This King Arthur statue goes hard. Tintagel Castle, England.

Howdy Powers, You may download the complete George PDF here. youngjesus.live/shop/george Thank you.

Vouching for randos during critical elections is nuts

Gavin Newsom spent somewhere between 24 and 37 billion taxpayer dollars solving homelessness and can’t account for somewhere between 24 and 37 billion of those taxpayer dollars. But in fairness, he did grow homelessness by 20%

Should only tax paying citizens be allowed to vote?

Why is Congress forbidden from accessing information about UFOs? What is the U.S. military and intelligence community hiding?

🇪🇺 THE CASE FOR ABOLISHING THE EU: UNELECTED BUREAUCRATS TELLING 450 MILLION PEOPLE HOW TO LIVE The European Union just fined X $140 million for refusing to censor content. VP Vance called it "a fine for not engaging in censorship." And he's not wrong. This is the same organization that nobody in Europe actually voted for making decisions about what hundreds of millions of people can say online. Let that sink in. Here's the problem with the EU that nobody wants to admit: it's fundamentally undemocratic. The European Commission, which proposes all EU legislation, is composed entirely of unelected commissioners. Not one. The European Parliament, which citizens do elect, can't raise taxes, can't sack the Council of Ministers, and historically has had limited power compared to unelected bodies. So who's actually running Europe? A small cadre of Brussels bureaucrats that citizens have zero direct control over. The "democratic deficit," as scholars politely call it, isn't a bug. It's a feature. The system was deliberately designed to be unresponsive to voters. Now these unelected officials have decided they get to regulate speech across the entire internet through the Digital Services Act. Platforms like X, Facebook, and YouTube face fines up to 6% of global revenue if they don't remove "illegal content" fast enough. What's illegal? Whatever any single EU member state decides is illegal, which can include vaguely defined "hate speech" and "disinformation." A House Judiciary Committee report found the EU uses the DSA to censor "core political speech" including humor and satire. In a May 2025 workshop, EU regulators labeled a hypothetical post stating "we need to take back our country" as "illegal hate speech" that platforms must remove. That's a common political statement in any democracy. But in the EU's view, it's forbidden. Here's where it gets worse: because tech platforms operate globally and can't afford billions in fines, they often just remove content everywhere rather than risk EU penalties. So Brussels bureaucrats are effectively censoring Americans too. The lowest common denominator of European speech law becomes the global standard. More than 100 free speech experts warned the EU that the DSA "constructs a pan-European censorship infrastructure with loosely defined boundaries and the potential to suppress legitimate democratic discourse." The EU's response? Ignore them completely. This isn't about protecting democracy, as EU officials claim. It's about control. When unelected commissioners can fine platforms $140 million for refusing to censor, and nobody who made that decision faced voters, you don't have democracy. You have technocratic authoritarianism with nicer branding. The EU also represents a massive sovereignty problem. Nation states that joined gave up democratic control to an interdependent union where Brussels makes decisions national parliaments used to handle. Citizens can't vote out the people making the rules. They're trapped in a system where power concentrates among elites disconnected from ordinary people. Council of Ministers meetings happen behind closed doors. Minutes aren't public. Even European Parliament representatives can't attend. This is the body making binding laws for 450 million people, and citizens can't watch how decisions get made. The argument for abolishing the EU is simple: unelected bureaucrats shouldn't have the power to regulate speech, override national sovereignty, and make laws that democratically elected governments can't change. If Europeans want cooperation, they can do it through treaties between sovereign nations where voters actually control their representatives. The EU promised prosperity and unity. What it delivered was bureaucratic overreach, speech restrictions, and a system where citizens have less control over their lives than before. Democratic nations shouldn't tolerate governance by unelected elites, no matter how nicely it's packaged. Sources: House Judiciary Committee, EUR-Lex, Deseret News, The Daily Signal, LibertyOrg