If you're anti-AI and open to discussion, let's talk. I'm not here to change your mind, convince you to embrace AI, or tell you that your concerns are unfounded. I'd genuinely like to build bridges between people on both sides of this increasingly polarised conversation. To exchange ideas, challenge assumptions, and perhaps come away understanding each other a little better. I've noticed a great deal of misinformation surrounding AI, from both its supporters and its critics. There are misconceptions about how these systems work, what they're capable of, what they aren't capable of, and where the technology currently stands. But that doesn't mean opposition to AI is inherently misguided. There are very real ethical, economic, creative, and philosophical concerns worth discussing, and I don't think those concerns should be dismissed simply because someone happens to be enthusiastic about the technology. In fact, I'm more than willing to help you strengthen your arguments against AI. If your criticism rests on a misunderstanding of the technology, I'd rather help you build a better, more accurate argument than try to score points by proving you wrong. And in exchange, I'd like to understand your perspective. What concerns you? What do you think people working with AI are overlooking? What objections do you have that deserve more attention than they're currently receiving? I'm perfectly comfortable walking away from a conversation with neither of us having changed our minds. You don't have to like AI. You don't have to use it. You certainly don't have to agree with me. I just think there's value in having conversations where the objective isn't to defeat the other person, but to leave both people better informed than when they started. So, if you're willing to have that conversation, my door is open.

The most dogshit, uninformed, uneducated posts I've ever seen on this app all comes from minors. Can we please just ban them all.

Another day, another phishing attempt. My late father lost a lot of money to scammers. I've seen the damage these people can do, and I absolutely despise them. Today, instead of simply deleting another suspicious SMS, I decided to try a little experiment. What could ChatGPT find out about these scammers? More importantly, could it actually do something about them? Within minutes, it investigated the suspicious domains, uncovered evidence suggesting a coordinated phishing operation, and submitted reports to the domain registrar, Maybank, and CyberSecurity Malaysia. All with very little effort on my part. Whether the reports lead to any action remains to be seen. But something that once required considerable technical knowledge is now accessible to practically anyone. So here's my appeal - if you receive a phishing message, don't just delete it. Don't click the links either. Use AI to help gather evidence and report it to the proper authorities. Imagine if everyone started doing this.

Honestly, I didn't believe in vibe coding at first. When it first became a thing, I tried it. Everything was buggy, half the things didn't work, and even as someone without formal programming training, I could see why developers were concerned. So I wrote it off. Then came the Astra/Opus 5.5 era. I saw what people were building, tried it again, and to my surprise, things actually worked. So I changed my mind. I formed an opinion based on the evidence available at the time. New evidence emerged, I tested it myself, and updated my beliefs. Isn't that how we're supposed to think? When did changing your mind in light of new evidence become a bad thing?