Writer, ranter, croaker. Do not ribbit.
Joined February 2025
- Tweets3.6K
- Following117
- Followers180
- Likes1.5K
General Toad retweeted
What Lula and the Left did in Brazil, the Democratic Party will inevitably do in America.
They appointed their own partisan hacks to the bench in as many seats as possible, then appealed to the legitimacy of the courts even as they dismantled any semblance of impartiality. And once they had control of the courts, they used them to install a soft dictatorship that had the veneer of democratic legitimacy.
Any attempt to overturn this will now, ironically, be called an illegal coup. It's genius if you think about it. Abuse the constitutional order so thoroughly that your enemies' only remaining options to fix it are, by definition, outside the bounds of normal constitutional law.
This is exactly what the Democrats plan to do in America once they inevitably have the votes to pack the Supreme Court.
General Toad retweeted
My favorite thing about wacky GOP antics from the Obama era is that every single thing your insane conservative uncle predicted at Thanksgiving 2011 came true.
- They ARE using your money for Abortions
- They ARE pushing the gay on Children
- The illegals/foreigners ARE stealing jobs
- New York City IS ruled by Islamo-Marxists
- The debt IS exclusively welfare fraud
General Toad retweeted
The US has become less stable, more divided, and more prone to internal conflict as it has become more diverse and multi-cultural.
We aren’t doing this bullshit anymore where we pretend like obvious truths are somehow controversial points that are still up for debate.
General Toad retweeted
You might wanna join the effort to rewrite the scripts for the whole movie then hopefully ai edit scenes and splice in the new scenes. For now we've got a group chat and we're mostly in the proof of concept/planning phase
General Toad retweeted
Hear ye, hear ye! We have a Fat Bear Week winner!
This year’s Lord of Lard, Earl of Girth and Commander in Beef is... Bear 89 also known as Backpack!
General Toad retweeted
Governor, your “critics online” are conservatives who are simply tired of seeing even our own side demonize young white men. Your team made an obviously very intentional decision to not depict a more statistically representative welfare leech, which as you know would be a black single mom. Explain why you made that decision. If you don’t want to explain it, because it’s precisely the answer we already know, then at least don’t insult our intelligence by pretending that you don’t understand the point we’re making.
Pour one out for Floyd the Breathless
𝐁𝐋𝐈𝐙𝐙𝐀𝐑𝐃 𝐖𝐈𝐏𝐄𝐃 𝐀𝐍 𝐄𝐍𝐓𝐈𝐑𝐄 𝐆𝐔𝐈𝐋𝐃 𝐎𝐅𝐅 𝐅𝐎𝐑𝐄𝐕𝐄𝐑 💀
Blizzard deleted a wave of Olympus characters overnight, says @Asmongold — he calls it "the unthinkable", so his guild lined up in game for a moment of silence, webcam eyes closed and all. He blames "woke Blizzard" for the purge. Fair call, or did those names have it coming?
General Toad retweeted
America’s corporate governance system is broken, and it’s killing public companies. Look no further than Cracker Barrel: Decades of brutal mismanagement have seen one incompetent CEO after another walk away with a massive paycheck while customers and actual shareholders take a beating.
Why does this keep happening? Because proxy advisory firms like ISS are corrupt. They blindly rubber-stamp failing boards year after year, protecting the corporate elite while burning shareholder value to the ground.
The root of the rot is index funds. There's no question that indexing one's money is a smart financial move for most people. But just because you passively index your investments doesn't mean your corporate votes should be handed over to the managers of your fund so they can play politics. Right now, passive funds hold massive, unchecked voting blocks while having zero skin in the game themselves.
It is time for a simple rewrite of the rules: We need to index the votes of index fund investors.
Passive index funds should be forced to automatically split their votes to proportionately mirror those of retail and active institutional shareholders — the people actually doing the research, risking their capital, and fighting for performance in the companies they hold shares in. No more rubber-stamping. A change like this will immediately strip corrupt gatekeepers like ISS of their toxic influence.
True accountability happens when lazy, overpaid boards actually answer to the stakeholders they represent, rather than screwing them over.
Actual, logic-driven governance when your money is passive happens when your vote passively follows the voting decisions of the actual market.
We need to stop letting passive capital protect active incompetence. By stripping index funds of their arbitrary voting power and empowering engaged investors, we will finally torch corporate cronyism and usher American capital markets into a golden age of capitalism.
General Toad retweeted
“America isn’t a people, it’s an idea.”
“Well, can we at least deport the people who openly reject the idea?”
“No, that would be against the ideas!”
This is the game we’ve been playing for over 60 years now.
Civic nationalism inevitably destroys itself because it’s utterly incapable of making literally any value judgements between those who openly reject the civics and those who adhere to it.
Why bother adhering or even learning the civics in the first place if there’s absolutely zero price to pay for betraying them?
General Toad retweeted
Sweden's Right-wing coalition got the order of operations wrong.
They did the typical conservative thing of passing policies that would objectively make people's lives better. They succeeded, and then people stopped caring about the issues that got the Right elected in the first place because they no longer saw them as problems to solve.
The siren song of progressivism and social democracy then lured these people back into complacency, as it always does in any universal mass democracy.
The order of operations shouldn't be:
Get elected -> Solve problems -> Lose to the Left because you've already solved the immediate problem that got you elected in the first place -> Wait for the Left to break something -> Try to win off of the ensuing backlash.
It should be:
Get elected -> Defund the Left -> Solve the first set of problems the Left created -> Win in an even greater landslide -> Crush the Left further -> Solve even larger problems you couldn't solve before because you didn't have a large enough majority.
Each action you take should make the next action easier. This is why the Trump administration got off on such a strong foot with the shuttering of USAID and the defunding of large swaths of the Left's patronage network.
The lesson here is to stop playing fair. Power is a tool to be wielded in order to destroy your enemies, not merely to do a good job of administering the daily functions of state.
Sweden, 6,200 of 6,626 districts counted:
Seat projection per bloc, national parliament
S+V+MP+C-S&D|LEFT|G/EFA|RE: 176 (+3)
SD+M+KD+L-ECR|EPP|RE: 173 (-3)
+/- vs. Last election result
➤ europeelects.eu/sweden
General Toad retweeted
We’ve never seen anything like this before. A man was conscripted into jury duty by the government. He performed his civic duty and followed his conscience, refusing to acquit a woman who confessed to systematically executing her three children. The defense attorney immediately launched a public smear campaign against the juror. Soon several other jurors joined the campaign. Then the media. Even the defense attorney’s wife has joined. Now they’re doxxing the man, digging into his past, contacting his family, showing up at his house. All of this both to punish him for refusing to go with their program, and to pollute any future jury pool by making it clear that anyone who votes to convict Clancy will have their life destroyed. It’s truly one of the most outrageously evil things we’ve ever seen from the Left, and that’s saying something. A direct assault on the integrity of our justice system. They are burning down every boundary and standard in their path. And doing it all for the sake of a child murdering psychopath. Unfathomable.
General Toad retweeted
Seeing a lot of outrage and shock at this, but why should we be surprised?
It wasn’t their people who were killed and it wasn’t their nation that was attacked.
There has never in been an American named “Zohran Kwame Mamdani” and there never will be. He is a foreign colonizer who has used our own political and philosophical system to legitimize his invasion of our country.
Every moment this human cockroach tramples the soil of America is an insult to the men who founded it.
What you're missing is that they don't want men to EVER act this way
They want a complete, permanent, self-internalized filter in men to where they always act as though a woman is present EVEN IF THEY AREN'T
Everyone keeps talking about the "male loneliness epidemic," but nobody seems interested in asking what happened to spaces where men could just be around other men.
And here's something people don't like acknowledging:
Simply adding women to a male group changes the social dynamic.
Men behave differently around women than they do when it's just the guys. The jokes change. The conversations change. The shit-talking changes. Guys become more guarded. Certain subjects disappear completely. Men start filtering themselves because the social consequences of saying the wrong thing are different in a mixed group.
That happens even BEFORE anyone complains.
Then add another layer. Once women enter traditionally male spaces, there is often an expectation that the existing atmosphere should become more accommodating to feminine sensitivities.
That's too crude.
That's offensive.
That joke went too far.
That's immature.
That makes me uncomfortable.
Why do you guys act like this?
Eventually the men aren't interacting naturally anymore. They're interacting through a filter.
And that's the entire fucking point people miss.
A male space isn't just a building with a "MEN ONLY" sign on the door. It's an environment where men feel comfortable dropping the social filter and interacting with other men in ways they often DON'T when women are present.
Change the composition and you can change the behavior. Change the behavioral expectations and you change it even further.
Eventually you've destroyed the very atmosphere that made it a male social space in the first place, even if men technically still gather there.
Then society turns around and asks:
"Why are men so lonely?"
Maybe because we spent decades treating exclusively male social spaces as suspicious, exclusionary or outdated while simultaneously telling men they desperately need stronger friendships with other men.
And the irony is incredible.
Men constantly hear: "Leave women alone. Respect women's spaces. Women don't exist for your benefit."
Okay.
Then afford men the same courtesy.
Sometimes men want to hang out with other men precisely BECAUSE there are no women around.
Not because they hate women.
Not because they're plotting against women.
Not because women are inferior.
Because the dynamic is different.
Men should be allowed to have that.
General Toad retweeted
The Greek historian Plutarch once recounted a story of how young women began to commit suicide in the city of Miletus.
It was as if the attention that a woman would receive by hanging herself drove them to continue doing so.
Finally, a law was passed declaring that any woman who killed herself would have her naked body dragged through the streets before being buried.
And lo and behold, the mass psychosis of women killing themselves stopped almost overnight.
This tweet is not about events in an Anatolian city state 2,000 years ago.
