Usually in the UK or Ireland - but (almost) always online. Mastodon @ralphaverbuch@mstdn.social

Either UK or Ireland
Joined February 2008
It’s not just the government that covered up Russian interference in Brexit. The press also played its part. This is one of the only times I was ever interviewed on the subject… by US media.
Here it is. This is the clip from yesterday's @CNN interview where I'm asked - for first time ever - about Brexit-Trump-Russia. "These vital questions of national security have been interpreted as about politics. And it's not about politics. It's about power. And about Putin."
212
1,861
40
4,950
67,046
Polite reminder. Trump & Brexit are not 2 different things. They are the same thing. Same companies. Same data. Same Facebook. Same Russians. Same Cambridge Analytica. Same Robert Mercer. Same Steve Bannon. Same Breitbart. Same Alexander Nix. Same Donald Trump. Same Nigel Farage.
965
32,653
1,499
48,390
Replying to @scotgov
@scotgov has enabled & @edinburgh_cc created a black market that is not policed & which legal licensed full time self catering will not provide, yet the double standard carries on regardless. Stop attacking local tax paying self catering biz & tackle the real issue. #SaveSC
4
11
233
ralphaverbuch retweeted
Don't expect ANY guest cleans e.g. mop & vacuum. They leave the place as they find it. Cleaners will vacuum, mop, empty the dishwasher, organise dirty linen gets washed & new linens & towels put on beds & in bathrooms for new guests. It's that simple. It's called self catering.
3
3
602
Replying to @Airbnb
@airbnb your new house rules are totally inappropriate in a UK context. It's not unreasonable to expect guests to wash their dishes or strip bedlinen as part of a visit provided it's made clear in the house rules what's expected before they book. @ASSCnews
80
10
2
39
11,990
This really is some serious overstepping of boundaries by @Airbnb ... Stick to selling the dates, take your pound of flesh & leave businesses to operate as they think appropriate to circumstances.
6
1
7
1,968
ralphaverbuch retweeted
Gary is just 1 of the 120 @PatrioticMillionairesuk that signed an demanding Burnham tax them more. And, despite what you might see in the press, Gary is part of the majority. 80% of UK millionaires support a 2% tax on wealth over £10million. patrioticmillionaires.uk/lat…
72
56
5
108
16,419
Not. In. Slightest. Surprised... #Brexit
NEW: Ten years on, Prime Minister @andyburnham tells @campbellclaret & @RoryStewartUK that there was ‘clear’ Russian interference in the Brexit vote. FINALLY after years of cover-ups & denials from the highest levels of the UK govt. That in itself deserves an inquiry. 1/
74
ralphaverbuch retweeted
Residents, artists and community leaders have called on developers to “keep their promise” to put arts at the heart of Summerhall as they revealed the first details of their plans to redevelop the site of the arts venue. @Summerhallery @EdinInquirer open.substack.com/pub/edinbu…
4
1
4
741
Who knew... Hypocrisy runs like a seam through the heart of our press. Well there you go another lesson learnt!
So.... £2,485 on glasses for a PM was "sleaze rotting our politics to the core" but £72,000,000 in a single day for Nigel Farage is celebrated as hitting "the jackpot" and a "war chest..." Whatever is happening here is happening in plain sight. You decide!
68
ralphaverbuch retweeted
This is the crazy situation we now face in @edinburgh_cc, where our Council is persecuting licenced self-caterers by weaponising planning, whilst an unpoliced black market that didn't exist now thrives. Explain it @StephenFlynnSNP? #SaveSC @ASSCnews @ETAG_UK
So Chas Booth (& no doubt @jomowat in her unholy alliance with him) wants more than 50% of the @Edinburgh_CC enforcement team’s workload spent investigating licensed Stls. Insane vendetta whilst the black market thrives.
8
15
451
We're not on a level playing Field with the rest of Europe. Local UK hospitality biz are already hit by much higher vat rates than most of Europe. Adding more tax on top of existing taxation will simply make us a less affordable destination. It will have consequences. #SaveSC
2
5
10
277
Money talks & a lot of money talks loudest. It's why this unwelcome development has gone forward with little effective resistance despite widespread local objections. #SaveSC @theSpurtle @thecockburn @ASSCnews
4
8
165
Community court action against 544-bed hostel in @Edinburgh_CC The point to #hypocrisy of planning closing small locally owned self-catering units while allowing this monster development. #SaveSC bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cnvl…
2
7
11
313
ralphaverbuch retweeted
The billionaire owned media would hate for you to share this apology....
This quoted post is unavailable.
118
3,491
24
10,188
241,578
Yep... About right.
The irony of Laura Kuenssberg presenting cheap flights, mobile phones and online shopping as some kind of fair exchange for forty years of neoliberalism, privatisation and globalisation is hard to miss. Britain didn’t go wrong because we lacked mobile phones and online shopping. We went wrong because we sold the country off. I’ll call out Burnham as quickly as any other politician when he deserves it. But on this, he’s right: Britain took a wrecking ball to itself in the 1980s. Power was centralised, industry hollowed out, public assets sold off and whole communities were left carrying the bill for decades. He could have added that the same economic model marched straight through the Blair years and every government that followed. That would have been the full truth. Instead Kuenssberg reaches for the establishment’s oldest response to decline: shut up and eat your gruel, you don’t know how lucky you are. “But we got cheap flights, mobile phones, home working and online shopping.” That is a spectacularly thin defence of forty years of economic vandalism. A cheaper holiday and next-day delivery are no compensation for selling off council housing, privatising the utilities, closing industry and handing essential infrastructure to shareholders. And those mobile phones rather prove the point. Britain consumes them, but doesn't make them. The model became brutally simple: shift manufacturing to Asia and India where production is cheaper, import the finished goods, and let retailers squeeze the maximum margin from the difference. We kept the shopping. We exported the factories, the apprenticeships, the skilled jobs and much of the productive wealth that went with them. The bitter irony is that British science helped lay the foundations of the communications revolution, yet Britain surrendered much of the productive capacity that could have turned innovation into skilled employment, exports and national wealth. We became very good at buying what other countries make. Cheap flights weren’t invented by Thatcherism either. Freddie Laker was flying passengers cheaply across the Atlantic in the 1970s. And online shopping may be convenient, but convenience does not replace the wages, shops and local economies lost when high streets are hollowed out. A mobile phone is a consumer product. A council house is security. Cheap flights are convenient. Publicly owned energy is economic power. Online shopping saves an afternoon. Ownership decides who receives the wealth for generations. Those things are not remotely equivalent. Meanwhile, we sold off the family silver, squandered the great windfall of North Sea oil and gas, and built an economy of soaring rents, grotesque inequality and household bills that would once have caused a political revolt. Selling off the country’s assets and running essential services for private profit was never a recipe for making the majority richer. Britain remains one of the richest countries on Earth. So if that wealth isn’t showing up in secure homes, decent wages, affordable energy, functioning public services and a better life for the working class, where exactly is it going? Someone is taking the cream. Everyone else gets the gruel, the bill, and then a lecture about living within their means. We know the disease because we live with the symptoms every day. The question Burnham now has to answer is the only one that matters: where is the cure? Where is the vision to rebuild public ownership, council housing, secure work and an economy that serves the country rather than strips it for parts?
1
68
ralphaverbuch retweeted
🚨 Today’s Times business page tells you almost everything about Britain’s broken economic model. At the top: lobbyists demand tax-free shopping for wealthy overseas visitors, supposedly delivering an £11.5 billion boost. In the middle: a global bond sell-off, driven by Trump’s war, rising oil prices, inflation, quantitative tightening and vast AI borrowing, is repackaged as pressure on Britain to cut public spending. At the bottom: more than $100 billion of takeover offers as further British companies prepare to pass into foreign ownership. This is the model: 👉 Tax concessions for international wealth. 👉 Austerity and unaffordable borrowing for the public realm. 👉 British companies, infrastructure and productive assets sold abroad. Buying an existing British company is not the same as investing in new British productive capacity. Ownership, profits, intellectual property and strategic decisions can all move overseas, while Britain retains the workers, liabilities and physical risks. Brexit accelerated this fire sale by weakening growth, depressing valuations, devaluing sterling and erecting barriers around British businesses. Yet each overseas takeover is still celebrated as inward investment. Global Britain was never about Britain conquering global markets. It meant Britain itself being sold cheap to the globe.
19
158
12
301
10,411
ralphaverbuch retweeted
Oh look 👀 Another Brexit bill arrives. The EU’s new €3 customs charge on low value imports was designed principally to tackle the flood of parcels from Chinese platforms such as Temu and Shein. But Brexit placed British retailers outside the EU customs regime so they are caught too. The charge applies per item, not merely per parcel, with an additional handling fee expected. That means higher prices, tighter margins and another competitive advantage for businesses located inside the Single Market. This is how Brexit suppresses growth: not through one dramatic collapse, but through thousands of permanent costs accumulating across the economy. Every time the EU strengthens its external border, Britain discovers once again that Brexit put us on the outside of it.
37
265
14
485
22,808
ralphaverbuch retweeted
🚨 There was one potential retail advantage Brexit created 👉 the ability to offer VAT-free shopping to 450 million EU residents living on our doorstep. AND UK 🇬🇧 residents became eligible for refunds when shopping in the EU. Britain could have extended its existing scheme for non-EU tourists to this huge, wealthy neighbouring market. Instead, the Treasury abolished it in 2021. EU cities retained refunds for non-EU visitors, including Britons. Britain therefore handed Paris and Milan a relative advantage while giving EU tourists no VAT incentive to choose London. This was not an EU veto. It was a British Treasury decision. Brexit created the option but Whitehall squandered it. FYI @edwinhayward
4
31
4
93
8,333
ralphaverbuch retweeted
✅ @chrisgreybrexit is right to say that until politicians are willing to face the legacy of Brexit, Britain faces an “undertow of low-grade crisis.” Brexit Britain is living with a nagging illness that saps energy. “A chronic thing, in this case perhaps not incurable. But it’s just that they don’t fancy going to the doctor because they know it’s not going to be very nice.”
14
104
4
220
2,971