
PhD, Senior Environmental Scientist @CA_DWR in Multi-benefit Initiatives. Biogeochemist: climate solutions, greenhouse gas fluxes, soil C. he/him. Views my own.
Oakland, CA
Joined February 2010
- Tweets913
- Following637
- Followers307
- Likes5K
Tyler Anthony retweeted
Thanks for sharing, @AGU_Eos!
After you've read the Research Spotlight, you can read the full #OpenAccess article here!
🔗doi.org/10.1029/2024AV001480
#AGUPubs @UCBerkeley @ESPM_Berkeley
Enhanced rock weathering alone may not be enough to sequester much carbon, but organic additives might give a substantial boost, finds new research from @tylerleeanthony @whendeesilver @ESPM_Berkeley.
Research in @AguAdvances. Story by @nathanielscharp. eos.org/research-spotlights/…
Tyler Anthony retweeted
Enhanced rock weathering alone may not be enough to sequester much carbon, but organic additives might give a substantial boost, finds new research from @tylerleeanthony @whendeesilver @ESPM_Berkeley.
Research in @AguAdvances. Story by @nathanielscharp. eos.org/research-spotlights/…
Tyler Anthony retweeted
This is my farewell post. I am not deleting this account, as I don’t want to lose the archive, and I don’t want my name taken by imposters. But, for as long as Musk owns the platform, I’ll no longer use it. I’m now posting at georgemonbiot.bsky.social.
Since Elon Musk bought this site, he has transformed it from one on which millions could converse as equals into his personal megaphone. Now the world’s richest man uses it to wage his class war, transferring blame for the ills of capitalism onto vulnerable minorities, boosting the grimmest and most antisocial accounts while suppressing the humane voices with whom he disagrees.
He has used X not only to subvert the election for the US presidency, but to create a role for himself in US politics which, though he has never stood for election and would not be eligible, grants him immense power over the citizens of that nation. This site has been used as a tool to help replace democracy with oligarchy.
Musk claimed, on purchasing the platform, to be a “free speech absolutist”. He is in fact a prolific censor, suspending dissenting accounts and using lawsuits to shut down free speech, while employing an algorithm to increase the reach of his own posts 1,000-fold. He cannot abide a level playing field.
He has permitted or encouraged the growth of a ghost army of bots and trolls to degrade the experience of all who disagree with him. Their task is not just to abuse opponents but, perhaps more importantly, to drown intelligent conversation with a tsunami of stupidity. They respond to data with denial, expertise with execration, insight with insult, humour with hatred and thinking with thuggery. They suck the meaning out of everything. The stupidity trends in one direction: in the service of economic power. It is a weapon used to suppress the possibility of a better world.
Many years ago, when I lived in Brazil, I learnt that the military dictatorship had actively sought to suppress educational levels in schools, as it saw a well-informed population as a political threat. A confused, distracted and ignorant population is easy to manipulate. Now this counter-educational model is being rolled out worldwide, and Elon Musk is its primary sponsor.
I stayed here long after I first considered leaving, as I believed it was wrong to cede the ground to an oligarch and his minions. But I came to see that those of us who do not subscribe to Musk’s grim project are being used as groundbait: stimulating the feeding frenzy of 15-minute, 24-hour hate that now powers this platform. We can no longer build anything of value here. Brute force – the unmediated power of money – has beaten humanity, intelligence, humour and democracy.
On Bluesky I can be the person I want to be, a better person than I am on X, where it is almost impossible not to get dragged into the mud. I feel I can be understood because I am not confronting a deliberate effort to misunderstand me. So I can speak more quietly.
There is no guarantee that Bluesky will not also one day be monetised by its owners or captured by self-serving billionaires. But for now it remains a place in which interesting and enjoyable conversations can be had, kindness can be shown to strangers and a better world can be imagined. I hope to see you there.
Tyler Anthony retweeted
Happy to announce our new study — an example of tight linkage among soil physics, chemistry and microbiology at micro scale. We showed possible niche separation of nosZ microbes within single soil aggregate.
authors.elsevier.com/c/1kJyJ…
Tyler Anthony retweeted
#Climate adaptation that is rooted in science-based decision-making matters, and we need your help to reduce the #sacdelta's vulnerability. ⚠
Our draft Adaptation Plan is available for public comment until January 17 ➡ rebrand.ly/deltaadapts. 📅
Tyler Anthony retweeted
Calif breaks battery records while going 100% #WindWaterSolar (not including battery output) on same day (11/16)
Records: Batteries discharged 35.1 GWh over 24h & supplied 7.02% of 24-h demand
124th of 255 days since Mar 7 w/#WWS>100% of demand
Fossil gas use also down 27%
Tyler Anthony retweeted
Australia has over 180,000 EVs and there have been 8 total EV fires to date. Causes:
1 arson,
3 spread from house burning to car,
3 in high-speed collision,
1 unknown.
EV FireSafe does the best research on battery fires globally. More info in the next EV Universe newsletter.
Tyler Anthony retweeted
I can’t believe I have to say this.
“we should build more solar panels so that everybody can have electricity”
does not mean
“we should close existing nuclear plants in Northern Europe”
It doesn’t mean we shouldn’t build new nuclear either. If your first reaction to “we should build more solar” is “you hate nuclear!,” you have been poisoned by dogmatism.
Tyler Anthony retweeted
It should come as no great surprise that a Democratic Party which has abandoned working class people would find that the working class has abandoned them.
While the Democratic leadership defends the status quo, the American people are angry and want change.
And they’re right.
Tyler Anthony retweeted
It is crazy to me that solar is caught up in the culture war.
Solar is energy freedom.
Solar is energy abundance.
Solar is energy sovereignty.
Solar is for everybody.
Tyler Anthony retweeted
"the probability of an AMOC collapse before the year 2050 is estimated to be 59%"
Looking and Atlantic heat transport reanalysis, relative sea ice anomalies, and model studies (including the effects of aerosols), I'm afraid the collapse of the AMOC might already be ongoing..
🌎📉🌍
I did some basic energy and water calculations on the scary AMOC study (1) that's making headlines, so you don't have to.
It's quite simple, so please don't let the orders of magnitude scare you off.
This is a Big F*cking Deal (BFD)!
First, what are we talking about here?
What is the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation?
It's a shitload of water transporting a shit ton of heat energy North, through the Atlantic Ocean!
The study starts with an AMOC strength of about 15 sverdrups, or 15,000,000 cubic meters of ocean water per second.
This transports about 1 PW (1 petawatt = 1*10^15 watt) of heat North from the Southern Hemisphere and the tropics.
That's about 32 ZJ (32 zettajoules = 32*10^21 joules) of heat per year.
When the AMOC tips, most of this ocean heat transport stops.
The obvious question people are asking is "could this happen any time soon and how?"
The study (as have others, for example @DrJamesEHansen et al. (2016) (2), which is not referenced for some reason) shows that a lot of fresh water input from rainfall and Greenland ice melt could shut this thing down this century.
The more fresh water is added, the slower the AMOC becomes.
The tipping in the model happens at about 0.5 sverdrups (0.5 Sv, 500,000 m³ per second) of fresh water input.
There is a lot of fresh water waiting to add those 0.5 Sv, if only there was enough heat available to melt the ice sheet of Greenland.
0.5 Sv is 1.6*10^13 m³ of water per year.
Greenland holds 2.85*10^15 m³ of ice, which could provide about 170 years of 0.5 sverdrups of fresh water (after which global sea levels would be over 7 meters higher).
To melt 0.5 sverdrups worth of ice for a year takes 5.3 ZJ of heat.
Since 1970, our greenhouse gases have caused about 450 ZJ of additional heat to accumulate in the Earth system. ~90% of that warmed the oceans.
Aerosols, notably from coal plants and ships burning sulfur rich fuels, have reduced that heat accumulation.
Now that we are reducing aerosols, more heat is accumulating.
The larger North Atlantic Ocean region shows a spike in how much sunlight is being absorbed over recent years, while higher temperatures cause more heat radiation to space.
The net effect is a spike of over 2.4 W/m² above the 2000-2009 average. This spike added 4 ZJ of heat over 12-months:
The record high global energy imbalance is now (2023) about 1.8 W/m², which adds 29 ZJ of heat to the Earth system over a year.
To make a long story short, the heat is there to melt enough Greenland ice to shut the AMOC down.
And we don't need all that heat to be directed to the melting of ice, as more precipitation also contributes.
And of course, we are only making the climate forcing and Earth's Energy Imbalance worse by rapidly increasing greenhouse gas concentrations while decreasing aerosols.
Sorry I couldn't make this more hopeful.
But numbers don't lie.
(1): Physics-based early warning signal shows that AMOC is on tipping course
René M. van Westen et al. (2024)
science.org/doi/10.1126/scia…
(2): Ice melt, sea level rise and superstorms: Evidence from paleoclimate data, climate modeling, and modern observations that 2°C global warming is dangerous
@DrJamesEHansen , @MakikoSato6 et al. (2016)
acp.copernicus.org/articles/…
Tyler Anthony retweeted
People like riding bikes. They don’t like being vulnerable. That’s why people don’t ride bikes. Remove whatever is making people feel vulnerable & more people will ride bikes.






































