Josh Verges retweeted
New: The Brewers say they “erred” on the logistics of fulfilling Timeless Ticket requests for World Series games, limiting fans to the 400 level and standing room tickets.
Those fans will now be able to keep those tickets AND retain their Timeless Ticket for a future game:
Two Kenosha brothers who paid $1,000 each for a Milwaukee Brewers "Timeless Ticket" more than a decade ago say the team isn't fully honoring the promise that came with it — the chance to sit in the best available seats for a game as big as the World Series.
More at the link in o
Josh Verges retweeted
Get-in prices on resale sites for every possible World Series game right now:
$2,123 Game 1 Milwaukee
$2,129 Game 2 Milwaukee
$2,133 Game 6 Milwaukee
$2,014 Game 7 Milwaukee
$1,327 Game 3 Cleveland
$1,453 Game 4 Cleveland
$1,502 Game 5 Cleveland
$626 Game 3 Tampa
$636 Game 4 Tampa
$767 Game 5 Tampa
Full Data:
ticketdata.com/world-series-…
Josh Verges retweeted
Replying to @ua14
They're honoring it per their public statement. wisn.com/article/brewers-fan…
The Brewers sold $1,000 tickets in 2015 for any future game. Fans now trying to redeem for the World Series say the club is not honoring the deal.
Star Tribune settled one of these lawsuits in 2023 for $2.9 million
Blockbuster-era law governing privacy of video rentals gets a fresh look from the Supreme Court twincities.com/2026/10/14/su…
Josh Verges retweeted
I asked Jose why he was laughing here, and he said he knew the pitch coming was a changeup and Adell could rollover, and hit a ground ball to the left side of the infield, so he took off to 3rd hoping he would pull Junior and Walls to the bases and open a hole in the infield 🥴
Josh Verges retweeted
There was a semi-well known interview of the famed Argentine writer JL Borges where he explains this.
Borges: I have done most of my reading in English. I find English a far finer language than Spanish.
William F Buckley: Why?
Borges: Well, many reasons. Firstly, English is both a Germanic and a Latin language. Those two registers—for any idea you take, you have two words. Those words will not mean exactly the same. For example if I say “regal” that is not exactly the same thing as saying “kingly.” Or if I say “fraternal” that is not the same as saying “brotherly.” Or “dark” and “obscure.” Those words are different. It would make all the difference—speaking for example—the Holy Spirit, it would make all the difference in the world in a poem if I wrote about the Holy Spirit or I wrote the Holy Ghost, since “ghost” is a fine, dark Saxon word, but “spirit” is a light Latin word. Then there is another reason. The reason is that I think that, of all languages, English is the most physical of all languages.
WFB: The most what?
Borges: Physical. You can, for example, say “He loomed over.” You can’t very well say that in Spanish.
WFB: “Asomó?”*
Borges: Well, no, no, they’re not exactly the same. And then you have, in English, you can do almost anything with verbs and prepositions. For example, to “laugh off,” to “dream away.” Those things can’t be said in Spanish. To “live down” something, to “live up to” something—you can’t say those things in Spanish. They can’t be said. Or really in any Romance language.
Josh Verges retweeted
Mike Evans Checking to see the name on the back of the Jersey is an all-time Gif and trash talk moment that I wish I would have thought of.
Josh Verges retweeted
As a homicide detective, I can say with all of my being that there is no lesson learned in seeing someone die. But there is a price. And that price is your peace. Your decency. And the soul of our society.
We don’t have to be this way, this fake tough but real ugly way. Stop
Breaking news: The firing squad execution of Fort Hood shooter Nidal Malik Hasan will be live-streamed, the Defense Department said.
“People need to understand that there’s serious consequences for these types of things,” Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said. wapo.st/4hNxK0C
Josh Verges retweeted
Susan Seager posted on Bluesky, asking us to ban the term "hallucinate" for AI. She said in part, “The term “hallucinate” is an inaccurate, industry-friendly term that should be banned when reporting news about AI fabrications.”
Our generative AI guidance says AI sometimes generates inaccurate or fabricated responses to queries, an effect AI scientists call hallucination. If using the term hallucination, describe it as an issue associated with the technology that produces falsehoods or inaccurate or illogical information. Some in the field prefer the term confabulation or simpler terms to describe the inaccuracies that don't draw comparisons with human mental illness.
What do you think? How would you describe it when AI creates inaccurate information?






















