
writing + editing @thefp email me: [email protected]
NYC
Joined April 2019
- Tweets1.3K
- Following672
- Followers2.1K
- Likes46.8K
Couple beside me in the theater made several quips, saying Holmes "should work for The Donald" after she told an obvious lie. It's pathological. Also, shut up during the movie!
This thing where liberals have uncontrollable audible outbursts whenever they hear something they disagree with really needs to be studied. What in the world is going on there?
I’m being totally serious. I’m not trying to make fun of anybody here or just saying something snarky. It’s very strange the way they audibly gasp whenever they hear something with which they disagree. I’ve never once heard a conservative do this.
Go watch an Ann Colter video from 20 years ago where she speaks to a liberal college audience. They literally cannot sit still and listen to somebody say something with which they disagree. Nervous laughter, audible moans and groans, literal gasps.
And every other speaker who goes up to the mic feels compelled to ask her, “do you really believe what you’re saying? I mean, is this a bit or do you really believe it?”
Again, I’m not trying to be funny or snarky here. It’s very weird how just one political faction does this.
Josh Code retweeted
BECERRA: "If you want to know where a leader's going to take you, know where they've come from. I don't know if we've ever had a governor who comes from where I come from."
ZAVALA: "Sacramento?"
LMAO
Josh Code retweeted
Fag babble is a tonal language like mandarin, extremely difficult for none native speakers to ever learn. “Diva” can have 9-12 different meanings depending on pitch/tone/accompanying sounds
Josh Code retweeted
New York attorney general challenger Saritha Komatireddy talks to Coleman Hughes about her viral debate performance, prosecuting street crime, and fixing the homelessness problem. thefp.com/p/the-case-against…
Replying to @pensandpoison
The 2026 Commonwealth winner wasn't falsely accused. The story rates as 100% AI generated on Pangram. The author and the prize committee who "investigated" are both lying. pangram.com/blog/ai-is-writi…
Josh Code retweeted
SCOOP: Democrats have insisted they have nothing to do with the other Dan Sullivan on Alaska's Senate ballot.
But aides with the Mary Peltola campaign and DSCC were part of a monthslong secret plan to recruit him to run -- as well as other candidates.
nytimes.com/2026/10/28/us/po…
Josh Code retweeted
NEW on the pardon economy: We found
Trump's clemency orders erased at least $119M in restitution owed to victims, w/ 18 recipients left off the hook who had White House ties. We spoke to several victims, from small business owners to retirees
@CBSNews
Replying to @paulnovosad
I think it's both! A lot of people don't use AI on principle. The idea that AI (pangram) could protect these people from having to read a bunch of AI slop complicates their simplistic moral framework. Conceding that AI has pro-social uses gives away the game.
Josh Code retweeted
Law professor Josh Blackman called the NYT out on politically labeling conservatives more often than liberals, and editor Patrick Healy acknowledged he was right:
“It can come off like The Times treats liberals as normal and conservatives as unique and worthy of labeling.”
I recently interviewed Pangram’s @max_spero_ about the tool’s revolving door of controversies, his jihad against AI slop, and how he feels about being the internet’s AI slop cop. Read here for free: thefp.com/p/two-drinks-max-s…
Replying to @keithedwards
Yeah, Pangram's false positive rate is higher for shorter texts-- especially ones hovering just over its 50 word minimum. I'm genuinely curious to see proof of the false positive you found. DM me?
Pangram is exposing a new strain of AI derangement that I find fascinating. The tool *obviously* works as advertised. The impulse to assail its integrity with false claims comes, I think, from a deeper fear that AI has already irrevocably changed how we express ourselves—from mundane emails to literary fiction. It feels like something has been stolen from us.
If these people can convince themselves AI isn't actually that good at detecting human writing, then surely the world they feared—with its job loss, its cybersecurity risks, its deluge of AI slop—isn't as close as people say.
Replying to @max_spero_
@max_spero_ cocreated one of the most accurate AI writing detectors around. His critics claim his software is “snake oil” and “biased” against people of color. Can he fend off the haters and stop the AI slopocalypse? My latest profile:
thefp.com/p/two-drinks-max-s…
I interviewed @max_spero_ , who wants to mop up the slop with his AI-writing detector, Pangram. Meet the man behind the 99+ percent accurate AI detector the internet loves to hate. thefp.com/p/two-drinks-max-s…


















