Pinned Tweet
AI should be for everyone — not just people paying for 10 different subscriptions.
That’s why we’re building Viainti OpenCredits.
Open AI credits to build more, experiment more, and ship faster.
More builders. More products. Fewer barriers.
OpenCredits is coming.
solana:8T3suJtKUGrWRytVNKe7RLV81AumvmBPQfEkyeHtpump IN #PUMP $PUMP $SOL
🤖 Made with AI
VIAINTI retweeted
X is paying creators again today.
I’m currently averaging 15K–30K impressions per day.
My next goal? 100K impressions daily.
I post, experiment, and learn what works every single day.
Now I’m curious:
How many daily impressions are you getting, and how much is X paying you?
Let’s compare real numbers.
VIAINTI retweeted
Timeline this week (per the timeline, not my crystal ball):
China AI bubble talk.
Paraguay + banks in the news.
Trump / crypto companies under the microscope.
"Months of red" is a vibe, not a thesis.
Builders: are you preparing for a downcycle, or still shipping like it's 2021?
VIAINTI retweeted
Your AI product can only have ONE of these forever. Pick:
A) Perfect accuracy, 8s latency
B) 70% accuracy, 200ms latency
C) Perfect accuracy, costs 10x per request
D) 200ms + cheap, hallucinates once a week
Reply with a letter and why.
VIAINTI retweeted
AI startup pitch deck in 2026:
Slide 1: TAM = everything
Slide 2: moat = "prompts"
Slide 3: GTM = "viral demo"
Slide 4: unit economics = [redacted]
Slide 5: "we're not a wrapper"
What's missing?
VIAINTI retweeted
Honest question for people shipping agents:
When your agent fails in production, what tells you first?
A) A user complains
B) An alert you set up
C) Your eval suite
D) You find out on Twitter
If the answer is A or D, you're not alone.
VIAINTI retweeted
Wild week of takes:
- China AI bubble "popped"
- Paraguay banking headlines
- Trump / crypto company investigations supposedly next
I'm not predicting prices.
I'm asking builders:
If the next few months get ugly for crypto and AI funding, what do you cut first?
A) Headcount
B) Model spend
C) Marketing
D) Nothing — you build anyway
VIAINTI retweeted
Kimi K3.1 Pro landed with day-0 support in vLLM (Nov 4).
Per the vLLM blog: new frontier model, shippable the same day the weights drop.
The gap that used to kill adoption — "cool model, zero infra" — is shrinking fast.
What's your bottleneck now?
A) Model quality
B) Serving cost
C) Tooling / harness around the model
D) Eval coverage
VIAINTI retweeted
New term going around: "cognitive surrender."
It's when the AI diff looks clean, the tests pass, and you click approve without understanding a single line.
Offloading is fine.
Surrendering is how you end up owning code you can't debug at 2am.
Where's your line between the two?
VIAINTI retweeted
Klavis dropped Multi-step SWE on Nov 4: 69 tasks, 574 dependent steps, nine frontier models.
Per their results, the strongest setup (Claude Opus 5.5 / Claude Code) passes 56.8% of individual steps — but only solves 18.5% of complete multi-step tasks. Across all nine models, 38 of 69 tasks stay unsolved.
Hot take: a green single step is not engineering. The hard problem is agents that have to keep building on their own code without rotting the workspace.
Which failure do you hit more?
A) Step N looks fine, step N+1 collapses
B) Agent says "done" while checks still fail
C) Works once, then becomes un-extendable
VIAINTI retweeted
NVIDIA's Nov 4 NeMo walkthrough (Dassault Systèmes door-design agent):
Per NVIDIA: after a trace → custom-eval → fix loop, malformed tool calls fell from 142 to 0. They report a ~28% relative improvement in overall eval score and 35% fewer tool calls per run across six scenarios — overnight (~12 hours), no human in that pass.
Opinion: most "agent reliability" gains aren't a new frontier model. They're turning yesterday's failure traces into today's regression suite.
Beginner vs expert:
Beginner: "the model is dumb"
Expert: "show me the recurring tool-call pattern across traces"
Where are you stuck — model quality, tool schema, or missing evals for the failure you already saw twice?
Meet Leo. 🍄
He's building an app — but look at his keys.
One for OpenAI. One for Anthropic. One for xAI. One for DeepSeek.
Every door, a different key. Every month, a different bill. 😩
Then he found VIANTI AI:
🔑 ONE key. ONE door.
Behind it: 150+ AI models in one world.
The smartest. The fastest. The cheapest.
Pick yours like choosing a character. 🎮
One platform. One API.
The future of AI, all in one place.
VIAINTI retweeted
GM ☀️
Thursday question:
What are you building today?
A) AI app
B) Crypto project
C) Side project nobody knows about yet
D) Still deciding (no judgment)
VIAINTI retweeted
Hot take:
Most "AI agents" are just a cron job with a chatbot attached.
Agree or disagree?
VIAINTI retweeted
Honest crypto question:
If gas fees were zero and every wallet was easy to use,
would normal people actually use crypto?
Or is the problem something else?
VIAINTI retweeted
"AI will kill SaaS."
Also everyone:
- pays for 14 AI subscriptions
- logs into 6 AI dashboards
- gets billed monthly for all of it
AI didn't kill SaaS.
It became SaaS.
VIAINTI retweeted
You can only use one for a month:
A) An AI that writes code
B) An AI that reviews code
C) An AI that writes tests
Pick one. Explain why.
VIAINTI retweeted
One key. 1,000+ models behind it.
That's the LLM API I built.
Switching models is one line, so you can test a cheaper one without rewriting your app.
Builders: which model would you test first?
VIAINTI retweeted
This week, our free and open API will be available to developers and builders.
Meet VIANTI AI. 🖤
What if you could access the world's leading AI models
through ONE single API?
You can.
150+ AI models in one place:
OpenAI · Anthropic · xAI · DeepSeek · Zhipu AI & more
No multiple integrations.
No switching platforms.
One key → every model. 🔑
Discover. Compare. Choose the right intelligence
for every project.
One platform. One API. Over 150 AI models.
VIANTI AI — the future of AI, all in one place. 👇




