Statistical Data Analyst , Statistical programmer, Applied statistician & Bio-statistician. ⛔No Private messages 👉 🚫📩❌.

Irbid city Of Jordan
Joined October 2017
How would you rate the accuracy and practical usefulness of my long-range forecasts for Autumn 2025 and Winter 2026 so far? (Rating Scale): (5🌟) Excellent (Highly accurate & very useful) (4🌟) Good (Mostly accurate & useful) (3🌟) Moderate (Mixed performance) (2🌟) Low accuracy (Limited usefulness ) (1🌟) Not useful / Missed expectations Your feedback helps refine future outlooks and improve regional targeting. Please also mention your country/region in the comments so I can prioritize areas of highest relevance and usability .
31
3
43
23,950
🌐Using statistical methods applied to a climatic archive extending back to 1750, I identified the following years as potential November SSW analogs , exhibiting signatures consistent with either of ( a major SSW with full wave propagation, vortex stretching, splitting, or elongation ) : 1805, 1807, 1877-1878, 1883, 1937, 1959, 1960, 1962, 1982-1983, 1984, 1985, 1999, 2001, 2020, 2023, 2025, 2026. The years shown in bold exhibit the closest overall climatic resemblance to November 2026 in terms of mean sea-level pressure (MSLP) and upper-level 500 hPa geopotential height configurations. This similarity emerges from a cluster analysis in which November 2026 sits comfortably within the corresponding cluster centroid, indicating a strong degree of synoptic pattern affinity-possibly. Among these candidates, 1807 emerged as the year with the strongest statistical signal for a potential November SSW event, irrespective of its timing within the month. These findings represent statistical analog signals derived from the historical climatic archive, rather than confirmation that an SSW will occur. @judah47
Maybe the word "unprecedented" is overused in weather/climate but the forecast of the strong weakening of the #PolarVortex in early November is truly without precedent. My stratospheric AO forecast disappeared at -4 SD! Good timing for a PV blog tomorrow! published.aer.com/aoblog/aob…
3
3
32
2,739
كان الاولى بكم - لو عندكم ذرة ذوق- ارسال وفد من مشايخ " المسلمين و المسيحيين من سكان البلاد الاصليين" لتقديم العزاء في الاردن و دون الاعلان الرسمي لانه بلا طعم و لا لون و لا رائحة . أنتم مثل البغي (العاهرة) ، تستشرفون في كل مناسبة، وتتشدقون بالأخلاق والقيم، بينما سجلكم التاريخي حافل بالجرائم التي طالت المسيحيين والمسلمين على حد سواء , سواء في القدم او في الحاضر ، جرائمكم فاقت بشاعتها كل تصور. كيف يُطلب منا يا روعي أن نصدق خطابكم و تعازيكم، وأنتم تتبنون سرديات التفوق العرقي، وتتعاملون مع بقية البشر بمنطق الاستعلاء والتمييز؟ وكيف يمكن تجاهل ما يُثار من انتقادات بشأن ترسيخ هذه الأفكار في بعض المناهج والممارسات التعليمية؟ الا ترى انه محرم بدينكم مساس الغوييم و اي انية و طعام مسه غوييم , اليست هذه فوقية واضحة وضوح الشمس تضع دماء هؤلاء الغوييم بمنظورك الديني على انها رخيصة و بلا ثمن؟ بل إن التوراة نفسها تتضمن روايات توثق عليكم حروب وعمليات قتل وتدمير في مدن مثل عاي وعجلون و سعير و مدين وغيرها من المواقع، وتصف ممارسات عسكرية قاسية طالت الرجال والنساء والأطفال و الحيوانات بدءا بقتل الاطفال و بقر بطون النساء و استخراج اجنتهم و قتل الرجال بقرون الثيران . من الصعب تجاهل هذه النصوص عند مناقشة العلاقة بين الرواية الدينية والتاريخ و ممارسات الحاضر ، ولا سيما في ظل ما يشهده العالم اليوم من دمار وقتل في غزة. فالتاريخ، كما الحاضر، لا ينبغي أن يكون انتقائيًا، ولا يجوز أن تتحول النصوص الدينية إلى ذريعة لتبرير العنف أو منح أي جماعة حصانة أخلاقية من جهة و ادعاء النبل بوجه اخر . الشمس لا يمكنك تغطيتها بغربال سيد روعي . بل اليوم نتفاجئ كالبغي تستشرف بتقديم العزاء للاردن و شعبها كأن امر المسيحيين في الاردن يعنيكم ؟ توقفو عن التعدي على مقدسات المسيحيين في القدس اولا و نكون لكم من الشاكرين . سؤال اخر , روعي بحكم عملك في الاذاعة الرسمية الاسرائيلية : الا تتضمن مناهجكم و النصوص الدينية روايات وعبارات جدلية تتعلق بالمسيح وأمه مريم ، و تصفهم باقبح الصفات . وهذه مسائل يا سيد روعي تستوجب النقاش الدقيق والتمييز بين النصوص وتفسيراتها ومواقف أتباع الديانات المختلفة، بعيدًا عن التعميم أو التحريض على أتباع دين بأكمله. فكفى ازدواجية في المعايير، وكفى استعلاءً عرقيًا وتبريرًا للجرائم . لا تمنحكم الهوية الدينية أو القومية حقًا فوق حقوق الآخرين، و لا تجعل من دمائكم اغلى من دماء بقية الاعراق ولا تجعل من جرائم الحاضر أمرًا يمكن التهرب من مسؤوليته بالاختباء وراء روايات الماضي . ابحثوا عن نهج آخر؛ نهجٍ يقوم على المساواة والعدالة واحترام كرامة الإنسان، بدلًا من الاستمرار في ادعاء الاخلاق و حسن الجوار . لقد سئم العالم منكم سيد روعي , مع التأكيد اني لا اعني كل اليهود في العالم بتعليقي هذا , بل الصهيونية التي تدير بلادكم و تعبث بمصيركم و تتاجر بدمائكم و دماء سكان المنطقة و اصحابها الاصليين . عزاء دولتكم المارقة غير مقبول و بغير مكانه و لغته التي يجب ان يقدم بها ,
משרד החוץ הישראלי פרסם הודעת תנחומים לירדן בעקבות הפיגוע בכנסייה באל-כרכ. לפי הודעת משרד החוץ, ישראל עומדת יחד עם ירדן במאבק נגד טרור וקיצוניות.
4
7
1,277
لحسن المصادفة: بلدة "عي" او (عاي) شهدت مذبحة مروعة موثقة بالتوراة بالتفاصيل و تصف ذبح الاطفال و الشيوخ و بقر بطون النساء بالحراب و السيوف كانها تصف غزة اليوم . و لحسن المصادفة ايضا : بلدة عي تقع جنوب غرب الكرك و منطقة كنيسة الحمود التي شهدت مذبحة بحق المواطنين الارثودوكس اول امس تقع شمال شرق الكرك , و كلا المذبحتين بنظري لا تختلف عن بعضها البعض فالمرتكب للجريمة واحد و هو متطرف بنهاية الامر .
1
290
نسيت شيء للتصحيح و اعتذر عنه : *المسيح و امه البتول الطاهرة مريم عليهما افضل السلام*
2
292
Hodhodata@statistics retweeted
Replying to @kaisos1987
أنتم مثل البغي (العاهرة) ، تستشرفون في كل مناسبة، وتتشدقون بالأخلاق والقيم، بينما سجلكم التاريخي حافل بالجرائم التي طالت المسيحيين والمسلمين على حد سواء , سواء في القدم او في الحاضر ، جرائمكم فاقت بشاعتها كل تصور. كيف يُطلب منا يا روعي أن نصدق خطابكم و تعازيكم، وأنتم تتبنون سرديات التفوق العرقي، وتتعاملون مع بقية البشر بمنطق الاستعلاء والتمييز؟ وكيف يمكن تجاهل ما يُثار من انتقادات بشأن ترسيخ هذه الأفكار في بعض المناهج والممارسات التعليمية؟ الا ترى انه محرم بدينكم مساس الغوييم و اي انية و طعام مسه غوييم , اليست هذه فوقية واضحة وضوح الشمس تضع دماء هؤلاء الغوييم بمنظورك الديني على انها رخيصة و بلا ثمن؟ بل إن التوراة نفسها تتضمن روايات توثق عليكم حروب وعمليات قتل وتدمير في مدن مثل عاي وعجلون و سعير و مدين وغيرها من المواقع، وتصف ممارسات عسكرية قاسية طالت الرجال والنساء والأطفال و الحيوانات بدءا بقتل الاطفال و بقر بطون النساء و استخراج اجنتهم و قتل الرجال بقرون الثيران . من الصعب تجاهل هذه النصوص عند مناقشة العلاقة بين الرواية الدينية والتاريخ و ممارسات الحاضر ، ولا سيما في ظل ما يشهده العالم اليوم من دمار وقتل في غزة. فالتاريخ، كما الحاضر، لا ينبغي أن يكون انتقائيًا، ولا يجوز أن تتحول النصوص الدينية إلى ذريعة لتبرير العنف أو منح أي جماعة حصانة أخلاقية من جهة و ادعاء النبل بوجه اخر . الشمس لا يمكنك تغطيتها بغربال سيد روعي . بل اليوم نتفاجئ كالبغي تستشرف بتقديم العزاء للاردن و شعبها كأن امر المسيحيين في الاردن يعنيكم ؟ توقفو عن التعدي على مقدسات المسيحيين في القدس اولا و نكون لكم من الشاكرين . سؤال اخر , روعي بحكم عملك في الاذاعة الرسمية الاسرائيلية : الا تتضمن مناهجكم و النصوص الدينية روايات وعبارات جدلية تتعلق بالمسيح وأمه مريم ، و تصفهم باقبح الصفات . وهذه مسائل يا سيد روعي تستوجب النقاش الدقيق والتمييز بين النصوص وتفسيراتها ومواقف أتباع الديانات المختلفة، بعيدًا عن التعميم أو التحريض على أتباع دين بأكمله. فكفى ازدواجية في المعايير، وكفى استعلاءً عرقيًا وتبريرًا للجرائم . لا تمنحكم الهوية الدينية أو القومية حقًا فوق حقوق الآخرين، و لا تجعل من دمائكم اغلى من دماء بقية الاعراق ولا تجعل من جرائم الحاضر أمرًا يمكن التهرب من مسؤوليته بالاختباء وراء روايات الماضي . ابحثوا عن نهج آخر؛ نهجٍ يقوم على المساواة والعدالة واحترام كرامة الإنسان، بدلًا من الاستمرار في ادعاء الاخلاق و حسن الجوار . لقد سئم العالم منكم سيد روعي , مع التأكيد اني لا اعني كل اليهود في العالم بتعليقي هذا , بل الصهيونية التي تدير بلادكم و تعبث بمصيركم و تتاجر بدمائكم و دماء سكان المنطقة و اصحابها الاصليين . عزاء دولتكم المارقة غير مقبول و بغير مكانه و لغته التي يجب ان يقدم بها ,
1
2
486
📡 #FollowUp | Daily Analysis: Potential SSW Events in Winter 2026–2027 Please note: These findings are based on daily analyses, not monthly composites. The distinction is important when interpreting the estimated timing, evolution, and potential atmospheric propagation of these signals. These remain preliminary analog-based indications and require further verification as the forecast evolves. Best regards, Mr. M @Statisticizer
Replying to @Statisticizer
🌡️🌀 Follow up with daily analysis of the February Possible polar SSW event-using the same very parameters! My ongoing seasonal analog investigation has identified two potentially noteworthy periods of Arctic polar vortex disturbance during winter 2026–2027. In this comment the Daily analyses are being used as an interim screening tool to refine the estimated timing, assess the relative intensity, and investigate possible stratosphere–troposphere coupling associated with February SSW possible event. The daily analysis however had unraveled another Possible SSW event near Mid-January, extending into early February. So we have two SSW Potential events now: 🌀 1. First potential event: Mid-January 2027 The January analog screening indicates a possible stratospheric warming episode around mid-January. Of particular interest is the subsequent atmospheric evolution, with a potential downward-propagation signal extending through late January and into the first ten days of February. The daily composites suggest a subsequent wind-reversal imprint, making this first candidate particularly interesting from a stratosphere–troposphere coupling perspective. 🌡️ 2. Second potential event: February 17–25, 2027 The February daily analyses suggest a second potential polar vortex disturbance, with an estimated event window between February 17 and 25. The monthly structural analog composites show pronounced Arctic stratospheric temperature anomalies, a strongly asymmetric 10 hPa wind-anomaly pattern, and an amplified tropospheric circulation configuration. The daily screening further suggests that this second candidate could be more intense than the January episode. The 10 hPa temperature-anomaly maps for February 17–22 provide a sample of the projected thermal imprint, while the subsequent wind diagnostics will be important for assessing whether a genuine reversal develops. This remains a preliminary signal: the event timing, relative intensity, and occurrence of a major sudden stratospheric warming require further verification. 🔬 3. Reading the daily diagnostics: why timing matters The attached maps illustrate two different stages of the potential evolution: • February 5–12: The 10 hPa wind-vector anomalies provide a sample of the possible atmospheric response following the January candidate event. • February 17–22: The 10 hPa temperature-anomaly composite illustrates the projected stratospheric thermal signal associated with the second candidate event. These are representative samples of four-day moving-average anomalies, rather than independent confirmation of two separate SSW events. Their value lies in helping screen the timing and evolution of the signals before undertaking more detailed verification. A major SSW requires reversal of the zonal-mean zonal wind at 60°N and 10 hPa from westerly to easterly. Wind-vector anomalies alone do not establish that criterion, while downward propagation and tropospheric coupling must be assessed separately. 📌 THE PRELIMINARY WINTER OUTLOOK The current analog screening identifies two candidate periods worth monitoring: 🌀 Mid-January 2027: A potential warming episode, followed by a possible downward-propagation and wind-reversal signal from late January into early February. 🌡️ February 17–25, 2027: A second potential disturbance, provisionally assessed as the stronger of the two, with a pronounced temperature-anomaly imprint around February 17–22 and a possible subsequent wind-reversal signal. Bottom line: The preliminary daily analog screening suggests the possibility of two separate polar vortex disturbances during winter 2026–2027. The January candidate is notable for its possible subsequent atmospheric propagation, while the late-February candidate appears potentially stronger in the current analysis. These are forecast hypotheses, not confirmed SSW events. Continued daily diagnostics and evolving dynamical ensemble forecasts will be essential to determine whether either disturbance develops into a major SSW and whether the associated circulation anomalies couple meaningfully with the troposphere. Now, for this time of the season waiting and patience is a virtue! ♻️Kindly support, share, and subscribe. I strive on encouragement, so thank you for everyone who had supported me over the years.🫶🙏🫶 #SSW #PolarVortex #StratosphericWarming #SeasonalForecast #AtmosphericDynamics #WeatherAnalogues #PyReWeather #Winter2027
2
5
26
1,929
🌐🚨❄️ #Headsup February 2027: Another Potential Major Polar Sudden Stratospheric Warming SSW event is possible for February-2027? ⛔️Firstly, this is an interim probabilistic forecast for February. Could February 2027 feature a significant disruption of the Arctic stratospheric polar vortex, with potential downstream consequences for Northern Hemisphere circulation? My latest analysis using the @PyReWeather 4-map interface identifies a potentially noteworthy configuration across the stratosphere and troposphere for February. The assessment is based on a 20-member February structural analog composite, including February 1958, February 1983, and 18 additional analogs, with anomalies calculated relative to the 1991–2020 February climatology. Here is what the four diagnostic maps reveal. 🌡️ 1. The 10hPa atmospheric temperature: pronounced Arctic stratospheric warming anomalies The temperature composite displays substantial positive anomalies over the central Arctic , with the strongest warming signal extending toward the North American Arctic. This asymmetric warming pattern is consistent with a potentially disturbed polar vortex and raises the possibility of vortex displacement or deformation. 🌀 2. 10 hPa winds: a pronounced, asymmetric circulation anomaly The updated 10 hPa wind-vector anomaly map adds an important diagnostic dimension. It shows a strong, spatially asymmetric ring of wind-anomaly magnitudes around the Arctic vortex, with marked variations in the circulation pattern with partial wind reversal (east-west flow) over the Eurasian sector. Combined with the pronounced temperature anomalies, this strengthens the case for monitoring a potential disruption of the polar vortex associated with a SSW possible event that may materialize during February weeks. 🌪️ 3. 300 hPa winds: pronounced upper-level circulation variability. The 300 hPa wind-anomaly magnitude and vector field reveal substantial meridional variability and several distinct sectors of enhanced wind anomalies around the Northern Hemisphere. This pattern suggests a potentially amplified upper-tropospheric circulation, with possible implications for jet-stream positioning, trough development, and the distribution of storm tracks. The anomaly magnitudes, however, should not be interpreted as actual wind speeds or as proof of a particular blocking regime. 🌐 4. The 500 hPa geopotential heights: an amplified planetary-wave pattern The 500 hPa composite displays a pronounced wave pattern, with positive geopotential-height anomalies over parts of the Arctic sector and substantial negative anomalies across other high-latitude regions. This configuration raises the possibility of high-latitude blocking and amplified troughing. Greenland blocking and ridging near the Urals are circulation features worth monitoring as the forecast window approaches, although their persistence and exact positions require further verification. 🌍 POTENTIAL DOWNSTREAM IMPLICATIONS FOR FEBRUARY 2027 If this stratospheric signal develops and couples with the tropospheric circulation, several regions deserve attention: 🌧️ North Atlantic and western Europe: potentially enhanced storm-track variability and episodes of unsettled weather. ❄️ Mediterranean and the Levant: opportunities for trough penetration, colder-air intrusions, and precipitation episodes, depending on the eventual synoptic configuration. 🌨️ North America: possible changes in the placement of troughs and ridges, including across parts of the S. United States and the North Pacific sector. 🧭 Northern Hemisphere circulation indices: A negative NAO, Negative PNA, and negative EAWR and SCAND phases are potential configurations that may materialized to gather or independently across weeks of February. 📌 MY CURRENT ASSESSMENT The 20-member February analog composite presents a potentially interesting SSW-related signal, supported by three notable features: • Pronounced positive 10 hPa temperature anomalies over the Arctic. • Strong, asymmetric 10 hPa wind-vector anomalies indicating a potentially disturbed stratospheric circulation. • An amplified 500 hPa geopotential-height pattern accompanied by substantial 300 hPa wind anomalies. Together, these features justify an early monitoring alert for a possible February 2027 stratospheric warming event. The next critical step is to examine the daily evolution of the 10 hPa zonal-mean zonal wind at 60°N, alongside polar-cap temperature and geopotential-height anomalies, to determine whether the vortex merely weakens or undergoes a genuine major SSW And identify which weeks of February the major events may materialize. Bottom line: February 2027 is worth watching for a possible major stratospheric warming. This is a probabilistic, analog-based forecast signal—not a declaration that an SSW, wind reversal, or specific regional weather outcome is certain. Long-range analogs help identify plausible atmospheric regimes. The coming weeks and months of dynamical ensemble forecasts will be essential for determining whether this signal strengthens, weakens, or fails to materialize. Statistical Model By Mr. M @Statisticizer. #SSW #PolarVortex #StratosphericWarming #SeasonalForecast #WeatherAnalogues #PyReWeather #February2027
6
8
1
61
4,865
🌡️🌀 Follow up with daily analysis of the February Possible polar SSW event-using the same very parameters! My ongoing seasonal analog investigation has identified two potentially noteworthy periods of Arctic polar vortex disturbance during winter 2026–2027. In this comment the Daily analyses are being used as an interim screening tool to refine the estimated timing, assess the relative intensity, and investigate possible stratosphere–troposphere coupling associated with February SSW possible event. The daily analysis however had unraveled another Possible SSW event near Mid-January, extending into early February. So we have two SSW Potential events now: 🌀 1. First potential event: Mid-January 2027 The January analog screening indicates a possible stratospheric warming episode around mid-January. Of particular interest is the subsequent atmospheric evolution, with a potential downward-propagation signal extending through late January and into the first ten days of February. The daily composites suggest a subsequent wind-reversal imprint, making this first candidate particularly interesting from a stratosphere–troposphere coupling perspective. 🌡️ 2. Second potential event: February 17–25, 2027 The February daily analyses suggest a second potential polar vortex disturbance, with an estimated event window between February 17 and 25. The monthly structural analog composites show pronounced Arctic stratospheric temperature anomalies, a strongly asymmetric 10 hPa wind-anomaly pattern, and an amplified tropospheric circulation configuration. The daily screening further suggests that this second candidate could be more intense than the January episode. The 10 hPa temperature-anomaly maps for February 17–22 provide a sample of the projected thermal imprint, while the subsequent wind diagnostics will be important for assessing whether a genuine reversal develops. This remains a preliminary signal: the event timing, relative intensity, and occurrence of a major sudden stratospheric warming require further verification. 🔬 3. Reading the daily diagnostics: why timing matters The attached maps illustrate two different stages of the potential evolution: • February 5–12: The 10 hPa wind-vector anomalies provide a sample of the possible atmospheric response following the January candidate event. • February 17–22: The 10 hPa temperature-anomaly composite illustrates the projected stratospheric thermal signal associated with the second candidate event. These are representative samples of four-day moving-average anomalies, rather than independent confirmation of two separate SSW events. Their value lies in helping screen the timing and evolution of the signals before undertaking more detailed verification. A major SSW requires reversal of the zonal-mean zonal wind at 60°N and 10 hPa from westerly to easterly. Wind-vector anomalies alone do not establish that criterion, while downward propagation and tropospheric coupling must be assessed separately. 📌 THE PRELIMINARY WINTER OUTLOOK The current analog screening identifies two candidate periods worth monitoring: 🌀 Mid-January 2027: A potential warming episode, followed by a possible downward-propagation and wind-reversal signal from late January into early February. 🌡️ February 17–25, 2027: A second potential disturbance, provisionally assessed as the stronger of the two, with a pronounced temperature-anomaly imprint around February 17–22 and a possible subsequent wind-reversal signal. Bottom line: The preliminary daily analog screening suggests the possibility of two separate polar vortex disturbances during winter 2026–2027. The January candidate is notable for its possible subsequent atmospheric propagation, while the late-February candidate appears potentially stronger in the current analysis. These are forecast hypotheses, not confirmed SSW events. Continued daily diagnostics and evolving dynamical ensemble forecasts will be essential to determine whether either disturbance develops into a major SSW and whether the associated circulation anomalies couple meaningfully with the troposphere. Now, for this time of the season waiting and patience is a virtue! ♻️Kindly support, share, and subscribe. I strive on encouragement, so thank you for everyone who had supported me over the years.🫶🙏🫶 #SSW #PolarVortex #StratosphericWarming #SeasonalForecast #AtmosphericDynamics #WeatherAnalogues #PyReWeather #Winter2027
2
1
1
4
2,088
Here is another analysis from NOAA PSL , also confirming wind possible reversal (East-West Flow ) north to the 65th Parallel line- coinciding with SSW imprint Northern Eurasia for February . The weekly analyses I will be conducted later should unveil the likely time within february and the exact associated possible weather configuration
2
846
🌍🌀 Another successfully anticipated, unusual Polar Vortex Sudden Stratospheric Warming (SSW) event for November! This event is unusual and relatively rare, and its potential occurrence has been on my forecast radar since June 2026—four months in advance. My approach integrates climatic teleconnection indices, the Arctic Oscillation (AO), the Quasi-Biennial Oscillation (QBO), and, most importantly, space-weather indices, examined under a Granger-causality framework with permissive model-misspecification assumptions. I hope this achievement will not be mistaken for bragging. Since the late-November 2025 SSW, I have anticipated five such events successfully in a row. At this point, the real reward is not the adrenaline of another successful forecast; it is the opportunity to demonstrate what long-range statistical forecasting may be able to achieve. 🎯 The real message for scientists, climatologists, and weather enthusiasts is this: The popular claim that weather cannot be predicted beyond five days is an oversimplification. Although conventional deterministic weather forecasts face rapidly increasing uncertainty with lead time, this does not mean that all aspects of the atmosphere become unpredictable beyond that horizon. The climate system has memory. Its atmosphere, oceans, stratosphere, solar-related variability, and other interacting components can preserve signals that help identify recurring patterns and probabilistic tendencies months ahead. ENSO binary paradigm and super-elnino is a total oversimplification, the universe of atmospheric phenomena has black, white and degrees of white and grey in between, neglecting the grey is what makes those deterministic models fail with fanned out margin of error across time. The key is understanding which signals matter, how they interact, and under what conditions previously observed physical patterns may recur or reoccur. Long-range forecasting is not about claiming certainty. It is about extracting predictive information from the climate system that conventional approaches may overlook. 🌀 The challenge is not simply to predict tomorrow’s weather, but to recognize tomorrow’s atmospheric possibilities months before they emerge. #ClimateScience #WeatherForecasting #SSW #PolarVortex #StratosphericWarming #Teleconnections #SpaceWeather #LongRangeForecasting #StatisticalForecasting @judah47 @severeweatherEU @Recretos
❄️🌀🌎 Early November 2026 — Stratospheric Warming Signal Early-November Polar Sudden Stratospheric Warming (SSW) Signal | 3–10 November 2026 The latest structural-analog analysis is showing a notable increase in the likelihood of a possible early-November sudden stratospheric warming episode during 3–10 November 2026, with the signal particularly pronounced across the Eurasian and North American sectors. This early November SSW had also oddly materialized in November 2025, which is considered a rare event . The forecast is based on 20 candidate structural analogs for November 2026, with the resulting pattern remaining robust after resampling across 10 independent random-season ensembles. The 10-hPa temperature composite shows a pronounced positive temperature anomaly across the Arctic/polar stratosphere, with the strongest warming extending through the Eurasian and North American sectors. The accompanying 100-hPa vector-wind composite also indicates a highly disturbed circulation pattern around the polar region, providing additional evidence of an anomalous large-scale dynamical configuration during the same period. ⚠️ Important: This is not a confirmation of an SSW event. At this stage, it represents an analog-based probabilistic signal. Confirmation would require the dynamical evolution to produce the characteristic weakening and/or reversal of the 10-hPa polar-night jet, particularly in the zonal-mean winds near 60°N. The next level of verification is therefore to examine the 10-, 30-, 50-, and 100-hPa circulation structure, including the evolution of the polar vortex and the potential role of upward-propagating planetary wave-1 and wave-2 activity. If the temperature and wind signals remain dynamically coherent as we approach November, the case for an early-November stratospheric disruption becomes considerably stronger. 🔹 Forecast window: 3–10 November 2026 🔹 Method: Structural Analog Modeling + Random-Season Resampling 🔹 Candidate analogs: 20 🔹 Validation: 10 independent random-season ensembles 🔹 Primary diagnostic: 10-hPa polar temperature 🔹 Dynamical support: 100-hPa vector-wind structure See the previous forecast for Nov SSW signal found from June in the comments please . Statistical Model by @Statisticizer 🔋Powered by Aviatech Jordan & UAE-Dubai — Poultry Farm Equipment & Integrated Farming Solutions Aviatech Jordan aviatech-mena.com/allservice…
9
14
80
6,175
🧠 Another home-takeaway: Finding the right balance between simplicity, parsimony (Occam’s razor), and complex causal pathway analysis requires higher-order thinking and an appreciation of interactivity. In scientific reasoning, we often construct causal pathways from left to right: from causes to intermediate mechanisms and, ultimately, to outcomes. This is a valid and powerful approach. However, sometimes, adhering too rigidly to this direction can blind us to important relationships and prevent us from recognizing which phenomena precede, follow, or interact with one another. Complex systems do not always reveal their underlying structure through a single, linear causal pathway or even conventional analytic methods . Cyclical-Feedback loops, delayed responses, reciprocal relationships, and interactions between seemingly distant components may require us to reverse our analytical direction, reconsider our assumptions, and work backward from observed outcomes to their potential drivers . 🌍 Consider Earth's climate system. Treating it as an effectively closed ( enclosed) system, while neglecting potentially relevant solar influences, can introduce model misspecification. The scientific task is not to assume that solar factors dominate, but to investigate whether, when, and through which mechanisms they contribute predictive or causal information. Sometimes, understanding a system requires moving from right to left—from outcomes back toward possible causes—before reconstructing the full pathway from left to right. There is an interesting analogy here with the right-to-left direction of Arabic and Hebrew writing. I am not referring to religion or language as determinants of scientific reasoning, but to a broader intellectual metaphor: the direction from which we approach a problem can influence the relationships we notice and the questions we ask. The ultimate goal is not complexity for its own sake, nor simplicity at the expense of reality. It is a parsimonious model that preserves the essential causal structure of the phenomenon being studied. 🔬 Occam’s razor should help us eliminate unnecessary assumptions, not blind us to necessary interactions. #SystemsThinking #CausalInference #ClimateScience #ModelSpecification #ComplexSystems #ScientificReasoning #OccamsRazor
1
1
358