Senior Lecturer in Mathematics// Educational Philosopher// Author & Educational Commentator// Personal Account// Views my own

Joined June 2023
Dr William H Kitchen retweeted
Direct instruction is joyful & leads pupils to success. Here is a *clip* where I use high frequency & high participation questioning in 3 phases: 1. Check for listening 2. Rehearsal 3. Check for understanding Established routines: all hands up, turn & talk, SLANT & ruler reading
188
428
221
2,536
1,488,175
Carmel aided and abetted in designing and implementing a curriculum which has failed. She is certainly a very well-respected person in education in NI. Her ideas on curriculum design and implementation, however, are highly questionable.
Replying to @mgtruth
I worked in education, I know Carmel Gallagher to be very experienced & respected, her judgement is very sound. I share her opinion on this whole debacle. The current NI Minister is following his own agenda, and wasting money on external consultants to do so. He needs to go.
1
1
4
2,081
Dr William H Kitchen retweeted
Good thread stating some important facts.
Replying to @GAHargan
Dr Gallagher is also the architect of the NI Curriculum that is being replaced, so the new curriculum is certainly going to challenge the values on which she built the 2007 curriculum. But the PISA results for NI have not shown that curriculum to be successful. Change is needed.
1
1
5
1,099
Dr William H Kitchen retweeted
As for it being rushed, the process started in autumn 2024 when Lucy Crehan was appointed to conduct her review. That was delivered in May 2025 & the process of writing the curriculum started in autumn 2025, completed for consultation by June 2026. Consultation closed nearly...
1
1
4
371
Dr William H Kitchen retweeted
As for local expertise, over 100 teachers & academics from NI were involved in the subject writing groups, along with representative from CCEA in the Curriculum Taskforce. Yes, international expertise was involved, but it's a misrepresentation to say local expertise was ignored.
2
1
5
372
Dr William H Kitchen retweeted
Replying to @GAHargan
Dr Gallagher is also the architect of the NI Curriculum that is being replaced, so the new curriculum is certainly going to challenge the values on which she built the 2007 curriculum. But the PISA results for NI have not shown that curriculum to be successful. Change is needed.
1
3
1
5
2,252
Dr William H Kitchen retweeted
That's my experience too Kathryn. There are loud voices dissenting (as is their right) but my sense is that many teachers are up for this, and some are genuinely excited at what it offers. Reform is needed & im broadly in favour of TransformED.
2
1
3
161
Dr William H Kitchen retweeted
Those responsible for the awful 2007 curriculum should probably take a backseat in this…
A former director of curriculum in Northern Ireland has delivered a scathing assessment of the Department of Education's plans for curriculum reform, which she believes was “pre-determined” and “rushed”. belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/… belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/…
2
4
20
3,511
Dr William H Kitchen retweeted
Teacher educators mock scripted instruction. But when the federal government tested competing approaches to teaching disadvantaged children, Direct Instruction came out on top.
17
34
10
166
10,730
Dr William H Kitchen retweeted
Math education myths
19
45
2
224
13,156
Only one of these approaches has any level of accountability built into it. There is nothing measurable or tangible in a competency based curriculum. Advocates of this approach want zero accountability in their work. So, they create an unmeasurable system.
Competency-based vs knowledge-based curriculum
2
403
Dr William H Kitchen retweeted
Last week, I had a teacher (outside my organisation) challenge me about TransformED, questioning why I am such a strong advocate for the proposed curriculum reforms. Her argument was that “the proposed TransformED curriculum doesn’t change anything that is already being done in classrooms, and it’s how I teach already.” I was shocked. Stunned, as a matter of fact. To suggest that the proposed reforms offer absolutely nothing different from what is currently in place is, in my opinion, an extraordinary assertion. But what I found even more bizarre was the contradiction within her own argument. If the approaches being proposed through TransformED are already central to her teaching practice, surely that would be a reason to welcome its implementation, rather than dismiss the reforms altogether? What an individual teacher does in their classroom is not necessarily what the curriculum requires, nor what every pupil across Northern Ireland consistently experiences. That is a fundamental distinction. What struck me most was the absence of any meaningful explanation. No comparison with the existing curriculum, no reference to specific proposals and no evidence to support the assertion that nothing would change. In my opinion, it felt like disagreement simply for the sake of disagreement. I welcome professional debate, particularly on something as significant as curriculum reform. However, personal experience and the argument that “we already do that” are not sufficient grounds to dismiss systemic reform. The question is not whether individual teachers are already implementing effective practice. Of course they are. The question is whether our curriculum ensures that all pupils, regardless of their school or classroom, experience the same high expectations, coherent knowledge and opportunities to succeed. That is the conversation these individuals should be having. Evidence over ideology. Always.
1
1
8
1,754
Dr William H Kitchen retweeted
Absolutely delighted to announce the launch of my new website, Beyond the Classroom! 📚 Over the past few years, I’ve become increasingly fascinated by educational writing, deepening my knowledge of teaching, learning and everything in between. This is a vision I’ve been actively developing, bringing together blogs exploring key educational issues, my own reflections and exciting ideas for the future. Delighted to finally see it come to life! 🙌🎉 Click below to explore the website ⬇️ thebeyondtheclassroom.co.uk
1
1
2
382
Dr William H Kitchen retweeted
Absolutely. Effective teaching strategies cannot compensate for a poorly designed curriculum. Yet, that is precisely what many excellent teachers have been expected to do for years. Speaking from a Northern Ireland perspective, this is why I welcome Education Minister Paul Givan's direction on curriculum reform. What we teach, when we teach it, and how knowledge is sequenced matters enormously. Evidence over ideology. Always!
Cognitive load theory for worked examples, but no cognitive load theory for content selection. it’s spaghetti on the wall teaching combined with hope and pray teaching.
2
4
362
Dr William H Kitchen retweeted
The one thing I’d want everyone to know about Direct Instruction is that the methods, materials and routines are far less important than the underlying drive behind it: the unswerving belief that EVERY child can achieve, regardless of circumstance. DI is based on a deeply held conviction that if a child didn’t learn, it was because the teacher (or curriculum) didn’t teach them properly. In that sense, it is a movement rooted in social justice but one which takes responsibility for outcomes. In the 60s and 70s, there was a view in the education academic establishment that formal academic work was premature for 4-year-olds, and doubly so for poor ones; so what they needed was enrichment and play. Worse still, in the early 70s, some academics described DI as a racist enterprise*. Engelmann's own memoir notes that he and Bereiter were called “Nazis” and “kid-haters.” Despite this, Engelmann taught disadvantaged 4 year olds to factor and to solve simultaneous equations, and filmed it. Bereiter and Engelmann’s argument, set out in ‘Teaching Disadvantaged Children in the Preschool’, was that the disadvantaged child was not “behind” in some general developmental sense but behind in specific, teachable things, that all kids could learn with the right scope and sequence. The preschool they opened in the mid 60s ran for two hours a day, with three twenty-minute lessons in language, arithmetic and reading, taught to small groups by a teacher following a specific DI sequence. Those kids made huge gains which faded when they went to normal public schools. DI has its limitations like everything but the drive behind it is sincere. As #SoldAStory season 2 will show, it has been portrayed as something very different to what it actually is and the animating principles behind it. *Baratz and Baratz, ‘Early childhood intervention: the social science base of institutional racism.’
26
107
14
362
33,335
Still waiting on @NickDMathison and @GAHargan to respond to my offer to give the full story behind my CCEA remarks. Maybe neither was actually interested in the full story, but instead just the part of it where they could use it as ammunition against the Minister?
2
5
912
It's impossible to fathom that John actually believes this view is congruent with the idea that Republican paramilitaries don't have a similar obligation to their victims, which account for approx. 60% of troubles related deaths. Are truth and justice only afforded to some?
Giving the British government the final say over prosecutions of its own state forces is an insult to victims & families. Political interference is not justice. It is the protection of those who should be held accountable. The British government has bowed to a military lobby determined to shield its own from prosecution, regardless of the crimes committed against Irish citizens. Victims & families have waited decades for truth & justice. They deserve accountability, not political protection for those responsible. Sinn Féin will oppose any attempt to deny them either.
6
7
1
64
2,091
Another fantastic article by Darragh.
A busy classroom isn’t necessarily a successful classroom. But are we sometimes mistaking engagement for genuine learning? Delighted to have another article published, drawing on Rosenshine’s Principles of Instruction and my own evolving understanding of effective teaching.
5
940
I actually hope this is AI. Otherwise, it's a shocker
Next Brendan will be telling us he was never a Provo, he's never planted a bomb nor held a terrified family hostage. Here he is attempting to claim he had a long term friend who was an Orangeman, only to claim minutes later he's never met an Orangeman 🤷🏼 What a f4nny
19
11
1
107
37,399