they all explain 1/
1
1
154
there can never be two sexes in one human body simply because of how the body is designed. The moment the sex determining gene is triggered, it cascades a set of information/instruction to cell development as the fetus develops, among these is the instruction to cancel 2/
1
40
the development of the other sex.
32
hindi po foreign court ang ICC, its an international court. Ang UN po ba ang foreign? bahagi po tayo ng UN. Ang ADB ba ay local bank dahil dito ang HQ? hindi, international bank po ito.
1
1
207
Processing times for proof of Canadian citizenship certificates have now stretched to a full 12 months as of May, up very sharply from five months in July 2025, due to an huge and overwhelming surge in applications from Americans. Following the December 15, 2025 removal of the first-generation limit, millions of U.S. citizens with Canadian ancestry—even across multiple generations—can now apply for proof of citizenship to obtain a Canadian passport, which many seek as a strong passport for greater travel flexibility rather than immediate relocation. Demand has spiked dramatically, with over 14,000 applicants in a single recent month and Americans dominating citizenship-by-descent filings, while also flooding Canadian archives with record requests for supporting documents. Applicants submitting today can expect processing around May 2027, with wait times continuing to fluctuate based on incoming volumes and inventory. 🇨🇦 #CanadianCitizenship #CanadianPassport
3
6
18
1,390
THE Zyann Ambrosio aka Resibo Kween’s report for tonight’s TV Patrol!!! SOBRANG SALUDO KAY MOTHER 😭🫡
43
6,102
169
26,266
479,412