/1 In his debate with @Craig_Truglia, @HwsEleutheroi cited the 794 Council of Frankfurt as if it claimed that Nicaea 2 failed to "remain content with the teachings of the ancient fathers".
This is not a statement attributable to Frankfurt.
A Thread 🧵
5/ This is a clear textual misattribution on White's part. He is not the first Protestant to falsely attribute a statement from the Opus to the Council of Frankfurt.
Martin Chemnitz did it in the 16th century.
Andrew Messmer did it in 2022.
@gavinortlund did it multiple times.
Final/ These persistent misrepresentations of the Council of Frankfurt need to stop.
For a more detailed discussion of the Franks, and why Protestants should stop using them in their anti-EO polemics, see my Substack article "An Outright Break With Rome"
iconsofgod.substack.com/p/an…
Reminds me of this:
youtube.com/shorts/FJmlYVOP-…
and this:
youtube.com/watch?v=2-EouZi1…
Can we please stop monetizing weapons you've named after a bishop that you would otherwise consider a saint-worshipping idolater, and go back to apologetics and scholarship?
Our Roman Spatha sword titled “the Augustine,” in the Apologia blade series that I partnered with @dawson_knives to create, just launched.
To find out more or to purchase your own, go to dawsonknives.com/products/au….
Augustine: "You [Paul] are reigning with the one you stoned [Stephen], reigning with Christ. There you can both see each other, can both now hear my sermon; both of you please pray for us."
amazon.com/Sermons-306-340A-…
"Apart from the few texts adduced by the iconoclasts… there is virtually no evidence of any Christian reaction against veneration of icons, which tells against any idea that such veneration was a sudden innovation in the sixth century (or even the fourth)."
-Fr. Andrew Louth
Ortho rules around icons and the theology of "essence/energies" are 8th century inventions at the earliest. Consider Eastern Orthodox Byzantinist, Fr. Andrew Louth, who taught Patristics at Oxford and Durham:
“It would seem obvious to a historian that neither the eighth-century doctrine of the necessity of making and venerating icons nor the fourteenth-century Palamite distinction between the essence and energies can really be found in the fourth century Fathers.” [“Is Development of Doctrine a Valid Category in Orthodoxy and Western Culture: A Collection of Essays Honoring Jaroslav Pelikan on his Eightieth Birthday” (Crestwood: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 2005, 47]
Here's a quick meme to give to Protestants whenever they attempt to assert that the Pre-Nicene church was "Aniconic".
Jas Elsner is a Professor of Late Antique Art at the University of Oxford and has been active in his respective field for decades.
For a discussion of this quote and a broader highlight of recent trends in secular scholarship on early Christian art, see my Substack Article "The Myth of Early Christian Aniconism" at this URL: iconsofgod.substack.com/p/th…
Part 1: The Myth of Early Christian Aniconism
iconsofgod.substack.com/p/th…
Greetings X,
My 6-part Substack Series, "The Disaster of Reformed Historiography of Art", is fully released. The introductory post is here. I hope you enjoy! open.substack.com/pub/iconso…
Hello X! My first Substack article on Roman Imperial Images, is now live. I hope you enjoy! Link is here:
open.substack.com/pub/iconso…
-Michael






















