Edinson Carranza (@edinsoncode) header
Edinson Carranza (@edinsoncode) profile picture

EX $SHIB Developer | Founder & Cryptocurrency Investor Expert in Full-Stack Development, AI, Machine Learning, and Blockchain Systems

Zurich, Swiss 🇨🇭
Joined May 2014
Photo by Edinson Carranza (@edinsoncode)Photo by Edinson Carranza (@edinsoncode)Photo by Edinson Carranza (@edinsoncode)Photo by Edinson Carranza (@edinsoncode)Photo by Edinson Carranza (@edinsoncode)Photo by Edinson Carranza (@edinsoncode)Photo by Edinson Carranza (@edinsoncode)Photo by Edinson Carranza (@edinsoncode)Photo by Edinson Carranza (@edinsoncode)Photo by Edinson Carranza (@edinsoncode)
Edinson Carranza retweeted
“Fix this bug” gives a coding agent a goal. “Don't change the public API” gives it a boundary. Those aren't the same instruction. Codex users: what boundary do you now include because you learned the hard way?
9
2
7
555
Edinson Carranza retweeted
We're hiring! Remote role. 3–4 hours/day researching startups and founders. Interested? DM me.
30
6
63
3,533
Edinson Carranza retweeted
How a startup goes from $0 to $1M ARR — in 30 seconds: $0 → 1 customer → $100 MRR 50 customers → $5K MRR Retention compounds it. 250 × $200 = $600K ARR 417 × $200 = $1,000,800 ARR No magic. Just math that repeats. Build. Sell. Retain. Repeat. What would you build? 👇
3
1
1
362
Edinson Carranza retweeted
Pitch your startup. Drop your link below. I'll personally review each product and share ideas to improve innovation, UX, and growth. Let's see what you're building.
8
1
3
385
Edinson Carranza retweeted
X is changing the rules. Likes and views aren't enough anymore. I explored the latest algorithm updates to discover what really drives reach, engagement, and growth. Are you adapting or still playing the old game? 👀
3
1
2
434
Edinson Carranza retweeted
X pays for verified engagement. Not just views. 1M views ≠ 1M paid impressions. Are you chasing views or revenue? 👀
1
1
286
Edinson Carranza retweeted
Your Next Competitor Is a 19-Year-Old With AI and No Employees. And that should terrify every traditional CEO. Not because teenagers are suddenly smarter. But because the rules of business are changing faster than most companies can adapt. The End of the Big Team Advantage Ten years ago, building a technology company required: Developers. Designers. Marketing specialists. Customer support. Sales teams. Significant capital. Today? One ambitious person with a laptop can use AI to handle parts of almost every one of those functions. Not perfectly. Not without human judgment. But well enough to launch something that once required an entire team. The cost of starting a business is collapsing. And that changes everything. The $100,000 Problem Imagine two competitors. Company A: 50 employees. Expensive offices. Multiple management layers. Six months to launch a new product. Company B: One 19-year-old founder. $200/month in AI tools. No office. A working prototype in seven days. Who wins? The obvious answer used to be Company A. Not anymore. Company B doesn't automatically win. Distribution, trust, capital and execution still matter. But Company B can now compete in markets that would have been completely inaccessible just a few years ago. That's the revolution. AI Isn't Replacing Entrepreneurs. It's Multiplying Them. We're entering an era where small teams can operate with capabilities once reserved for much larger organizations. One person can build software. Generate marketing content. Analyze customer behavior. Automate repetitive workflows. Serve customers across time zones. And test dozens of ideas before a traditional organization approves its first budget. Speed is becoming a competitive advantage that money alone cannot guarantee. The Biggest Threat Isn't Artificial Intelligence. It's someone using it better than you. While established companies debate whether employees should use ChatGPT, a new generation is building entire businesses around AI. They're not asking: "How can AI improve our existing processes?" They're asking: "What can I build now that was impossible three years ago?" Those are fundamentally different questions. And they lead to fundamentally different companies. The Uncomfortable Truth The next generation of founders might not need permission, prestigious degrees or millions in funding to get started. They'll still need ideas worth paying for, resilience, customers and good judgment. But they'll have something extraordinary: Access to capabilities that previously required money, teams and infrastructure. The future won't necessarily belong to the biggest companies. It may belong to the fastest learners. And somewhere right now, a 19-year-old with a laptop is building a product your company doesn't even know it will have to compete with. Here's my question: If you were starting a business tomorrow, would you rather have: A) $1 million in funding and 20 employees B) $10,000, powerful AI tools and complete freedom to execute Choose A or B. And tell me why. @edinsoncode
3
1
4
378
Edinson Carranza retweeted
Should a coding agent update a dependency without asking if that's what fixes the bug? Where do you draw the line between useful initiative and scope creep?
5
1
4
383
Edinson Carranza retweeted
We’re growing on X. 🚀 And now X is paying us to grow. $630.04 in the latest payout. More content. More reach. More growth. We're just getting started. 🔥 @edinsoncode
1
1
3
341
Edinson Carranza retweeted
AI didn't steal my job. It stole the tasks I hated doing. And I'm not asking for them back. 😂 What's one task you'd NEVER want to do manually again?
1
2
292
Edinson Carranza retweeted
What instruction do you wish Codex remembered without being told in every session? The coding style? The test command? "Please stop touching unrelated files"? What's yours?
3
1
4
376
Edinson Carranza retweeted
Would you rather have 1,000 followers who buy what you build or 100,000 who like what you post? What would change your answer?
3
1
3
362
Edinson Carranza retweeted
What's one task you WANT AI to do, but it still takes longer to explain than to do yourself? Not a benchmark. Your actual work.
2
1
3
297
Edinson Carranza retweeted
Meet Leo. 🍄 He's building an app — but look at his keys. One for OpenAI. One for Anthropic. One for xAI. One for DeepSeek. Every door, a different key. Every month, a different bill. 😩 Then he found VIANTI AI: 🔑 ONE key. ONE door. Behind it: 150+ AI models in one world. The smartest. The fastest. The cheapest. Pick yours like choosing a character. 🎮 One platform. One API. The future of AI, all in one place.
1
1
2
183
Edinson Carranza retweeted
A creator can build an audience of thousands and still have no idea what to charge a brand. Follower count isn't a rate card. If you've done a brand deal: what do you wish you'd known before the first one?
2
1
1
2
336
Edinson Carranza retweeted
You built the audience. You create the content. But you don't control the payout. We're building a platform for X creators who want another way to earn. Before we build what nobody needs: What's harder for you right now — finding brands, pricing your work, or getting paid?
1
1
268
Edinson Carranza retweeted
I’ve been shipping UI the slow way for years. So I built Viainti — free components so builders stop reinventing the same buttons, forms, and layouts. No pitch deck. No waitlist. Just stuff you can drop into a product today. If you build AI tools and need a clean UI layer, steal from @viaintisol — or tell me what’s missing.
1
2
380
Edinson Carranza retweeted
hahahah Good Morning Red
1
4
350
Edinson Carranza retweeted
Unpopular take: “Vibe coding” isn’t dying because the models got worse. It’s dying because the people who shipped with it got tired of owning code they can’t debug. The ones still winning tightened the harness: AGENTS.md, skills, permissions, reviews. Still vibe-coding in production — or did you graduate?
14
1
10
1,413