Empty, but full of potential.
Plato's cave
Joined January 2024
- Tweets7K
- Following388
- Followers106
- Likes20.4K
Pinned Tweet
This is an admission of an invincible belief, a belief that despite any reason of evidence will be held onto or impervious to challenge.
It's an admission reality doesn't matter.😅
I am convinced at the core of all authoritarians is the desire to limit others to the authoritarian's beliefs.
A self-centered and self-supremacist position.
Stolen entails an higher authority over the ownership.
“They are all clapping, ‘no one is illegal on stolen land.’ They are basically just saying, ‘bring on the slaves.’”
Ricky Gervais ROASTS Grammy Elitists Over Woke Pandering
youtu.be/VXjIGmPgJw4?si=ISAu…
**A** good god?!🤣
Such a straw man.😅
The issue isn't 'a good god', but omni-being of claims that can't be. If **god** exists, not **a** god, then the nature of being omnipotent dictates there can be no reason beyond *wanting* it.
To say otherwise is to say there are limits.😅
If women collectively wanted to repeal the 19th, I'd support it too.😅
But, if the right wants to win elections, they need to appeal to their voters instead of ignoring them.
Of course, the right is full of cancer and wants to include another divisive issue into the mix instead
EmptyBrainPan retweeted
"What a terrible error it is to go after anybody who has legitimate questions about the interaction between the United States and not only a foreign state but a particular administration that has a very hard line bent within that foreign state.
You're allowed to have questions. You're an American. That's one of the great things about it. You're allowed to have questions. You're allowed to ask any question you want. And anybody who wants to say that the reason you can't ask that question is because you're revealing a horrible defect in character, or defect of character, is running exactly the risk of creating the enemy, effectively calling it forth."
- @BretWeinstein
They're valid and important questions, but what they are not is explicitly exclusionary. In most cases one doesn't have to exclude the Bible to include the Constitution. But when they do come into conflict, priorities are important to know and understand as you can't plan without
Everything that can be seen as 'good' will be used for 'evil' for it's the appealing concept that draws people to follow and such appeal is valuable to those who would abuse it.
Maybe make sure those abusers aren't the only source of what is appealing to the masses.
Bret makes a good point about prominent atheists and the comments are full of theistic cope and blame of all atheists.😅
I'll say the core issue with the atheist 'community' is the lack of building upon the core question.
It's a bit tongue and cheek, but isn't this the most pro-abortion passage or are the unborn not good nor godly?😅
