Bookish, tallish, daddish, webbish.

The North. (MN)
Joined April 2008
jason scherschligt retweeted
One Frenchman can’t be wrong. Push to the edge of what people will accept. Stop there. Raymond Loewy called it MAYA, and used it to design the modern world. The most important industrial designer you've never heard of. zeldman.com/?p=20996
1
1
14
2,763
Replying to @FredFredSanders
Intentionality often gets overlooked. There is an *I* behind my words that gets lost or at least obscured when AI does the work.
1
1
1
28
9,242
And the truly mad thing is that millions of Americans, contemplating the legacy of 1776 as they filled out ballots, listened to the undemocratic, tyrannical ravings of Trump and decided he would be the one to carry on the revolutionary spirit. Shame on us all.
68
jason scherschligt retweeted
You think you're good at thinking until you write
313
3,398
276
22,515
821,539
jason scherschligt retweeted
President Trump, who five years ago asked Georgia's elections chief to somehow find the exact number of votes Trump needed to overturn his 2020 defeat in the state, lies of Democrats: "They cheat. 'How many votes do we need, how many votes?' That's why they take their time. 'How many votes do we need?' 'OK, here they are.'"
38
630
14
2,489
89,821
jason scherschligt retweeted
I've always wanted a journalist to ask Trump this question: "what were the terms of the JCPOA"? Huge indictment of journalism in the U.S. that no one has done that and his criticisms of the Iran Deal were treated as genuine positions.
271
1,442
61
7,117
246,150
jason scherschligt retweeted
Cast of Laocoön and his Sons (Roman version of a lost Greek original), 100BC-50AD
159
9,635
215
65,917
1,585,219
I have a long-held belief that playoff tickets for any sports team (Knicks, or anyone) should be prioritized for true fans, and that this could be enforced by asking any interested ticket buyer to answer a few random trivia questions about the team.
46
jason scherschligt retweeted
No one is more annoyed by the AI revolution than people who can actually write a sentence. Basically, having any ability to write now is suspect - you will get accused of being AI at some point. It feels like you are being accused of being a witch, of holding a type of rare magic that only the machines are now allowed to have.
266
1,089
111
6,244
170,849
jason scherschligt retweeted
A message to all sane Republicans: He pardoned 1,600 violent criminals. You said nothing. He bulldozed the East Wing. You said nothing. He interfered with the release of the Epstein files. You said nothing. He took over the Kennedy Center and renamed it after himself. You said nothing. He accepted a $400 million airplane as a personal gift. You said nothing. He threatened Canada, Cuba, Denmark, Greenland, Venezuela, Colombia, and Brazil. You said nothing. He tariffed just about everyone but Russia, causing inflation and instability worldwide. You said nothing. He attacked a nation during mediated negotiations. You said nothing. His ill-conceived war killed 175 children on day one. You said nothing. He alienated and insulted our allies. You said nothing. His ICE Army terrorized and murdered U.S. citizens. You said nothing. He committed murder on the high seas. You said nothing. He co-opted the Justice Department and directed it to prosecute his political enemies. You said nothing. It’s time to start talking.
2,723
23,418
1,208
50,746
828,907
jason scherschligt retweeted
"Fifty-seven United States senators were able to do the right and obvious thing and voted to convict and bar that evil man from ever holding public office again, including seven Republican senators. John Cornyn, however, could not do what his oath of office required. I’m sure the senator was very lawyerly and eloquent in his explanation of why the man sitting in the seat of George Washington and Abraham Lincoln shouldn’t have been held responsible for the feces his mob spread all over the walls of our seat of government—but you know, and I know, and John Cornyn knows, that this little man didn’t want a primary challenge six freaking years later." michaelwood627.substack.com/…
9
61
3
352
25,731
The internet used to be full of websites; there were millions of them and you could browse for hours and come away smarter rather than dumber. Now there are four sites and they've made half the population illiterate. We've destroyed a wonderful thing, and it has destroyed us.
I can't properly describe to anyone under the age of 30 just how cool the Internet was before Amazon, Google, Meta, and Apple turned it all into a walled garden of garbage and commerce.
206
5,942
126
30,301
458,828
jason scherschligt retweeted
I can't properly describe to anyone under the age of 30 just how cool the Internet was before Amazon, Google, Meta, and Apple turned it all into a walled garden of garbage and commerce.
500
5,641
291
41,386
1,017,368
Some of you have forgotten that only three years ago you were perfectly capable of writing an essay, writing a eulogy, telling a bedtime story to a child, and it should worry you that powerful companies have convinced us we can’t do things we’ve been doing for 5,000 years.
255
18,788
250
83,021
1,157,284
jason scherschligt retweeted
Something I've noticed the best product leaders and teams I've worked with do; they're (almost annoyingly) specific. They know the devils in the details and ambiguity leads to mis-interpretation. Here's a few examples: "Our goal is to increase active users” What do we mean by active users? - Is it those who login? - What about those who bounce right away? do we count those also? - Across what time horizon? Daily active users? weekly? monthly? - How do we calculate it? Is it a rolling average? For how long? - What about engagement? different levels of engagement? - Why? To what end? .... Here's another example. "You're empowered" Empowered to do what? - Solve customers problems or just empowered to work out the 'how'? - Ship a new product? or sunset the current one? - Can I sign the company up for a new enterprise tool? - Can I start a new business in our current business and be the CEO of it? ..... Again I could go on and yes some are a bit ridiculous but hopefully you get the point. Clarity is hard. There's no shortcuts. And it takes a lot of effort. As I shared in the training I ran the other day; if things are misaligned, unclear, etc I would be spending 50% of my time communicating and trying to create clarity. Because you can't scale or create leverage if your team aren't aligned or unclear.
2
4
162
jason scherschligt retweeted
look I'm just saying that for all the flak the humanities get, it's only the stem people outraged by the idea that they should be responsible for the contents of a paper with their name on it
The reactions of many researchers on finally being held responsible for having read the very paper they submitted are... something.
29
553
12
5,274
149,392
jason scherschligt retweeted
I think this episode perfectly encapsulates the new right: Trump says he doesn't care about Americans. JD Vance is asked what he thinks about that, and the quote is read to him word for word, but all he can do, because he has no spine, no moral compass, no self-respect for himself as an American, is deny that Trump said it at all. Then Trump doubles down, knowing full well that his base will swallow his contempt for them, and that no one around Trump, least of all dogs on leashes like Vance, would dare ask him to mask his hatred for the average person, while conservative media from The Blaze to The Daily Wire will praise Trump for being so refreshingly candid about how much he hates this country and its people, which they will also call patriotism.
Trump on saying he doesn't think about Americans' financial situation: "It's a perfect statement. I'll make it again. Everybody agrees."
45
1,386
17
8,624
495,894
"Learning how to write well is an experience you don't want to rob yourself of." Preach. I plan to pass this exact message on to my offspring for generations.
Replying to @babadookspinoza
Learning how to write well is an experience you don’t want to rob yourself of, because there’s no substitute for knowing how to communicate well in your own voice, how to be heard, how to persuade and move people and articulate your feelings and argue for your causes. You can!!
34
People seem to have forgotten that the point of creating products in small iterations is to get the continuous feedback necessary to produce a great product. It has nothing to do with coding mechanics. The idea is that very few customers know what they want until they get something into their hands. So, get something into their hands, get some feedback, and adjust. Small increments (because nobody, including customers, has the cognitive bandwidth to handle an avalanche of changes all at once), frequent releases (daily is ideal), continuous improvement. Meanwhile, the stans all tell me that the "right way" to use AI is to create a vast amount of code all at once. So much, in fact, that it's not feasible to examine it. Honestly, though, pushing out all that code in one chunk works against us from a product development perspective. I'm not saying we shouldn't use AI, but maybe we're not going about using it in the best way, at least not if we intend to produce products people actually want to buy. That all-at-once mindset has led us back to traditional shove-it-down-the-customers-throats waterfall thinking. Build something huge, some "great idea!" that we're convinced will "disrupt the market!" with its "revolutionary!" approach 🙄. Then try to convince customers that they actually need it. Often, the market remains unconvinced. That's a sales-driven approach. Compare that to a marketing approach, where you figure out what the customers need first, then build that. That's where small increments come into play. It's not a coding strategy; it's a market-research strategy that's more effective (at least faster and cheaper) than doing it with mock-ups. It's a way to figure things out while we're building, rather than before. The traditional critique is that it's somehow "cheaper" to mock up the idea first, but that thinking doesn't factor in the opportunity cost of the time delay and overestimates the cost of actually building it. In this brave new AI world, that cost is lower than ever. The AI advantage is a tight inspect-and-adapt loop that gets us feedback sooner. Leverage that.
9
8
1
109
5,020