Code-execution flaw in UEFI firmware threatens most servers on planet Earth arstechnica.com/security/202…

Many Americans are trying to make better choices and big-food is actively making this difficult by making the Ingredient List very difficult to read. This would be an easy fix... 1. Increase Font Size Current Regulation: Minimum font size is 1/16 inch (1.6 mm). Recommended Change: Increase the minimum font size to at least 1/8 inch (3.2 mm) or a point size equivalent of 12 points, which aligns with accessibility guidelines for printed materials. Reason: Research shows that many older adults, individuals with presbyopia, and those with low vision struggle with smaller font sizes. Larger fonts improve legibility across demographics. 2. Improve Contrast Requirements Current Regulation: Text must contrast with the background, but no specific standards are defined. Recommended Change: Implement a minimum contrast ratio of 4.5:1, as per the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) for readability. Reason: A defined contrast standard ensures that text is distinguishable from the background, benefiting individuals with visual impairments. 3. Mandate Clear Typography Current Regulation: No restrictions on font style. Recommended Change: Require sans-serif fonts (e.g., Arial, Verdana) and avoid decorative or stylized typefaces. Reason: Simple, clear fonts enhance readability, particularly for people with dyslexia or cognitive impairments. 4. Allow Dynamic Labeling Adjustments for Smaller Packages Current Regulation: Labels on packages smaller than 12 square inches can use reduced font sizes. Recommended Change: Require the use of fold-out labels, QR codes to provide legible ingredient information without reducing font size. Reason: Smaller font sizes compromise accessibility; alternate methods preserve readability while accommodating limited space. 5. Use Plain Language Current Regulation: Ingredient lists must use common or usual names but may still include scientific terminology. Recommended Change: Mandate plain language descriptions alongside technical names (e.g., "sodium chloride (salt)"). Reason: Simplifying terms ensures greater comprehension for individuals with low literacy skills. 6. Standardize Allergen Formatting Current Regulation: Allergens can be declared in the ingredient list or a separate "Contains" statement. Recommended Change: Require a consistent allergen section in bold or highlighted text, clearly separated from the main ingredient list. Reason: Improves visibility for people specifically looking for allergen information. 7. Add Digital Accessibility Current Regulation: Labels are static with no interactive features. Recommended Change: Encourage the use of QR codes or NFC technology on packaging to link to accessible digital formats (e.g., larger text, audio descriptions). Reason: Provides enhanced accessibility options for individuals with disabilities. These stroke-of-the-pen changes can be made Day 1 and any argument from big-food would reveal their obvious attempt to keep The People in the dark... @RobertKennedyJr @MartyMakary @DoctorJanette @DonaldJTrumpJr @US_FDA @FDAfood

🚨 BREAKING Gmail Users Need to Read This! ⚡️Google just admitted it's spying on your emails⚡️ About time to switch to a #private alternative. Enjoy! 😃 🔐👉 tuta.com/blog/best-private-e… #GmailAlternative  #DeGoogle #Google #Tuta #privacy

What’s the gospel? If you encountered someone dying in the street and needed to explain the gospel to them so that they’d be saved, what would you say?

❗️ Google's privacy policy no longer rules out ads based on your Gmail, Drive and Photos. A 16 October update makes an exception if you let other Google services, like Search, access that data. Search may process it to "personalize content, including ads", the policy now says.

Heretic. Another gospel.

There is zero scriptural support for the position that it's a sin for Christians not to vote.

Sharing again. No sub to subscribe to, no pay wall. ⬇️ DMSO