
Politics, EA, Constitutional Design Alt: @BFishRedFish. Also follow me over there: https://xitter.cf/t.co/a6MzEQVsoE
NYC
Joined March 2019
- Tweets26.2K
- Following122
- Followers555
- Likes21.4K
Pinned Tweet
My constitutional design series is complete! If you've ever wondered anything like "which is the best voting system, taking into account practical concerns?", read it! 20 posts, most 10-15 min read
Here is a thread with all the posts here, starting from highlights
Gil retweeted
Abraham Lincoln was not an abolitionist activist. LBJ was not a civil rights activist. They would not have won if they were. They were critical nonetheless.
It’s worth pointing out that the Ohio senate seat is worth a lot less than the other ones because we’re probably going to lose it in 2 years.
I am begging Peltola to get a chauffeur. We’re at N=2 of transportation-related accidents here. We need her in that senate seat for a long long time.
Per @AKNewsNow, Mary Peltola and her family sustained minor injuries in a vehicle accident Saturday night, according to her campaign.
On medical advice, Peltola will reschedule upcoming campaign events in Fairbanks and Bethel for later this week as she recovers.
I keep thinking this line is going to plateau and it keeps not doing that. If Republicans lose the Senate (pretty big if) I can't imagine this gets any better, bad vibes tend to compound.
Very topical given today's discussion about how Trump's second term is "not as bad as we thought". AFAICT this would allow them to circumvent all laws? People with more legal knowledge should correct me if I'm wrong about this.
SCOOP: White House lawyers weigh preemptive pardons for large numbers of junior admin staff, as MAGA allies press for protections for lower ranking aides
Under discussion is pardons everyone in certain policy, like deportation
Does not seem imminent
washingtonsun.com/whitehouse…
The South Carolina senate race feels like a window back in time. The candidate issue stances, the fundraising, the media coverage, it all reads as a race straight out of 2018. Bizarre.
Gil retweeted
It's not just immigration though. He would make these comments about how ACA was a DISASTER and how Hillary was the worst candidate in the history of the world and lots of things like that and it just wasn't perceived as the positions of an extremist
This is the message you put out when you want people to bet on their preferred candidate
Nate Silver is too blind to fake polls. He discards some that are proven fake, but there are a bunch that raise red flags (see eg Trafalgar) that he keeps in the average.
I think it might improve his forecasts bc they correct for systemic error, but still bad
Would be more respectable to discard sketchy polls and just shift every poll in favor of Republicans to correct for systemic error. (I think this is the right thing to do)
Ok in light of this post I think I mostly take this back? IMO the Rasmussen and Trafalgar calls are stupid but it seems like for the rest they're just relying on other people who I'd trust. natesilver.net/p/fake-polls-…
To the people saying “its just a coin toss”: you do realize this isn’t just random sampling error, right? Like it’s way too broad an effect and too high sample sizes to be that. So everyone acknowledges there’s systemic error, the only question is if we’d expect it to go away
Gil retweeted
Prediction models that blend polls w/ fundamentals do adjust in this direction, but not enough (at least in our case). Adding explicit poll-debiasing (which I plan to do for 2028) would cut Dems’ Senate win probability by 2.5 % pts (so not massive—this helps Dems in ME/MI/MN/NH).
Is Nate writing these pieces specifically to respond to me? I feel like I’m the only one online really engaging in these arguments
I think the big modelling question right now is if it’s better to pay attention to polls and adjust them up for Rs or mostly ignore them and focus on fundamentals. I think I’m somewhere in the middle?









