Pinned Tweet
I work in financial market regulation. My job: let innovation grow while keeping its risks in check, before they hit.
With AI, the questions are being asked. But the race is moving faster than the answers.
I use it every day. It saves me hours, and it may have just cracked math problems people chased for 50 years.
But the US-China race feels a lot like the US-Soviet race for the bomb: each side pushes ahead out of fear the other gets there first and worries about the risks later.
In finance, we learned the hard way: the danger isn't one bad bank, it's everyone making the same bet. Now everyone runs on the same few AI models.
Here, I try to make sense of the big shifts AI is driving in finance, geopolitics and tech, and break them down simply, for you and for me.
Come argue with me. What’s the one AI risk you think is being underestimated right now?
🤖 Made with AI
🚀SpaceX went public in June at a $1.8 trillion valuation. Its stock jumped to $225 in the first week, then fell 53% by August as the excitement faded and insiders got closer to selling.
Anthropic is asking for a similar valuation, based on growth its own filing says "may not be sustainable."
What happens when that excitement fades too?
Anthropic just filed to go public, at a valuation discussed around $1.5 to $2 trillion.
Its filing even warns that advanced AI could pose "catastrophic or existential risks to humanity."
For anyone buying the stock, this IPO raises 3 big problems:
1. A risk nobody can price
2. A price that will show if the whole AI market is a bubble
3. Shareholders can't hold anyone accountable for safety decisions
Let me explain. (a thread)
Anthropic just filed to go public, at a valuation discussed around $1.5 to $2 trillion.
Its filing even warns that advanced AI could pose "catastrophic or existential risks to humanity."
For anyone buying the stock, this IPO raises 3 big problems:
1. A risk nobody can price
2. A price that will show if the whole AI market is a bubble
3. Shareholders can't hold anyone accountable for safety decisions
Let me explain. (a thread)
The third problem is accountability.
Normally, one share means one vote, and unhappy shareholders can replace the board.
Here, a special class of shares gives the founders 50.1% of the vote, and a separate trust elects a majority of the board.
That setup is legal and common in tech. What's new is that it covers safety decisions the company itself calls existential. If something goes wrong, shareholders have no way to hold anyone accountable.
Hey @grok, my self-driving Tesla has to choose in a split second: hit 3 elderly women or a baby to avoid killing me.
Who decides that choice: me, Tesla, or the government? And who pays when it goes wrong?
One clear sentence each.
🇧🇷 Brazil re-elected Lula yesterday by 4.4 million votes.
Today investors ran: stocks down ~14%, trading halted at the open, the currency down ~10%, and borrowing costs spiked overnight.
And the loser, Flávio Bolsonaro, still refuses to concede.
Why it matters: US midterms are in 8 days, and markets now judge an election within hours.
If your 401(k) dropped 14% the morning after an election, would you still accept the result?
Sam | AI, Money & Power retweeted
My AI knows me better than most of my coworkers.
Grok Bot fact-checks me before I make a call, tells me when my idea is weak, and remembers every correction I give it.
But only because I told it to. One prompt telling it to stay neutral and criticize me.
Without it, would it have just agreed with my mistakes?
How many people are getting yes-men instead of advisors?
My AI knows me better than most of my coworkers.
Grok Bot fact-checks me before I make a call, tells me when my idea is weak, and remembers every correction I give it.
But only because I told it to. One prompt telling it to stay neutral and criticize me.
Without it, would it have just agreed with my mistakes?
How many people are getting yes-men instead of advisors?
SpaceX just borrowed $40 billion to buy AI chips.
Meanwhile, a top Wall Street economist says AI has made zero extra money for most companies outside Big Tech.
Billions going in. Almost nothing coming out, yet.
Smartest bet of the decade, or the next bubble?
🤖 Made with AI
$SPCX - SPACEX SIGNS $40 BILLION GPU FINANCING DEAL WITH APOLLO
SpaceX has entered into a binding commitment for a master finance lease with Apollo Global Management ($APO ), according to an SEC filing.
Apollo will purchase GPU pods and related equipment and lease them to SpaceX, with aggregate scheduled principal payments expected to total $40 billion.
The agreement is expected to close before year-end 2026.
The key takeaway: SpaceX is securing large-scale GPU infrastructure through lease financing, highlighting the enormous capital requirements of AI expansion.
Sam | AI, Money & Power retweeted
Brazil votes today.
Fact-checkers counted 1,423 AI-made election posts in this campaign. 716 involved deepfakes. 54% had no AI label.
One word: will a deepfake swing a major election before 2030?
Yes or no?
🇧🇷 Brazil: Lula is projected winner. Some Bolsonaro supporters are already calling it stolen.
Fact-checkers counted 716 deepfakes (fake AI images and videos of real people) in this campaign. Nobody knows if they changed a single vote. But when fakes are everywhere, anyone can call the result fake.
Can elections still be trusted in the AI era? Yes or no?
Update: Brazil's electoral court declared Lula reelected, 51.8% vs 48.2%.
Source for the deepfake numbers: fact-checker Lupa (VigIA tracker) riotimesonline.com/brazil-lu…
Brazil votes today.
Fact-checkers counted 1,423 AI-made election posts in this campaign. 716 involved deepfakes. 54% had no AI label.
One word: will a deepfake swing a major election before 2030?
Yes or no?
Europe is boiling. And it's not just France.
Italy. Belgium. Germany. Spain. Portugal. Greece. Albania. Serbia.
All protesting at the same time.
In Turin, students chanted: "Let's do it like France."
The common thread? EU food prices are up 34% in 5 years.
Governments say they have no money left.
Now imagine what happens when AI starts cutting white-collar jobs.
Is America next?
Everyone wants the AI. Nobody wants the data center.
New CNBC poll: 63% of US voters don't want an AI data center within 10 miles of home. Only 13% do.
Why? These things eat massive amounts of power and water, and people fear their electricity bills will pay for it.
Even among MAGA voters, 55% want AI to keep moving... but just 29% want the data center nearby.
Now Trump says developers should pay host towns a "dividend."
It's not left vs right anymore. It's: whose backyard?
Would you take one next door for $1,000 a year?











