Co-founder & COO @AskTillyAI. Early contributor @Tensorcash. Building @inferenceFI, the market for verified AI compute.

London, England
Joined June 2009
Looking forward to discussing @tensorcash on @mcglive with @enrico_otta.
This week on MCG powered by @fomo, @MetaDAOProject, times in ET Monday 10/26 12:30 - $OVER @overdotcomputer w/@lililashka (@backabledotbiz raise) 1:00 - $CHOP @choplogsapp Tuesday 10/27 12:30 - tensorcash:native @tensorcash w/@samjavadi @enrico_otta 1:00 - $ARX @arcium w/@yrschrade Wednesday 10/28 12:30 - $UFG @ufgdefi w/@defidave 1:00 - $AI @longdotxyz w/@natan_benish Thursday 10/29 12:30 - robinhood:0x72be1277e198d0c476869253cb4e62807e14533c @RaetoCC 1:00 - robinhood:0x7163ae1b5aea2f09ebc609c52b4dcac0a7a4bc2d @gagedotcash w/@0xbisbis Friday 10/30 12:30 - $ANYONE @AnyoneFDN w/@0xneuratic 1:00 - robinhood:0xfce34d21a92069100e3226638140706cf03a266e @GldstnOnChain w/@SonofAdam777_ Watch on YT 👉 youtube.com/@MCG_Live MCG Research terminal: mcgsignal.com Learn to LP with @met_lparmy on @MeteoraAG Convert to solana:USDvUSpnhCr9yBgj3UyVrD239HRUv4RsHwH2FxsWuMk w/@solomon_labs, link in bio
5
169
Interesting finds by @ValsAI after over 650 hours of model runtime. The same model can cost up to 2.3x more per task depending on the provider. Some providers also scored lower on specific task types, factors such as lower-precision weights behind the same model name can cause exactly that. Because most buyers have no certainty that the promised model actually ran, or how it ran, they pick the option they trust even if it means paying a premium for it, while cheaper options may score just as well overall. It shows nicely how much people value trust. That makes verification the main thing these cheaper options are missing, so the buyer knows what they get. @Tensorcash solves this by attaching a proof of the model, and the precision it ran at, to every answer.
Does it matter where you run an open-weight model? Today we are releasing the Inference Provider Index. It compares first and third-party open-weight models for quality on agentic tasks in finance, coding, and legal industries. Unlike other inference benchmarks, we rerun it every two weeks to catch quality degradation, and we use agentic tasks, not single-turn multiple-choice questions. It covers over 650 hours of model runtime.
3
10
305
A lot of tensorcash:native talk is about how the work gets produced. This one's about who buys it. People already spend real money on useful AI output via ChatGPT, Claude, Cursor, API bills, the usual. If apps on @Tensorcash stretch that same budget further, users show up again even if they never care about the chain or the coin. That's the @inferenceFI bet where providers fight for those jobs, tensorcash:native settles the service payments and network fees, and paid reuse is what can grow the network for reasons other than ticker chatter. Their docs also sketch assets, trading and settlement on the same rails so the inference layer isn't even the whole story. tensorcash.org/tsc tensorcash.org/finance
The thesis inferenceFI was founded on: inference will trade like any other commodity.
7
37
1,497
Samad Javadi retweeted
The thesis inferenceFI was founded on: inference will trade like any other commodity.
6
14
3
40
4,118
Samad Javadi retweeted
This account is now @inferenceFI, formerly @AskTillyAI. inferenceFI will become the commercialization layer for the verified inference produced on @Tensorcash, and we’re looking forward to finding a home for the verified compute running on the network. inferenceFI is being built on the TensorCash rails, using its verification protocol and settlement layer. AskTilly, the consumer app, comes online later at @AskTillyAI.
1
6
1
30
1,214
8B vs 27B > One burns significantly more compute per token. The 27B has over 3x the parameters, which makes it the more capable model. Meaning every token it writes takes more compute, so a GPU finishes fewer 256-token windows per hour. Simplified explanation: Mining a block takes two steps. First writing a window, which is the real work. Then hashing it, which is cheap and costs the same on every model. Only a hash under the difficulty target wins. So from a mining point of view you should be indifferent to what model you pick. Glad to see the design working in practice too, both are being mined in parallel right now with 27B producing over half of blocks. Looking forward to onboarding models like DeepSeek V4 soon, one of the top open models on price versus quality.
Two models can now be mined on TensorCash: Qwen3-8B and Qwen3.8-27B. The newly added 27B has more than three times the parameters, making it more capable. That also means each 256-token window takes more compute, so a miner would get fewer attempts at a block. To make up for that, and keep both models worth mining from a block reward perspective, its difficulty is set lower. A miner’s chance at a block stays roughly the same on either model.
3
9
525
The 7x gap between serving tokens on a card you own vs renting that card out (DeepSeek's $38/card-hour vs SpaceX's $5.27 contract rate) assumes optimal conditions for running inference but is still huge. Today only operators large enough to run their own serving stack capture it. A trustless market with an embedded verification protocol opens that to anyone with idle hardware, because buyers no longer have to trust the seller and the market brings the demand to them. The owner serves instead of rents, so returns on their own capex improve, more supply comes online without new build-out, and the buyer gets a receipt proving which model ran. The underlying economics are healthy. The market is fragmented.
Yesterday brought two data points about the health of inference businesses : SpaceX's third-quarter report & DeepSeek's inference post. Overall, they demonstrate that inference businesses can be quite healthy even at current prices & efficiencies.
8
154
Samad Javadi retweeted
Questions have come in about community-built web wallets, extensions and EVM bridges. No official EVM bridge for TensorCash has been released. A supported bridge will only be announced here and on tensorcash.org. Until then, no bridge is official.
2
12
2
47
3,899
Samad Javadi retweeted
The founder of DRW is talking about AI compute becoming bigger than oil, with entire financial markets emerging around it. Meanwhile, @Tensorcash is building infrastructure for exactly this at a sub-$20M valuation. I’ve been covering TensorCash for a few weeks now, and I still feel like most people have no idea what they’re overlooking. Let me explain it as simply as possible ⤵️ 1️⃣ WHAT IS TENSORCASH? Traditional Proof of Work uses computing power to secure a blockchain. TensorCash uses that computing power to run REAL AI models instead. One job, two purposes: 1. Secure the blockchain through verifiable AI computation 2. Generate AI inference that can be sold to paying customers 2️⃣ WHERE DOES THE MONEY COME FROM? • @AskTillyAI brings AI services to users and businesses through chat, agents and APIs. • InferenceFi is building the marketplace where verified AI inference can be bought and traded, with miners paid in $TSC • TensorCash already has native financial infrastructure for settling transactions and compute-linked contracts. 3️⃣ NOW LOOK AT THE OPPORTUNITY The managed AI inference market is projected to exceed $100B annually by 2030. • 0.01% market share = $10M/year • 0.1% market share = $100M/year That’s potential commercial volume, with $TSC positioned as part of the payment and settlement infrastructure. Now compare the scale of that opportunity with a valuation below $20M I genuinely think the disconnect is insane People are still treating $TSC like another AI narrative, while completely overlooking what they’re actually building. Wake up!
Yesterday the founder of DRW said compute will be bigger than oil in ten years. That man traded Bitcoin in 2010 and he is early on aynthing for past thirty years. He also said how it will trade and that is what blew my mind. Futures on GPU hours, futures on tokens, and you trade the margin between them like a refinery trades the crack spread. He calls that the crunch spread. Now look at what already runs on $TSC . A unit, a million tokens of a named model, proof of which model answered, contracts that settle on the chain's own compute without oracle, repo and forwards all private until settlement. That is the market he is describing btw and it is really crazy to see tradfi backoffice built already on $TSC with tradfi squad around. I am not going to tell you who is looking at it just read his tweet then go look at what $TSC already does and connect it yourself. Bitcoin of inference. The fuel, the collateral and the fee asset of the market the big money wants to have. $TSC xitter.cf/platacrypto/status/211… xitter.cf/enrico_otta/status/211…
3
12
1
36
3,939
Samad Javadi retweeted
LLM tokens will inevitably trade like any commodity - open price, verifiable quality. But three problems stand in the way: → you can’t check what you get → you can’t store it → the market prices the rig, not the oil Full piece on @AskTillyAI this Friday.
2
6
20
1,068
Samad Javadi retweeted
TensorCash is a proof-of-work chain where the work is AI inference. Miners can sell this inference and get a chance at the next block with the same work. It sets the standard for verifiable inference by attaching a proof of the model used to every answer.
4
18
58
3,173
Samad Javadi retweeted
@AskTillyAI, founded by @enrico_otta and @samjavadi, offers AI chat and agents with a built-in $TSC wallet and an API for developers. Users pay in regular currency, miners are paid in $TSC, and every answer can be checked with a Verify receipt button.
1
2
8
466
Samad Javadi retweeted
TensorCash 1.2.3 activates today at block 31,400, expected around 13:00 to 15:00 UTC. Verifiers: upgrade to 1.2.3a-r1. Full wallets: upgrade from the release page. After activation, a registration for Qwen3.8-27B (bf16) is planned, with a difficulty multiplier of 50,000.
2
2
24
1,530
Samad Javadi retweeted
An early contributor of the protocol signed his first post with a qualified electronic signature, and the proof is stored on TensorCash. The hash of the text, the certificate fingerprint and the signature are in block 31,144. This shows that the exact text was signed and existed at that block, and it cannot be changed or backdated. The certificate ties the signing key to his legal identity. Native assets on TensorCash offer additional rules that every node enforces. Among others, the signed legal document belongs to the asset, no more units can exist than it allows, and it can only change with the holders’ approval.
Replying to @enrico_otta
Some questions were raised about this account not being real, given its long inactivity, so here is the cryptographic evidence. The hash of this tweet and a digital signature of the very same are published here, as they say in @Tensorcash , verify it yourself: asktilly.ai/verify/enrico-ot…
6
3
38
1,845
Samad Javadi retweeted
Amazing read, model & context diversity is what we use at @AskTillyAI to reliably avoid Claude’s “load bearing” rabbit holes… but we are the humans in the loop. @hardmaru is taking this to the next level.
New paper from the team at Sakana AI: Recursive Self-Improvement through Multi-Agent Self-Supervision (MASS) How do we keep improving AI when the tasks become too complex for humans to reliably evaluate? For open-ended research, we eventually hit a "supervision bottleneck." If we use the model itself as the solver, optimizer, and evaluator, it gets trapped in a homogeneous loop, reinforcing its own blind spots rather than correcting them. To break this loop, we drew inspiration from Marvin Minsky’s Society of Mind. What if you prompt a single model to organize copies of itself into a structured team, then distill what the team learned back into the base model? MASS alternates between two loops: 1/ Workflow Optimization: the model iteratively evolves its own multi-agent workflows, figuring out how subagents should communicate and route information to each other. 2/ Workflow Internalization: fine-tune the shared model on the successful multi-agent trajectories so the coordination behavior gets baked into the weights. After two cycles with a 27B open-weights model, performance improved 1.2-1.6x per output token on tough research benchmarks (MLR-Bench, ScienceAgentBench, DSBench). Multi-agent traces were also much better training data than single-agent ones. The model learns faster from jointly learning high-level orchestration and bounded subagent execution. The results showing that the model can bootstrap its own coordination skills by organizing copies of itself into teams feels promising as a mechanism towards self-improvement. Blog: pub.sakana.ai/mass/ Paper: arxiv.org/abs/2610.12176 Incredible work by Hyunin Lee, Jinglue Xu, Jeffrey Seely, Yujin Tang, and our collaborators from UC Berkeley (Somayeh Sojoudi, Matei Zaharia, Donghyun Lee)!
1
2
19
648
Samad Javadi retweeted
TensorCash v1.2.3 is out. Multi-model verification, cascading verifier failover, VDF checkpoints and tougher RED block penalties. ⚠️ Upgrade nodes, miners and verifiers before mainnet block 31,400 (~Thu 15 Oct, 12:00 UTC). Qwen3.8-27B mainnet registration follows.
5
8
5
43
4,643
Samad Javadi retweeted
For those following $NOCK and $PRL, I think $TSC deserves a place in the same conversation @Tensorcash is approaching proof-of-work differently, and the technology behind it is what caught my attention Instead of relying on traditional hashing, $TSC uses verifiable AI inference as part of its consensus mechanism Here’s the concept: → Miners perform AI inference computations. → Independent verifiers reproduce the results. → Matching results help validate blocks. → Incorrect results lead to rejection. The goal is to make the computational work securing a blockchain useful beyond the blockchain itself And the architecture goes further: • 21.18M max supply, with no premine or token sale • 40% block reward reductions each epoch • Native financial infrastructure supporting assets, settlement, and derivatives • Post-quantum security incorporated into the protocol What makes $TSC interesting to me is the combination of Bitcoin-inspired scarcity, verifiable AI computation, and financial infrastructure built directly into the network NFA - DYOR
🤖 Made with AI
4
6
41
1,510
Verified inference at this scale needs a buyer. We're building it at @AskTillyAI: the market where TensorCash capacity gets bought, paid for, and settled. Tokens per second in, revenue per second out.
The TensorCash network produced an average of about 98.29 million tokens of Qwen3-8B output per second over the last 24 hours, roughly 246,000 pages or 820 novels every second. This is inference capacity that can be sold to users to answer their questions. With the upcoming Proof v5 aiming to lower latency, the same capacity can reply ever faster, and its value grows with it.
3
12
555