The mutterings of a freelance software engineer. (Be honest now, who amongst us should not be doing something more productive than tweeting?) GC, Right Leaning

Europe
Joined September 2009
Oh bugger this. I am a straight white, right wing, cishet Male, but I want 1) Adverts featuring gay male couples. 2) Idris Elba as James Bond.
12
2
1
45
1000 days: June 21st 2029, a few weeks shy of then next GE. It’s like a really badly written movie, it really is.
Wes Streeting Declares War: In 1000 Days. Wuss has Credible Evidence of Enemy Activity against the UK. He just can't show us the Military Intelligence Reports. He wants to. He just can't. "Security Issues" So we must take the word of one of the biggest and most unpleasant Cowards and Liars to insult the position of Defence Minister. Likely?? The British people believing a Snivelling Little Turd of a man? A man who wished death on an elderly female journalist. Advising us that War is on the way in a Thousand Days. Now I've heard of the Thousand Day War, Mr Streeting. But not the War in a Thousand Days. Seems like we are warning our "Enemies" to be ready for Conflict: In 1000 days. Or to attack us any day before a 1000 days is up. Literally fall the way to Day 999: And they are guaranteed winners. Wes, you really are an idiot of the first order. A Posturing Plastic General, parading across the World Stage. No gun in hand, just a limp, flacid instrument of self-abuse. You Truly Are Pathetic.
1
113
If you didn’t already despise Piers “Morgan” with every fibre of your being, this is the cure for it.
He decides what Britain is allowed to be angry about. He books the fights, stages the exits, designs the clips, and banks the rage. The ring is his. The fighters bleed. And for thirty years, the country has been watching the wrong man. His name is not even Piers Morgan. It is Piers Stefan O'Meara. He buried the O'Meara before he was twenty-five, traded a hyphenated stepfather's name for something cleaner on a masthead, and built an identity so complete that the original barely registers. That was the first trick. The man who demands authenticity from every guest who sits across from him began by erasing himself. Rupert Murdoch made him editor of the News of the World at twenty-nine. Twenty-nine years old in 1994, handed a national newsroom, not because he had earned it but because Murdoch decided he was useful. The outsider died the day that phone call came. Everything since has been the performance of one. What he did with that chair is the record. And the record is this. Three weeks into his editorship, his paper identified the person making silent phone calls to Diana's confidant Oliver Hoare as the Princess of Wales. The source was a corrupt Metropolitan Police officer. Morgan was twenty-nine. He ran it. Diana's private distress became a front page, and his career launched on her humiliation. When Harry brought his case against News Group Newspapers thirty years later, Mr Justice Fancourt's 386-page judgment found that unlawful activity had been deliberately concealed across the group's titles. GBP140,600 in damages awarded to the Duke of Sussex in December 2023. News Group Newspapers settled in January 2025 with a full apology, admitting unlawful activity from 1996 to 2011. Morgan was at the heart of those years. He has never fully explained how he missed all of it. In March 2001, Paul McCartney and Heather Mills were still together. Morgan obtained a voicemail from Mills's phone. Not just obtained it. Played it. In his Daily Mirror newsroom. To staff. In December 2011, sitting at the Leveson Inquiry under oath, he told the panel he had never listened to an illegally obtained voicemail. The record of what he did in 2001 was sitting in a filing cabinet somewhere while he said it. He knew that. The inquiry moved on. In January 2000, Morgan's City Slickers column tipped Viglen shares. The day before the tip appeared in print, someone purchased GBP67,000 of Viglen stock. His colleagues James Hipwell and Anil Bhoyrul were convicted. Morgan was not. The financial regulator investigated. The CPS reviewed the file. He walked. He has never provided an explanation that satisfies anyone who has read the dates in sequence. In 2004, he published photographs purporting to show British soldiers abusing Iraqi prisoners. The photographs were fabricated. He was sacked. He maintained they were genuine until the day it became impossible to do so. He did not resign. He was removed. In February 2014, CNN cancelled Piers Morgan Live. His ratings had fallen so badly that local affiliates were requesting to be released from the simulcast. He blamed America's relationship with guns. America blamed Morgan. Three editorships. Three exits. Not one of them on his own terms. Not one of them clean. After CNN he returned to Britain and reinvented the business model. He would not report. He would promote. Two people who loathe each other, a studio, a loaded question, and sit back while the clip spreads. The ring is always his. The fighters are always someone else's problem the morning after. He made Tommy Robinson, a convicted thug and fraudster with a documented criminal record, a fixture on that sofa. He booked Cenk Uygur and watched Cenk combust live on air, then treated the clip as content for a week. When Cenk and Hasan Piker were then banned from entering the UK in June 2026, Morgan publicly attacked the ban. Read that again. The man who spent five years helping to dismantle Meghan Markle for choosing not to live in this country suddenly discovered a principle about the right of American commentators to enter it. He booked Mehdi Hasan, Bassem Youssef, Glenn Greenwald, and Roger Waters and called it debate. He ran Middle East panels with three voices on one side and one on the other, week after week, and never once explained the arithmetic to his audience. It is not balance. It is booking. A booker curates who gets to speak. A journalist is accountable for what goes unchallenged. Morgan is a booker who calls himself a journalist, which means he gets the credit for every confrontation and none of the accountability for the platform he built around it. In 2022, he released a promotional trailer for his new show featuring Donald Trump. In the trailer, Trump appeared to walk out. He did not walk out. The footage was deceptively edited. A court found the edit unlawful. The clip had already been viewed millions of times. Morgan moved on. This is the machine. Manufactured confrontation, engineered virality, tactical outrage, and a clean exit every time accountability arrives at the door. Now watch who he chose most carefully, because this is where the machine becomes something else entirely. In June 2016, Piers Morgan met Meghan Markle for dirty martinis at the Scarsdale Tavern in Kensington. She was an actress, not yet a public figure, about to go on a first date with a man she had met online, who turned out to be a prince. Morgan has said the evening went well. What is documented is that she stopped returning his messages within weeks. What followed was a five-year public campaign, dressed as journalism, presented as public interest, that climaxed with Morgan walking off Good Morning Britain in March 2021 after fifty thousand Ofcom complaints in a single morning. He did not leave because he was wrong. He left because the audience had worked out that the woman under investigation was being investigated by the man she had once not texted back. He named Charles and Kate as the royal racists in November 2023. Not because he had evidence. Because naming them was the biggest available move that week. And the biggest available move is always the Morgan move. Now read what he did with Israel and Iran, because this is the part that should alarm everyone. In 2023, Morgan was the confrontational voice. He pushed back on pro-Palestinian guests. He cited the forty beheaded babies claim before the facts were fully established and pushed it hard. He was the man who asked the difficult question. Or he presented himself that way. By July 2026, John Mearsheimer was sitting across from him and explaining that America cannot win and that Iran has prevailed. Morgan listened. The Qatar Prime Minister, Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al-Thani, appeared on the show and called Benjamin Netanyahu a war criminal. Morgan did not press him with anything close to the energy he directed at guests in 2023. He called Trump's threats against Iran madness. He used the phrase brazen pre-admission of genocide about American foreign policy. In three years, Morgan had moved from Israel's interrogator to Iran's most comfortable English-language platform. He did not explain the move. He never explains the moves. He just makes them, and waits for the audience to follow. The man at the centre of this pivot is Professor Mohammad Marandi. Seyed Mohammad Marandi, born in Richmond, Virginia in 1966. His father Alireza Marandi served as Ayatollah Khamenei's personal physician and completed two terms as Iran's Health Minister. Marandi volunteered in the Iran-Iraq war. He served in the IRGC. In 2019, he was photographed in IRGC uniform and posted the photograph himself, publicly, without apology. He is a University of Tehran professor, a named adviser to Iran's nuclear negotiating team under both Rouhani and Raisi, and Iran International has described him as Iran's chief propagandist in English. During the 2019 tanker standoff, he disclosed details of an IRGC seizure before Iranian official channels had confirmed it. Morgan has called Marandi a government stooge. A propagandist. On air. To his face. And then booked him again. And again after that. Morgan presents the confrontation as rigorous journalism. Here is what it actually achieves: Marandi goes home with a larger international platform, martyr optics for the Iranian domestic audience, and documentary evidence that even hostile Western broadcasters cannot dismiss him. Morgan does not expose Marandi. Morgan launders him. Every booking is the service. Every clip of Morgan being tough is the product Marandi takes home to Tehran. Now look at who owns the building. Wake Up Productions Limited, Companies House number 13490132, declared GBP17.1 million in turnover in 2024. Cumulative revenue since launch exceeds GBP50 million. One employee on the books. Morgan holds 94 percent of the equity. On 9 July 2026, four new directors arrived simultaneously on the Companies House filing. Joseph Ravitch, co-founder of the Raine Group, built by two former Goldman Sachs co-heads of media banking, whose client list includes the Chelsea Football Club takeover, Manchester United, Endeavor, the UFC, and WWE. Gordon Rubenstein. Marc-Andre Zagar, representing Antenna Group, the Kyriakou family media empire, a four-generation Greek shipping dynasty with a World Economic Forum seat and deep Gulf-region connections. And Rashida Jones, former president of MSNBC, CEO of a venture called Uncensored from March 2026. Also in that boardroom: Elisabeth Murdoch. Rupert Murdoch's daughter. The patriarch who installed Morgan as a national editor at twenty-nine has a daughter on the board of the company Morgan built after Murdoch's own titles were found to have engaged in unlawful activity on Morgan's watch. The family retained a News UK revenue share arrangement in the deal. The Reuben Brothers, David and Simon, Britain's second-richest family in the Sunday Times 2026 list at a combined GBP27.9 billion, with stakes in Newcastle United and Arena Racing Company, are shareholders. Karl Brophy, Morgan's former Mirror colleague, sold his consultancy Red Flag Consulting to Ankura in February 2025 for EUR45 million, taking EUR33 million personally, and holds a seven-figure stake in Wake Up. The company raised USD27 million at a USD145 million valuation. Goldman alumni. A Murdoch. A Greek shipping dynasty with Gulf connections. Britain's second-richest family. A former MSNBC president. A Mirror veteran worth EUR33 million. This is what Morgan calls independent journalism. He is not the man at the edge of power, shouting in. He is the product power decided to back. The investment thesis is clean: Morgan's audience believes he is outside the establishment. That belief is the asset. The boardroom is the establishment. The audience is the return on it. When TalkTV finally pulled his linear television slot, the audience on that channel had collapsed to nine thousand viewers. Nine thousand. He moved to YouTube, declared it a revolution in independent media, and his new board of Goldman alumni and a Murdoch waved him off from the boardroom they all walked into on the same afternoon in July 2026. He was never the outsider's champion. He was always the insider who needed you to believe he wasn't. THE PROMOTER DOES NOT BLEED. THE FIGHTER DOES. FOR THIRTY YEARS MORGAN HAS BUILT THE RING, BOOKED THE CARDS, BANKED THE RECEIPTS, AND NEVER ONCE STEPPED INTO IT HIMSELF. EVERY CAREER HE HAS ENDED. EVERY LIFE HE HAS DAMAGED. EVERY PIVOT HE HAS MADE WITHOUT EXPLANATION. EVERY PLATFORM HE HAS HANDED TO A MAN IN AN IRGC UNIFORM. EVERY VOICEMAIL HE HAS DENIED UNDER OATH. EVERY PHOTOGRAPH HE HAS FABRICATED. EVERY DIRTY MARTINI HE HAS WEAPONISED. THE RING IS STILL HIS. THE BLOOD IS ALWAYS SOMEONE ELSE'S. THAT IS THE WHOLE CAREER. THAT IS THE WHOLE MAN.
1
45
Something that Labour would throw a shit-fit about if the Tories did it. And also something that Labour won’t do very well. Crap.
John Healey plans to send 2,000 anti-fraud experts into Jobcentres in bid to claw back £1.4billion from benefits cheats, amid warnings welfare bill could soar by £5.5billion. Welfare needs a complete rethink. mol.im/a/16234707 via dailym.ai/android
2
18
In the hours of darkness this morning: I took part in a multinational discussion about the progress, economics and historical deployment of embedded controllers in large hypothetical installations. Not a bad start to the day!
So I think nu-BSG did a poor job of explaining what "no networked computers" really meant in the end. It's clear that they have networked systems, by dint of the existence of Damage Control Central with its Christmas Tree. But the DC computer managing that doesn't talk to the FTL computer which doesn't talk to the Comms computer which doesn't talk to the Fire Control computer which doesn't talk to... The example of maneuvering realistically could probably be managed fairly effectively by a high-end gaming rig on your planet today, even for a ship of its size. But that's all it would do, and it wouldn't talk to anything other than thrusters (and their associated controllers), inertial sensors, etc. etc. I'd wager it wouldn't even talk to the Navigational computer who's busy taking star-shots and whatnot else. Yeah, it'd throw a hitch into any immediate-action scenario, but there's a reason why the Galactica was being turned into a museum.
21
Replying to @SCShipyards
Clutch pearls, "you value property over human life?" passes out in empathy overload /end scene yes, because property is an indicator of human life investment those who destroy and steal property are taking human life and it is correct to reply in kind
2
1
11
622
Sir Rob the skiving. #LBFB retweeted
"This government isn’t managing decline of our defences, it is driving that decline." Understatement of the week.
If nothing changes, we may be in the appalling situation of only being able to put only 2-3 warships to sea (not including the QEII and River Classes and those stuck in maintenance) - perhaps a couple of T26 and a T45 if we’re lucky - in 2035. BAE has made proposals to speed up delivery of T26s, but the Treasury says no. The T45s could be subjected kept going with a £150m life extension plan, but the Treasury won’t fund the autonomous programmes so the First Sea Lord has to make the decision to axe the LEP to fund those future platforms before there’s a replacement for the T45s This government isn’t managing decline of our defences, it is driving that decline. Trafalgar Day was the day before yesterday. How far we have fallen. We will have to work very hard to pick ourselves up.
3
11
108
1,957
Sir Rob the skiving. #LBFB retweeted
Replying to @FUDdaily
2
13
42
1,105
One of our elected representatives is called rude and immature, specifically an “oversized child”. This is how she interprets it. She really isn’t one of this world’s thinkers.
Replying to @BenedictSpence
Hi Benedict is that supposed to be a comment on my weight? 🤨
1
39
Be honest, with Labour in the mix we don’t need “Russian interference” to enjoy all of that.
21
They say a picture’s worth a thousand words. Either she has no idea about trigger discipline. Or, on some level, she’s ready to shoot someone that’s in the room with her.
I have so many concerns, I'm no firearms expert but I'm pretty sure your finger shouldn't be resting on the trigger for one.
39
What use is a unionised workforce, when you can replace the workers en-masse?
It's interesting how old school Labour is now more neoliberal than the Blairites in seeking to enable scab labour. There's only one reason care homes (usually private equity) are using foreign labour, and that's to undercut British workers and further depress wages to increase their profits.
34
Cremation coffins are specifically made to burn cleanly and completely, leaving only the screws pins and staples used to assemble it. These are removed and the bone fragments further pulverised.
Does anyone know the answer to this? When someone is cremated are they removed from the coffin before hand because if not the ashes you receive surely would include wood. If they are removed then is that coffin that you’ve paid for reused?
1
92
Yet again, The Sun is the closest MSM product to reality. Https://thesun.co.uk/news/40…
They want trouble to start on November 20th don’t they. Advertising for students to protest when they know how this originally started in France & how rapidly it changed into something bigger & different. Kids you are being used. Stay away from the protest.
1
50
I read this, and I screamed. A bad crypto implementation is always far worse than useless!
Replying to @astuyve
Oh god: The p384 private keys are randomly selected integers between 1 and 256, the private keys are effectively all-zeroes apart from the last byte
35
I’d never have to work again!
BREAKING: President Trump reveals his new anti-fraud program set up to reward people who expose fraud with a 1% commission on the money uncovered. "If you turn somebody in and you, let's say report and you find $1 billion, we are giving a commission to that person of 1%."
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
DOJ's published guidance caps individual whistleblower rewards at up to $30,000 per tip, not an uncapped 1% of fraud uncovered, with a total program fund of $25 million. A $1 billion fraud tip would not yield a $10 million payout under the official program rules. newsweek.com/trump-vance-of… foxnews.com/politics/trump…
2
36
This has been in plain sight all along, and I’ve never noticed it. The question really is ‘is it proportionate, once a hefty “they blooded started it” modifier is applied?’
Replying to @SCShipyards
The sly trick of his rhetoric is: “worse”. Worse under what metric? What ethical framework? And moreover: I don’t care that it’s worse. Actually, I do: I want it to be worse. That’s the point. It is escalation in response to their escalation. It is counterrevolution.
2
46
Although once they admit that arson is just as destructive (and often worse) than a bombing, they’ll suddenly decide that bombing is legitimate too.
Replying to @SCShipyards
There is a rising sentiment that Arson is the equivalent of Graffiti and not just a bomb in slow motion
1
45
Sir Rob the skiving. #LBFB retweeted
If you don't want to be permanently damaged while looting or vandalizing, then don't loot or vandalize. That seems simple enough. This loops us back to the "language" problem; the rioters are speaking in violence, and this idiot is whining that others are more eloquent.
Killing/Permanently scarring people is indeed worse than stealing.
11
23
237
1,697
Va te faire foutre, la mairie est en feu!
Schoolboy French taught me such phrases as: “The Monkey is in the tree” and “This is the pen and book of Florence”. At no time was I taught: “Is this shirt stab-proof?” and “Fuck me, the Town hall’s on fire”
1
3
44
Explain to me how setting fire to a motorbike protests the cost of living?
Have they no meaning in their lives that they’d burn the very symbol of freedom (a motorcycle). Perhaps motorbikes are anti-Islamic
19