whoever retweeted
Corrupt ingrate Zelensky had a strong preference for the Democrats to win the midterms, which is why he inflicted pain at the pump on American families before Election Day by refusing to stop striking oil refineries despite President Trump’s demands.
He's thrilled with Democrats controlling Congress!
whoever retweeted
Yes audit the shit out of this. I already made my best attempt at it several months ago.
Canada’s $25.5 Billion Ukraine Scandal: Billions Flushed Away with Zero Accountability
thedaily.ca/canadas-25-5-bil…
Canada has poured more than $25.5 billion of Canadian taxpayer money into Ukraine since the full scale Russian invasion began in February 2022. This enormous sum includes over $13 billion in financial and economic support that consists mostly of loans handed over with almost no effective oversight. Military assistance reaches $8.5 billion with deliveries stretching through 2029. Humanitarian contributions sit near $396 million, while recovery and reconstruction efforts reach around $722 million, and peace and security programs add nearly $230 million. The scale alone demands rigorous accountability, yet the government has failed to deliver it.
The financial support flows mainly through international institutions in ways that make real tracking impossible. Canada sent $11.55 billion into the International Monetary Fund administered account for Ukraine, supposedly to cover pensions and essential services. An additional $1.94 billion went through multilateral development banks, along with $500 million in direct bilateral loans. Canada also added $5 billion under the Group of Seven extraordinary revenue acceleration mechanism that relies on immobilized Russian assets. Once these funds enter the Ukrainian budget, they become completely fungible. This structure leaves Canadian taxpayers with no reliable way to confirm where their money actually ended up, and it opens the door to massive undetected losses.
Military aid offers the illusion of detail through Department of National Defence lists, but it still falls far short of proper verification. Canada supplied approximately 40000 rounds of 155 millimeter artillery ammunition valued at $313.7 million across batches from Canadian inventory, United States sources, and the Czech initiative. Specific procurements include $89 million for medium and large calibre ammunition scheduled for 2026 and 2027, plus $100 million to the Czech ammunition initiative. A broad procurement package worth $835 million covers armoured vehicles, medical supplies, spare parts, small arms, ammunition, explosives, and drones. Recent additions include $680 million and $200 million for United States sourced equipment under NATO prioritized requirements, along with $76 million to a German air defence initiative and $33 million to a United Kingdom led partnership. These numbers exist on paper, yet battlefield verification remains weak and serial level tracking is absent, leaving plenty of room for diversion or waste.
Humanitarian and development projects depend on partners such as United Nations agencies, the Red Cross, and nongovernmental organizations that provide only self reported summaries. Examples include $115 million for Kyiv power grid repairs and $216.7 million for a capital increase at the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. The April 2026 package of $51 million supposedly supports health services, shelter, food security, governance, and veterans programs. These efforts rely on vague project level descriptions that never deliver exhaustive dollar by dollar proof of final spending on the ground. The lack of independent verification means Canadian money can disappear into inefficiency or worse without anyone outside the system ever knowing.
Ukraine carries a persistent and deeply rooted corruption problem that continues unchecked even in wartime. The most glaring recent example came in late 2025 with Operation Midas. The National Anti Corruption Bureau of Ukraine and the Specialized Anti Corruption Prosecutors Office exposed an alleged $100 million kickback scheme inside the state nuclear energy company Energoatom. Contractors paid 10 to 15 percent kickbacks on deals, with proceeds laundered offshore. A former business associate of President Volodymyr Zelenskyy named Timur Mindich stood at the center, along with former ministers and executives. High level officials resigned or faced charges, yet the scandal erupted in a sector indirectly supported by Western budget aid. Canada and other donors responded with mild calls for reform while continuing the cash flow without pause. This pattern reveals a willingness to overlook graft when strategic goals take priority over taxpayer protection.
Canadian officials claim scandals will not derail support and that reforms are expected. In reality, no comprehensive independent forensic audit from the Auditor General of Canada has ever examined the full Ukraine aid package. Broader reviews of Global Affairs Canada programs have repeatedly exposed serious weaknesses in results tracking, information management, and outcome measurement. These failures existed long before Ukraine, and they continue to shield the entire operation from real scrutiny. The absence of a dedicated full scope public audit means substantial sums could have vanished into waste, fraud, or corruption with no clear detection possible. Taxpayers receive high level aggregates and limited lists that conveniently avoid hard proof.
Chrystia Freeland played a central role as deputy prime minister and finance minister during the early flood of aid decisions. She later moved into positions as Canadas special representative for Ukraine reconstruction and then as an unpaid economic development adviser to President Zelenskyy in January 2026. She resigned her Canadian seat to take the Ukrainian job. This revolving door raises serious questions about conflicts of interest and the appearance of self positioning. No public evidence ties her directly to misuse, yet the optics fuel deep distrust when billions lack proper safeguards.
Taxpayers inside Canada face aggressive enforcement from the Canada Revenue Agency over even tiny domestic amounts. This harsh approach stands in brutal contrast to the loose high level tracking applied to billions sent abroad. Financial support disappears into general budgets. Military donations list quantities but skip meaningful battlefield checks. Humanitarian work rests on partner self reporting. Wartime conditions and multi donor layers add convenient excuses. These combined failures make it impossible to prove that no large scale losses occurred at the level of hundreds of millions or even billions. Ukrainian institutions have exposed some domestic graft, yet the sheer volume of external assistance and its fungible design create risks that independent auditors have never fully confronted.
The entire situation exposes a troubling pattern. Substantial public resources move with weak high level oversight and institutional excuses while falling dramatically short of the forensic accountability Canadians deserve. Stronger parliamentary scrutiny, dedicated Auditor General examinations, and real transparency tools such as public dashboards remain absent. The documented corruption vulnerabilities in Ukraine, combined with tracking failures on the Canadian side, explain the widespread taxpayer anger. Citizens endure strict enforcement at home while watching opaque spending abroad with no adequate safeguards. This accountability deficit demands urgent correction through unrelenting legal and democratic pressure.
whoever retweeted
Scottish Member of Parliament Irshad Ahmed complains about pubs having ALCOHOL and not being suitable for ‘Religious Minorities.’
“Pubs are not spaces designed for families, young teenagers or religious minorities like mine. We need these shared spaces too!”
whoever retweeted
Cocaine was found at Biden's house, dead body at Obama's house, a male prostitute at Pelosi's house, and an illegal server was found at Clinton's house, so the FBI RAIDED TRUMP'S HOUSE!
whoever retweeted
The EU globalists told us we had to give all our money to Ukraine because Russia was about to invade and take over Poland.
Turns out it was the EU globalists planning to invade Poland. teapawt.org/JackPosobiec/status/21…
whoever retweeted
They arrested the President of the United States 4 TIMES!!
CHARGED HIM 91X and INDICTED HIM 4X
They also:
Spied on his campaign
Sabotaged his first term
Jailed his supporters
Raided his home
Censored and gagged him
Tried to ruin him financially
And tried to remove him from the ballot
When THAT didn't work, they tried to kill him several times
Then, with a straight face, went on national TV talking about how he's a "Threat to Democracy"
whoever retweeted
90 DAYS WITHOUT POWER, RANKED
You are not leaving.
The roof is fine.
The grid is just gone.
No power, no water pressure, no store deliveries, for 90 days.
In each category we will go from most important to least important.
The categories are ranked too.
The roof is covered, so water comes first, then food, then everything that keeps those two usable.
90 days is what you should be prepared for. Most official lists say 3 to 14 days. Those are minimums, not plans.
WATER
Without it you have days. One gallon per person per day.
90 days is 90 gallons per person. A family of 4 needs 360.
Water filter (a gravity filter is the best buy)
Food grade barrels or water bricks
Unscented bleach to treat stored water
Your water heater tank holds 40 to 50 gallons. Know how to drain it.
Rain collection (check local rules)
FOOD
Rice and beans are the backbone.
If you cannot afford freeze dried meals, load up on rice and beans.
Rice has about 1,650 calories per pound. Dry beans about 1,570.
2,000 calories a day for 90 days is about 110 pounds per person, or four 5 gallon buckets.
Cooking oil, salt, sugar, spices
Peanut butter
Canned meat and vegetables
Powdered milk
Multivitamins
Freeze dried meals if you can afford them
Eat the fridge first, then the freezer, then the pantry.
COOKING AND FUEL
Food you cannot cook is just weight.
Camp stove plus fuel for 90 days
Extra propane or butane
Lighters and matches
One pot with a lid
Never run a stove or heater indoors without ventilation.
HEAT
Cold is the quiet killer.
Wood stove or a safe indoor rated heater
Fuel for it
Wool blankets and sleeping bags rated below your coldest night
Pick one room, close it off, and live in it
Carbon monoxide detector with batteries. Not optional.
SANITATION
This is what ends up killing people in long outages.
5 gallon bucket with a toilet seat lid
Heavy trash bags
Kitty litter or sawdust
Bleach
Soap and hand sanitizer
Toilet paper, a lot of it
MEDICAL
Prescriptions. Ask your doctor about a longer supply.
First aid kit
Pain and stomach relief
Any glasses or contacts, plus a spare pair
A printed first aid manual
LIGHT AND POWER
Headlamps and lanterns
Batteries, rotated
Solar panel with a power bank
A generator is a bonus, not a plan. Fuel goes bad and it is loud.
INFORMATION, CASH AND NEIGHBORS
Cards stop working when the power does.
Battery or crank radio
Cash in small bills, silver and gold if you have it
Paper copies of IDs and contacts
Know your neighbors. Trade skills, not just supplies.
MORALE
Books, cards, games, something for the kids.
Boring beats hungry. Bored beats panicked.
THE FIRST 72 HOURS
Fill the bathtub and every container you own before the water stops.
Fridge and freezer stay shut. A full freezer holds about 48 hours.
Charge everything while you still can.
Cook and eat what will spoil first.
Obviously we could add security and it is important but depending on where you are, what your aloud to have/own I'm not going into great detail on that.
What I can say is have a plan, talk it over with your family, everyone has a job. Don't be afraid to talk to your neighbors you know as well to make sure they are doing their part if you plan on working together.
Feel free to add anything I may have missed. Anything you may think would be of added value for others to read and share.
Book mark this, come back to it, create a check list.
To be clear, I am not a survivalist. This is not survival advice. This is only my setup that I am following with my family. If nothing else maybe just a reminder.
ISO Ledger 🛡
whoever retweeted
Wow. The peace deal scuppered by Zelensky was even better than we thought. Remember, Ukraine had already been fighting a civil war in its own Russian speaking regions for 8 years by the time Russia invaded in 2022. The invasion did not come out of nowhere. And yet Zelensky had an opportunity to walk away with not just the status quo ante, but an even better position than Ukraine had been in before 2022.
It is absolute insanity to have rejected such a deal. So many dead sons, brothers, and fathers. So many shattered families. So much needless suffering. And for what? Zelensky’s desire to be celebrated as a hero by Western elites?
Ukrainian MP confirms that 2023 peace plan, which was reported by @FT & accepted by Putin but rejected by Zelensky & Biden administration, envisioned:
"- Russia withdraws its troops from most of the four oblasts it had just declared “annexed.”
- The new line of demarcation runs roughly along the line as of February 24, 2022: Crimea and the part of Donbas that Russia controlled before the full-scale invasion.
- Ukraine recognizes Russian control over Crimea. - Ukraine grants Russia an unobstructed land corridor to Crimea.
- The ceasefire regime is guaranteed by NATO countries that provide protection for Ukraine.
- Russia begins negotiations with the US on its own security guarantees.
-Moreover, Russia was ready to give up the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant as well.
-And the 300 billion in frozen assets was to go toward rebuilding all of Ukraine, that is, together with the occupied territories.
-As for Crimea: we were not required to recognize it as Russian, only to recognize Russia’s control over it. In other words, we acknowledge that right now it is under Russian control (which is how it is). We were also required to adopt a law banning the return of Crimea by military means.
-The land corridor to Crimea, a highway and a railway, was to be built at Russia’s expense. The hardest question was how to guard it. That is why the Russians were ready to give up Melitopol, but not Tokmak: they feared we would cut the corridor with artillery.
-Zelensky rejected this proposal at the time."
whoever retweeted
Let me break down what I'm seeing and hearing here from DR.
I don't know DR's source for these materials , but they appear completely legit and are profoundly disturbing.
These are leading members of the Democrat Party hatching up the following strategy:
1. After the midterms, use the DSA to incite and carry out violent civil unrest.
2. Make the violent civil unrest so bad that Trump must invoke the Insurrection Act.
3. Use the invocation of the Insurrection Act to create a national sense of illegitimacy whereby Democrat governors appear justified in taking the extreme action of refusing to acknowledge federal authority and push to form a new form of federal government via various means, including an Article V transformation of the Constitution.
Maybe there is more to this and it's not as bad as it seems, but right now this appears to be a conspiracy to create the next Fort Sumter.
This is a CIA-style color revolution in real time, on our own soil.
(Of course the legacy media is nowhere near this--it takes us Internet randos to get the word out.)
The past few days, I got my hands on thousands of new transcripts and hundreds of recordings, thanks to leads from @SKDoubleDub33 and @iamlisalogan .
You've heard that the DSA is proposing structural reforms to America, including abolishing the Senate and imposing term limits.
What you not have heard is - there is an operational plan to put it all into action. If the Democratic Party sweeps 2026, then DSA will become "foot soldiers" in constant clashes with the administration to cross a "red line" or invoke a "doomsday scenario" - meaning, President Trump invokes the Insurrection Act, probably sometime in 2027.
Then, a lot of coordinated responses kick off, including delegitimizing the federal government itself and handing that legitimacy to Democratic governors. 2028 then becomes a vote on whether to keep America governance as-is or to burn it all down to appease a "young and brown" demographic.
The mysterious group who's been coordinating 50501, Indivisible, and coordinating the NoKings protests is called "United Democracy Alliance" and their intellectual leader is Erica Chenoweth who came up with the 3.5% rule of nonviolent regime change.
Patience. I know I've hyped this more than anything else. It's genuinely the biggest discovery I've had. This is an enormous archive. This is only the beginning.
whoever retweeted
I want to update my original post which was based on another post that laid out the scenario & location of the incident.
I accepted the scenario & questioned the location. In fact I’ve now received a great deal of new information from soldiers who were there & want to correct the record.
So here’s what I know: the location is correct, the scenario (an artillery round caused the explosion) was totally wrong.
Soldiers on the ground are saying 2 training scenarios were happening in that location simultaneously.
First there is lots of static ranges that face the second lake from rifle ranges to a 60 mm mortar range to a grenade range to an antitank range limited to the M72 & 84 mm Carl Gustov. These hand held shoulder fired anti armour weapons have been used by CDN infantry platoons for 4 decades now. They are generally very effective & reliable.
I’m told a Carl G was being fired at a target some 300 metres away from a static cement bay using the standing position. The safety officer stands about 18” away in a cement bay observing every action taken by the loader & gunner. This is very basic infantry training & carried out at least annually.
In this case a high explosive (HE) round was being fired.
Apparently shortly after the HE round was fired it malfunctioned & dove at full speed into the ground striking either a buried natural gas wellhead or pipeline which exploded. There were casualties at this range caused by the blast wave.
Simultaneously there were some 150 soldiers training in fighting in built up areas (FIBUA or Urban Warfare) using blank ammo or just running through the basic drills using dry fire. No live ammunition, no explosives of any type, certainly no live indirect fire. There were 3 wooden structures being used & all three were completely destroyed by the blast. A significant number of casualties occurred here.
The explosion led to a grass fire which was whipped up by strong gusts of wind which blew directly through the units bivouac site (tented area where troops sleep, rest, park vehicles etc) casing additional casualties. The fire then continued on & went beyond the training area into the municipality of Wainwright.
At this point, it appears that this series of incidents began with a round malfunctioning & doing damage that never could have been imagined let alone predicted or prevented.
As was the case last night, the fog of war/crisis still exists so information may still change.
This is not because of a cover up or some imaginary conspiracy.
If the casualty count is only half as high as some are claiming you will have to go back to the darkest days of WWII to find similar numbers & never has a training exercise seen anything like this so a great deal must be done in the immediate aftermath before making definitive public statements so please have patience, please believe everyone is trying to get this right & those who really care are more than willing to correct their earlier errors as the newest information comes in.
Think long & hard about what you post…thousand of soldiers & their families are watching! Please keep them all including the military & civilian first responders in your prayers.
I hope this helps & I’ll potentially post more as it becomes available.
I have no direct knowledge about what happened but based on this post, I think I can add some clarity to things I read in the comments.
There are many types of ranges within the CFB Wainwright training area & there is an attached permanent base area that has training & administrative buildings, dining halls, barracks & even a whole community of houses for married permanent staff members. All ranges are in the training area several kms from the base area.
Some ranges are permanent & fixed in place, some amount to an area on the map & range orders that tell the user what types of weapons can be fired within that designated area. This type of live fire range is likely where this incident took place.
Once you decide that a live fire range is going to happen a Range Safety Officer must be designated. The RSO works with Assistant RSO’s who are qualified to template (safely determine where a weapon can be fired from based on its maximum range, if it’s an indirect fire weapon like an artillery or mortar shell, there’s lots of added factors to be considered) the different weapons that will be used from rifles to medium & heavy MG’s to anti tank weapons to 2 calibres of mortars to artillery. All these folks work with a permanent base organization called Range Control who ensure all the templates are properly done, all the safety rules are understood, all the temporary safety staff are qualified for their jobs & that flags, road barriers & guards on the outer perimeter have been assigned & are in place so no one just wonders into a shit storm.
They assign a safety frequency separate from the tactical frequency. Whenever any obstacles or sensitive things are located within a designated live fire training area or range, they are made known to the range safety staff by Range Control so that buffer or restricted zones can be placed around them.
The area indicated (see the map) near the 2 lakes was never authorized for indirect fire & if my memory is correct, it was never authorized for any form of live fire training.
It should also be noted that prior to any live fire range involving multiple weapons systems (especially indirect fire) & movement by troops, the safety staff would not just rely on maps & templates & written rules, they would be walking the ground repeatedly so they were 100% familiar with what is referred to as the trace, which is just another way of saying, the direction the training troops would generally follow.
A good range gives as much latitude to the tactical officer or NCO in charge to fire & maneuver using the ground to their advantage but still ensuring that their weapons are staying within the safety arcs. This takes a lot of effort by a very large safety team & must also stand up to the inspection by a full time Range Control Officer.
Typically indirect fire is tightly controlled both by the safety staff assigned to monitor the tactical fire controllers requesting the indirect fire & by the safety team at the gun or mortar line positions to ensure the rounds will land safely & avoid any potentially dangerous targets such as a gas well. This is double checked by those doing the firing & their safety monitors several kms away.
So two things jump off the page with this report. One based on my years of working in Wainwright both as a trainee, as permanent staff & as a safety officer for indirect mortar fire countless times including on static & maneuver ranges, I can’t imagine this part of the training area ever being used for any form of live fire let alone indirect fire.
And two, the idea that at least 6 people would have had to miss the fact that a restricted target had been selected or the folks at the gun line had entered the coordinates incorrectly into the targeting computer or set up the gun line incorrectly is beyond imagination.
There are so many safety redundancies built into using indirect artillery fire with troops on the ground it’s nearly impossible to believe.
Hope this helps!
whoever retweeted
I have no direct knowledge about what happened but based on this post, I think I can add some clarity to things I read in the comments.
There are many types of ranges within the CFB Wainwright training area & there is an attached permanent base area that has training & administrative buildings, dining halls, barracks & even a whole community of houses for married permanent staff members. All ranges are in the training area several kms from the base area.
Some ranges are permanent & fixed in place, some amount to an area on the map & range orders that tell the user what types of weapons can be fired within that designated area. This type of live fire range is likely where this incident took place.
Once you decide that a live fire range is going to happen a Range Safety Officer must be designated. The RSO works with Assistant RSO’s who are qualified to template (safely determine where a weapon can be fired from based on its maximum range, if it’s an indirect fire weapon like an artillery or mortar shell, there’s lots of added factors to be considered) the different weapons that will be used from rifles to medium & heavy MG’s to anti tank weapons to 2 calibres of mortars to artillery. All these folks work with a permanent base organization called Range Control who ensure all the templates are properly done, all the safety rules are understood, all the temporary safety staff are qualified for their jobs & that flags, road barriers & guards on the outer perimeter have been assigned & are in place so no one just wonders into a shit storm.
They assign a safety frequency separate from the tactical frequency. Whenever any obstacles or sensitive things are located within a designated live fire training area or range, they are made known to the range safety staff by Range Control so that buffer or restricted zones can be placed around them.
The area indicated (see the map) near the 2 lakes was never authorized for indirect fire & if my memory is correct, it was never authorized for any form of live fire training.
It should also be noted that prior to any live fire range involving multiple weapons systems (especially indirect fire) & movement by troops, the safety staff would not just rely on maps & templates & written rules, they would be walking the ground repeatedly so they were 100% familiar with what is referred to as the trace, which is just another way of saying, the direction the training troops would generally follow.
A good range gives as much latitude to the tactical officer or NCO in charge to fire & maneuver using the ground to their advantage but still ensuring that their weapons are staying within the safety arcs. This takes a lot of effort by a very large safety team & must also stand up to the inspection by a full time Range Control Officer.
Typically indirect fire is tightly controlled both by the safety staff assigned to monitor the tactical fire controllers requesting the indirect fire & by the safety team at the gun or mortar line positions to ensure the rounds will land safely & avoid any potentially dangerous targets such as a gas well. This is double checked by those doing the firing & their safety monitors several kms away.
So two things jump off the page with this report. One based on my years of working in Wainwright both as a trainee, as permanent staff & as a safety officer for indirect mortar fire countless times including on static & maneuver ranges, I can’t imagine this part of the training area ever being used for any form of live fire let alone indirect fire.
And two, the idea that at least 6 people would have had to miss the fact that a restricted target had been selected or the folks at the gun line had entered the coordinates incorrectly into the targeting computer or set up the gun line incorrectly is beyond imagination.
There are so many safety redundancies built into using indirect artillery fire with troops on the ground it’s nearly impossible to believe.
Hope this helps!
A catastrophic blast at Canadian Forces Base Wainwright, Alberta has reportedly resulted in multiple fatalities and injuries during a live fire military training operation.
According to local sources on base, Canadian Forces personnel had been conducting exercises over several days when an artillery projectile reportedly struck an active natural gas well on the bombing range, triggering a massive detonation.
The blast is said to have levelled nearby tactical training buildings, with subsequent fires reaching munitions storage and setting off secondary detonations across the range.
The geography and infrastructure;
➟ CFB Wainwright has a documented history of natural gas production, with approximately 180 wells reported on the military property in 2014.
➟ Military range maps identify munitions storage, pipelines and designated live fire danger areas near Peterson Pond.
➟ NASA FIRMS satellite imagery recorded multiple thermal hotspots between Peterson Pond and Jamieson Lake on October 17.
Local accounts also describe hospitals activating Code Orange protocols, mobilizing stretchers and preparing for a significant influx of casualties.
The reported gas well strike, secondary detonations and hospital emergency measures remain unconfirmed as authorities investigate the incident.
Should these reports be confirmed, my thoughts and prayers are with everyone involved and affected.
whoever retweeted
Every time something happens in the Grand Conspiracy case in Florida, Obama jumps on the plane to fly to the UK. He rushed to London last year when the subpoenas were issued (video attached)
Now he is in the UK again just as Brennan is facing the Grand Jury.
Why?
Because Obama and Brennan ran CIA operations against President Trump and his aides from the UK, with help from British intelligence chiefs.
The CIA cannot operate against American citizens in the US, let alone against an opposing political campaign.
So Obama's friends in the UK helped him to target Donald Trump. Richard Dearlove, former head of British intelligence, Christopher Steele, who worked for Dearlove, Stefan Halper, Brennan's CIA operative based in the UK, numerous others.
CIA station chief in London was Gina Haspel, who later covered up all the evidence. She worked with Alan Kohler who became the head of FBI counterintelligence and raided President Trump's home, Mar-a-Lago to steal and hide Russiagate documents.
OBAMA MEETS UK PRIME MINISTER IN MANCHESTER
Manchester, UK, same day: Obama photographed leaving the Stock Exchange Hotel on 15 October.
The Manchester Evening News reports he met UK Prime Minister Andy Burnham in the hotel's Sterling Bar.
This was ahead of his Co-op Live show.
[Photo: Manchester Evening News]
whoever retweeted
What do you think about Ukraine?
31%We must support it 100%
6%Support, it but less
46%Getting tired of Ukraine
17%We should back Russia
1,618 votes • Final results whoever retweeted
In May 2026, the Carney gov announced they had entered into negotiations with the Saab/Bombardier JV to sole source purchase 6 GlobalEye Airborne Early Warning & Control aircraft. A plane that the RCAF has never asked for & wasn’t notified in advance of the announcement.
Turns out, it may well have been a hoax/faint announcement aimed at Trump to make it seem like Canada was really considering cancelling part of the F35A contract & buying Gripen E’s from Saab.
According to the AG there’s no actual contractual negotiations or agreement to investigate!
whoever retweeted
The sheer stupidity on display among the elites, the intelligence establishment, and the self-proclaimed intelligentsia falling for the Russian data center hoax is breathtaking. Or perhaps they hold the rest of us in such contempt that they think we'll swallow whatever garbage they put in front of us. Either way, they have no business holding power, and we won't rest until they don't.
whoever retweeted
“Russian propaganda” from 2013, courtesy of The Times of Israel.
timesofisrael.com/ukraine-di…
whoever retweeted
Canada under fire for applauding 'literal Nazi' in parliament during Zelenskyy visit trib.al/MPD84g8
whoever retweeted
Did you know Russia is also responsible for all those single socks that go missing in the laundry.
Russia interfered in the Brexit referendum in 2016, says Burnham trib.al/cReHnGZ
