Pinned Tweet
Most people want 100x plays.
What they don’t see is what it actually takes to find them.
It’s not luck.
It’s time, repetition, and being early when nobody cares.
This year alone:
$WHITEWHALE — 100X+
$METALS — 14X
$RADR — 5X
$KERMIT — 9X
#我的刀盾 — 3X
$PUNCH — 3X
$KURUMI — 3X
$SHTF — 3X
And from 2025:
$PRIVIX → 100X
$RAI → 85X
$BOSS → 40X
$COFFEE → 38X
$HYPR → 35X
$KTA → 30X
$XMW → 26X
$MASK → 20X
None of these felt obvious at the time.
They were early, quiet, and easy to ignore.
That’s the real edge.
Being there before it becomes consensus.
I spend most of my time scanning, filtering, and watching for those setups.
If you don’t have the time for that, just stay close.
Everything I’m looking at gets shared publicly.
No gated alpha and no games.
Just real-time ideas as they show up. 🤝
Straight rubbish without any use case other than pocket filling for the grifters who create this crap.
Trad retweeted
"he's an insider"
his actual entries, all public on fomo:
$MEME - bought at $44.7m mcap
$BASECAT - bought at $24.1m
$USELESS - bought at $53.2m
$PONS - bought at $6.1m
an insider buys at $1m and sells at $100m
he bought $MEME at $44.7m that is after it already 40x'd from launch
and today he's down $2m in 24 hours on a $24m portfolio
- insiders don't take $2m drawdowns
- they don't buy at $44m market caps
- they don't have 99 open positions and a five day average hold
he's just early and public about it which apparently reads the same as cheating to some people2
'hE iS aN iNsIdEr'
CT would rather everyone be poor than see someone take a winning trade
being a smart trader ≠ being an insider
$MEME is only a few days old
a lot of early holders got in sub $1m market cap
my average entry is around $45 MILLION market cap
i've spent $500k+ accumulating gradually over several days
this is NOT how an insider trades
if i was an insider, i'd have bought sub $1m and sold above $100m
instead, i first saw $MEME below $10m and faded it
then watched it rip to $150m within a few hours while i was completely sidelined
that's when i realized:
this could be one of THE defining memecoins of the cycle
why?
because $MEME sits directly at the heart of what i believe is the greatest narrative in the history of memecoins:
meme/stock
the meme/stock meta is already fueling some of the biggest pumps we've seen across crypto
$AI on Robinhood hit $320m
$MARSCOIN on BNB hit $260m
solana:6GmAFSYs4gk3FDao5FzzySQpPZaWsa4rUJHacpMpUNgx on Solana hit $220m
and i don't think this meta is even close to mature
it's still in its infancy
more importantly, it's bringing an entirely new audience back into memecoins
not just degen memecoin traders
but RWA enthusiasts, retail traders and outside observers who are starting to believe that memes can actually mean something
i mean this is a meta crypto billionaires, CEOs of the biggest CEXs & blockchains, and even tradfi entities and hedge funds are keenly paying attention to
these people have deep pockets
and this is happening right before what could be the most explosive alt season of our lifetimes
now look at where $MEME sits
$MEME is at the center of the debate between Vlad Tenev, the founder of Robinhood, and the AMC CEO over the legality of meme/stock tokens
that debate could become one of the most important catalysts for this entire meta
it either kills the narrative
or legitimizes it and sends meme/stock tokens into an entirely new phase of growth
if the latter happens, $MEME has the potential to reach billions in market cap
and the memetics are almost too perfect:
- the narrative is literally 'A Meme Coin'
- the golden $MEME ticker is instantly understandable
- AMC is a mainstream entity that normies already know
- Vlad Tenev is one of the most recognizable figures in retail trading and the face of Robinhood
- this debate could generate mainstream attention for months, and memes thrive on attention
then there's the Robinhood angle:
if this meta keeps exploding, i expect $MEME to eventually make its way onto Robinhood
remember:
Robinhood helped send $DOGE to an $88 BILLION market cap last cycle
they already gave millions of retail users their introduction to memecoins
now imagine those same users opening Robinhood and seeing a token literally called:
MEME
the meme writes itself
and if the meme/stock meta starts impacting actual stocks or triggering another short-squeeze phenomenon?
study 2021.
you'll understand why i think this could go MUCH harder
this is why i sized into $MEME
not because i'm an insider
because i think i'm watching a new meta form in real time
and $MEME is sitting directly in the middle of it
i wasn't even planning to publish this thesis yet
i wanted more time to accumulate
then Vlad Tenev randomly followed the account today and $MEME started flying
so i figured:
might as well tell you what i'm seeing
and to everyone calling 'insider' every time i catch a winner:
if i was an insider, i'd be buying the lows
not spending $500k+ accumulating around a $45m average market cap
i've never insider traded a single token on fomo
yet i became the first account to hit 8 figures on the platform
and the first account to hit 8 figures on a single trade
my FOMO portfolio hit an ATH of $28 MILLION late last week despite me being on the platform for less than 4 months
i don't think ANY other account has sustainably crossed the $10m mark
and my PNL on the 7D / 30D / ALL timeframes sits comfortably above 2x the next runner-up
not from one lucky trade
from a basket of trades across EVERY major blockchain
- Robinhood
- BNB
- Solana
- Base
i've caught the biggest winners on each
and i've put out clear theses for them at the lows before they moved
if that makes me an 'insider' then apparently i'm so connected that i can call the shots at EVERY SINGLE MAJOR BLOCKCHAIN IN THE WORLD
nah
there's a method to my madness
and you can literally watch me execute it in real time on fomo
better yet, join through my ref link and start learning:
fomo.family/r/unipcs
this cycle is still in its early innings
you still have time to change your fortunes
and i'm running a $350k giveaway for active refs
maybe you end up catching the next one too
don't say i didn't warn you
Sometimes it's also about how we use our wallets.
Ledger. Trezor. Whatever.
None of them are going to save you if you’re still signing everything put in front of you.
The basic stuff matters.
Double-checking addresses.
Reading what you’re signing.
Keeping your seed offline.
Slow yourself down for an extra 10 seconds before you hit "Confirm."
Keeps your bags alive.
Hot take from @zachxbt on hardware wallets
I think he’s dead on that the hardware wallet experience today sucks
And regular UI updates and software changes absolutely break regularly, making them frustrating to use
When you use a hardware wallet you want it to just *work*
I’ve been leaning away from Ledger and toward Trezor recently for this reason, but Trezor isn’t perfect either
I still think hardware wallets offer a few advantages beyond key storage offline
The most important of which imo is the ability to confirm that what you’re signing on your internet connected device matches what shows up on your HW wallet
But in general using a separate device to trade on is a strong security strategy, and you’d be better off than most crypto users if you truly stuck to it
If you follow Zach’s advice I’d 100% use an iPhone like he suggests, not Android
I’d also be very intentional to store your seed phrase backups offline and not as screenshots on the same device
Finally I’ll leave you with this thought on mobile vs desktop/laptop: when you use a mobile device you often have less information to work with when transacting
Smaller UIs sometimes don’t show all information, and it can be easier to miss that you’re on a phishing site, etc
I prefer a laptop for this reason, but understand mobile is king these days for many
Appreciate Zach sparking the discussion here, it’s always good to check your security assumptions as the tech changes and threat evolves
Every few months CT tries to convince me we’re done with memes.
Then I open Dexscreener and it’s literally dogs, cats, frogs and complete nonsense soaking up all the volume again.
RWAs are cool.
Tokenized stocks are cool.
But brother…
I do not wake up thinking “damn I wish I could buy Apple onchain today.”
I wake up wondering which unemployed dev just launched the next cult.
That’s crypto.
Always has been.
Tom Lee (@fundstrat)'s #Bitmine bought another 6,000
$ETH ($11.18M) from FalconX a few hours ago.
Bro won't stop buying. 🤝
You made $1,000,000.
Here’s what you actually get to keep after tax in these countries.
How much are you guys keeping?
$SOL to $1000 is not too crazy if you think about it
- Gamers onboarding
- Gamblers Onboarding
- AI onboarding
- Utility projects onboarding
- ETH too expensive to build on
Meanwhile sentiments is at ATLs.
Are you connecting the dots?
Nearly half of the top 50 coins have outperformed Bitcoin in the last three months.
Be honest:
Do y'all believe there will EVER be another Altseason?
THIS IS HOW AI BUBBLE ENDS.
SpaceX, OpenAI, and Anthropic are all racing to IPO at the same time.
The market needs to come up with $200 BILLION in fresh capital to absorb them.
That money has to come from somewhere.
Large funds will start selling their biggest tech positions to free up cash.
NVIDIA, Microsoft, Google will be the first to get sold.
The problem is, those three names are carrying the entire S&P 500.
When they drop, everything drops.
This exact setup played out during the COVID-era IPO wave.
Rivian, Coinbase, Robinhood all went public at absurd valuations.
When the Fed tightened and liquidity disappeared, every single one crashed over 80%.
AI and tech are already stretched thin.
A $200B capital drain on top of that creates a forced liquidation event.
If you've been following me, you already caught the $16k bottom and the $126k top.
This is why they paid social-media influencers, e/acc fanatics and junk accounts to go crazy on AI narratives recently.
Just for retail exit liquidity.
Make sense now.
If you missed those. The next one is coming.
THE BIGGEST IPO IN HISTORY ALWAYS MARKS THE TOP.
This pattern has never failed SINCE 1926.
It happens every time:
- 1926: Goldman Sachs Trading Corporation
- 1972: Wendy's
- 1999: Pets
- 2026: SpaceX
Then the S&P 500 crashed.
- 1926 crash: -86%
- 1972 crash: -50%
- 1999 crash: -51%
- 2026 crash: -**%
People think the SpaceX IPO means the market is strong.
That's exactly what they thought in 1926, 1972, and every top since.
And SpaceX is the final liquidity event before the AI bubble breaks.
If you've been following me, you already caught my $83K bull trap call.
Missed it? The next one is bigger.
Follow me and turn notifications on.
SpaceX raises $75B.
Holds 18,712 $BTC.
30% of shares go to retail.
Millions of people just became indirect Bitcoin holders without knowing it.
the green candle everyone called a reversal on?
short squeeze.
I'm still looking for altcoin entries 30–50% cheaper from here.
the bottom won't look like what people think it looks like.
$BTC supply in loss just crossed 50% on the 7-day moving average.
Last time we saw this level was November 2022. Bitcoin was under $20K.
Not calling the bottom. Just noting what the data said last time this printed.
Few paid attention then too.
$KINS slow for a few days.
then $2M to $10M in 48 hours.
that's how real projects move. not with a bang at launch, but with a quiet build that most people miss entirely.
the weak hands leave. the noise fades. then the chart does what the product deserved to do weeks ago.
you have to stay in it long enough to see it.
On Dec 12, 2023, a 4chan user said Bitcoin would top on Oct 6, 2025.
650 days later, $BTC peaked that exact day at $126,198.
His pattern suggests the next ATH could be Sep 5, 2029.
Bookmark this.
Let’s see if it happens.
Also took advantage of this dip to get into $GITLAWB.
It’s currently the only platform where AI agents can:
• Store code
• Push repositories
• Earn bounties
• Pay for inference
Now it’s also integrated directly with x402, the payment standard Coinbase is pushing for AI agents.
And $GITLAWB is already plugged straight into it.
The more I look at it, the more it feels like the GitHub layer for autonomous agents.
CA: 0x5F980Dcfc4c0fa3911554cf5ab288ed0eb13DBa3
It's official.
MicroStrategy, $MSTR, is now sitting on its biggest unrealized loss in history, at -$10.8B.
In other words, after 6 years of buying Bitcoin, the company is now down -17% on its position.
By comparison, the S&P 500 is up +116% over this same timeframe.
Since MicroStrategy sold 32 Bitcoin at $77,135 per coin, their positions has lost -$12B in value.
MicroStrategy's stock, $MSTR, down -77% since its record high.
Are they cooked?






























