
creator economy veteran @All_InVentures
New York City
Joined November 2013
- Tweets25.1K
- Following345
- Followers21.3K
- Likes19.8K
bryan retweeted
We brought the @cryptocom experience to Rome, Italy - tutte le strade portano a Roma!
"Community" gets thrown around as a buzz word, but crypto.com takes an immersive, tailored approach.
A special thanks to @AntoineBlanc and @aliciapeas for entrusting the All In platform and continuing to work with us to curate crypto.com's global presence.
bryan retweeted
Introducing Scout.
Scout is a social investing platform that brings stocks, crypto, AI-powered insights, and a community of investors together in one place.
Scout is officially live on iOS + Android.
And to celebrate the launch, we’re giving away $500 to the community (⬇️)
Hosting another @cryptocom event, this time in Rome!🇮🇹
Sign up here here👇
Crypto.com is coming to Rome 🇮🇹.
Come hang with the community, meet the team, score dope swag and learn all about tokenized stocks & more!
Join us on Sept 26, RSVP now ➡️ luma.com/cryptocom-6hd5
Seriously? What’s the concern you ask, @vladtenev? The list of concerns is almost existential.
U.S. securities laws are in place to protect investors. For good reason, we spend millions and millions of dollars every year to comply with U.S. securities laws. In good. conscience, how can Robinhood as a U.S. company set up an operation in far offshore Jersey, an island 3000 miles away, and market a security sort of posing as AMC in some shape or fashion, and not comply with U.S. securities laws. That is shocking and shameful.
Our past issuance of equity to strengthen our balance sheet was vital to our success. Your setting up some kind of fictitious synthetic equity market decouples stock token ownership from a company’s ability to control its own capital raising efforts.
Share ownership gives shareholders various rights, including the right to vote their shares. Your stock token pretend to be some form of stock ownership, but disclosures to the contrary notwithstanding, they are not ownership and they deprive investors of their rights.
This quasi-fake market you are creating on the island of Jersey sows distrust amongst the public about financial markets in general. There already is distrust in financial institutions, you are potentially making it far worse.
These are but a few of my concerns about your actions.
I hereby call on you and Robinhood to voluntarily CEASE AND DECIST the trading of AMC stock tokens. If you don’t, our high priced securities counsel has been asked to see whether we can force you to stop.
I also wonder how can the SEC possibly support your sham ignoring of U.S. securities laws. You can be sure we will be asking them.
bryan retweeted
Do my eyes deceive me? Is it…..@thebryanjun ?
i think everyone should watch this vid.
guys be ready because i genuinely think it’s going to be hell for everyone. literally everyone, but especially newjeans and illit.
i’ve already seen people on x/tiktok saying, “hopefully things will finally be easier for illit” after
bryan retweeted
Kudos @thebryanjun!
He perfectly explained Jin's emotion as crystal clear as a distilled water that's gone through 5978 reverse osmosis. Nobody needs to be Korean to understand his reaction, unless of course u are dense or simply lack emotional intelligence.
bryan retweeted
everyone and their mama's acknowledge the fact how weird this clip is but ratmys will ignore it and look you in the eye and say they're family
bryan retweeted
We're going to let the public have a chance at partaking in @AnthropicAI's success before the IPO
bryan retweeted
With all due respect to Hasseeb, I completely disagree with this take.
Chris was and is a mentor to me, I'm not pretending otherwise.
But neither Chris nor Haseeb are builders in the category.
I have spent the last year in the trenches trying to build non-speculative consumer crypto usecases. Ignore "non-financial". That's a useless umbrella. I care about non-speculative.
Here's what I know with total clarity: Three years ago it was 100% impossible to ship a good consumer crypto experience.
Not hard. Not early. Impossible.
The wallet experience was complete and utter dogshit.
Injected wallets are an unacceptable UX.
Seed phrases, unacceptable.
Blind signing, unacceptable.
Bridging, unacceptable.
Here's your onboarding experience for a consumer media flow:
1. Install a fox-faced browser extension
2. Write down a 24 word seed phrase and hide it under your fridge (btw now some romanian dude's gonna break int your house)
3. Select a chain if god willing you understand what that means
4. Go find a bridge (Wormhole, LayerZero, ...) if you guessed wrong
5. Sign hexadecimal strings with very scary error messages
6. "Transaction pending... would you like to increase your gas price" (wtf is gas? they'll say)
Thats is before you even fund the thing.
But I'm not done, on ramps were even worse.
If you wanted to use some "web3 media" app, you had to open an exchange account. The UI looked like DraftKings for slop-maxxed decentralization jargon.
Spin the wheel to get decentralized compute coin on Arbitrum or turbo DNS coin on Polkadot! Last cycle nonsense.
Before you buy anything you need to go through a rigorous KYC process. SSN, address, Drivers License verification, transfer to your mobile device, liveness check on your face, transfer back, "a human in a remote country will check this asynchronously and we'll get back to you".
Now we sign into Plaid, put our bank credentials into some random form on this new DraftKing exchange, now they can auto-draw down money. Perfect.
Now god willing you've found UDSC and bought it on the right chain. You're ready to transfer out. You paste in your 40-character Hex address to the fox-head app.
That'll be 24-48 hours before it arrives due to ACH fraud risk.
Aaaand now you can use the web3 media app.
And KYB on ramps for enterprises? Rectal inspection. I need not go deeper.
Consumer apps are viral flywheels. If there's too much friction on the axle, the flywheel never spins. Crypto had superglue on the flywheel.
So when we say "the market rejected consumer crypto," we should ask a basic question.
Did we ever actually ship it in a form that normal people could evaluate.
Finance worked because the users were willing to tolerate absurd friction. Traders will jump through flaming hoops when their perceived EV is +infinite (because they're a genius and have alpha or astrology signals or whatever).
Media and other consumer activities do not get that tolerance budget.
Now enough with the pessimism of the past. Let's fast forward to today (or next 3 mo).
- Embedded wallets are real
- OAuth style onboarding is real
- Headless custody is real
- In app onramps are real
- Stablecoin onramps are real (this is a distinct thing and is critically important and I don't have time to explain in this post)
- KYB capable providers are emerging
Privy. Bridge. Stripe. Zerohash. Coinbases' new stack. This stuff is recent. Widely usable versions are maybe two years old. Broad developer adoption is even newer.
For the first time you can do something like:
- Sign in with email
- Wallet created under the hood
- Buy stablecoins inside the app
- Transact instantly
No exchange account, no raffle spinny wheels for decentralized slop, no fox icon, no seed phrase under your fridge.
That stack did not exist in a usable form when most of the "consumer experiments" were run.
After teh blood sweat and tears out of the L1 engineers, L2 engineers, the cryptographers, the wallet teams, the exchange teams, the compliance teams, and the onramp providers, we are finally getting something that resembles a sane consumer stack.
We are just getting the grease.
That does not mean consumer crypto is inevitable.
It does mean we are only now in a position to run the experiment honestly. It's the best time to build in crypto, in the history of crypto.
If it fails from here, with real UX and real onboarding and real distribution, then fine. I'll eat my shoe. Call it dead.
With all due respect to Chris, I completely disagree with this take.
Chris argues that "web3," particularly crypto-powered gaming and media, failed due to scams and regulation, and that better regulation will unlock these non-financial cases.
OK, think about this for a second.
Does this pass the smell test?
Do you think web3 gaming failed because of Gary Gensler? Do you think web3 media plays failed because the scammers crowded out the honest media innovators? Really?
If this is true, why didn't they kill financial crypto, which had WAY more of both? Financial use cases were right in the crosshairs of the regulatory harassment, and they also attracted way more scams.
Why shouldn't we instead accept the more obvious answer: non-financial use cases for crypto have failed because no one wants them.
Let's just admit it. They were bad products. They failed the market test. It was not Gensler or SBF or Terra that caused these things to fail, it was that no one wanted any of it. Pretending otherwise is cope.
Enormous sums of capital and talent explored these ideas, and we should acknowledge what we learned. That lesson is not "if we just had better laws, then finally people would finally be using decentralized Spotify" or whatever.
Call a spade a spade. Every single use case in crypto that has worked at scale has been financial in nature.
2008: Bitcoin - non-sovereign store of value
2014: Tether - stablecoins
2015: Ethereum - programmable money
2017: ICOs - capital formation
2018: Prediction markets (Augur, later Polymarket)
2020: DeFi - literally finance is in the name
2021: NFTs - non-fungible financial assets (to the extent they worked)
2024: RWAs (the year BUIDL took off)
All this stuff was adopted bottoms-up. We as investors discovered that people wanted to do these things with crypto. The web3 consumer stuff, on the other hand, was primarily conjured up by investors and pitch decks, ZIRP accelerationism, and "wouldn't it be crazy if" blog posts. This was the opposite of the "what smart people are doing on their weekends" thesis.
In fact, if you go back to the Ethereum white paper from 2014, almost every single Ethereum use case Vitalik describes is financial in nature: token issuance, stablecoins, derivatives, on-chain treasuries/DAOs, on-chain savings, insurance, price feeds, escrow, gambling, prediction markets. It's all in there.
This is nothing to be ashamed of. Finance is almost 10% of GDP. It's an enormous part of the world economy, and banks are some of the lowest NPS score companies in the world. People hate their banks and the outdated financial architectures their money runs on. It's literally why Bitcoin was created. There is so much to innovate in the realm of finance, and I truly believe we are only at the beginning of that displacement. You don't need to assume anything more to project the next 10x in crypto.
The old saying goes "crypto will do to finance what the Internet did to every other industry."
I respect Chris's optimism. But 18 years in, we should not be propagating this meme about consumer web3 use cases as though they're inevitable. If you are hanging around the rim hoping that crypto is going to disrupt media and gaming, you should know the history and look at it with clear eyes.
Now if you as a founder believe that despite that, you know the secret to cracking this market--I respect that, and I certainly don't begrudge anyone to follow their convictions.
But I think it's important that investors be honest that all the evidence points the other way.
bryan retweeted
No one can’t tell me Korea isn’t trying to hide smth and is using all of these people to cover up someone’s sh1t and it’s also paid smear campaign
bryan retweeted
I just came across Bryan yesterday from my friend’s review and I’m wowed by such an amazing person he is. Checked out his YouTube channels and there’s a rare mix of clarity, humor, and depth in how @thebryanjun talks about Web3, startups, and digital ownership. you can tell he’s not just creating, he’s educating with intention.
The more I learned, the more it made sense why he’s part of the founding team at @joinearlybird. Bryan’s background in investment banking and startup strategy really shows in how he bridges traditional finance thinking with Web3 innovation. Earlybird isn’t just another platform, it’s reshaping how we trade narratives and real-world events through a fun, open prediction market on Solana.
One of the things that stands out most to me is how Bryan keeps reminding people to zoom out, to think beyond the usual noise and look at where adoption and impact truly meet. His approach feels grounded and refreshing. Whether you’re deep in $SOL, $ETH, or just exploring the next wave of digital ownership, Bryan Jun is one of those voices you genuinely learn from every time he posts.
bryan retweeted
Finding ways to get better in this space is something I try to do every day.
A friend recently recommended a YouTube channel by Bryan Jun, and even though I rarely use YouTube, I’m really glad I checked it out. He already has almost 30k subscribers and I later found him on X @thebryanjun and his content instantly clicked with me.
Bryan Jun is a Web3 entrepreneur and creator who’s shaping real conversations around crypto, startups, and digital ownership.
He’s part of the founding team at @joinearlybird, where he combines his background in investment banking and startup strategy to build smarter and more practical tools for Web3.
What I really like about him is how he reminds people in crypto to look beyond Twitter and think bigger about adoption, storytelling, and real world impact.
Earlybird is building something fun yet powerful, a Solana-based prediction market where people can trade on real-world events like IPOs, acquisitions, and even bankruptcies for companies like OpenAI and SpaceX.
By mixing humor, DeFi, and on-chain markets, they’re showing that finance doesn’t have to be complicated or boring it can be open, transparent, and human.
I’ve learned a lot just from his page. Whether you’re into $ETH, $SOL, or just curious about where Web3 is headed, Bryan is definitely someone worth following.


























