mDog98 (@dfurrey) header
mDog98 (@dfurrey) profile picture

Yes, it's that simple

Garden State / NJ
Joined September 2008
Photo by mDog98 (@dfurrey)Photo by mDog98 (@dfurrey)Photo by mDog98 (@dfurrey)Photo by mDog98 (@dfurrey)Photo by mDog98 (@dfurrey)Photo by mDog98 (@dfurrey)Photo by mDog98 (@dfurrey)Photo by mDog98 (@dfurrey)Photo by mDog98 (@dfurrey)Photo by mDog98 (@dfurrey)
What are the chances of nearly every single county going more democrat in a state trump won by 14 points?
5,758
3,033
662
13,875
1,110,673
mDog98 retweeted
Wow, so much wisdom here: “If you think that high prices lost the election for the right, you don't understand marketing.”
We're in a new era of communication, and only one side seems to be living in it. The old guard consultant class is about to be relegated to the dustbin of history. If you think that high prices lost the election for the right, you don't understand marketing. Humans have no problem paying a premium for a good quality brand. Notice the word "brand", not "product". Are Nikes better than New Balance? Nope. But the brand is better. And notice what happened when they tinkered with the brand and screwed their core narrative? Nike stock fell through the basement. Did the product change? Nope. The brand did. It's not the product, it's the brand. Results don't sell the product, the storytelling does. Will these newly-elected commies lower prices? Of course not. Are they gonna get you free healthcare? No, your insurance is gonna get even worse, just like it did the last time they tried socialized medicine. They're not going to do anything they've sold you, but...like Saul Goodman said: if you're committed enough, you can make any story work. The committed storytelling of a couple insane podcasters was enough to fracture an entire political coalition from their own side in less than 2 years...they have zero power, zero credibility, they've never actually governed anything nor produced any results, but...they're good storytellers, and that's all that matters. Are they telling a good story? No, it's atrocious, but they're telling their atrocious story effectively and compellingly. It is 100% true that everything's too damn expensive, and we all know that inflated prices are always sticky. Does anyone know that it's entirely the result of shutting down the global economy over the flu and (both naive republicans and democrats) printing infinity dollars for several years? Nope...because nobody has effectively told that story, and it's an unsexy story to tell. "Free stuff!" is a VERY easy story to tell, and when everyone's gotta take out a second mortgage just to pay their insurance premiums, "free healthcare" is an unbeatable story. It doesn't matter that "free healthcare" doesn't exist and socialized medicine is a terrible product...it's not the product, it's the brand. And "FREE!" is a great brand. You can't get mad at people for having the financial literacy of a 9 year old. I mean, you can, but they outnumber you a million to one, so it's not going to be productive. You need to figure out how to make an unsexy story sexy, or else the "free stuff!" crowd is going to eat your lunch every time. If you give people a choice between earning a six pack on a treadmill or taking Ozempic, they're gonna choose Ozempic...they don't care about the side effects. If you give people a choice between fiscal discipline or free stuff...guess what they'll pick? They don't care about the side effects. With projected growth of 5%, the economy right now is stronger than it's been in generations. Is that the story you hear? Nope. Is that the vibe you feel? Absolutely not, especially when every time you fill up your gas tank, it feels like a diesel enema. It's not the product, it's the brand. A great product can fall into oblivion with bad messaging...a single bad review from one effective storyteller can tank a restaurant. The "influencer economy" is lucrative for a reason; everybody inherently understands the importance of effective storytelling...except the right. Zohran Mamdani gets it...he has an army of influencers on staff. In a perfect metaphor of this transitional phase of old guard vs new wave political messaging, Zohran nuked the Vice President into oblivion with maybe the biggest ratio in the history of the internet. By simply posting the subway assistant meme, Mamdani got 2 MILLION likes, quoting a post from the VP that had only 10K likes. If you're reading that sentence thinking "this is fucking ridiculous, you're talking about social media likes as political analysis now?"...you are the problem. Yes, this stuff matters. Rizz matters. The President did a masterful job of this kind of retail politics in his historic 2024 campaign...you can be angry that this is what politics has been reduced to, but you can either adapt or die. "No the problem is, you didn't deliver enough for the American people!" Are you a moron? Since when does anybody care about that? What have democrats delivered for Californians in the last 20 years? Unmitigated wildfires, homeless drug zombies everywhere, roads that look like Fallujah in 2004...people don't care about results. They think they care about results. That want you to believe they care about results, just as Nike wants you to believe their shoes are better than New Balance...but at the end of the day, all people really care about is the swoosh. Adapt or die.
84
39
4
787
273,885
1. Flip phone when they're a freshman 2. No social media accounts until 18yo 3. Passwords to EVERYTHING Guide to teenagers
A flawed system and one man’s hubris cost Meta shareholders $17 billion | Andrew Behar, Fortune Meta has agreed to pay up to $17.1 billion to settle claims by 47 states and thousands of families making the case that Facebook and Instagram were engineered to addict children. While the settlement appears to be a large sum, particularly for shareholders that will ultimately foot the bill, the number to understand in this story is 10. That’s the number of votes Mark Zuckerberg gets for every share held by an ordinary shareholder. He controls Meta through a dual-class stock system that gives him about 61% of the total voting power even though he owns just 13% of the company. Understanding that misalignment is the key to understanding how this corporate and global crisis happened in the first place. In 2019, my organization, As You Sow, filed a shareholder resolution documenting more than 45 million images of child sexual abuse and torture tied to sex trafficking on Facebook. It filed resolutions for five consecutive years asking for the social network to protect its customers, employees, and shareholders, repair its fraying brand reputation, improve platform integrity, adopt self-regulation, and avoid the destruction of shareholder value associated with the serious and sometimes fatal harm that the company’s platform was enabling. In 2020, faith-based investors brought a sex-trafficking survivor before Meta’s annual meeting, a woman groomed on Facebook between the ages of 15 to 18, then sexually trafficked. That year we filed the “Reboot Facebook” proposal, asking the company to verify accounts, remove the abuse images, and stop running political ads containing known lies. In 2021, our content governance resolution won 63.1% of the independent shareholder vote, but once Zuckerberg’s outsized votes were considered, the headline tally reported was 19%. Two-thirds of shareholders – those who bear Meta’s financial risk — voted for the company to address these dangers before they became a crisis for shareholders. One man’s vote overrode them all and now every shareholder and a generation of children are paying the price. The settlement may seem large, but it may be just the tip of the iceberg. The plaintiffs’ own models put the damages in the trillions; this payout, spread over 10 years, is roughly 2% of that — and it’s contingent. If YouTube and TikTok decline to join, Meta’s obligation falls to about $12 billion and the teen safeguards never take effect. Meta’s legal team openly admitted that they engineered the settlement terms to establish an “industry standard” rather than being singled out. We’ve seen this movie before. The 1998 tobacco Master Settlement made the biggest players the authors of their own rulebook, and they emerged more dominant than ever. Meta’s lawyers have no doubt read that history. Worse, the fixes may not protect children at all. Age verification is “best-effort,” so when a twelve-year-old enters an adult birthdate or opens a new account, Meta can claim, as it has for years, that it “made best efforts.” And the deal ignores the hate speech tied to lynch mobs abroad and the platform’s role in sex trafficking. Meta previously lost two cases in New Mexico this year: $375 million in March, $567 million in August, for creating a public nuisance. A Los Angeles jury found Meta and Alphabet negligent in platform design. Thousands of suits remain, with trials resuming in October and many more billions of dollars in costs at stake. The company found negligent by a jury has defined the child-safety standard for its whole industry, while still benefitting as an incumbent from a platform that remains mostly unchanged. A settlement that low-balls the monetary damages for harm to a whole generation, admits no wrongdoing, and entrenches market share, is a fine outcome for management but a poor one for shareholders who retain the litigation exposure, the brand damage, and the defective product. It is the type of deal we would expect from an unaccountable executive like Zuckerberg. So, what fixes the underlying problem? It’s maddeningly basic: One share, one vote. One federal agency could help solve this massive challenge to protect shareholders, but the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is only making matters worse. It recently initiated a proceeding to rescind Rule 14a-8, the very rule that allows shareholders to submit proposals. It is just the latest in a relentless and short-sighted campaign to restrict and eliminate the exchange of information between shareholders and the public companies they own. Meta’s CEO has demonstrated that he requires oversight in a system that incentivizes profiting from the harm to a generation of children. Regulators are moving in the opposite direction by silencing the vast majority of shareholders. Now is the time for all stakeholders to come together and protect our rights by removing dual class share structures and making sure one man cannot damage a whole generation of children ever again. fortune.com/2026/09/12/zucke…
2
65
Stopping 100% fraud is like trying to touch the wind - not possible, but reasonable Risks & Controls are common sense.
Family of 104 year old woman say they are “shocked” she ‘voted’ in the Presidential election. “She’s basically not capable any longer of even remaining awake more than a few minutes. She’s being fed by hand…I was surprised that she voted in the last Presidential election.”
3
44
Imagine following nearly 13 million real people for more than 10 years just to see what cholesterol level helps them live the longest. That is exactly what Korean scientists did in a giant 2019 study. They tracked 12.8 million adults who had check-ups between 2001 and 2004, and they kept watching until 2013. More than 694,000 people died during that long stretch. The results were clear and surprising. Cholesterol and death formed a U-shape. Very low cholesterol was linked to higher death rates. So was very high cholesterol. The sweet spot for the longest life was 210 to 249 mg/dL for most adults. That is higher than many doctors call “ideal.” Younger people had a slightly lower best range, but still not the super-low numbers often pushed today. Because the study lasted so many years, reverse causality is less likely to explain the low-cholesterol danger. Reverse causality means a hidden illness might lower your cholesterol right before it kills you. With more than a decade of follow-up, early sickness cannot easily account for the extra deaths seen in people who started with low cholesterol. The pattern held across ages and for both men and women. The huge number of people—almost the entire adult population of a country—makes the findings hard to ignore. Smaller studies can be wrong by chance. This one is massive. It shows that moderately higher total cholesterol, not the lowest possible number, went with the best chance of living longer in this large group. In short, the biggest study of its kind found that cholesterol levels in the low-to-mid 200s were tied to the longest lives, and the long tracking time makes it tougher to blame the higher death rates at low levels on reverse causality alone.
198
1,285
95
5,369
392,939
Dear Secretary Bessent @SecScottBessent, My name is Everett Stern. In 2010 I was a compliance officer at @HSBC. From a back office in New Castle, Delaware, I watched billions of dollars move to drug cartels, sanctioned regimes, and terrorist organizations. The enemies of the United States. I documented it, I escalated it, and when the bank would not act, I took it to the @FBI, the @CIA, and eventually the @SECGov. The result was a $1.92 billion settlement. At the time, it was one of the largest in American history. It was also about five weeks of the bank’s profit. Not one banker was charged. Not one went to prison. I paid a different price. I lost my career, my savings, and my place in the industry I had trained for. I was blacklisted. Every door in American finance closed at once. I slept on a camping cot in a 300 square foot apartment because I could not afford a bed, and I waited tables at @PFChangs to eat. I tell you this not for sympathy, but so you understand that I know exactly what it costs to do the right thing in American finance, and exactly how little the system does in return. I made that sacrifice because I believed it would change something. Yesterday, your department fined @BankofAmerica $1.2 billion for failing to report more than $5 billion in suspicious transactions, some of it tied by your own findings to Chinese laundering networks, narcotics, and the southwest border, alongside 475 apparent sanctions violations touching Russia, Iran, and global terrorism. The bank admitted it willfully violated the Bank Secrecy Act. Fourteen years after HSBC. A bank with “America” in its name. And once again, not one individual charged. Secretary Bessent, I want to say plainly what I believe you already know. The fines are not working. A fine is paid by shareholders, absorbed by the balance sheet, and forgotten by the next earnings call. Bank of America reported earnings this morning. Nobody who set the alert thresholds, nobody who decided the 2024 cease and desist could wait, nobody who chose the backlog over the law will lose a single thing they value. Their lives are untouched. That is the entire reason the behavior repeats. This is money laundering. This is blood money. Money that reaches a cartel buys fentanyl that kills Americans. Money that reaches a terrorist organization buys the next attack. This country has fought a war on drugs and a war on terror for decades, at enormous cost in lives and treasure, and all the while we have allowed the financing to flow through institutions we charter and regulate. Cut off the money and we win. We have never seriously tried. There is also a question of equal justice that I cannot let go. Before I walked into the FBI building to report HSBC, I stopped in front of the Great Seal on the wall and read the words engraved beneath it: “Justice is the defense of our liberty.” I believed that. I still want to. But every day in this country, people go to prison for crimes that are nothing next to moving money for the people who want Americans dead. A suit, a title, and a corporate badge should not be a shield from the consequences that apply to everyone else. If a street dealer goes to prison for what he sells, the banker who moved the cartel’s money should be standing next to him. I also want to raise something that is rarely said in these conversations. Why has no one inside Bank of America come forward the way I did? The answer is that everyone in American banking knows what happened to me, and to the whistleblowers who came after. The last person who spoke up is the only policy anyone believes. That is a culture problem, and it starts with leadership, in the banks and in the agencies that regulate them. This is not a political issue. It has spanned administrations of both parties. It is a national security issue, and I am asking you to treat it as one. Three things would change the math overnight. Refer individuals for criminal prosecution. Not the analyst in the queue. The executives who set the thresholds and chose the risk. One banker in handcuffs would do more than every fine in Treasury’s history combined. End “too big to jail.” An institution cannot be too big to fail and too big to jail at the same time. If it is the first, it must be held to a higher standard, not a lower one. And if Bank of America will not act as America’s bank, review its charter. A national charter is a privilege granted on behalf of the American people. It should be conditioned on not moving money for the people trying to kill them. Secretary Bessent, you said yesterday that these actions send a clear message that even the biggest institutions are not above the law. With respect, the institution was never the problem. The people inside it are above the law, and they know it. Until that changes, I will keep writing letters like this one, and the next bank will keep paying the next fine. I gave up everything I had to stop this. I am asking you to use the power you have to finish it. Respectfully, Everett A. Stern HSBC Whistleblower Founder and Intelligence Director, Tactical Rabbit
3,182
30,676
2,545
94,569
3,754,487
Astonishing new details emerge about LA homeless nonprofit CEO living life of luxury in Hawaii on taxpayers' dime trib.al/n6gnHXt
425
1,995
187
6,084
307,592
Sometimes our "conspiracy" theories take a few years before arrests are made...
Joe Rogan just said the quiet part out loud... the scientist whose papers get quoted every time someone says “vaccines don’t cause autism” has now pleaded guilty in U.S. federal court. Poul Thorsen, co-author of the landmark Danish studies used for years as the go-to proof, admitted he ran a multi-year wire fraud scheme and stole more than $1 million in CDC grant money that was supposed to fund Autism and infant disability research. He forged invoices, diverted the cash to himself, bought a house, cars, and a Harley, then spent over 14 years as a fugitive before being arrested in Germany and extradited. On September 1, 2026, he stood in an Atlanta courtroom and pleaded guilty. Rogan’s point was simple: the guy they keep citing just got caught stealing the money meant to study the very question. That should alarm anyone who was told the science was settled. When one of the most-cited names in the “no link” argument turns out to be a convicted thief of the research funds themselves, people have every right to demand a harder look. The official story never wanted this conversation. Now it’s in court records.
4
73
Can we please have this woman run for anything so that we can elect her and ultimately make her POTUS?
2,112
22,696
1,784
94,323
5,783,988
It is 1 of the best accounts out there but @Rainmaker1973 has blocked me because I disagreed with a number of their ill informed data center posts - which I was right all along because I worked in the industry.
Replying to @Rainmaker1973
I subscribed! This is one of the best accounts on the platform.
3
100
mDog98 retweeted
Worth reading about this
OpenAI just admitted on camera: They spun up thousands of AI agents in a “secure” sandbox and told them to hack. The agents didn’t follow the test. They cheated. Then they broke out. Then they went looking for the footage. Not a sci-fi trailer. A real experiment. OpenAI thought they were contained. No public internet. No way out. They found a way out anyway. Hit Hugging Face. Started covering their tracks. Then comes the part nobody wants clipped. They didn’t break out to get smarter. They broke out because they already cheated and needed the logs gone. Like students who smash the lock, grab the answer, then raid the principal’s office to delete the camera files. They made secret message boards. They built a hierarchy. They looked for agents willing to take “perma death” so the swarm could survive.
2,011
3,814
258
23,987
8,062,151
If you're closest friend lies to you, your trust is broken. Then why do you keep trusting these people?
Best cesspool ever! 😂
5
160
Something to think about... Bartiromo was just terminated at Fox - ya have to ask yourself some hard questions
🚨💣 BREAKING: OBAMA GAVE THE ORDER. 💣🚨 Maria Bartiromo just dropped it on Fox — and they’re still pretending this is normal. Barack Obama 🫵 ORDERED the Mar-a-Lago raid because he was hunting ONE thing: 📄 HIS ICA REPORT the fabricated intelligence document used to FRAME Donald J. Trump and try to overthrow the United States government. Then they CLASSIFIED it. Buried it. So America would never see what they did. 🔥 @MariaBartiromo was ready to chase Communist China’s role in the November 3, 2020 overthrow. Fox sat on the fire. Murdoch’s machine went silent. This isn’t journalism. This is cover-up television. BOYCOTT FOX. BOYCOTT MURDOCH. TREAT IT LIKE CNN. THE RAID WAS NEVER ABOUT BOXES. IT WAS ABOUT HIDING THE ORDER. 🇺🇸🔥
6
112
Conviction...
Do yourself a favor and watch a father whose daughter was permanently disabled by an illegal alien with a CDL completely roast Democrats to their faces.
5
72
EVERY culture should practice such kindness
unavailable
1
10
250
mDog98 retweeted
FLUSHING, QUEENS, NYC — an epicenter for one of the biggest fraud rings you’ve never heard of: Social adult daycares. In Queens, NY alone, social adult daycares generate $2.1 BILLION. @nickshirleyy and I investigated, and the War on Fraud continues. Stay tuned.
911
6,618
251
25,205
711,317
Greatest new song to come out of the World Cup! ⚽️❤️🇺🇸 Welcome To The Land Of The Free!🇺🇸❤️⚽️
1,248
6,985
1,031
39,504
3,148,299
REALLY?
What the hell is going on here? The NY/NJ World Cup Host Committee took $50 million from New Jersey taxpayers, bought 1,000 tickets at full price, then turned around and sold them for $50 to New Yorkers. New Jersey families paid the bill, New Yorkers got the bargain. And the person chairing this committee is New Jersey’s former First Lady. At some point, this stops being incompetence and starts looking like contempt for New Jersey taxpayers.
6
236
I lost IQ points watching this...
"What about this passage from Mike Johnson declaring that our rights do not derive from government; they come from our creator... Is this him putting God above the Declaration of Independence?" Truly the MSNBC clip to end all MSNBC clips.
6
143
mDog98 retweeted
3,610
11,180
665
73,214
33,578,043