Nejc Novak (@NejcN) header
Nejc Novak (@NejcN) profile picture

Lawyer. Founder. Geek. In love with European Startups and Venture Capital. Building legal AI that works instead of you. Arna & Nlaw.

Europe
Joined October 2009
Photo by Nejc Novak (@NejcN)Photo by Nejc Novak (@NejcN)Photo by Nejc Novak (@NejcN)Photo by Nejc Novak (@NejcN)Photo by Nejc Novak (@NejcN)Photo by Nejc Novak (@NejcN)Photo by Nejc Novak (@NejcN)Photo by Nejc Novak (@NejcN)Photo by Nejc Novak (@NejcN)Photo by Nejc Novak (@NejcN)
by the way, for clarity:
18
10
5
221
30,744
Nejc Novak retweeted
What's really behind the Trump - Meloni rift, and why it was a long time coming: 🧵
8
28
5
154
100,624
Nejc Novak retweeted
just realized even Karpathy is on Eb-1 visa, and is not a citizen himself. Damn. Even he can't use mythos anymore.
47
170
25
5,498
307,127
The European Union is “struggling” to respond to the changing world order, former Italian Prime Minister Mario Draghi said late Friday, promoting “pragmatic federalism” as a way to overcome the bloc’s difficulties. politico.eu/article/mario-dr…
70
160
46
692
150,264
Ok some perspective on this. Firstly, I ran tech listings at LSE for 4 years 2016-2020. That jump before the drop off was my pipeline. - the huge spike at the start of the chart was an enormous volume of listings on AIM. Lots of these were very bad companies. It was a bit like the ICO listings rush in 2017-18. Thereafter AIM tightened its rules and listings became fewer but better. The real problem was post Financial Crisis. A few things happened: despite the GFC being caused by debt markets, equity markets took a reputational hit because they were "finance" and with it came regulation. The EU piled on regs, the UK piled on regs, stamp duty was taxed. Public companies disproportionately bore the brunt because it was easier for policymakers. This created a disincentive to list in the UK. But other regs disincentivised investment in UK companies - taxes on stamp duty are an example. But a much bigger problem was the pension fund market shifting to debt and almost entirely dropping equities. In the mid-90s UK pensions held something like 50% UK equities in funds under management. Today it's about 5%. Fiddling around with listing rules will help a bit, and yes getting rid of ESG and DEI will help but the biggest problem to solve is bringing investors back to the market. Without them valuations will remain low.
The London Stock Exchange is dying. We have dropped out of the top 20 IPO markets, falling behind Mexico. In 2006 London raised $51bn, this year it was $248m. A 99% decrease. Some thoughts on why this matters and how we change course 🧵
36
89
14
498
79,796
The Italians get it: We need a Federal European Union. 🇪🇺 Makes sense that they are the first ones. After all, they are the heirs of the Roman Empire, the first federal'ish Union in European history.
🇪🇺🇮🇹 Meloni cheers Draghi's vision in Rimini today; a more federal, independent Europe. A NATO of two equal pillars, a European Army able to act autonomously. There's broad support for a geopolitical Europe across the political spectrum
115
90
14
838
41,296
Nejc Novak retweeted
📉 Thousands of hours wasted on policy Qs? Meet #RiskyAI—automatically handles 80% of routine compliance queries, cites exact rules, and flags only the tough cases for humans. Ready for compliance calm? ⬇️ riskaway.ai/blog/from-compli…
1
1
153
Milton Friedman explains why no one can “bring back” industry by force. 👇
223
3,535
413
14,969
769,353
trump: the united states should put the same tariffs on other countries that they put on the united states. reality: the us has imposed radically higher rates on everyone.
200
825
84
3,062
319,395
singapore pm with some of the most sensible analysis responding to us tariffs i’ve seen from a global leader.
437
5,386
985
20,725
3,177,774
Nejc Novak retweeted
We've improved Risky's drafting mode 📄 . You can now smoothly transition from discussing a legal situation to creating and finalising a solution. 🚀 Risky is getting better every week. 💪
1
1
96
Nejc Novak retweeted
Rome was not built in a day, and AI General Counsel also won't be. Read about our vision. blog.riskaway.ai/a-risky-vis…
1
1
90
https://teapawt.org/t.co/dxze3jKs4e Finally it’s good to hear in Europe what we all know. I strongly urge you to listen to this speech rather than me repeat it. Vive la France 🇫🇷
149
1,109
139
3,755
122,647
EU's GDP 🇪🇺 is $29.005 trillion in purchasing power parity. A size equal to that of the US 🇺🇸. Equal to India 🇮🇳, Russia 🇷🇺 and Japan 🇯🇵combined. Time to gain back our confidence. Time to grow larger. Time for a European Federation! en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Econom…
60
211
11
1,301
32,465
The revolt against regulation is inevitable! Whether someone in the EU likes it or not. The time is now!
1,603
1,636
545
14,089
1,462,371
As an investor, you need to be war-gaming these Trump tariffs. Going tit-for-tat on tariffs when you run a trade surplus with the US is like bringing a squirt gun to a Reaper drone fight. No, you won't out-tariff the US if you're more dependent on their market than they are on yours. So the question we should be asking is: How could these nations fight back? The Achilles heel of the US is their capital markets, and the fact that US financial assets have become a de-facto store of value asset for global capital. Foreigners own close to ~$30 Trillion worth of US treasuries, corporate debt, and equities. Europeans pump up the Nasdaq and S&P500 at the expense of the French CAC40 and German DAX. So what happens if Europe responds to future tariffs not by imposing tariffs of their own, but by putting a targeted capital gains tax on all US securities? Imagine European nations give their citizens 6 months to repatriate capital into European assets before a ~25% tax on US assets kicks in. This is pure war-game speculation on my part... But it seems like the best leverage foreign nations have to fight these tariffs. What happens to US equities and bond yields in that scenario? It wouldn't be pretty. And in my opinion, it once again highlights the need for a neutral reserve asset that isn't tied to the fate of any single nation or economic zone. Bitcoin and gold are the only options. One thing is clear: The Trump admin seems to be willing to upend everything to change the status quo. They want to re-shore US manufacturing at any cost. And this is a sea change that has yet to be priced. The markets fear uncertainty. So don't be surprised if we experience some turbulence as investors recalibrate their vision for the future. But long-term, I expect this to be extremely bullish for Bitcoin. The world has just taken one giant step closer towards a new monetary system with a neutral reserve asset. And most investors don't realize it yet.
80
137
15
1,290
134,443
While the West crumbles, one Eastern European nation is quietly building a superpower: • Outpacing US economy • Strongest military in Europe • Silicon Valley's new favorite $62.7B hub The rise of Poland is the greatest story nobody's talking about 🧵:
626
1,809
266
14,942
1,503,163
Nejc Novak retweeted
Družba, ki je tako nezrela, da rabi monopolno državno zdravstveno zavarovanje in pokojninsko “varčevanje”, ne more imet delavskega “samoupravljanja” podjetij. Če ljudje niso sposobni upravljati z lastnimi financami in lastnim življenjem, zagotovo niso fit, da bi upravljali podjetja.
5
28
3
128
2,779
MiCA is officially live! 🇪🇺 After years of consultation, heated debates, contemplated bitcoin bans, last-minute amendments, and countless votes, MiCA now (actually since Dec 30 2024) officially applies to crypto-asset issuers and service providers in the EU - even if the latter still benefit from national transitional periods. MiCA stands as the world’s most comprehensive regulatory framework for crypto assets. With regulatory clarity and access to a massive single market of 450 million consumers, the EU has a unique opportunity to position itself as a global hub for crypto innovation. However, only time (and the market) will tell whether MiCA can achieve its goals of fostering innovation, creating a competitive local market, and protecting EU consumers. A pragmatic and iterative approach to implementation will be critical. We should think of MiCA as a "V 1.0"—a foundation that must evolve to address emerging challenges and adapt to new business models. I still receive many questions about MiCA's rules and potential impact, so I’m resharing two of my MICA-articles in the comments. 1️⃣ A "MiCA Primer" covering MiCA’s origins, goals, and rules for token issuers and crypto-asset service providers. 2️⃣ A "MiCA market impact article" co-authored with @ddisparte, exploring how MiCA will transform the EU crypto markets. Last but not least: Yes, it’s pronounced “mee-kah” :D
154
307
52
1,153
247,244