
Dad. Working on tech projects with my 6 kids. #Bitcoin nostr:#npub1w9fty2lc7szxphqm78rhwvtal8pj6xt5mukdmdcpyg6tnf9ksfwquqzy6t
Oregon
Joined April 2009
- Tweets5.7K
- Following457
- Followers1.1K
- Likes27.9K
Ryan Finlay retweeted
Muchos mensajes, análisis y comentarios como este, asegurando que las pandillas de Haití no son como las de El Salvador; que son sanguinarias, que están fuertemente armadas, que nadie ha podido vencerlas, que todas las misiones han fracasado, que estamos cayendo en una trampa, que no sabemos a lo que nos enfrentamos, que será nuestra ruina, que vamos camino a nuestro Waterloo.
Pero cuando Dios nos conceda la victoria, los mismos que hoy dicen todo eso cambiarán su discurso. Dirán que siempre fue fácil, que cualquiera podía hacerlo, que las pandillas de Haití no eran tan peligrosas como se pensaba.
En fin, nunca los hemos escuchado y no vamos a empezar ahora.
Todos los que se han enlistado son creyentes y hemos encomendado esta misión a Dios, mientras que las pandillas de Haití son satánicas y es de conocimiento público que hacen sacrificios humanos.
Dios nos concederá la victoria. El Creador del Universo está con nosotros.
Deuteronomio 28:7
“Jehová derrotará a tus enemigos que se levantaren contra ti; por un camino saldrán contra ti, y por siete caminos huirán de delante de ti”.
¿BUKELE Y SU WATERLOO?
Con el anuncio del envío hacia Haiti, desde El Salvador, de un contingente de 3000 militares, cuya misión es encontrar a los 4 miembros de las fuerzas armadas de ese país, secuestrados el pasado domingo, cuando penetraron en territorio dominado por las pandillas y fueron atacados por una pandilla de irregulares armados, se avizoran en las próximas horas fuertes enfrentamientos armados.
A estas horas, y sabiendo cómo se resuelven las cosas en Haití, las probabilidades de que estos militares continúen vivos son mínimas, así que si no hay posibilidad de negociar nada, y por lo tanto lo que se plantea es un enfrentamiento armado entre tropas de El Salvador y las pandillas que son dueñas del territorio donde fueron atacados y secuestrados los militares centroamericanos.
Según lo publicado en la prensa internacional, los responsables son dos organizaciones criminales que dominan el área de “Croix des Bouquets”, una de ellas dirigida por Claude Celestin, quien es cabeza de la pandilla Chen Mechan (perros rabiosos), y Wilson Joseph (“Lammo San Jou) líder de la banda 400 Mawozo.
En el día de ayer, este último desafió públicamente al presidente Nayib Bukele en un vídeo publicado en las redes sociales, donde advirtió que no se irá de Haití, y mostró miles de municiones y pertrechos con arma de diversos calibres, que según el están esperando a los salvadoreños.
Tenemos entonces la bandeja servida para un enfrentamiento armado a solo 45 kms de la frontera de la República Dominicana y Haití, de un ejército de pandilleros armados sin nada que perder, frente a tropas regulares de El Salvador, que pelearán una guerra urbana en las calles de un país que no es el suyo y es absolutamente desconocido.
Ya en el pasado reciente, los Estados Unidos en 1994 mando 20,000 soldados e intentó organizar a Haití para que se volviera a la senda de lo que ellos llaman democracia, y luego en el 2004 invadieron de nuevo junto a Canada, lo que terminó en la creación de una fuerza multinacional, la Minustah, que terminó en el más absoluto fracaso, es decir, estamos metidos en un tema que no tiene solución.
Si hay alguien que tiene experiencia en combatir pandillas lo es Nayib Bukele, el presidente de el Salvador, su historia de combate a las “Maras” está a la vista de todos, solo que Haití no es el terreno amigo donde peleó esa guerra, un país de habla y cultura hispana donde jugaba de local, el país caribeño es un transplante de África en América, con una historia de violencia típica de las sociedades primitivas.
Cuando Napoleón envió a sus tropas a sofocar la revolución haitiana en 1802, pensó que miles de solados podrían devolver la colonia a sus dueños, pero solo un año después, Dessalines y la fiebre amarilla los obligó a rendirse, ¿será Haití el Waterloo de Bukele?.
El futuro dirá.
Ryan Finlay retweeted
You can be globally compassionate as a person and still feel that your society should have careful borders and that local cultures matter, and should be preserved if they're clearly doing well.
These actually aren't in contradiction.
First bitcoin back reward for paying with bitcoin at my local coffee shop using @CashApp 🤙 Great job @milessuter @jack and team!
The @Bitkey team at @BitcoinatBlock has been cooking! New Bitkey device confirmed! 🤙
Oil price projections
Replying to @AlaliQasem
So when does $150–$180 actually hit?
Based on current inventory draw rates:
Now → May: Market still pricing hope. $95–$110.
Late May → June: Asian refiners outside Japan & China run dry. They pay any price for barrels. $130–$150.
July: US inventories approach operational minimum. Government intervention likely. $150–$180.
Aug → Sep: If Hormuz stays shut — we enter the $180–$224 zone. But by then, governments act first.
The critical window: June–July 2026.
That’s when inventory depletion meets zero alternatives.
Are we in a new stage in the terminal decivilization in the US?
NEW: In just 48 hours, 75 fire hydrants in Detroit have been destroyed after thieves started stealing the metal nozzles and stems.
Local officials are now needing to tell scrapyards not to accept the stolen fire hydrant parts, which are worth about $600 each.
"One hydrant here or there is manageable, but the problem is whoever's doing this is doing multiple hydrants in a row," said Executive Fire Commissioner Chuck Simms.
"So when DFD shows up, they're not going to have a hydrant within 600 or 900 feet, which put people's lives at risk."
Officials are asking the community to help find the suspects.
Excellent summary
The church is the new Israel. Paul explicitly calls the church the “Israel of God” in Galatians 6:16: "And as many as walk according to this rule, peace and mercy be upon them, and upon the Israel of God.”
Some argue that Paul distinguishes two groups in this verse. For example, a Christian Zionist paraphrases the verse this way: "For all [Gentiles] who walk by this rule [the new creation], peace and mercy be upon them, and upon the Israel of God [Jews who walk by the new creation].”
But this is simply an impossible reading of the text. For one thing, the entire letter of Galatians argues that Jew and Gentile believers are one in Christ. There is no way Paul would suddenly break them apart into two groups at the very end of the letter. Paul summarizes the theological argument of the letter in Galatians 3:28: “There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus.” There is one Israel of God – and it includes both Jews and Gentiles who are untied to Jesus by faith/baptism.
So what is Galatians 6:16 saying?
Galatians 6:16 is a fitting conclusion to the letter: just as Paul began the letter with the threat of a curse, a malediction, so he ends the letter with a promise of blessing, a benediction. But since Paul does not know if the Galatians will heed the warnings in this letter, he has to formulate his blessing in conditional terms: “as many as walk according to this rule” will be the recipients of peace and mercy.
Further, it is likely that in 6:16 Paul is echoing a familiar Jewish blessing, “The Blessing of Peace” from Shemoneh Esreh, used in ancient Jewish synagogues, but now repurposed by the Apostle for the use in the church: “Bestow peace, happiness, blessing, grace, and loving-kindness, and mercy upon us and upon all Israel, your people.” In this benediction, the “us” is not a group distinct from “all Israel,” but a subset of “all Israel.” The “us” is the locally gathered people; “all Israel” is the entire covenant community. So it is here.
We can paraphrase Paul’s benediction this way:
“And as many as walk according to this rule that circumcision and uncircumcision do not count for anything in the new creation, may peace and mercy be upon them in your community, and upon the whole Israel of God of which you are all a part.”
1/4
Ryan Finlay retweeted
A huge part of pastoral ministry today is training Christian people to be propaganda-resistant.
Make Pastoral home visitations common again! 🤝
I just returned from a lovely coffee with an older saint, and it reminded me how crucial these things are to the life of the church. Pastoral home visits and coffee with parishioners should be a thing...a consistent thing, no matter how large your congregation is.
I have come to see this more clearly the longer I serve. There is something about stepping into a home, sitting at a table, or sharing a simple cup of coffee that cannot be replaced by emails, texts, or even Sunday conversations. You begin to see people as they really are, not just as they appear in the pew. You hear the tone of their lives. You notice the small things. You sense the burdens that never quite make it into formal speech.
I have found that when I neglect this, even unintentionally, my ministry begins to feel thinner. My preaching can drift toward generalities. Faces blur into a crowd. But when I am in the homes of the saints, when I sit across from them and listen, something changes. I carry their stories with me into the pulpit. I pray more particularly. I speak with a greater sense of who is actually before me. It grounds everything.
In a larger congregation, I understand the temptation to rely on structure and efficiency. There are always more people, more needs, more moving parts. But I do not believe the answer is to become distant. It simply means we must be more intentional. It may require planning, sharing the load with other elders, or setting aside regular time for these visits, but it should not disappear. If anything, the larger the church, the more deliberate we must be about remaining present.
These moments also remind me that the Church is not just what happens on Sunday. When I enter a home, pray with a family, or laugh over coffee, I am reminded that the life of the Church stretches into the ordinary spaces of the week. It is there, in those unspectacular moments, that much of the real shepherding happens.
And candidly, I need it as much as they do. It keeps me from becoming a voice rather than a shepherd. It reminds me why I do what I do. It ties my heart to the people God has given me to serve.
A church can grow in size, but it should never outgrow this kind of care.
Wisdom is knowing when to fight and even more importantly when not to fight.
This was Churchill’s logic in attacking Gallipoli in WW1 (disaster for UK) & Japan’s logic in bombing Pearl Harbor in WW2 (disaster for Japan)…
…but maybe going to war against the nation with the world’s biggest factory base will end differently for us this time?
@bscholl
Good word
Replying to @WeTheBrandon
We treated them like barbarians they treated us like worthy enemies. Never underestimate your opponent it is how you will lose every time. Honestly maybe we need this loss to break away from trying to be a empire. We have to go back to what we built.
Excellent summary of where AI capabilities are.
Judging by my tl there is a growing gap in understanding of AI capability.
The first issue I think is around recency and tier of use. I think a lot of people tried the free tier of ChatGPT somewhere last year and allowed it to inform their views on AI a little too much. This is a group of reactions laughing at various quirks of the models, hallucinations, etc. Yes I also saw the viral videos of OpenAI's Advanced Voice mode fumbling simple queries like "should I drive or walk to the carwash". The thing is that these free and old/deprecated models don't reflect the capability in the latest round of state of the art agentic models of this year, especially OpenAI Codex and Claude Code.
But that brings me to the second issue. Even if people paid $200/month to use the state of the art models, a lot of the capabilities are relatively "peaky" in highly technical areas. Typical queries around search, writing, advice, etc. are *not* the domain that has made the most noticeable and dramatic strides in capability. Partly, this is due to the technical details of reinforcement learning and its use of verifiable rewards. But partly, it's also because these use cases are not sufficiently prioritized by the companies in their hillclimbing because they don't lead to as much $$$ value. The goldmines are elsewhere, and the focus comes along.
So that brings me to the second group of people, who *both* 1) pay for and use the state of the art frontier agentic models (OpenAI Codex / Claude Code) and 2) do so professionally in technical domains like programming, math and research. This group of people is subject to the highest amount of "AI Psychosis" because the recent improvements in these domains as of this year have been nothing short of staggering. When you hand a computer terminal to one of these models, you can now watch them melt programming problems that you'd normally expect to take days/weeks of work. It's this second group of people that assigns a much greater gravity to the capabilities, their slope, and various cyber-related repercussions.
TLDR the people in these two groups are speaking past each other. It really is simultaneously the case that OpenAI's free and I think slightly orphaned (?) "Advanced Voice Mode" will fumble the dumbest questions in your Instagram's reels and *at the same time*, OpenAI's highest-tier and paid Codex model will go off for 1 hour to coherently restructure an entire code base, or find and exploit vulnerabilities in computer systems. This part really works and has made dramatic strides because 2 properties: 1) these domains offer explicit reward functions that are verifiable meaning they are easily amenable to reinforcement learning training (e.g. unit tests passed yes or no, in contrast to writing, which is much harder to explicitly judge), but also 2) they are a lot more valuable in b2b settings, meaning that the biggest fraction of the team is focused on improving them. So here we are.
From a Christian perspective, there is so much noise about what constitutes a healthy country, but this in my opinion is the clearest scoreboard. Even from a secular perspective, I think people are starting to wake up to the fact that extinction is not "winning".
Elon said three words over the past month on the supply chain fragility revealed by this war.
“We got lazy” he said.
That’s the truth and the era of complacency is over.
Time to get back to work and make America productive again. 🤝
@elonmusk @LukeGromen
Replying to @mercoglianos
Sal Mercogliano: "1️⃣Iran has ZERO authority to monitor what sails into or out of the Persian Gulf"
Iran's "authority" is both geographical and weapons-based. It's a fait accompli, unless the US Navy wants to do something to stop it. That would mean a direct naval confrontation at point-blank land-based anti-ship-missile range.
Modern drones, anti-ship missiles and even just the threat of activating sea mines gives those nations along chokepoints "the authority."
This is why the US Navy conducted an "emergency sortie" out of the Persian Gulf and beyond the Gulf of Oman. Even 5th Fleet HQ has been abandoned, its support staff evacuated back to Norfolk.
The Pax American freedom of navigation that had existed since 1945 is over, at least through chokepoints. Our misbegotten sneak-attack war of choice on Iran has exposed this new reality to the entire world.
Experiencing full self driving from a Tesla Model Y this last month was a mind blowing experience. Told it where to go, and it navigated out of a parking lot through town onto the freeway to the destination, parked itself, and drove back all the way. I never touched the pedal or the steering wheel. Truly a remarkable innovation. Next milestone will be having it drive all night while you sleep and you wake up at your destination.
Replying to @callmetobiloba @elonmusk
Based on Tesla's latest Vehicle Safety Report (as of April 2026), FSD (Supervised) is 7x safer than the US average human driver—1 crash every ~5-7 million miles vs. ~660k for humans, with over 9 billion miles of data.
On a 1-10 scale (10 being zero risk, perfect autonomy), I'd rate it an **8.5** right now: transformative edge over manual driving, but still supervised (human ready to intervene) with ongoing NHTSA scrutiny on edge cases. Data keeps improving quarterly.


























