cola (@yeemmsa) profile picture

cola

@yeemmsa
Joined January 2023
  • Tweets95
  • Following162
  • Followers141
4Media
Photo by cola (@yeemmsa)Photo by cola (@yeemmsa)Photo by cola (@yeemmsa)Photo by cola (@yeemmsa)
์žŠ์–ด๋ฒ„๋ฆด ๋•Œ ์ฏค ๋‹ค์‹œ ๋ด์•ผํ•˜๋Š” ์นด๋‹ˆ ์ง‘๊ฒŒ ใ… 
7
11,300
1,378
34,914
1,409,138
An update on this post: Today, one day after an AXIS team member became aware of this issue, the tokens allocated to the KOL I raised concerns about were reclaimed. However, there are still unresolved issuesโ€ฆ The first concerns the date of a walletโ€™s last transaction. Among the dozens of participants I spoke with, everyone who submitted a wallet that had been inactive for several weeks or longer said they did not receive the airdrop. I also entered with multiple accounts because I wanted to receive the airdropโ€ฆ So Iโ€™m very familiar with the criteria used for Sybil filteringโ€ฆ But it seems those criteria werenโ€™t applied to one particular personโ€ฆ (Of course, there may be exceptions.. But apart from the wallet I flagged, I have not seen a recipient wallet that had been inactive for 250 days and had five or fewer transactions in total across all chains..) The announcement in the Korean community simply stated that multiple accounts had been identified and the tokens had been reclaimed. It did not explain the details. Because of that, I used an alternate account to explain some of the situation. (My main account is muted in the Telegram group, so I could not post from it, so I used my subaccount) They then kicked me out of the group. What I am asking for is the Telegram IDs of all the winners. Their wallet addresses can already be checked on the block explorer. However, the moderators say they cannot provide the winnersโ€™ list because only the team has itโ€ฆ So I need teamโ€™s help.. I am deeply disappointed with how @axisrobotics has handled this. I just wish they would offer an apology where one is due so we can move forwardโ€ฆ @chris_anm01
cola (@yeemmsa) profile picturecola
@yeemmsaOct 23
I have serious questions about how the AXIS Robotics Korean community airdrop was handled. Participants were initially told that everyone who submitted the form would receive an allocation, before the process changed to include Sybil screening. Several participants I have spoken to believe they were rejected because their wallets lacked transaction history. Yet when I asked the Korean moderator about the actual eligibility criteria, I did not receive a clear explanation. Meanwhile, I found that 50 different addresses transferred a total of approximately 2,047.5353 AXIS into a single wallet within 68 seconds. My understanding is that the receiving wallet belongs to โ€œ์ง‘๊ฐ€๊ณ ์‹ถ๋‹ค,โ€ a community member who is close to the Korean moderator. This raises a specific question that deserves an answer: if those 50 addresses received the airdrop despite having little or no prior activity, why did they qualify while other similarly inactive wallets were reportedly rejected? The team should confirm whether those addresses received allocations and explain how they were assessed. The moderatorโ€™s response was that the team handled the distribution and that they did not know the details. Simply referring the matter to โ€œthe teamโ€ leaves the concern unresolved. Who made the eligibility decisions? What criteria and cutoff date were used? Did the Korean moderator submit recommendations, influence exclusions, or participate in exceptions? Were the same rules applied to everyone? These are reasonable questions about the fairness of the distribution. The team needs to provide a direct, verifiable explanation. Leaving the criteria undisclosed while concerns about preferential treatment go unanswered only makes the process harder to trust. @axisrobotics please explain about this situation basescan.org/address/0x11e26โ€ฆ
Image from cola (@yeemmsa)
6
22
2,773
cola retweeted
cola (@yeemmsa) profile picture
cola
@yeemmsaOct 23
I have serious questions about how the AXIS Robotics Korean community airdrop was handled. Participants were initially told that everyone who submitted the form would receive an allocation, before the process changed to include Sybil screening. Several participants I have spoken to believe they were rejected because their wallets lacked transaction history. Yet when I asked the Korean moderator about the actual eligibility criteria, I did not receive a clear explanation. Meanwhile, I found that 50 different addresses transferred a total of approximately 2,047.5353 AXIS into a single wallet within 68 seconds. My understanding is that the receiving wallet belongs to โ€œ์ง‘๊ฐ€๊ณ ์‹ถ๋‹ค,โ€ a community member who is close to the Korean moderator. This raises a specific question that deserves an answer: if those 50 addresses received the airdrop despite having little or no prior activity, why did they qualify while other similarly inactive wallets were reportedly rejected? The team should confirm whether those addresses received allocations and explain how they were assessed. The moderatorโ€™s response was that the team handled the distribution and that they did not know the details. Simply referring the matter to โ€œthe teamโ€ leaves the concern unresolved. Who made the eligibility decisions? What criteria and cutoff date were used? Did the Korean moderator submit recommendations, influence exclusions, or participate in exceptions? Were the same rules applied to everyone? These are reasonable questions about the fairness of the distribution. The team needs to provide a direct, verifiable explanation. Leaving the criteria undisclosed while concerns about preferential treatment go unanswered only makes the process harder to trust. @axisrobotics please explain about this situation basescan.org/address/0x11e26โ€ฆ
Image from cola (@yeemmsa)
38
20
1
77
6,221
This situation needs an explanationโ€ฆ People in the Korean community are struggling to understand what happenedโ€ฆ @chris_anm01
cola (@yeemmsa) profile picturecola
@yeemmsaOct 23
I have serious questions about how the AXIS Robotics Korean community airdrop was handled. Participants were initially told that everyone who submitted the form would receive an allocation, before the process changed to include Sybil screening. Several participants I have spoken to believe they were rejected because their wallets lacked transaction history. Yet when I asked the Korean moderator about the actual eligibility criteria, I did not receive a clear explanation. Meanwhile, I found that 50 different addresses transferred a total of approximately 2,047.5353 AXIS into a single wallet within 68 seconds. My understanding is that the receiving wallet belongs to โ€œ์ง‘๊ฐ€๊ณ ์‹ถ๋‹ค,โ€ a community member who is close to the Korean moderator. This raises a specific question that deserves an answer: if those 50 addresses received the airdrop despite having little or no prior activity, why did they qualify while other similarly inactive wallets were reportedly rejected? The team should confirm whether those addresses received allocations and explain how they were assessed. The moderatorโ€™s response was that the team handled the distribution and that they did not know the details. Simply referring the matter to โ€œthe teamโ€ leaves the concern unresolved. Who made the eligibility decisions? What criteria and cutoff date were used? Did the Korean moderator submit recommendations, influence exclusions, or participate in exceptions? Were the same rules applied to everyone? These are reasonable questions about the fairness of the distribution. The team needs to provide a direct, verifiable explanation. Leaving the criteria undisclosed while concerns about preferential treatment go unanswered only makes the process harder to trust. @axisrobotics please explain about this situation basescan.org/address/0x11e26โ€ฆ
Image from cola (@yeemmsa)
1
2
10
804
I have serious questions about how the AXIS Robotics Korean community airdrop was handled. Participants were initially told that everyone who submitted the form would receive an allocation, before the process changed to include Sybil screening. Several participants I have spoken to believe they were rejected because their wallets lacked transaction history. Yet when I asked the Korean moderator about the actual eligibility criteria, I did not receive a clear explanation. Meanwhile, I found that 50 different addresses transferred a total of approximately 2,047.5353 AXIS into a single wallet within 68 seconds. My understanding is that the receiving wallet belongs to โ€œ์ง‘๊ฐ€๊ณ ์‹ถ๋‹ค,โ€ a community member who is close to the Korean moderator. This raises a specific question that deserves an answer: if those 50 addresses received the airdrop despite having little or no prior activity, why did they qualify while other similarly inactive wallets were reportedly rejected? The team should confirm whether those addresses received allocations and explain how they were assessed. The moderatorโ€™s response was that the team handled the distribution and that they did not know the details. Simply referring the matter to โ€œthe teamโ€ leaves the concern unresolved. Who made the eligibility decisions? What criteria and cutoff date were used? Did the Korean moderator submit recommendations, influence exclusions, or participate in exceptions? Were the same rules applied to everyone? These are reasonable questions about the fairness of the distribution. The team needs to provide a direct, verifiable explanation. Leaving the criteria undisclosed while concerns about preferential treatment go unanswered only makes the process harder to trust. @axisrobotics please explain about this situation basescan.org/address/0x11e26โ€ฆ
Image from cola (@yeemmsa)
38
20
1
77
6,221
I also know more about the leak of listing information, but I wonโ€™t go into that in this postโ€ฆ
4
399
To be honest, Iโ€™m very close to the owner of that walletโ€ฆ But wrong is wrong, regardless of our relationship.
5
465
This is the wallet address: 0x11e262946fB6133296B779CAc7Fe58F7C618f956 If you check it on BaseScan, youโ€™ll see what I meanโ€ฆ
1
3
708
Please share this post widely so the AXIS team becomes aware of this issue. Iโ€™d really appreciate your help.
1
7
911
๐ŸŒ• @axisrobotics x ๋ถˆ๊ฐœ๋ฏธ AMA ์‚ฌ์ „ ์•ผํ•‘ ์งง๋จน ์ด๋ฒคํŠธ! ๋ณด๋‹ˆ๊นŒ Axis ์นด์ดํ†  ์•ผํ•‘์ด ์ง„ํ–‰์ค‘์ด๋“œ๋ผ๊ณ ์š”? ๊ทธ๋ž˜์„œ! AMA ์ „์— Axis ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ฐ„๋‹จ ๋ฆฌ์„œ์น˜ ์•ผํ•‘์ด๋ฒคํŠธ๋ฅผ ์ง„ํ–‰ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ผ์ • : 10์›” 18์ผ ์˜คํ›„ 23์‹œ 30๋ถ„ ๊นŒ์ง€ ์ฐธ์—ฌ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ• 1. ํ•ด๋‹น ํŠธ์œ— ๊ธ€ ์ข‹์•„์š”, ์ธ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ Axis ๊ฐ„๋‹จ ๋ฆฌ์„œ์น˜ 2. ์ด๋ฒคํŠธ๋ฆฌ์— ์ œ์ถœ : eventree.live/#event/ev_8438โ€ฆ 3. ํ•˜๋ฉด ๋! ๋ณด์ƒ : 1๋งŒ์› ์ƒ๋‹น์˜ Axis ํ† ํฐ x 100๋ช… (ama ๋ณด์ƒ์—์„œ ๋นผ์˜ด) ๊ฐ€์ฃผ์•„!!!
Image from FIREANT (@fireant_korea)
FIREANT (@fireant_korea) profile pictureFIREANT
@fireant_koreaOct 16
๐Ÿ“Œ ๋ถˆ๊ฐœ๋ฏธ์™€ ํ•จ๊ป˜ํ•˜๋Š” @axisrobotics AMA! ์ด๋ฒˆ AMA์—์„œ๋Š” Axis Robotics์˜ Co-Founder and CEO Chris Feng ๊ณผํ•จ๊ป˜ ๋กœ๋ณดํ‹ฑ์Šค์™€ ๋ธ”๋ก์ฒด์ธ์ด ์–ด๋–ป๊ฒŒ ๋งŒ๋‚  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์„์ง€!!! ์•Œ์•„๋ณผ ์˜ˆ์ •์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. โœ”๏ธ ์žฅ์†Œ : ๋ถˆ๊ฐœ๋ฏธ ํŠธ์œ„ํ„ฐ ์ŠคํŠธ๋ฆฌ๋ฐ ๐Ÿ—“ ์ผ์ • : 10์›” 19์ผ (์›”) ์˜คํ›„ 9์‹œ KST โœ”๏ธ AMA ์ฐธ์—ฌ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ• : t.me/fireant_crypto/44739 ๋ถˆ๊ฐœ๋ฏธ Crypto ์ฑ„๋„ ์ž…์žฅ ๋ถˆ๊ฐœ๋ฏธ ํŠธ์œ„ํ„ฐ ํŒ”๋กœ์šฐ ๋ถˆ๊ฐœ๋ฏธ ์œ ํŠœ๋ธŒ ๊ตฌ๋… ํ•ด๋‹น ํŠธ์œ„ํ„ฐ ๋ฆฌํŠธ์œ— ๋ฐ ์ข‹์•„์š” ๋Œ“๊ธ€ Axis Robotics ํ•œ๊ตญ ๊ณต์ง€๋ฐฉ ์ž…์žฅ Axis Robotics ํ•œ๊ตญ ์ปค๋ฎค๋‹ˆํ‹ฐ ์ž…์žฅ ๐Ÿ”ฅ AMA ๋ฆฌ์›Œ๋“œ : Axis ํ† ํฐ 1. 5๋งŒ์› ์ƒ๋‹น์˜ ๋ฆฌ์›Œ๋“œ x 20๋ช… 2. 3๋งŒ์› ์ƒ๋‹น์˜ ๋ฆฌ์›Œ๋“œ x 20๋ช… 3. 1๋งŒ์› ์ƒ๋‹น์˜ ๋ฆฌ์›Œ๋“œ x 200๋ช… * ์ด 240๋ช…์ด Axis ํ† ํฐ์„ Get ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ธฐํšŒ!
Image from FIREANT (@fireant_korea)
127
278
404
461
42,267
์˜จ๋„ํผํ”„๋Š” ๋งค์ฃผ ์ƒ๋‹นํ•œ ๊ทœ๋ชจ์˜ ๋ฆฌ์›Œ๋“œ๋ฅผ ๋ฟŒ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์žˆ๊ณ , ์ˆ˜์ˆ˜๋ฃŒ๋„ ๊ต‰์žฅํžˆ ์ €๋ ดํ•œ ํŽธ์ด๊ธฐ์— (ํŠนํžˆ ์ฝ”์ƒํผ๋Ÿด ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋ฉด 30ํผ ์ถ”๊ฐ€ ์ˆ˜์ˆ˜๋ฃŒ ํ• ์ธ) ์ €๋„ ์‹ค์ œ๋กœ ์ž˜ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š”๋ฐ์š”, ํŠนํžˆ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ํŽ๋ฑ์ด๋ž‘ ์–‘๋นต ์žก์•„๋‘๋Š” ์šฉ๋„๋กœ ์ฃผ๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค ํฌ์ธํŠธ๋„ ๋ชจ์ด๋‹ˆ๊นŒ 1์„2์กฐ๋„ค์š” ์˜คํ™ํ™~~
This quoted post is unavailable.
Try viewing anyway ยท View on X
2
275
cola retweeted
Branxi (@OG_Branxi) profile picture
Branxi
@OG_BranxiOct 10
4 hours till @papertrade_xyz launch spend 5 mins on this and you'll get more $PAPER spoiler: don't liquidate, and don't use 1000x $PAPER is minted strictly on losses & liquidations, base rate: 100 $PAPER per $1 loss while LP < $2M emission decays after, early execution = higher ROI best way is just running long + short at the same time you lose on one side (print $PAPER) and get most of the money back on the other side youโ€™re only really paying the haircut on the winning leg Example: - $100 each side at 100x - Price moves 0.5-1% - One side loses ~$50 and prints ~5k $PAPER - Other side gives you back ~$42-43 - Net cost ~$7-8 for ~5000 $PAPER -> ~0.15-0.16 cents per $PAPER Important Mechanics - Asymmetric impact heavily cuts small moves and barely affects larger ones, optimal close is around 0.7-1.5% move - Liquidation is very expensive, close manually before it - High leverage (500-1000ร—) is fast but easy to get liquidated, 100-300ร— is more practical - Profits can go into a FIFO queue if the LP is short, margin is always returned immediately - $PAPER is non-transferable at launch (stake/unstake only) TIPS: - Aim to close around 1% move - Donโ€™t get liquidated (thatโ€™s expensive) - 100-300x is usually better than full 1000x - Stake the PAPER right away - Watch OI so both sides actually open early delta-neutral cycles closed around a 1% move + manual closes + staking = the most efficient way to farm $PAPER see you at 14 UTC
papertrade.xyz (@papertrade_xyz) profile picturepapertrade.xyz
@papertrade_xyzOct 10
papertrade launch timing and details papertrade is expected to launch at 14:00 UTC on 10.10.2026, following the scheduled hyperevm network upgrade. at this time trading through the frontend will be enabled. deposits will pause for a short period of time at 13:45 UTC, fifteen minutes before, to ensure that trading has the utmost priority during launch. if you wish to participate in the launch you must predeposit. launch congestion papertrade will be congested at the start due to launch demand. expect temporarily long confirmation wait times, especially for smaller notional trades. the frontend relayer plays an important role during launch, controlling how transactions are submitted to the hyperevm. some actions like staking distributions run separately in big blocks. the chain will always look as if only half of all possible gas is being used, this is optimal. using more than this would exponentially raise fees within minutes to unpayable prices. oi limits papertrade has individual atomic position limits of 10m. there is no limit on the number of 10m positions a user can have. papertrade also has floating oi headroom per market/side, which determines how much oi can be opened in a very short period. these are not designed to be triggered through normal trading usage and are set at 1bn per market/side for launch. asym pnl fee parameters papertrade inherits rollbitโ€™s asymmetric fee pnl curve the parameters are: -baseRate: .1 -rateMultiplier: 15000 -rateExponent: 1 -referenceNotional: 100000*k (k=1m) -positionMultiplier: 814.598 btc / 483.979 eth -profit deadman: 0.2 basis points a visualization of the pnl parameter curve is below admin keys the papertrade admins (2 of 3 multisigs consisting of @izebel_eth @blurr @UngusTrade ) perform three separate roles: -guardian: pause opens and freeze individual/global markets. if a market is frozen any existing positions can still be closed against the paused bbo mid. -owner: set impact curve and fee parameters. change configure relayers/keepers. list new markets and upgrade the contracts. all contract upgrades are gated by a 7 day timelock. -markets: adjust the oi headroom per market/side. set the minimum margin and minimum position sizes. read more about these features at: docs.papertrade.xyz
Image from papertrade.xyz (@papertrade_xyz)
34
32
10
456
85,267
CP ํ‹ฐ์ง€์ด์ถ•ํ•˜๋“œ๋ฆฝ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค ์—…๋น„ํŠธ๋”ฐ๋ฆฌํ•˜๋‹ค๊ฐ€ 50๋งŒ์›์†ํ•ด๋ด์„œ ์ด๊ฑฐ๊ผญ๋ฐ›์•„์„œ๋ฉ˜์ง•ํ•˜๊ณ ์‹ถ๋„ค์š”.. ์ œ๋ฐœ๋ถ€ํƒ๋“œ๋ฆฝ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค @cluster_korea $CP @OpenProtocolFND t.me/clusterprotocolkoreaAnnโ€ฆ
Cluster Protocol Korean Announcement ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท

Cluster Protocol Korean Announcement ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท

์ด 2,500$ ์ƒ๋‹น์˜ $CP๊ฐ€ ๊ฑธ๋ ค์žˆ๋Š” ์ด๋ฒคํŠธ๋ฅผ ํ•œ๊ตญ ์ƒ์žฅ ๊ธฐ๋… ํ•œ๊ตญ์ธ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ์ง„ํ–‰ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค!๐ŸŽ† ๐Ÿ—“ ์ด๋ฒคํŠธ ๊ธฐ๊ฐ„ ๋ฐ ๋ณด์ƒ ๐ŸŸข๊ธฐ๊ฐ„ : 09.08 ~ 10.08 (11:59 PM) ๐ŸŸข๋ณด์ƒ : ย $2,500 ์ƒ๋‹น์˜ $CP ํ† ํฐ ๐ŸŸข๋Œ€์ƒ์ž : ๋žœ๋ค 50๋ช… (50$ x 50) โœ๏ธ ย ์ด๋ฒคํŠธ ์ฐธ์—ฌ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ• ๐ŸŸขCluster ํ•œ๊ตญ ๊ณต์ง€๋ฐฉย /ย Cluster ํ•œ๊ตญ...

t.me
1
298
Cluster Protocol is coming to Upbit. Sep 8 at 14:30 KST/05:30 UTC. 500+ models through one endpoint. Compute on demand. Data you own. Applications and agents settle per request in $CP.
Upbit Korea (@Official_Upbit) profile pictureUpbit Korea
@Official_UpbitSep 8
์‹ ๊ทœ ๋””์ง€ํ„ธ ์ž์‚ฐ ํด๋Ÿฌ์Šคํ„ฐํ”„๋กœํ† ์ฝœ(CP) ๊ฑฐ๋ž˜์ง€์› ์•ˆ๋‚ด โœ… ์ง€์› ๋งˆ์ผ“: KRW, BTC, USDT ๋งˆ์ผ“ ๐Ÿ“… ๊ฑฐ๋ž˜์ง€์› ๊ฐœ์‹œ ์‹œ์  : 2026-09-08 14:30 KST ์˜ˆ์ • ๐Ÿ”—๊ณต์ง€ ๋ฐ”๋กœ๊ฐ€๊ธฐ: upbit.com/service_center/notโ€ฆ #Upbit #CP @OpenProtocolFND
Image from Upbit Korea (@Official_Upbit)
346
308
18
440
37,364
Cluster Protocol is coming to Bithumb. Spot trading opens September 8 at 15:30 KST/06:30 UTC. One endpoint. Every model, every GPU, every dataset. Settled in $CP on Base.
๋น—์ธ Bithumb (@BithumbOfficial) profile picture๋น—์ธ Bithumb@BithumbOfficialSep 8
๐Ÿ“ข New Listing ๐Ÿš€ ํด๋Ÿฌ์Šคํ„ฐํ”„๋กœํ† ์ฝœ(#CP) ์›ํ™” ๋งˆ์ผ“ ์ถ”๊ฐ€ ์•ˆ๋‚ด ๐Ÿš€ $CP/KRW will be listed on #Bithumb! ๐Ÿ”ธ Details : feed.bithumb.com/notice/1654โ€ฆ #Bithumb #CP @OpenProtocolFND
Image from ๋น—์ธ Bithumb (@BithumbOfficial)
384
350
23
448
42,518
cola retweeted
QP (@qpzmzm) profile picture
QP
@qpzmzmAug 7
โšฝ๏ธ OKX ๊ตฟ์ฆˆ ์ด๋ฒคํŠธ ์ฐธ์—ฌํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค! ์ €๋Š”ย 1๋ฒˆ OKX Boostย ์ชฝ์œผ๋กœ ์ฐธ์—ฌํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค! @star_okx ์š”์ฆ˜ ๋ณด๊ณ  ์žˆ๋˜ ๋ฐˆ์ฝ”๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์–ด์„œ OKX Web3 Wallet์—์„œ ์ง์ ‘ ๊ตฌ๋งคํ•ด๋ณด๊ณ , ์‹ค์ œ๋กœ Boost ๊ฑฐ๋ž˜๋Ÿ‰์— ๋ฐ˜์˜๋˜๋Š”์ง€๋„ ํ™•์ธํ•ด๋ดค์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ œ๊ฐ€ ํ™•์ธํ•œ ๊ณผ์ •์€ ๊ฐ„๋‹จํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค 1๏ธโƒฃย web3.okx.comย ์ ‘์†ย @wallet 2๏ธโƒฃ ๊ธฐ์กด ์ง€๊ฐ‘์„ย OKX Walletย ์ชฝ์— ์ž„ํฌํŠธ 3๏ธโƒฃ ์ฝ”์ธ ๋ชฉ๋ก์—์„œย ์œ ๋™์„ฑยท๊ฑฐ๋ž˜๋Ÿ‰ ๊ธฐ์ค€์œผ๋กœ ๊ด€์‹ฌ ํ† ํฐ ํ™•์ธ 4๏ธโƒฃ ์šฐ์ธกย Buy ํ™”๋ฉด์—์„œ ์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰ ์ž…๋ ฅ ํ›„ ๊ตฌ๋งค ์ €๋Š” ๋ณดํ†ตย ์œ ๋™์„ฑ / ๋ณผ๋ฅจ / ์ฐจํŠธ ํ๋ฆ„ย ์œ„์ฃผ๋กœ ๋ณด๋Š”๋ฐ, ์ตœ๊ทผ์—” ์‚ฌ์ด์‹์ด๋ž‘ ANTFUN ์ชฝ ์ฐจํŠธ๊ฐ€ ๋ˆˆ์— ๋“ค์–ด์˜ค๋”๋ผ๊ณ ์š”. ๋‹ค๋งŒ ๋ฏธ๋ฆฌ ๋ด๋‘” ์ฝ”์ธ์ด ์žˆ์–ด์„œ ๊ทธ๋Œ€๋กœ ์ง„ํ–‰ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ตฌ๋งค ํ›„ Boost ํŽ˜์ด์ง€๋„ ํ™•์ธํ•ด๋ดค์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. โ‘  ์•ฝ $300 ๋งค์ˆ˜ โ‘ก 0.5x ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„์œผ๋กœ ๋ฐ˜์˜ โ‘ข Daily snapshot ๊ธฐ์ค€ Daily Volume $149.6์œผ๋กœ ํ™•์ธ ์ œ๊ฐ€ ๊ตฌ๋งคํ•œ ๋ฐˆ์ฝ”๋Š” Boost ๋žญํ‚น ํ† ํฐ์ด ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ์„œ ์ถ”๊ฐ€ 20% ๋ถ€์Šคํ„ฐ ๋Œ€์ƒ์€ ์•„๋‹ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์ง€๋งŒ, OKX DEX๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•œ ๊ฑฐ๋ž˜๊ฐ€ Boost Volume ๊ณ„์‚ฐ์—๋Š” ์‹ค์ œ๋กœ ๋ฐ˜์˜๋˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ํ™•์ธํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฏธ OKX Wallet ์ž์ฃผ ์“ฐ์‹œ๋Š” ๋ถ„๋“ค์—๊ฒ ์ต์ˆ™ํ•œ ๊ณผ์ •์ด๋ผ ํ•ต์‹ฌ๋งŒ ์งง๊ฒŒ ์ •๋ฆฌํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. @ManCity ๋ฐˆ์ฝ”๋Š” ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ์ด ํฌ๋‹ˆ ๋งค์ˆ˜ ์ถ”์ฒœ์€ ์•„๋‹ˆ๊ณ , DYOR ํ•„์ˆ˜์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค
Image from QP (@qpzmzm)
Image from QP (@qpzmzm)
Hope | Web3.0 (@Hope_web3_) profile pictureHope | Web3.0
@Hope_web3_Aug 5
โšฝ๏ธHOPE xOKXx Manchester City VIP ๊ตฟ์ฆˆ ์ฝ˜ํ…์ธ  ์ด๋ฒคํŠธ ์ œ๊ฐ€ ์ง„ํ–‰ํ•˜๊ณ  OKX Wallet์ด ํ›„์›ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ตฟ์ฆˆ ์ด๋ฒคํŠธ! (๊ฒฝ์Ÿ๋ฅ  ๋‚ฎ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค!) ์›๋ž˜ ํ•œ๋‹ฌ์— 1m ์ด์ƒ ํŠธ๋ ˆ์ด๋”ฉ ํ•ด์•ผ ๋ฐ›์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฑฐ๋ž˜์†Œ ์›”๋“œ์ปต ํŠน์ง‘ vip ๊ตฟ์ฆˆ ๋งจ์ฒด์Šคํ„ฐ ์‹œํ‹ฐ์˜ ํ•œ๊ตญ ๋ฐฉ๋ฌธ์„ ๊ธฐ๋…ํ•ด, ๋งจ์ฒด์Šคํ„ฐ ์‹œํ‹ฐ ๊ณต์‹ ํ›„์›์‚ฌ์ธ OKX Wallet๊ณผ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ์ปค๋ฎค๋‹ˆํ‹ฐ ์ฝ˜ํ…์ธ  ์ด๋ฒคํŠธ๋ฅผ ์ง„ํ–‰ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค! ๐ŸŽ‰ ์ฐธ์—ฌํ•ด์ฃผ์‹  ๋ถ„๋“ค ์ค‘ ์ด 5๋ถ„โ€‹๊ป˜ OKX VIP ํ•œ์ • ๊ตฟ์ฆˆ๋ฅผ ์„ ๋ฌผ๋กœ ๋“œ๋ฆฝ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค! ๊ตฟ์ฆˆ๋Š” ๋น„์น˜ํƒ€์›”, ๋ชจ์ž, ์Šคํƒ ๋ฆฌ ํ…€๋ธ”๋Ÿฌ, ์†๋ชฉ๋ฐด๋“œ, ์œ ๋‹ˆํผ ๋“ฑ VIP ๊ตฟ์ฆˆ๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์–ด ํ€„๋ฆฌํ‹ฐ๋„ ์ข‹์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค ๐Ÿ’™ ๐Ÿ“Œ ์ฐธ์—ฌ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ• ์š”์•ฝํ•˜๋ฉด ์ด๋ฒคํŠธ ๊ธฐ๊ฐ„ ๋™์•ˆ OKX Boost ๋˜๋Š” OKX xStocks๋ฅผ ์ฃผ์ œ๋กœ ์ด ๊ธ€ ์ธ์šฉํ•ด X์— ์ฝ˜ํ…์ธ ๋ฅผ ์ž‘์„ฑํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ตฌ๊ธ€ํผ ์ œ์ถœ 1๏ธโƒฃ OKX Boost ์ฐธ์—ฌ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ• ๋ฐ ๊ฐ€์ด๋“œ ์ด์šฉ ํŠœํ† ๋ฆฌ์–ผ ์‹ค์ œ ์ฐธ์—ฌ ํ›„๊ธฐ ๋ฐ ์ธ์ฆ 2๏ธโƒฃ OKX xStocks ์„œ๋น„์Šค ๋ฐ ์ƒํ’ˆ ์†Œ๊ฐœ ๊ฑฐ๋ž˜ ํ›„๊ธฐ ๋ฐ ์‚ฌ์šฉ ๊ฒฝํ—˜ xStocks ๊ด€๋ จ ์ •๋ณดยท๊ต์œก ์ฝ˜ํ…์ธ  (ํ˜„์žฌ xStocks Trading Competition๋„ ์ง„ํ–‰ ์ค‘!) ๐Ÿ“… ์ด๋ฒคํŠธ ๊ธฐ๊ฐ„ 2026๋…„ 8์›” 5์ผ ~ 8์›” 12์ผ ๐Ÿท ํ•„์ˆ˜ ํƒœ๊ทธ 3๊ฐœ @wallet (ํ•ธ๋“ค์ด ๋ ˆ์–ดํ•œ okx wallet ๊ณ„์ •) @ManCity @star_okx (๋Œ€ํ‘œ๋‹˜ ๊ณ„์ •) ๋‹น์ฒจ ์•ˆ๋‚ด 1. ์กฐํšŒ์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋†’์€ ์ฝ˜ํ…์ธ  3๋ช… 2. ์ฐธ์—ฌ์ž ์ค‘ ๋žœ๋ค ์ถ”์ฒจ 2๋ช… ์ด 5๋ถ„๊ป˜ OKX VIP ํ•œ์ • ๊ตฟ์ฆˆ๋ฅผ ๋“œ๋ฆฝ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค! ๐Ÿ”—๊ตฌ๊ธ€ํผ forms.gle/TubQMY6EoKJAgYM6A ์ฝ”์ธ ๊ตฟ์ฆˆ ์ค‘ ํ€„๋ฆฌํ‹ฐ ๊ฐ‘์€ ์—ญ์‹œ ๊ฑฐ๋ž˜์†Œ vip ๊ตฟ์ฆˆ ๋งจ์ฒด์Šคํ„ฐ ์‹œํ‹ฐ ํŒฌ๊ณผ OKX Wallet ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๋ถ„๋“ค์˜ ๋งŽ์€ ์ฐธ์—ฌ ๋ถ€ํƒ๋“œ๋ฆฝ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค! โšฝ๏ธ๐Ÿ’™
Image from Hope | Web3.0 (@Hope_web3_)
21
3
62
2,655
cola retweeted
JAKE (@0FJAKE) profile picture
JAKE
@0FJAKEJul 8
Looking to airdrop some $HOODIE. 1. Make this your pfp. 2. Retweet the launch tweet. 3. Reply with your wallet address. Must have the image below as your pfp to be eligible.
Image from JAKE (@0FJAKE)
JAKE (@0FJAKE) profile pictureJAKE
@0FJAKEJul 8
hey @bankrbot launch $HOODIE on robinhood chain
Image from JAKE (@0FJAKE)
831
459
26
683
62,918
cola retweeted
JAKE (@0FJAKE) profile picture
JAKE
@0FJAKEJul 8
hey @bankrbot launch $HOODIE on robinhood chain
Image from JAKE (@0FJAKE)
269
507
65
1,072
220,284
[AMA] With peaq, Transform Robot(Physical AI) Narrative teapawt.org/i/broadcasts/1qxvvkaZrโ€ฆ
Video
0:00

Wecryptotogether

[AMA] With peaq, Transform Robot(Physical AI) Narrative

117
589
8
726
12,257
๐Ÿฆ Multipli ๋ฅผ ํ–ฅํ•œ ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋Š” ์–ด๋””์„œ ์˜ค๋‚˜์š”? ์ง€์ง€๋‚œ์ฃผ AMA๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•œ ํ† ํฐํ™” ์‹œ๋Œ€๋ฅผ ๋Œ€๋น„ํ•œ RWA ์ž์‚ฐ ํ™œ์šฉ ์ผ๋“œ ํ”Œ๋žซํผ Multipli๋Š” ์—ฐ๋‹ฌ์•„ ๋””ํŒŒ์ด์— ํฐ ํƒ€๊ฒฉ์ด ์žˆ์—ˆ์Œ์—๋„ ๋ถˆ๊ตฌํ•˜๊ณ  $400M ์˜ TVL์„ ์œ ์ง€ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ”Œ๋žซํผ ์ด์šฉ์ž์˜ ๊ฒฌ๊ณ ํ•œ ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋Š” ์–ด๋””์„œ ์˜ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ผ๊นŒ์š”? ํŒŒ์šด๋” @Shaaran5 ์€ Multipli์˜ ์ด์šฉ์ž๊ฐ€ ๋‹จ์ˆœํ•œ ๊ฐœ์ธ์œผ๋กœ ์ด๋ค„์ ธ์žˆ์ง€ ์•Š์Œ์„ ์–˜๊ธฐํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. UAE์˜ ํŒจ๋ฐ€๋ฆฌ ์˜คํ”ผ์Šค๋ฟ๋งŒ์ด ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ ๋…ธ๋ฌด๋ผ ์ฆ๊ถŒ ์‚ฐํ•˜์˜ Laser Digital , Fasnara, ๊ทธ๋“ค์˜ ํˆฌ์ž์‚ฌ์ด๊ธฐ๋„ ํ•œ Sequoia๊ฐ€ ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์ด๋ฉฐ ์ด๋Š” ๊ณง Multipli๊ฐ€ ๋ณด์•ˆ๊ณผ ๊ทœ์ œ ์ด์Šˆ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์ž˜ ์ค€์ˆ˜ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์Œ์„ ์˜๋ฏธํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ฟ๋งŒ์ด ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ ๋ฏธ๊ตญ์—์„œ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ํฐ ์€ํ–‰ ์ค‘ ํ•˜๋‚˜๊ฐ€ Multipli์™€ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ๋‹ด๋ณดํ™”์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ธํ”„๋ผ ๊ตฌ์ถ•์„ ํ˜‘๋ ฅํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ๊ณง ๊ณต๊ฐœ๋œ๋‹ค๊ณ  ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค! Multipli ํŒ€์€ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๊ฒƒ ์—†์ด ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฌผ๋“ค์„ ๋ฐ”๋ผ๋ณด๋ฉฐ Multipli์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ํŒ๋‹จํ•ด์ฃผ๊ธธ ๋ฐ”๋ผ๋ฉฐ ๋ฏฟ์Œ์„ ํ˜ธ์†Œํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๊ณ  ์ฆ๋ช…ํ•ด ๋‚˜๊ฐ€๊ฒ ๋‹ค๊ณ  ํ•˜๋„ค์š”! ๊ทธ๋Ÿผ ์—ฌ๊ธฐ์„œ Quiz ์—„๊ฒฉํ•œ ๊ธฐ์ค€์„ ํ†ตํ•ด Multipli๋ฅผ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•œ ํ›„์— ํ”Œ๋žซํผ ์ด์šฉ์ž ํ˜น์€ ํ˜‘๋ ฅ ํŒŒํŠธ๋„ˆ๋ฅผ ๊ตฌ์ถ•ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ๋‹จ์ฒด๊ฐ€ ์•„๋‹Œ ๊ณณ์€ ์–ด๋””์ผ๊นŒ์š”? 1. Laser Digital 2. Sequioa 3. Family office from UAE 4. Illuminati ์ •๋‹ต์€ ๋Œ“๊ธ€๋กœ!
๐Ÿค Paid partnership
648
563
5
648
10,905
Load more