Truth and Justice matter. Fan of Newton and Tesla. Theory of General Relativity is wrong. Like Philosophy, psychology, satire and real physics.
Joined April 2026
- Tweets7.1K
- Following492
- Followers220
- Likes7.6K
MrNoBull retweeted
I don't understand the hate toward her, i've asked on a stream before, "She denounced all the OF stuff and took accountability, what do you want? For her to go to hell?" And tons of commenters answered yes to that. So... that explained a lot.
These people act as if she owes them something, which is strange. She doesn't. And she didn't get away from all accountability either - yes she is saved, but there are repercussions for sin in this life, and I'm sure she has and possibly still is battling through that in ways we probably don't even know. Not only that, but for those criticizing her, if they have ever partaken in porn before then they are just as guilty as her. But do we hold that sin against them if they've repented? Absolutely not.
She sinned against God, and He forgave her. Why are you mad?
Much love to her.
If this is real, Tamara is romantic. People are too mean to her. I think I actually like her more than Hila.
I can see why Ethan Klein started to have feelings for her. (If it is her) Imagine being married to Hila, 'we don't need to discuss not having s*x for a year Hila', with Tamara.
Um, Hila. This sounds like an Anisa Jomha idea. If your gf or wife has insane friends, at some point their insane ideas will wear off on them.
I was pretty sure this was mostly Ethan's fault. Was I wrong?
Bot moderation is dumb. Bots flagging bot accounts is fine but the cost of humans isn't something we should ignore because bots can. False positives and lack of insight.
The new AI world sucks because corporations who makes billions in profit, can't spend a few hundred million on employing humans that are better at a task then bots.
Also OpenAI is focusing on developing security solutions with AI. This is going to get worse and I don't expect it to get better for a long time.
OpenAI+Microsoft in security = Vulnerabilities and lazy fixes. Just what we need, more unnecessary problems.
Just my opinion, even though Microsoft's history included the Firewall on Windows XP being OFF by default.
I watched this and would like to know how much is true from any ladies who would care to comment.
To me it describes someone who has a practiced lack of accountability over time, not a personality or something absolute about all women but practiced reaction, parental neglect or indifferent culture.
The #FemaleRationalisationHamster explained.
The name for the tireless little engine in a woman’s mind that retroactively justifies whatever she already FELT like doing. This explains almost everything about female psychology in as simple a format as possible:
MrNoBull retweeted
Layoffs in the gaming industry is long overdue.
For years, major studios treated paying customers with open contempt, pushed ideology over great gameplay, and bloated budgets on projects nobody asked for; all while acting like they were untouchable.
The era of consequences is finally here.
Stop blaming the audience, stop lecturing the fans, and start building things people actually want to buy.
Fries in the bag, please! 🍟
MrNoBull retweeted
> be a high-flying MIT scientist
> discover mTOR
> expected to win a Nobel Prize some day
> have consensual relationship with younger female biology MIT professor
> she accuses him of sexual harassment, coercion and grooming after he declines a long term relationship with her
> MIT launches investigation
> MIT lets the accuser’s allies help pick the judges and threaten the president if he wasn’t destroyed
> lo and behold, investigation finds he violated MIT’s sexual relationship and anti-harassment policies
> he gets fired and resigns under threat of termination
> loses his lab
> he sues her for defamation
> jury awards him $6 million in defamation case and rejects her claims that she was coerced in any way
How did 13 members of a civilian jury come to a different conclusion than @MIT?
Answer: MIT’s investigation was not exactly independent thanks to coordinated female faculty collusion. It was a kangaroo court and the verdict was pre-determined
🚨 BOMBSHELL COURT EVIDENCE EXPOSES INSIDER INFLUENCE OVER MIT'S TENURE-REVIEW PROCESS IN THE DAVID M. SABATINI ORDEAL.
🔱 NEW REVELATION — Court evidence exposes MIT Professor Sangeeta Bhatia's involvement in the selection of Sabatini's tenure-review committee
On 27 September 2021, Kristin Knouse exchanged messages with Izabella Pena following a conversation with @MIT Professor Sangeeta Bhatia.
The court-disclosed messages reveal Kristin Knouse telling Izabella Pena:
🔴 “Sangeeta just called”
🔴 “they even asked for insight into who to put on the committee”
🔴 “AND she said she will go to Rafael Reif’s office and protest the decision if and when needed.”
Pena responded:
“At least they are asking her insight”
Knouse replied:
“Exactly”
“This is good”
⚠️ The evidence exposes a troubling channel of insider influence surrounding MIT's tenure-review process.
These contemporaneous communications document that Knouse understood Bhatia to have been consulted about the committee's composition and to be prepared to challenge its eventual decision directly with MIT President Rafael Reif.
Rather than an independent review insulated from interested parties, the messages reveal access to the committee-selection process by an academic aligned with the complainant, raising serious concerns about institutional impartiality and conflicts of interest.
This disclosure adds another significant piece to the growing documentary record surrounding the institutional handling of Professor @DMSabatini's case.
📑 REVIEW THW ORIGINAL COURT EVIDENCE BELOW.
🔱 ScienceGuardians™ Legal and Investigative Team
MORE COURT EVIDENCE. MORE REVELATIONS. STAY TUNED. ⚠️
@SciGuardians 🔱
MrNoBull retweeted
It's now Sunday morning.
Brian is still locked up.
And they are not even acknowledging our calls to release him. 🤬
FREE BRIAN COLE JR NOW!
MrNoBull retweeted
It's now Monday morning.
An innocent man is still locked up for a crime the whole world knows he did not commit.
RELEASE HIM NOW, ASSHOLES! 🤬
FREE BRIAN COLE JR NOW! 🙏
Crash out incoming.
Bias. While I still respect science. I used to strongly respect scientists then several things changed. One of the major ones was the inaccuracies with Carbon Dating, which scientists promoted with such confidence. I don't like inference being treated as fact so some narcissi can receive a title for finding something.
In this case, which addresses claims relating to HERV-W detection over tens of thousands or millions of years. I asked @grok for evidence in human remains no older than 10,000 years. Far shorter than the 45,000 or the 300,000 years of which these claims have been made. The recovered remnants are interpreted as HERV-W, with that identification described as ‘strongly supported'.
The ancient individual’s genome does not, on the information presented in the study alone, establish which specific HERV-W sequence was recovered or its extent, so it does not resolve that question. If it isn't solved at 10k years or 30k years then the assertion at 300k years is almost so ridiculous to be considered 'scientific'.
The quoted part is me asking grok again and again. I am not a biologist so forgive the incorrect terms thrown in.
grok, citing scientific research again and again told me it must be there, but refused to provide proof.
How can I believe in 45k-300k years with confidence if scientists haven't yet done the same testing with homo sapiens that are within a much shorter time period. Simply, even though I believe it is possible, that is not sufficient evidence.
If the analysis hasn't been or done, or cannot be done. Than I refuse to accept these larger claims that are far harder to prove reliably.
Scientists always want people to trust scientific research and yet, some scientists are exactly the reason research cannot and should not be believed without sufficient supporting evidence, if it is more easily available, which in this case it is. @grok yes or no, show me a report or studies showing they found the HERV-W insertion in human DNA less than 10,000 years old?
The quoted statement is accurate. No paper reports a specific HERV-W locus (such as ERVW-1) with supporting reads from Loschbour. The high-coverage FASTQ maps to the reference that already contains the fixed insertions, so presence is expected in this modern human genome but has not been separately demonstrated or published.
Watch this clip, is it that she confessed to him. Or she made a statement and Ethan Klein made her publicly say she loved him in front of Hila. I don't know but it looks to me like he wanted to her to say it, knowing what kind of person she is. Before I thought she was pursuing him, to me, in this video, he looks like the one who pushed her feelings from friendly respect to more than that. Am I wrong on this?
So leahfiles is left wing, Candace isn't but this "former" Democrat sides with Leah even though she has been attacking Candace for months. Not only are you not a former Democrat, you are also still lying scum.
So Candace Owens turned on “the Leah files”?
Not surprising.
Remember when Candace specifically said the unfortunate creature behind “Project Constitution” was “not a part of the investigation”?
It’s only a matter of time before she turns on everyone. That’s why she’s left nothing but drama and burned bridges in her wake.
Zero loyalty.
MrNoBull retweeted
This is his response to a paying member of 7 months…
I can agree that the burst of negative narrative surrounding Baron over the last several days did NOT feel entirely organic.
That was obvious.
However, mixed in with the bot attack are authentic accounts, like me, who genuinely are disappointed with Baron.
I have watched Baron's show religiously for the last 9 months.
In the last several weeks, I have watched less for a variety of reasons.
However, I watched Tuesday's show live---at least part of it.
Although, I disagreed with his take on the Leah interview, I certainly respect that people have different perspectives on the situation.
Baron says a lot of things that I dont agree with---that's not my issue.
I do not tune in with the expectation that he will fill my ears with only things that I agree with.
I enjoy the thought provoking nature of his content.
In my opinion, Baron's Tuesday episode felt very off.
Just not his usual content---didnt enjoy it.
But, again, I respect that it is his show.
He can do what he wants.
He has no duty to please us.
I get it.
This isnt what caused me to unfollow him.
What caused me to unfollow him is this clip below. 👇👇👇
I hadn't seen this part of the show live, and when I first saw the clip floating around X, I was shocked and questioned whether it was even REAL.
😱
In my opinion, his response was inconsistent with his brand---"intellectually honest, philosophically consistent".
He is a self-proclaimed free speech absolutist but tells his viewers to "shut up" when he doesnt like what they say?
"Shut up"
"Goodbye"
I found it to be disrespectful.
➡️Since Baron is taking commentary without clips or quotes less seriously than those with, here is the clip. 👇👇
And, here is the quote:
"Shut up. I mean, seriously, shut up. If you have a question, ask me the question. But if you're going to rant and rave because you don't like my take on one particular podcaster, shut up. I'm serious. I do not do this show to please you. I do this show because this is a good community and we have good entertainment and we we get good information and we go back and forth. If you think that that is going to affect me in any way whatsoever, bye. I'm serious. Bye."-Baron Coleman (10/20/2026)
Some women, not all. Great image and topic in the post.
Let's be honest…for most women, sex is never enjoyment, it's leverage.
A man wants sex because he wants sex. Pure, physical, hardwired. He's ready at 18, at 40, at 60. He doesn't need candles, conversations, or chore lists.
A woman? She doesn't want sex the same way. She wants what sex can GET her.
That's why the price is always changing. Before marriage it's dates, money, attention, commitment. After marriage it's "help me with the kids," "do the dishes," "fix the sink," "validate my feelings."
Same product. Higher price.
That's why all their marriage talk is about consent, boundaries, marital rape, "my body my choice" INSIDE marriage. It's not about safety.
It's about keeping the toll gate closed so the husband never stops paying. So sex is never free, never automatic, never just given because you are her husband. You have to earn it every damn time like a stranger.
"Make her feel safe and she'll want sex."
"Make her laugh and she'll want sex."
"Do housework and she'll want sex."
Just say you are selling it. Just say it's conditional on payment.
That's why they love prostitution. Not out of sisterhood. Out of recognition. They see a businesswoman who stopped pretending.