Forefather of Western Independence. Don't take advice from people that haven't done what you're trying to do. My posts are my own.

Calgary, Alberta
Joined March 2021
Why wasn't this on the referendum? You know why.
Canadian politician Danielle Smith announces an expansion of the covid vaccine program in Alberta.
35
51
4
257
3,086
David Robinson retweeted
This article is hot garbage. I will not stop my efforts to create an independent Alberta. There are 500k other Albertans who feel the same. RUBENSTEIN: Time for Alberta to reconsider its independence obsession westernstandard.news/opinion…
55
40
3
178
2,649
David Robinson retweeted
The voting ends. The bullshit doesn’t. @WScafemirror joins me LIVE tonight to talk Alberta’s referendum hangover, the B.C. Conservative win and whatever else comes up. 7:30 PM Berta Standard Time. Bring your questions. #Alberta #BCPolitics #CanadianPolitics
4
1
7
886
Interesting post. This just makes me realize, whatever happens from this point is going to take a lot of work and incredible leadership.
I’ve spent a lot of time thinking about what comes next for the Alberta independence movement. The October 19 referendum demonstrated something important. We built a substantial grassroots movement, but we also saw what happens when that movement goes up against an established political and media apparatus. I believe there are three possible paths forward. 1. Form a new independence party. Some point to Quebec as the model. But Alberta’s political environment is fundamentally different. Quebec has a multiparty political landscape, while Alberta currently functions much more like a two-party system dominated by the UCP and NDP. A new independence party could split the conservative vote across dozens of constituencies. The risk is an NDP government, four years in opposition and potentially no realistic opportunity for another referendum until 2031 or later. 2. Force a UCP leadership change. Even if independence advocates successfully replaced Danielle Smith, what happens next? A potentially bitter leadership contest, a divided UCP and limited time to rebuild unity before the 2027 election. The risk is marching a fractured conservative party into an election against a comparatively united NDP. And even a successful leadership change wouldn’t automatically create the public support necessary to win a referendum. Once again, the potential consequence is an NDP government and years of delay. 3. Build from within the existing conservative coalition. This approach has its own immediate challenge. Premier Smith’s recent statements about maintaining a united pro-Canada position have created a serious disagreement with independence advocates who want to remain active in the UCP. I believe that disagreement needs to be addressed through short-term negotiation and a workable understanding that allows both sides to coexist. There is common ground: maintaining conservative unity and avoiding an NDP government, while allowing independence advocates to continue expressing their views and building public support. That doesn’t require Danielle Smith to endorse independence. Nor should it require independence supporters to abandon their convictions. Meanwhile, the movement can continue growing outside party politics. If Mark Carney’s government fails to address Alberta’s longstanding grievances, that could further change public opinion and the political incentives facing provincial leaders. But the most important part of this strategy is institutionalizing the independence movement. We need more than a large grassroots following. We need sustained influence through UCP memberships, constituency associations, policy conventions, elected representatives, caucus discussions and eventually the machinery of government. That kind of influence takes time to develop. It requires organization, patience and continued public support. One of my biggest takeaways from October 19 is that a future referendum campaign should not depend entirely on grassroots organizations competing against the full weight of established political institutions. The next phase needs to be about building the organizational capacity and institutional relationships that were missing or limited in this campaign. For me, the ultimate objective isn’t simply getting another referendum on the ballot. It’s building a movement capable of winning one. Every strategy should be judged against that objective.
2
5
343
Boys and girls, if you don't like your eggs at exactly this consistency- you are objectively wrong.
1
1
220
Trump fired Eby.
19
19
3
132
1,263
Taking the high road.
Mitch Sylvestre has released his full response to recent statements made on social media. Read his statement in its entirety, in his own words. albertaprosperityproject.com…
3
14
62
908
APP/APS Official Response, which is what I'd want to see in this situation instead of just a notice about something that happened in the past. Sounds like both sides disagree, let's hear what an arbitrator has to say.
There's no upside in this for me. Some people are going to hate me for it, (many already do,) It'll cost me friends, credibility and time I never have enough of anyway. I'm doing it because it's my responsibility as a director of APS, and APP is worth protecting. Here's the full story. 4 parts. I won't be commenting on social media any further about this issue until there are changes that you need to know about.
2
2
5
553
BC's biggest worry is nothing but... Trump, I guess?
Ok I found 123 different times that Eby said "Trump" during one of his press conferences held since the election was called on September 22nd. (I put a counter in the top right of the frame of the supercut). Here are all the ones I found in order. Did I miss any? #bcpoli
4
6
3
34
862
Just had a 1-on-1 with @Drew__Barnes where I asked him his plans for his new Alberta Now federal party. My takeaways were that this is a home for: - Conservative-minded Albertans - Albertans that want a values based approach that doesn't shift alongside the day of the week - Independence supporters that have been cast aside by the CPC - Good people, in general These are my words, not necessarily his- but I'm excited at the prospect of this new party and I wonder where it's going to take us.
36
43
6
162
5,275
Which conservative supporters have the UCP severed ties to? I don't hear about any. Independence should learn to build support instead of severing it.
2
2
19
583
So... When the flames are licking the pipes, it'll kick in.
There's got to be a better way to test the sprinkler system Writer: Ian
9
4
14
1,386
Independence supporters will not be harvested as a voting block to help broken federal: - Immigration - Poor laws - Unfair institutional economic disparity - Other bs If someone tells you how to vote, be wary. You are not a number on their page. You're Albertan.
5
14
2
63
846
4 months ago, watch this interview between Chris & BertaProudDad @ 3:38 Was Chris Scott looking to take over and fire everyone? I don't know the guy. But it's interesting, to say the least. What does this sound like? youtu.be/BARifrj_Mb4?si=lciF…
11
8
18
3,193
Summed up, according to Chris Stott via The Western Standard, what I can piece together... Mitch has another group: Stay Free Alberta. That created conflicts, so he was booted. Due to not signing some audits, Chris blames Mitch for losing the referendum. Jeff had disagreements for months, and for that, he was booted. Tanya Clemens added that they kept it quiet to not add to the noise of the referendum. Which, I support not dropping this bomb in the middle of it. This doesn't make sense, to me. But it doesn't have to. It's the way the world is, whether you want it to be or not. This is APP's story. Do you buy it or not? westernstandard.news/news/ci…
43
8
1
22
5,813
I just had a dark thought that scared me. With all the floor crossings and the 180 degree turn by Smith and the general smooth questions by the Media... I'm not sure how much it pays to be bought out by Mark Carney, but I bet it's a butt load. I hope this is nothing more than a musing, but fear it's reality.
45
45
5
255
5,197
I don't know the first thing about this, because: * I'm not affiliated with the APP (though I've wished I was, in the past) * I'm not on their board, and * I don't know what occurred. What I do know is, this is a lot of words for a public notice that does not explain anything. The closest I see to an explanation anywhere is the phrase, "for cause." Can someone detail for me what Rath and Sylvestre are guilty of doing- and why they both needed to be not only ousted from the institution... but tarred and feathered on Social Media? I fully expected Cory Morgan & Jeff to have it out the day after the referendum... they've been parking that car for too long. I'm surprised there wasn't a brawl in the parking lot. And by the way, kudos to both for not doing it during the referendum period. Do we need to do this? What part of this makes Independence stronger? Maybe we do, let's hear the rationale. There might be some particularly heinous charges, and this is public... so, let's get it public.
I had sincerely hoped that this matter could be resolved privately. In the interest of protecting the integrity and unity of Alberta’s independence and sovereignty movements, every effort was made to reach a resolution behind closed doors. Unfortunately, those efforts have been unsuccessful. It is therefore with profound disappointment and reluctance that I find it necessary to issue this public notice to the members of the Alberta Prosperity Project.
27
10
73
4,163
I'm barely able to repair anything car related. The first time I topped up my oil, I put it in the dipstick hole instead of in the oil hole. I made some big mistakes... it wasn't the best. But the result made me better off and educated me. That's what this first shot at independence was. Don't expect to be a mechanic the first time you pickup an oil funnel. Don't expect to win independence the first time it's on the ballot.
19
7
2
66
2,006
Read the writing on the wall... Fact: The UCP can't win the next election because both sides hate Smith for the referendum. Fact: Due to the amount of brokenness in Canada and Alberta, and given we didn't secede- the next government is going to have to increase taxes, go into heavy debt, or cut programs. Nenshi is promising to increase programs. So guess which 2 will happen? Fact: The next government will be unpopular after a 4 year cycle, as a result of the above. Fact: There's no reasonable provincial competition for these two (sorry, but there's 2 big dogs in the dog park). Smith is running to lose, which is why she's going to retain leadership- she's done. And in 4 years Albertans will wake up saying, "how could we have done this!" just like they did with Notley. Fact: You should have voted option #2. Bookmark this, my predictions are almost always accurate.
89
118
9
443
10,543