Replying to @DesignCodeAI @doja_dan
that's a good one for @ezfacility to acquire.
Mike @ DesignCode.ai retweeted
Anyone that works in AI is working the hardest they've ever worked in their lives. On the surface it's somewhat ironic (AI should give us back time!), but the reality is that it's the most fun, fascinating and empowering epoch in human history. The intelligence revolution.
for its entire existence, the creation of software has been an incredibly unreliable endeavor
most projects ran late, over budget, and still missed user needs
if you were an SMB, you simply couldn't get good software built for you
this is the promise of the 'software factory'
The future belongs to designers who build.
When I started at Anthropic, I challenged myself to work as close to production as possible.
That meant working in code and spinning up prototypes with real states and depth, not just simple flows.
Soon, I realized I hadn’t touched Figma in a week. It's now been over a month.
So I thought: what if I just kept working this way? I zoomed out and spun up a container for my first project, so I could add a second, third, and eventually as many projects as I needed. I customized everything around what I needed, how I work, and how my brain works. Not a diss to any creative tools. But you can’t really beat a tool that matches your mental model.
What came out of it is a fully custom, Frank-first tool that’s part FigJam, part Figma, part Loom, part Google Docs, and part Trello except it’s built entirely around how I actually think.
I’ve already handed files off to engineers and shipped to production using it.
At this point, I can’t really imagine working any other way. And I'm moving 100x faster. I had a lot of anxiety around AI, but I truly feel like the future is bright, and fun.
Mike @ DesignCode.ai retweeted
Replying to @karpathy
Majority people will ignore above statement for now. But in few years, everyone will understand.
Mike @ DesignCode.ai retweeted
The speed at which a product is developed doesn't inherently make the product better or worse. The number of commits doesn't make the product better or worse. The number of people or agents working on it doesn't make it better or worse. The number of hours you’re pouring into it doesn’t make it better or worse. Working on a weekend, or late into the evening, doesn’t make it better or worse. Talking about these things sounds like it’s talking about the product, but it’s not talking about the product.
Those are all development metrics and styles of work. They don't speak to the product itself. They're all back of the house. Important to those making the work, but not inherently important to the people using the work.
Development metrics and style say nothing about fit. They say nothing about quality. They say nothing about clarity. They say nothing about usability. They say nothing about utility. They say nothing about performance. They say nothing about how customers feel when they use your product.
It's like reviewing a restaurant by talking about how many cooks were in the kitchen, how long the shift lasted, how many orders they fired, or how late they stayed cleaning up. None of that tells you about the meal, the product, the customer’s experience.
Mistaking making for the thing you've made is like confusing the kitchen for the meal or the blueprint for the building. They're connected, but they're not the same thing. One of them matters a whole lot more than the other.
We just released 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚌𝚝-𝚋𝚎𝚜𝚝-𝚙𝚛𝚊𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚌𝚎𝚜, a repo for coding agents.
React performance rules and evals to catch regressions, like accidental waterfalls and growing client bundles.
How we collected them and how to install the skill ↓
vercel.com/blog/introducing-…
You can't let the slop and cringe deny you the wonder of AI. This is the most exciting thing we've made computers do since we connected them to the internet. If you spent 2025 being pessimistic or skeptical on AI, why not give the start of 2026 a try with optimism and curiosity?
Mike @ DesignCode.ai retweeted
I've gone too far. Now I can make music with my fingertips using hand tracking with my webcam.
Link in comments.
Mike @ DesignCode.ai retweeted
People who are good at programming will use AI to take the jobs of those who are mediocre at it. So you should study CS iff you're going to be good at it.
Mike @ DesignCode.ai retweeted
We’ve developed Claude for Chrome, where Claude works directly in your browser and takes actions on your behalf.
We’re releasing it at first as a research preview to 1,000 users, so we can gather real-world insights on how it’s used.






















