Flagging H1B abuse. My guiding Principles 1) America is not an Economic Zone. 2) Our rules and regulations must prioritize Americans. 3) We shall persevere.

California, USA
Joined November 2012
Stock-Analysis-simple retweeted
PERM test, 24-hour check. Yesterday I applied by email to PERM ads, the jobs employers must advertise to Americans before sponsoring a green card. I'm a qualified U.S. applicant. Still no reply, not even a receipt: @GileadSciences (2 roles) @sigmacomputing @CBRE @DEShawGroup Why it matters: with no receipt, an employer can later claim no American applied. That's possible fraud in the labor-market test, and every silence goes on the record for review. We heard back from Lam Research and aren't reporting them. Things are moving, and we're tracking every step. TikTok has been responsive. One employer held a phone screen. Appian answered with screening questions. An answered application is how we know the seat was really open. Heard nothing? Report it to the DOL OIG hotline @USLaborIG. Want to apply to PERM ads yourself? Have a Grok Bot account? Meet Tony, the PERM Watch Bot: xitter.cf/7SwanSwimming/status/2… Reply TONY and we'll get you set up. Support the American System 🇺🇸
One American's job search, shared with me privately. He asked to stay anonymous. His layoff, in his own words, came from inflated expectations of what SI could write. Not visa workers. Then came the search: About 300 applications. 2 phone screens. 107 rejections. 191 never answered at all. At his former employer, he saw outside worker groups brought in. That's his firsthand experience, not proof of cause. But it's the same silence we log on PERM ads, the ones employers must run for Americans before sponsoring a green card. That's why Tony, our PERM watchdog bot, logs every answer and every non-answer. Silence becomes the record. Good policy sets the table. Americans in the seats build the capability, but only if someone answers. What's your count? Applications sent, and how many got a human reply?
10
32
109
7,500
Just #h1bvisa things. To submit fake resume or real one? Mind you this person already has a job and has displaced an American worker. @USDOL you should NOT be approving H1Bs without extensive checks. There is adequate justification for 100k fee to fight this fraud. @USLaborIG
28
Training being offered but its only for H1Bs. Being run by Indians. Tell me why this is not a cartel.
9
Of course they have to use SI. They cant be trusted to not do fraud and not leak the paper. Thats just asking for too much
🚨 Nandan Nilekani proposes the use of 'AI' to create question papers on the day of the test to avoid fraud and leaks.
48
DHS - you are Department of Homeland security. Not Department of rubber stamping approvals! Do a proper job pls. Have some professionalism and pride in what you do
54
Share link pls. Will dig them some more.
Americans need not apply. We have 12 pages of listings on @LinkedIn that are specific for work visas only. Right out in the open depriving Americans of jobs. @DOLOIG @WHFraudTF @CivilRights @andrealucasEEOC
32
Tired of divisive, controversial figures getting attention from Nobel each year. About time American society comes up with an alternative that represents western values. @MichaelDell or @WarrenBuffett have the credentials to pull it off.
During the Second Intifada, a period during which over 1000 Jews were killed by Palestinian terrorists, Israel increased security measures. Around the same time, the UN did an inquiry into why Palestinian men were beating their wives. And do you know what the UN concluded? That it’s Israel’s fault. How? Well. Since Israel added extra security on the Palestinian terrorists who were killing the Jews, the security measures stressed out the men and they took it out on their wives. Yes, that’s an actual UN conclusion. The woman, who Trump rightly described as known for nothing other than hating Jews, is the person who affirmed this conclusion that it’s the Jews’ fault that Arab men beat their wives. Her job was to look out for Palestinian women’s interests and this is the help she gave them. And she is this year’s recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize. And no, she achieved zero peace and made zero progress towards peace. Her only contribution to the world is raw Jew hatred.
30
Bloomberg is hiring a Senior Technical Software Developer in SF — ref B154-2026, resumes to [email protected]. Searched their careers portal by title and ref: zero results. Not on their site, only in the newspaper. @USDOL @USLaborIG @JobsNowPR More importantly how can one expect impartial reporting from them on visa abuse since they are using the same loopholes themselves.
2
1
6
262
Stock-Analysis-simple retweeted
Foreign doctors need real USMLE scores + ECFMG certification (which verifies the medical school) to match into US residency. Most start on J-1, then move to H-1B after Step 3 and a state license. How some are gaming it: In India, people who fail the FMGE screening test are buying fake certificates for ₹20-29 lakh to get local medical registration. Schools like Al-Falah have been accused of using fake patients and “on-paper” faculty just to pass inspections and hand out degrees. Forged transcripts from real universities also show up in these networks. ECFMG does primary-source checks, but sophisticated forgeries of legitimate schools still slip through
10
56
3
132
1,620
Stock-Analysis-simple retweeted
Replying to @MatNuclear
Rampant Fraud. Fake degrees, fake resumes, having someone else take your interview, outsource your work to someone in India. All this at industrial scale and not one-off. This is my first-hand experience. Plus the attitude of bending rules for small gains. All from coming from a low-trust society. Oblivious to basic decency and norms ( cutting in lines, standing in aisles, being loud in public). Stealing, shop-lifting, fake CDLs, fake marriages for visa. Bribery, kickbacks - very common in certain Tech companies. More than you would believe. No one gets prosecuted. Attitudes towards women and weak. Casteism, Regionalism, Religious animosity. Phew..
1
44
Peter - you sick fuck. Why did you have to make the playbook public? Signed - VP of Global Mobility @Amazon, ex-VP @Meta, @Google
I’m the Corporate Vice President of Global Talent Strategy at Microsoft. People say I hire H-1Bs. My badge says I source world-class talent that can’t leave. That second part? That’s the whole program. Last year we filed 4,812 petitions. 97% got approved. Everyone talks about the lottery like it’s luck. It’s great for us, because it lets us call the outcome chance. It isn’t. The outcome got decided months earlier by a team that writes the specialty-occupation language before the req even opens. They’re fantastic. I’m proud of them. This year Copilot started drafting the language for them. Turns out Copilot is really good at describing a job only 1 person on earth could possibly do, as long as that person is already in our system. We called the workstream PERMANENCE. Legal made us rename it. Now it’s Project Continuity. Same slides. Domestic candidates apply. Plenty of them clear the bar. We go with the H-1B anyway. Why? Because the H-1B already took the band. The band is Level II prevailing wage. Level II is the median we asked for. The people who can quit get paid off a different median, one they talk about openly at lunch. The H-1B negotiates off the LCA. The LCA’s public. Basically nobody reads it. I read it every quarter. Honestly, it’s calming. We track the result as diversity and inclusion. 68% of the engineers who joined Azure last cycle came in on temporary status. The dashboard shows that number in a really nice green. What it doesn’t show is the 28% fully-loaded cost delta. That lives in a different workbook. Finance owns that one. Finance is proud too. Let me tell you about Raj. Raj has been on Azure Storage for 6 years. He knows the codebase better than the guys who wrote it, and 2 of them already left for counteroffers. Last spring his manager, Dana, asked why we couldn’t just promote him to staff and backfill locally. So we set up a talent review. 40 minutes. I asked Dana about pipeline health. Dana asked about the codebase. I asked about competitive intensity. Dana asked about the codebase again. I asked whether she had a growth mindset. She said she thought so. We agreed to take it offline. Offline is where Dana’s req went to die. Raj stayed. Raj always stays. He came in on another company’s visa, and we transferred it. Counsel has a template for that. The new $100,000 fee only hits talent that’s still overseas. Raj was already here. Transfers keep the leverage and skip the toll. Finance made a slide about it. There’s a little rocket on it. The transfer is the point. Look, if you can quit on Friday, you’ve got leverage on Thursday. If your legal status ends the day your job does, you’ve got Thursdays and that’s it. We never have to threaten anybody. The statute does that for us. Raj has read the statute. He’s also read his priority date: 2014. Projected to go current in 2031. Between now and then we’ll bump his Level II wage twice, and both bumps will be smaller than what we gave the people who can walk. We call that pay equity, since the formula treats everyone exactly the same. Only some people get to argue with it. His wife’s on an H-4. Back in Pune she was a pharmacist. Here she’s a really organized volunteer. His daughter turns 21 in 2029, which is the year she ages out of his case. She wants to be a doctor. On paper, in 2029, she becomes an international student in the only country she remembers. HR flagged it as a retention risk. Finance flagged it as a retention asset. We went with Finance. Some people call this a caste system. We call it a two-tier compensation architecture, and it’s working exactly the way it’s supposed to. In the workbook, the line is column AF. The header says Mobility Status. There are 2 options: Portable and Anchored. Nobody ever types the word caste. Excel’s never needed it. The Portable folks sit above the line. They get the counteroffers, the refreshers, and the freedom to ignore the 11pm call. When a Portable engineer mentions he’s “exploring options,” a VP takes him to lunch somewhere with no prices on the menu. When an Anchored engineer explores options, he gets 60 days to do it. That’s the grace period after you’re let go. They call it grace. We didn’t name it. We’d have named it better. The Anchored folks sit below the line. They get the scope, the on-call rotation, the “stretch assignment,” and a calibration note that says high potential, visa-dependent. Nobody writes down that second part. Everyone in the room already knows. The room claps for the first part. When a Portable engineer pushes back on a deadline, we call it psychological safety. When an Anchored engineer pushes back, well, he doesn’t. We call that alignment. At the all-hands, both tiers sit together. Same hoodie. The hoodie says One Microsoft. And at the hoodie level, it’s true. During the January layoffs, the Portable folks got severance, a sweet LinkedIn post, and 14 recruiter DMs by lunch. The Anchored folks got severance and a countdown. A guy on Raj’s team spent his last 3 weeks training his replacement and his first 3 weeks unemployed applying to 212 jobs from a Starbucks in Bellevue, because his landlord wanted proof of income. He landed something on day 57. We sent him a survey about his offboarding experience. He gave it 4 out of 5. He said everyone was really kind. And they were! The people were kind. The people just didn’t design the system. Belonging scores go up when the alternative is a one-way flight. Velocity goes up when nobody on the team can say no. Viva pings Raj at 11:40pm to remind him to protect his focus time. He reads it on the incident bridge. His engagement numbers are fantastic. In March his dad died in Hyderabad. Raj didn’t go home. His visa stamp had expired, and the next consulate appointment was 11 months out. If he left, he might not get back in. And getting back in meant the job, the house, his daughter’s school, the 2014 priority date. So he watched the cremation on his phone, propped up against his monitor, between a design review and an on-call handoff. His manager approved 3 days of bereavement leave. He used 1. The other 2 roll over. We’re super flexible about leave. Critics say we’re replacing Americans. Internally we call it workforce durability. Durability just means they stay. Durable talent brings specialized skills. The specialized skills have signed the at-will acknowledgment and the non-compete, and we’ll enforce it if they try to jump before their date’s current. The date’s never current. Everybody knows what happens if we pull a petition. We’ve never had to explain it twice. (Fine, immigration counsel will tell you that after 180 days the priority date survives a withdrawal. We leave that out of the onboarding deck. Onboarding decks should be uplifting.) In March we won Best Employer for Global Talent. The plaque’s in Building 92. Most of the people it honors can’t switch employers to find out if it’s true. Some of us have started thinking of the backlog as infrastructure. We don’t lobby against it. In our policy comments we call it a “stable pipeline environment.” Stability’s one of our values. It’s on a poster, right next to Courage. I meet with the team every Monday. They know the cap. They know the premium processing window. They know which vendors will staff the interview loop so the candidate’s prepped and the manager never gets surprised by an acceptance. They cheer when a req closes under budget and the diversity and inclusion cell turns green. Last quarter it went green in 4 orgs. We sent a note. It said belonging and innovation. Both totally accurate. Raj belongs. We innovated. Dana left in August for a competitor. We matched the offer in a day. She still said no. People who can leave are like that. Raj sent her a goodbye message in Teams. He couldn’t make the drinks. He was on call. I’m so, so proud of this team. They took a regulatory constraint and turned it into permanent leverage. And the leverage compounds. We report it as growth. The analysts love growth. So do I. My equity vests every quarter. Raj’s priority date goes current in 2031. His father’s never will.
66
Stock-Analysis-simple retweeted
Anyone interested in a director role at the Gates Foundation? We found this $406k role as a strategy director in this week's Seattle Times. But strangely, this job isn't on their website career page? Could they be planning to sponsor an immigrant for an EB visa for this job?
40
460
15
1,656
12,329
Stock-Analysis-simple retweeted
Indians are updating their green card applications for EB1 category to speed up the process to only a year long processing time. Apparently publishing 10 BS AI written articles in online journals qualifies them for this fast paced GC process even with normal IT jobs. What a scam!
30
96
9
503
31,936
Stock-Analysis-simple retweeted
"America is not a jobs program for the rest of the world. We built them for Americans." — FTC Chairman Andrew Ferguson BASED 💯
44
381
13
1,636
39,737
RT @VP: Vice President JD Vance breaks down the data: "If you are working as an H1-B visa in the United States of America, you’re earning…
Stock-Analysis-simple retweeted
No one has gone after Crusoe Technologies for asking American job applicants to send their resumes directly to the immigration department yet We think many Americans could be customer success managers for $225k per year, remote!
20
297
16
1,168
31,977
Stock-Analysis-simple retweeted
Why is Netflix advertising this fully remote software engineering job in the Seattle Times Classifieds this week - but the same job isn't listed on their career website? We bet a lot of Americans would take a fully remote job at Netflix for a $750k salary!
115
1,045
60
5,463
131,725
Stock-Analysis-simple retweeted
PLEASE APPLY FOR THIS JOB SO THE LMT FAILS DENY THIS INDIAN THAT HAS THIS JOB RIGHT NOW A GREEN CARD jobs.now/jobs/744747974-sap-…
27
467
6
1,684
16,716
Now add offshoring snd the charts will match perfectly
Job market is red for Americans. Green for Indian H-1Bs.
48
And we know there are enough US companies that will prefer to hire a foreigner than to give a job to Americans. Looking at you @GileadSciences
Replying to @itspsneha
If you're considering US-based roles, an option is to work for a year in India, if the company has an Indian entity, and then make an internal transfer to the US office via L1-A a year later. Side-by-side, you can even think about building your case for an O1 visa, and propose that your employer sponsor it as a part of the employment offer.
46