
Just a guy who likes writing, games, and boba. 3rd year PhD @UCSanDiego. @rajammanabrolu Prev: Intern@MSR-Montreal, MBZUAI IFM
phd reality checked
Joined August 2011
- Tweets534
- Following250
- Followers171
- Likes993
Pinned Tweet
This has been sitting on arxiv for a bit, but figured it's time to announce it properly. Introducing Behavior Cues: a way to make LLM reasoning more monitorable and controllable for scalable oversight.
Christopher Z. Cui retweeted
Ready for inspiration, discussion & community collabs? 💡🤝
Join us October 28th for research pitches from @tw_killian (Asst. Professor at BYU and Principal Scientist, AI Research at Lila Sciences) & Sha Yi (Research Scientist at Physical Intelligence, incoming NYU prof), whose work spans RL, LLM reasoning & robot learning.
Thanks to @TheEsraaSaleh, Ruchira Dhar and @Ujan55906689 for organizing this session! 🔥
RSVP to join: luma.com/igac551y
Christopher Z. Cui retweeted
🚨 Excited to release GlyphBench, our new paper on games, RL, and LLM reasoning!
big, big thanks to @MavorParker, @matthewjsargent, @Cote_Marc, @GlenBerseth & @pcastr
and shoutout to @wwwjim for the beautiful blog design!
preprint, code, and blog post are all public! ✨
Christopher Z. Cui retweeted
The field should shift the focus from benchmark scores to item response is essential for building the science for AI eval and trustworthy eval reporting! We are actively building OpenEval to serve as the foundational data layer for the science of AI eval.
AI Eval Should Require Standardized Item-Level Data Releases
In our #NeurIPS2026 position paper, we argue the science of AI evaluation requires shifting focus from benchmark scores to item-level data.
We present OpenEval to enable such releases.
🔗open-eval.com/ #AI #NLP
Christopher Z. Cui retweeted
Torn between congratulating for great branding and damn I should've taken that name first
Introducing Boba - the social intelligence that understands your goals and your community. Text Boba today or message it online at boba.app
I'll also join the ICLR reviewer ranting. I usually try to spend alot more time to provide feedback for papers where I am giving a below accept score.
Really feels like I cannot justify doing that for my batch because there's just so much missing. Pain.
Christopher Z. Cui retweeted
🚨Did you know that your coding agent is writing your code in an insecure way, leaving exploitable vulnerabilities unpatched?
@dqwang122 trained agents to be better at *secure* vibe coding
Check the preprint and thread 👇
Not All Privileged Information Is Equal: What Makes OPSD Actually Work?
We find that information-rich PI, such as environment observations and mistake analysis, outperforms PI that only provides ground-truth solutions.
Better PI leads to better post-training performance. But can we predict which PI will work best before spending compute on post-training?
We investigated three offline metrics:
🔹 Utility: A model's performance with PI can be misleading due to information leakage.
🔹 Reverse KL: Larger PI-induced distribution shifts often correlate with better post-training performance, but incorrect PI can cause equally large shifts.
🔹 Error-step KL contrast: Measuring whether PI changes the model's behavior specifically at error steps better captures its effectiveness and helps select stronger PI.
What types of privileged information have you found most effective in your OPSD experiments?
📄 Paper: arxiv.org/abs/2610.22512
Christopher Z. Cui retweeted
Proud to be part of the team!
Christopher Z. Cui retweeted
Neuralese might seem cute and fun, but steganography (hiding information in text using patterns of tokens) is one of the ways AI could break monitoring and control systems. Check out what my advisor has to say along with others in this article
What happens if AI agents start speaking their own language?
@mark_riedl says AI models could develop shorthand references intended for the model to work faster.
But it would probably look like gibberish to most humans.
Read more: cnn.com/2026/10/16/tech/ai-s…
Christopher Z. Cui retweeted
Excited to see Bespoke Labs build on our ROFT work for autonomous ML research!
Their recipe combines context distillation, self-generated retrospections, and action replay -- improving Nemotron’s AutoResearchExam score by ~25% vs. base.
Learning to explain → learning to do 🧠
We are excited to announce that we post-trained NVIDIA Nemotron-3.5-Super-VL to be an autonomous ML researcher. We show that our post-trained model goes from 28% to 35% on AutoResearchExam, matching Qwen 3.8 Max, a model with 20× the total parameters.
The tasks are long horizon, open ended AI and ML research: building a faster executor for a transformer compute graph, training a RL control policy, creating new uncertainty quantification methods, etc. The model gets to submit once, and it doesn't see its score until the end.
We curated SFT data using Self-context distillation. This means that we let the Nemotron model to solve a problem with hints, then we SFT on these trajectories but without the hints. This gave us +11% on AutoResearchExam.
As a next step, we added reflection: We ask the Nemotron model to review its own past attempts and writes concrete lessons learned. Then we SFT on these reflections.
Surprisingly, training on these lessons improved the performance to +25% compared to the base model.
The hardest part was choosing the right data. We selected traces based on task scores, completion checks, and runtime, then refined the sampling across training rounds to address failures in the base and fine-tuned models. We removed hints and filtered out steps that relied on information available only in those hints. The goal was to teach decisions supported by the task and history the model would actually see at inference.
Full write-up:
bespokelabs.ai/blog/teaching…
Thanks to @NVIDIAAI for early access and collaborating on this.
Christopher Z. Cui retweeted
After 11 years at Maluuba and Microsoft Research Montréal, yesterday was my last day. Grateful to everyone I got to build with along the way, especially the Froggy team 🐸.
I'm starting something new with a good friend. Can't say much yet, but it's the most excited I've been in years. More soon.
Christopher Z. Cui retweeted
What is TMLR doing under a 300% increase in submissions?
- Suspensions of >150 authors
- Publicly naming major violations
- Submission quotas distinguishing slop patterns
- Desk rejections 6% → 53%; focus on clarity
- AI reviews evaluating soundness
blog.tmlr.org/2026/adapting-…
Christopher Z. Cui retweeted
Another paper0 from my students @kzhao1617 and Tianrun Yu with collaborators from @WeitongZhang's group.
We've investigated stabilizing OPD where teacher models fail to provide supervision. The fix is simple, yet effective! Teacher critique is enough to get the student on track!
📢 Sharing our new paper: CriticOPD!
What happens when a student model makes a mistake during on-policy distillation? We found that the teacher often follows the same error, even on problems it can solve from scratch. Yet when asked to critique the solution, it can still identify what went wrong.
💡 In CriticOPD, the teacher critiques an incorrect solution, and the student uses that feedback to rewrite it.
📊 On Qwen3-1.7B, this improves average accuracy over OPD by 4.57 points across six math benchmarks, with the largest gains on competition problems.
Would love to hear your thoughts, and an upvote on HF would be much appreciated!
🤗 HF: huggingface.co/papers/2610.2…
🔗 Project & code: kzhao5.github.io/CriticOPD-w…
Christopher Z. Cui retweeted
Apparently this is where the AI era started 😅
If I had beaten that bot in 2017, maybe the world would be a very different place now
I had a chance to stop AI, but …
Christopher Z. Cui retweeted
look at my independent AI safety evaluator dawg 😭
New: Accenture has told employees it will only fund $29 per month of Claude use. Meaning that employees who often spend as much as $1,000 a month are now scrambling to find ways to keep access to the tool. A sign of the continuing crack down of AI 404media.co/accenture-tells-…
Christopher Z. Cui retweeted
We've open-sourced RLRT (RLVR with Reversed Teacher), together with representative OPSD and self-distilled RLVR baselines, as a testbed for studying self-distillation in single-turn (math) reasoning.
💻 Code: github.com/beanie00/self-dis…
🌐 Project page: beanie00.github.io/self-dist…
Feedback and PRs welcome! We hope it offers a unified view of self-distillation in LLM post-training and a solid foundation for future research.
RLRT has also been accepted to #NeurIPS2026, following its selection for an oral presentation at the COLM workshop! 🎉
TL;DR: RLRT (RLVR with Reversed Teacher) reverses self-distillation on correct rollouts by reinforcing self-driven tokens that diverge from the teacher, turning disagreement into valuable exploration.
Glad to share this with my co-first author @jiwonjeon_jen! 😍
(Code will be released soon)
Christopher Z. Cui retweeted
Replying to @beanie0__0 @jiwonjeon_jen
And a nice bonus today: our RLRT got a Best Paper nomination at the #COLM2026 Efficient Reasoning Workshop 🎉
Christopher Z. Cui retweeted
Want credit assignment over long-horizon agent tasks?
Your model can do it for itself. No per-turn labels. No value model. No RL.
Train it only on its own reflections, and its correct turns gain likelihood more often than its incorrect ones. GRPO barely tells them apart.






































