FVM is non-partisan. We advocate for #ProportionalRepresentation in Manitoba. Honor Treaties 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 10; Metis homeland. Join us: [email protected]
Winnipeg, Manitoba
Joined July 2019
- Tweets20.2K
- Following1.5K
- Followers709
- Likes2.2K
Separatists need their own viable party. A sovereign people must cast a sovereign vote. A vote that counts in a sovereign vote. No coercion to vote blue or we get you know who.
Rob Anderson’s sudden eagerness to put the referendum in the rearview mirror is revealing.
The man who co-wrote the Free Alberta Strategy now wants to retreat into the same tired, mainstream conservative narrative that has achieved precious little for Alberta.
Affordability. Crime. The economy. Attack Nenshi. Repeat.
All perfectly safe political territory.
It certainly looks like an attempt to change the subject before the sovereignty debate becomes a sustained demand for institutional action.
But Rob has a problem.
He helped write the very strategy that raised those expectations. Now he wants Albertans to move on without explaining what happened to the promises.
Where is the Alberta Firewall? The Pension Plan? Tax autonomy? The institutional reforms?
You cannot spend years telling Albertans that the status quo is unacceptable and then expect them to applaud when you return to it.
I see blood in the water.
And I have no intention of changing the subject.
Fair Vote Manitoba retweeted
The UCP seem to think that politicians get to pick the voters to stay in power.
If Albertans come together we can show them that voters, in fact, pick the politicians.
Fair Vote Manitoba retweeted
buff.ly/BlaDSVv
National Commission – an idea whose time has come – but what’s the idea?
Labour Campaign for Electoral Reform invites you to discuss - Timeline? What would we rule out? How can we help?
Tuesday 3rd November 7pm - Register Now! us02web.zoom.us/meeting/regi…
Fair Vote Manitoba retweeted
poliwave.com is currently mapping out the controversial minority report from UCP MLAs on redrawing Alberta's electoral boundaries, and we will produce a report on it, stay tuned
Fair Vote Manitoba retweeted
These UCP “influencers” are so transparent.
Check out this “if I had more time, I’d have written a shorter letter” rambling attempt at defending the indefensible. lol.
Gerrymandering is cheating. Full stop.
All the Alberta NDP activists complaining about "gerrymandering" had nothing to say about Rachel Notley's Alberta NDP government consolidating rural ridings and creating 3 separate new urban ridings in Calgary and Edmonton.
Although the AB NDP was so unpopular by 2019 the gerrymandering couldn't save them from being washed out by the UCP.
The truth is what the UCP government is doing now is Un-gerrymandering the map so the Alberta NDP cannot win elections while losing the popular vote by a country mile.
The proposed boundary changes the UCP threw out last year would have made it EVEN EASIER for the NDP to win elections by making the urban slant of Calgary ridings worse.
The NDP is the party that can win elections while losing the popular vote by 8% and yet they are complaining about the UCP letting a judge better draw lines to not have a bunch of Calgary ridings all dog-leg into downtown to allow for the NDP to win while never trying to win votes outside of the urban core of Calgary and Edmonton.
Calgary-Elbow after the last redistricting looks like someone broke someone's elbow in the way it carves up suburban areas and cures around MRU to try and absorb some urban downtown neighbourhoods.
I'm running for Calgary-Currie's UCP nomination (shameless plug: wyattclaypool.com) and I never knew why the riding for some reason reaches downtown to Sunalta and Bankview yet Wildwood is not part of the riding but Sprucecliff is???
Not that my opinions on the map matter but I'm just pointing out the maps the Alberta NDP left us with are obviously designed to allow the NDP to win very tight victories by baking a bunch of downtown Calgary and Edmonton into several ridings to offset the popularity of the UCP province-wide.
Last election the NDP only lost on seat count by a couple thousand votes across the tightest ridings in Calgary, and if they did get those extra votes they would have had a majority despite losing the popular vote by more than 8%.
I don't believe in Proportional Representation based only on popular vote.
We need a balance between overall popular vote and local support. If a party wins the popular vote by 2% but losses on seats that's fine since one party being hyper-popular in one region should not necessary decide the election if the other party is winning more local races across the province.
BUT, obviously an 8-10% popular vote victory for one party in a 2 party system should logically always result in that party winning the most seats.
The NDP is mad that the map is becoming more fair and will better balance popular will across the province with local choice.
The NDP want to be able to ignore the majority of voters and sneak into office with tight victories in urban areas.
Fair Vote Manitoba retweeted
Let's call it what it is:
When a governing party ignores the non-partisan process for electoral ridings to expedite a map that gives them a political advantage, it is political corruption - plain and simple.
Please note seats awarded by FPTP lack a connection to voter support. Proportional representation is a level playing field.
In the last federal election, Alberta gave the Conservatives a 32-seat edge. The City of Toronto alone gave the Liberals a 22-seat edge.
“One city, in other words, offset nearly 70 percent of an entire province’s net Conservative advantage.”
thehub.ca/2026/10/30/what-ch…
In a fair electoral system, no party should have an advantage. Proportional representation is a level playing field.
Giving the sitting government the power to decide what electoral boundaries doesn't work. It already has a significant advantage over other political parties. calgaryherald.com/opinion/co…
Fair Vote Manitoba retweeted
BC United/Liberals is a cautionary tale on electoral reform.
After rejecting a 57.7% YES referendum for proportional representation in '05 via an arbitrary threshold, first-past-the-post vote-splitting led them to fold, leaving their voters with no voice instead of coexisting.
Former British Columbia opposition leader Kevin Falcon has stepped down as head of the deregistered BC United party, two years after it folded its 2024 election campaign to support the provincial Conservatives.
cheknews.ca/falcon-steps-dow…
Fair Vote Manitoba retweeted
First-past-the-post encourages provincial meddling in opposition riding bike lanes to pander to swing seats over real traffic solutions.
Proportional representation ends this: when every vote counts equally, governments can’t steamroll opposition seats without backlash.
Removal of existing bike lanes could cost Edmontonians up to $170M ctvnews.ca/edmonton/article/…
Fair Vote Manitoba retweeted
Proportional Representation threatens the political establishment by weakening political monopoly and patronage politics.
First Past the Post built a system where sharing democratic power is treated as losing it.
Give us equal power, not entrenched party privilege.
Fair Vote Manitoba retweeted
Quebec tried this, and the SCC made them go back to the independent commission’s map. We’d be burning taxpayer money asking the Supreme Court a question they just answered in Quebec v Lalande 2026.
Thank you David Cochrane for bringing up the 28% voter support Paul St-Pierre Plamondon (PSPP) received in his public demand to speak at the Canada-EU summit which resulted in his boycott. According to Quebec journalist, Joel-Dennis Bellavance, Quebecers were not happy with PSPP.
He spoke as if he has a majority of Quebec behind him but he doesn't. This is a problem of the electoral system electing him by giving him seats disproportionate to his 28% voter support.
@PnPCBC @miarabson @jbellava @StephanieLevitz
Fair Vote Manitoba retweeted
This is a strong argument in favour of proportional representation, not rejigging electoral boundaries to make it easier for the ruling party to win (if you'd prefer not to call it gerrymandering).
Again:
In 2023, the UCP won 53% to 44%.
But had it been just 1% different (UCP 52% to NDP 45%), the NDP would have won.
So under the current boundaries, the NDP can win with just 45% of the vote!
This is because drawing ridings along municipal boundaries packs conservatives into fewer rural ridings and artificially makes the NDP more competitive in the cities.
Removing an existing gerrymander is not gerrymandering.
Now, if the UCP went far further, and made it so that the UCP would win even if they only got 45% while the NDP got 52%, then yes that absolutely would be gerrymandering.
But that’s not what’s happening here.
At a quarter of the vote, separatists and sovereigntists deserve representation in the Alberta legislature. Loyalty to a big tent party to stop a vote split fails them. Only proportional representation or nonmonogamic voting as in Quebec. @state74705
