Catholic. Traditional. (@observeratus) header
Catholic. Traditional. (@observeratus) profile picture

Authentic Catholic. Anti faux-trad. Rejects the VII New Order. Intolerant of heresy & apostasy. Impervious to Novus Ordo and R&R psy-ops. Allergic to sophistry.

Joined March 2015
Photo by Catholic. Traditional. (@observeratus)Photo by Catholic. Traditional. (@observeratus)Photo by Catholic. Traditional. (@observeratus)Photo by Catholic. Traditional. (@observeratus)Photo by Catholic. Traditional. (@observeratus)Photo by Catholic. Traditional. (@observeratus)Photo by Catholic. Traditional. (@observeratus)Photo by Catholic. Traditional. (@observeratus)Photo by Catholic. Traditional. (@observeratus)Photo by Catholic. Traditional. (@observeratus)
Catholic. Traditional. retweeted
Taylor ‘Ashkenazi’ Marshall was ordained by Jack Iker on October 28th, 2005.
1
6
11
736
Catholic. Traditional. retweeted
For the historical record: Abp. Lefebvre's 1983 Ridgefield conference after the departure of 'the Nine' (nine sedevacantists) - seekingtruthgoodnessbeauty.b… Three of the Nine (Saborn, Dolan, Cekada) give THEIR side of the story here: soundcloud.com/truerestorati…
3
5
1
26
2,273
Catholic. Traditional. retweeted
The Recorded Lectures of Dr. Bella Dodd are now available as a book - enroutebooksandmedia.com/bel…
2
5
23
1,001
Catholic. Traditional. retweeted
Such analogies are misleading if they are not reflections of Catholic doctrine. The Vatican II 'popes' are not merely firemen refusing to act, they are the ARSONISTS. But it is impossible that true Popes be the arsonists. Fellay is not extinguishing any fire, he is attempting to fight fire with more fire. The result can only be an even worse conflagration.
If a firefighter who is entrusted with extinguishing a burning house refuses to act, the bystander who has the means to fight the flames does not become a rebel by taking up the hose. Necessity does not abolish authority but neither does authority abolish the duty to protect souls. Salus animarum suprema lex: the salvation of souls is the supreme law.
12
17
2
98
7,450
Catholic. Traditional. retweeted
In his personal diary, Mgr. Joseph Clifford Fenton wrote on Nov. 25, 1962: “…some other people believe what I have thought for several months, namely, that John XXIII is definitely a lefty. This nonsense to the effect that he is ‘deceived’ or ‘mal servite’ is disgraceful. He is the boss.”
3
9
240
Catholic. Traditional. retweeted
A few years ago, I found the Carmelites' execution announcement in the Journal de Paris. sharonkabel.com/post/carmeli…
1
4
11
414
Catholic. Traditional. retweeted
Here we go again. These "Catholic Hermeticists" don't know when to give up. We need another St. Irenaeus, St. Dominic, or St. Anthony of Padua to crush these heretics and their damnable lies.
These books will change your life, if you let them.
10
8
51
2,560
Catholic. Traditional. retweeted
Instead of attacking the messenger (because it's an anonymous account), why not objectively analyze the message itself? Here's the sermon given on June 28th by the priest who wrote the email to the faithful on July 2nd, the same sermon he references in said letter. Either you accept that the post-Conciliar Church is the Catholic Church and submit to it or you recognize that such an institution cannot be the actual Catholic Church, denounce it as counterfeit, and have no part with it. What you cannot do is claim that the Church divinely instituted by Christ Himself can also be responsible for directly deceiving and injuring the flock of Christ, which is why you get to pick and choose when and when not to obey the "Pope", as well as where the Church's laws do and don't apply. Such an assertion is wholly anti-Catholic. It's one thing for a cleric to lose his marbles and act against the Church; it's another thing altogether to claim that the Church herself, through the Vicar of Christ, opposes the will of Our Lord Himself. This is why we left the #SSPX: because we finally understand that the Modernist Synodal church they claim to be in communion with CANNOT be the Roman Catholic Church instituted by Our Lord Jesus Christ through His Apostles. The Catholic Church has returned to the catacombs, to the wilderness. As we said in our original tweet, what is the point of appealing the decision to the "Holy Father" when it makes no difference to the SSPX anyway, since they'll unilaterally decide what's legitimate and what isn't?
Replying to @holysmoke
Not really. That (anonymous) blogger is nuts
4
6
2
21
7,325
Catholic. Traditional. retweeted
Replying to @StephenKokx
True, traditionalists didn't cause the crisis. But by maintaining the recognize and resist stance, isn't it precisely the SSPX that continues to give the modernist hierarchy its semblance of power? Pretending they have power only prolongs the crisis.
5
21
528
Catholic. Traditional. retweeted
2
13
3
28
2,057
Catholic. Traditional. retweeted
Dear @stephenkokx, you wrote: “I can’t recall a single public statement His Excellency [Viganò] has made that doesn’t read like one of the great social encyclicals of the 19th century” - please consider the Naturalism in his open letter to President Trump: novusordowatch.org/2020/06/h…
4
1
18
Catholic. Traditional. retweeted
Why settle for the SSPX, which insists on calling the head of a non Catholic sect the Pope, when you can have the fullness of Truth in the Catholic Church cmri.org/about-cmri/theologi…
1
5
13
462
The idea of Catholic Charities trafficking millions of Hispanic migrants into the US just for them to convert to Pentecostalism as soon as they get here
1
3
48
1,434
Catholic. Traditional. retweeted
This part of the SSPX order of service defies belief. There is no papal mandate.
20
25
264
17,671
Catholic. Traditional. retweeted
This clip shows the utter inconsistency of recognizing the apostates in Rome as valid Roman Catholic authorities while going off and doing your own thing, effectively overruling the 'Vicar of Christ' and sitting in judgment on his pronouncements. A most anti-traditional thing!
SSPX Consecrations: Asked if the four bishops have the apostolic mandate, the notary replies -- “It is the Catholic & Roman church, always faithful to the traditions received from the apostles, who in entirely exceptional circumstances demands that we provide for the upholding of these traditions, that is the deposit of faith & that we take the means necessary to transmit them faithfully to all men for the salvation of their souls. Since the Second Vatican Council up to the present day the authorities in the church have been animated by a spirit that is contrary to the faith & have been acting against holy tradition. They will no longer endure sound doctrine” Schreiber then makes the episcopal oath.
4
16
1
57
5,975
Catholic. Traditional. retweeted
introiboadaltaredei2.blogspo… See my latest post, “Why I Believe In Our Lady Of Fatima (And So Should You)” #fatima #sedevacantism
1
6
1
10
1,011
Catholic. Traditional. retweeted
I’m not sede but I find it so dishonest to call them Protestant. It says more about you than them if you use that to describe faithful Catholics.
11
5
77
2,813
Catholic. Traditional. retweeted
Importante declaración del Obispo Paul Morgan (de la Resistencia de Williamson), sobre las próximas consagraciones episcopales del próximo 1 de julio en Écône havresaintjoseph-tradition.f…
1
1
5
570
Catholic. Traditional. retweeted
Concerning this topic, we must be brutally honest: we attended various SSPX pilgrimages in the past, and at no point did we give any thought to the contradictions inherent to our behavior. We simply trusted in what our priests told us. This is why we want to thank Our Lord for His Mercy towards us, for giving us the docility to read/listen to the works of those great defenders of the Church such as @NovusOrdoWatch, @WireCatholic, @LouieVerrecchio, @TheWMReview, @Radical_Fidelit, Fr. Cekada †, Bp. Pierre Roy, Bp. Altamira, Bp. Pivarunas and the CMRI clergy, among others. We never would have developed these reflections about the importance of our actions as Catholics and their grave consequences if we had not dropped our fear of reading the solid and objective arguments of these faithful sons of the Church concerning the ongoing vacancy of the Apostolic See. May Our Lord keep His blessings upon them! Their perseverance has not been in vain. We want SSPX attendees to understand that we're not attacking them; we want to help them to wake up as we did, and we would like to see their priests do the same. It is our desire to fight the good fight and defend Holy Mother Church! #SedeVacante #FightForTheChurch #UnamSanctam
Why does the SSPX dare to take the faithful on pilgrimages and visits to Catholic churches currently controlled by the conciliar/synodal Church? Furthermore, how have they dared to celebrate Holy Mass in some of those churches, such as the case of the SSPX in Colombia at the Basilica of Our Lady de Chiquinquirá since 2023, or the case of †Bp. Tissier de Mallerais at All Souls Church in Sanford, Florida for the 2023 confirmations? There are only two options to answer that question: 1: The SSPX doesn't believe that Novus Ordo masses produce transubstantiation and, as such, they do not fear entering sanctuaries where they would otherwise be profaning the Body and Blood of Our Lord Jesus Christ due to particles of the Sacred Host being scattered on the floor. (Even in this case, there would still be the question of whether those temples need to be reconsecrated or not.) 2: The SSPX does believe that Novus Ordo masses produce transubstantiation, but they don't care that they themselves could be stepping on particles of the Body and Blood of Our Lord. In either case, they are gravely deceiving their faithful. In the first case, they would be concealing what they actually think of the Novus Ordo and its clergy, and in the second case, they would be allowing the faithful to commit the same grave profanation that Novus Ordo laity allegedly fall into. This is madness!!! #SedeVacante #FightForTheChurch #UnamSanctam
8
5
2
21
5,485