PCrudy retweeted
I have a feeling sooner or later we're going to find out that the whole shitshow of the second Trump administration revolves squarely around this guy and his various extracurriculars.
PCrudy retweeted
The path back from 2026 requires acknowledging that the Trump political formula was never the magic elixir its proponents promised & 2024 showed us a possible winning coalition rather than the birth of a dominant one.
PCrudy retweeted
This is no longer out of the realm of possibilities for a JD Vance 2028 electoral map.
PCrudy retweeted
Clearly we should interpret the US midterm elections as the electorate preferring EMALS catapults for their aircraft carriers and not steam catapults
PCrudy retweeted
Every Florida Governor Election Result since 2010:
2010 - R+1.1
2014 - R+1.1
2018 - R+0.4
2022 - R+19.4
2026 - R+1.3
PCrudy retweeted
Conservatives, you have nothing left to fear because you have nothing left. The nation has turned away from a party that is governed by the whims of a man and now is the time to turn back to lasting principles.
Scoop: The White House delivered a warning to conservative groups on Thursday: We’re watching you wsj.com/politics/elections/w…
PCrudy retweeted
You know what the Jews aren't responsible for that Vance is going to have to address? The billions in corruption that he stood by and watched happen while he was trying to think of ways to suck up to Nick Fuentes until Fuentes called his wife a "jeet."
PCrudy retweeted
In which Vance admits his friend Tucker, who probably helped craft this statement, convinced a large portion Trump’s voters to vote for Communists in the midterms.
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up.
So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us."
Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026.
There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true.
But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone.
Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were:
1) End the war
2) Focus on cost of living/inflation
3) Put America First
4) Change our relationship to Israel
Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.)
In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you.
The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night.
If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest.
But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there.
I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
PCrudy retweeted
>Be close friends with pro Iranian journalists
>Snitch to Erdogan about the Kurdish plan, causing it to fail
>Take a war that had mass approval then kill all momentum with an MOU that did nothing and caters to Iranian strength in negotiating
>When war is unpopular blame Israel
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up.
So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us."
Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026.
There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true.
But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone.
Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were:
1) End the war
2) Focus on cost of living/inflation
3) Put America First
4) Change our relationship to Israel
Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.)
In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you.
The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night.
If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest.
But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there.
I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
PCrudy retweeted
Populism is reshaping the political landscape, just as MAGA promised.
"The Founding Fathers and their war of choice against the Barbary Pirates will END this country!" Some fuckass in 1805
If you think Iran has or ever had or ever will have the power to destroy the US and make it so that "we don't have a country at all" then you are flat out delusional. We may indeed see our country destroyed but it will be because the communists took over from within. And these retarded foreign wars will be a big part of the reason for that.
PCrudy retweeted
It's no secret I think Hegseth is a horrible SECDEF and should be fired for practical reasons
But for purely political ones, this seems like an incredible error on the President's part- and will only cause him far more headaches
NEW: President Donald Trump says he is standing by Pete Hegseth, which leaves in place a political lightning rod for newly empowered Dems who are eager to probe the Pentagon and hold the administration accountable for the Iran war. washingtonsun.com/whitehouse…
PCrudy retweeted
If you start a war, then the whole point is to win the war
Did JD Vance contribute anything to trying to win the war? Or did he do a cowardly hedge so he could then throw Trump under the bus?
And this isn’t even taking into consideration his role in the disastrous Ceasefire/MOU
PCrudy retweeted
If someone is on social media blaming “neocons,” that is not a serious person who can help the GOP rebuild and undo the damage its own leaders have caused. They’re grifting, not helping.


































