
⚢ - #̢̛ͥ̀̽̽ͨ̌̓͆̇̀̽ͦͨͫͯ̏̎̇̈̚͜҉̕͢͏͡҉̸̶̛͢͡Scottish Brit. Nativist. Ancient history lover. Defend our heritage. Anti-Bolshevik. Speak out while you still can.
Scotland, United Kingdom
Joined September 2024
- Tweets10.5K
- Following923
- Followers750
- Likes83.4K
Songburd 𓅪 retweeted
Afghan migrants followed schoolgirl, 14, onto train before sexually assaulting and raping her in the toilets, court told trib.al/zXrrGaD
Songburd 𓅪 retweeted
One nuclear bomb, followed by others, will destroy most of the world. The Americans have a chance to stop this before it's too late. Say no to Israel for once for the sake of humanity.
Songburd 𓅪 retweeted
Replying to @ukhomeoffice
Migrants who claim benefits will have to wait 20 years so that they can carry on claiming benefits forever
What a nonesense
Songburd 𓅪 retweeted
Replying to @ShabanaMahmood
@ShabanaMahmood just committed political suicide on national TV.
Basically if you are British Citizen you must pay 38 years full stamp to get a pension. Whilst illegals will get it after 3 years. But according to @UKLabour this is totally fair!
Songburd 𓅪 retweeted
If the US drops a tactical nuclear weapon on Iran, expect the Strait of Hormuz to be closed for 50 years, the complete end of the petrodollar, Europe drowning in exorbitantly high energy prices, and a severe global economic crisis.
Songburd 𓅪 retweeted
🚨BREAKING: The polling data the UK Government used to justify its relaxing of immigration restrictions has been revealed
Just 19% of the people asked were white
Just 18% of people were British citizens
They're writing immigration policy based upon what immigrants what
Songburd 𓅪 retweeted
It all comes down to this.
A Restore Britain Government will reverse the third-worldification of our country.
If you want that, then vote for it.
Songburd 𓅪 retweeted
Labour has said that small boat illegals will have to wait either 20 or 30 years for settlement.
Welcoming these invaders is suicide. Societal, economic, civilisational suicide.
Songburd 𓅪 retweeted
Breaking 🚨 Shabana Mahmood has finally - and predictably - u-turned on her phoney get tough on immigration rhetoric. It must have lasted all of a year until her natural instincts kicked in and she realised she didn't really want to extend indefinite leave to remain from 5 to 15 years and stop the 1.6 million migrants waiting for UK citizenship.
She talked tough for a while - some were even taken in - but people mustn’t forget she was one of the signatories of the letter to halt a Home Office flight to Jamaica in 2020 to return foreign nationals who had committed murder, rape and drug offences.
She was never going to get tough on immigration. It was all talk.
Songburd 𓅪 retweeted
Replying to @realDonaldTrump
No Nukes In Iran should also mean DO NOT USE NUKES ON IRAN.
If you can’t comply with what the American people want, which is to end war and upend Bibi’s global stranglehold, what good is it having you in the office again?
Shutting down the strait of Hormuz was a great victory—for Iran. Now they can meter it. What good was that for us?
Shutting down the genocide of Gaza should be a priority—for everyone. Instead you enable it. What good is murdering kids?
Do you realize how close the calls are getting? Your own voters would prefer you resign or be 25th’d, than for you to capitulate to Israeli demands any further.
Songburd 𓅪 retweeted
Replying to @realDonaldTrump
President of country with 330 million, most powerful military, technologically advanced but takes order from a country of 8 million. What's the point of all these ballyhoo?
Songburd 𓅪 retweeted
I can’t believe that the west is funding Ukraine blowing up power infrastructure that affects ALL of us… Trump, the Uk government. All of them. Not one single leader in the west gives a shit about their citizens. Not 1
Songburd 𓅪 retweeted
The levels of betrayal it requires for DJT to go from campaigning on no new wars to considering dropping the first nuke in 81 years…
Songburd 𓅪 retweeted
And then he had a stroke… “I will just say this: Their plan is insane.... It will lead to devastating escalation and the likely destruction of our commitment to the rule of law,” Murphy said. “There’s been open reporting as to what we may be planning, and the civilian infrastructure that we may be targeting.... They have been asked by the president to develop a plan. Whether they believe it will work or not, I do not know. But the plan that they have developed will lead, in my view, to a prolongment and an escalation of this war that will be devastating for our security interests.”
Songburd 𓅪 retweeted
This fucking cunt is destroying Europe and nobody is stopping her.
Songburd 𓅪 retweeted
JUST IN: 🇺🇸🇮🇷 Tucker Carlson says US President Donald Trump may be days away from launching a nuclear strike on Iran under pressure from Israeli PM Netanyahu.
Tucker is extremely well sourced in the Trump administration and shouldn’t be ignored if this is what he’s being told.
Under pressure from Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the Trump administration may be within days of launching a nuclear strike on Iran. The target would be Pickax Mountain in central Iran, where Israeli intelligence claims the Iranian government has restarted its nuclear enrichment program. No conventional weapon in the American arsenal can penetrate 300 feet of solid granite to destroy the tunnels where enrichment is supposedly taking place. The only military option is a nuclear strike. Netanyahu has been pushing hard for one. “Bibi calls Trump about it every day,” says an informed observer.
Netanyahu is cornered and desperate. After last week’s election results, he can’t form a government unless Trump intervenes directly in Israeli politics and brokers a deal with other parties that gives Netanyahu 61 seats in the Knesset. Otherwise, he is out as prime minister and on his way to ignominy, investigations and possibly jail. Netanyahu must stay close to Trump. He needs this war.
To that end, he’s applied maximum pressure to his closest allies in the administration, including Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and CENTCOM commander Brad Cooper. Both oppose a negotiated settlement to the war they’ve so grievously mismanaged; both are pushing to restart major combat operations. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and CIA director John Ratcliffe are also following Netanyahu’s lead, as are leaders of the Democratic Party. In a recent meeting on the subject, former president Barack Obama said he opposes the current Iran peace deal being drafted in Doha.
The rest of America’s longtime allies in the Middle East are terrified by the prospect of more war. On September 27th, Netanyahu flew secretly to Abu Dhabi to enlist the UAE in his lobbying effort for a final attack on Iran. The Emiratis refused. After eight months of conflict, Gulf economies are teetering. So are global energy and fertilizer markets. They won’t recover soon. Globally, there are a total of about 850 supertankers used to transport oil from producers to the rest of the world. In October alone, 11 of them were badly damaged in Hormuz. At this pace, a global depression is imminent. A nuclear strike would radically accelerate the destruction. Fallout from a ground explosion at Pickax Mountain would contaminate the Persian Gulf, poisoning the water supply for 100 million people.
And those are just some of the immediate consequences for the region. The rest of the world is every bit as exposed. No country other than the United States has ever used a nuclear weapon in war. Some would like to. An American nuclear attack on Iran would set a new precedent. The Russians have already told at least two other governments that an American nuclear strike on Iran would free them to use nuclear weapons against Ukraine. Pakistan and India would be tempted to do the same against each other, as would North Korea against Seoul. After the first nuclear strike, World War Three is inevitable. That war would be short and final.
We’ve been sleepwalking toward this moment for months. Since February, the administration has quietly rewritten America’s nuclear doctrine to make first use of so-called “battlefield nukes” easier and therefore more likely. No one in Washington in either party seems bothered by this. Now we’re on the brink of it.
Close observers say Trump is likely to decide by next weekend whether or not to use nuclear weapons. That would be November 7, six days from now. To his credit, he’s hesitating. At the moment, Trump is listening to his vice president, JD Vance, and to his envoy and friend Steve Witkoff, both of whom argue a deal with Iran can be made.
They’re right, though it won’t be simple. The Iranians are famously frustrating to negotiate with under any circumstances, and elements of that government have become more radical since Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his family were killed in February. After decades of isolation, even relatively moderate Iranian leaders seem confused by how decisions are made in the West. (There is a widespread belief in Tehran, for example, that the United States government controls Israel.) But overall, people who have spoken to decision-makers in Iran say there is consensus there that more war is bad for everyone and a deal is worth making.
One group that hasn’t been consulted so far is the global population — the hundreds of millions of people who will be killed along with their children if Trump is pushed by Netanyahu into launching a nuclear strike next week. Now would be the time for them to speak up.
Songburd 𓅪 retweeted
Replying to @TuckerCarlson
This would be crimes against humanity.
It must be stopped.
Songburd 𓅪 retweeted
Under pressure from Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the Trump administration may be within days of launching a nuclear strike on Iran. The target would be Pickax Mountain in central Iran, where Israeli intelligence claims the Iranian government has restarted its nuclear enrichment program. No conventional weapon in the American arsenal can penetrate 300 feet of solid granite to destroy the tunnels where enrichment is supposedly taking place. The only military option is a nuclear strike. Netanyahu has been pushing hard for one. “Bibi calls Trump about it every day,” says an informed observer.
Netanyahu is cornered and desperate. After last week’s election results, he can’t form a government unless Trump intervenes directly in Israeli politics and brokers a deal with other parties that gives Netanyahu 61 seats in the Knesset. Otherwise, he is out as prime minister and on his way to ignominy, investigations and possibly jail. Netanyahu must stay close to Trump. He needs this war.
To that end, he’s applied maximum pressure to his closest allies in the administration, including Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and CENTCOM commander Brad Cooper. Both oppose a negotiated settlement to the war they’ve so grievously mismanaged; both are pushing to restart major combat operations. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and CIA director John Ratcliffe are also following Netanyahu’s lead, as are leaders of the Democratic Party. In a recent meeting on the subject, former president Barack Obama said he opposes the current Iran peace deal being drafted in Doha.
The rest of America’s longtime allies in the Middle East are terrified by the prospect of more war. On September 27th, Netanyahu flew secretly to Abu Dhabi to enlist the UAE in his lobbying effort for a final attack on Iran. The Emiratis refused. After eight months of conflict, Gulf economies are teetering. So are global energy and fertilizer markets. They won’t recover soon. Globally, there are a total of about 850 supertankers used to transport oil from producers to the rest of the world. In October alone, 11 of them were badly damaged in Hormuz. At this pace, a global depression is imminent. A nuclear strike would radically accelerate the destruction. Fallout from a ground explosion at Pickax Mountain would contaminate the Persian Gulf, poisoning the water supply for 100 million people.
And those are just some of the immediate consequences for the region. The rest of the world is every bit as exposed. No country other than the United States has ever used a nuclear weapon in war. Some would like to. An American nuclear attack on Iran would set a new precedent. The Russians have already told at least two other governments that an American nuclear strike on Iran would free them to use nuclear weapons against Ukraine. Pakistan and India would be tempted to do the same against each other, as would North Korea against Seoul. After the first nuclear strike, World War Three is inevitable. That war would be short and final.
We’ve been sleepwalking toward this moment for months. Since February, the administration has quietly rewritten America’s nuclear doctrine to make first use of so-called “battlefield nukes” easier and therefore more likely. No one in Washington in either party seems bothered by this. Now we’re on the brink of it.
Close observers say Trump is likely to decide by next weekend whether or not to use nuclear weapons. That would be November 7, six days from now. To his credit, he’s hesitating. At the moment, Trump is listening to his vice president, JD Vance, and to his envoy and friend Steve Witkoff, both of whom argue a deal with Iran can be made.
They’re right, though it won’t be simple. The Iranians are famously frustrating to negotiate with under any circumstances, and elements of that government have become more radical since Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his family were killed in February. After decades of isolation, even relatively moderate Iranian leaders seem confused by how decisions are made in the West. (There is a widespread belief in Tehran, for example, that the United States government controls Israel.) But overall, people who have spoken to decision-makers in Iran say there is consensus there that more war is bad for everyone and a deal is worth making.
One group that hasn’t been consulted so far is the global population — the hundreds of millions of people who will be killed along with their children if Trump is pushed by Netanyahu into launching a nuclear strike next week. Now would be the time for them to speak up.

























