Pulkit (@pulkit_one) header
Pulkit (@pulkit_one) profile picture

creator (ai • crypto • depin) | ambassador @ionet | independent views

Joined February 2021
Photo by Pulkit (@pulkit_one)Photo by Pulkit (@pulkit_one)Photo by Pulkit (@pulkit_one)Photo by Pulkit (@pulkit_one)Photo by Pulkit (@pulkit_one)Photo by Pulkit (@pulkit_one)Photo by Pulkit (@pulkit_one)Photo by Pulkit (@pulkit_one)Photo by Pulkit (@pulkit_one)Photo by Pulkit (@pulkit_one)
Happy Diwali to everyone 🪔 🎇 may the divine bless each of us with good health, joyful hearts and endless prosperity. Let the light of our resolve guide Bharat to rise stronger, completely self reliant, and undefeated. Jai Hind 🇮🇳
29
The AI infrastructure race is becoming less about how many GPUs companies can buy and more about how efficiently available compute can reach the people who need it. Neoclouds are taking on billions in debt to expand GPU capacity: - SpaceX closed $40B for GPUs - CoreWeave is carrying $35B while power shortages, construction delays and rising energy demand are making that expansion harder. Data centers are projected to reach 945 TWh by 2030, even access to funding is becoming more selective. Meanwhile, AI workloads are changing. Open weight models now handle 70%+ of tokens on OpenRouter and developers need flexible compute across different providers rather than being tied to sold out clusters or long term reservations. Two approaches are playing out: • Debt funded new capacity: Borrow → buy GPUs → build campuses Constraint: debt cost, power queues, concentration Result: scarce on demand access • Utilize existing GPUs : Aggregate hardware already powered and connected Constraint: needs durable demand Result: faster access, less new power required. Neither removes the need for new infrastructure but making better use of existing resources can help meet demand without waiting for every new data center to come online. That's the part of @ionet's approach i always find worth following. The important signals aren't just how many GPUs join the network, but how consistently they're being used (35M+ compute hours and counting), whether customers return and how much demand translates into actual revenue ($29M total network earnings, with surplus being burned). More compute supply matters, making that supply useful and consistently accessible matters just as much.
4
1
6
105
This chart is useful the 249x gap in the same sector is extreme but the more practical signal for people who are actually in AI infrastructure is which networks have revenue that looks durable from AI workloads versus early or subsidized activity. @ionet, with 6x multiple reflects a network designed from the start for AI training and inference, aggregating GPUs from independent providers globally so teams can spin up clusters in under two minutes at 50-70% below hyperscaler rates, with native multi GPUs support rather than forcing full nodes or long reservations that’s different from general purpose marketplaces or networks that still lean heavily on rendering and other non AI jobs. When the revenue is coming from AI teams that need the capacity running and keep coming back, the multiple starts to look less like speculation and more like a function of utilization and honestly that’s the part which makes ionet different.
Market Cap Per $1 of Yearly Revenue 10 DePIN networks 👇 → $ALTHEA | @AltheaNetwork : 2.4x → $IO | @ionet : 6x → $GEOD | @GEODNET : 15x → $GLW | @GlowFND : 27x → $SCP | @ScPrimeCloud : 30x RENDER sits at 324x. FIL at 595x. Same sector, 249x between the ends.
7
110
It's over for crypto ig 👀
BREAKING: Binance has been hacked with wallets across the Ethereum, Bitcoin, and TRON networks seeing outflows of -$5.7 billion. The hack includes $1.45 billion worth of Bitcoin and $875 million worth of ETH. If confirmed, this would mark the biggest hack in crypto history. We expect more information shortly.
2
45
Akash just voted 98% to move from Cosmos to Solana. i've been in DePIN space for a while now and maybe this is the story i've been waiting to see play out the thing that always stood out to me about @ionet, is the simplicity of the choice - no own chain, just build on @solana, that's it. Be where the DePIN users already are. And look at who's on Solana now. Helium, Render, Hivemapper, XNET, Geodnet, ionet… and Akash is walking in the door. That's not a coincidence bcuz the whole DePIN ecosystem actually lives on solana only. Actual users, real revenue and low fees. Akash took the longer road, ionet took the direct one. Either way, they're neighbors now. As someone who creates content in this space, i think the "DePIN chain" question has a pretty clear answer at this point and it's not the one most people expected 2 years ago. thedefiant.io/news/blockchai…
1
7
142
One thing this journey at @ionet reminds me of is that growth often demands a change in direction. What worked yesterday may not work tomorrow. Sometimes, moving forward means letting go of what you've built and finding a path that fits the present and that's where the actual skill comes which is knowing when to adapt, learning as you go and having the courage to keep moving even when the next step isn't clear. 1 trillion requests didn't come from getting everything right. Of course, it came from figuring out what worked and having the conviction to follow it maybe growth isn't about finding one path and sticking to it forever, but about knowing when that path needs to change while staying focused on what you're trying to achieve. kudos to ionet team for this huge achievement 🫡
IO Intelligence at @ionet has crossed 1 trillion requests processed. Getting here also meant closing two launch ready products - BC8 and Quantum Agents, and shelving a mobile app. We had to choose where to put our focus. Last year, we were running Cyber Monday campaigns to make B2C subscriptions work. We ran hackathons across Asia and Eastern Europe and tried products from agent creation to training as a service. Several attempts did not find enough traction. We gradually focused on reaching developers inside the tools they already used. That meant partnerships with vibe coding platforms and becoming an inference provider in tools such as @goose_oss. On @OpenRouter, we went from roughly 500 million daily tokens in March to 20 billion. We also became a day zero launch partner for leading open model labs. Two engineers have carried much of the work on integrations, tool calling, serving costs and reliability while the workloads kept changing. Many others helped us get here. Some are still at io.net. Others have moved on. Their contributions are still part of what we build on, and this milestone belongs to them too. Congratulations to the team, past and present. Thank you to the partners and developers who supported us when progress was harder to see. Before io.net, I thought product market fit was the point where things would settle down. Now I understand how much doubt comes before it, and how a new model or price change can reopen questions you thought you had answered. Growing usage does not make those questions go away.
13
177
Many people in India don't even know that UPI Autopay is not one time payment and how to stop the debit. Whole bangalore is funded due to this technical illiteracy ig
3
75
Neuroplasticity is the new obsession on 𝕏
1
46
You can order more GPUs but you can’t order a power grid to catch up that’s what i found interesting in this read on the physical limits of data center expansion. The AI industry is moving at an incredible pace but the infrastructure supporting it has a different timeline. • Power availability • Grid connections • Construction • Equipment can all become bottlenecks long before demand slows down. Having followed the GPU compute space, i think this is an important shift in how we look at the problem. Compute scarcity isn’t just about how many GPUs exist. It’s also about how quickly we can bring capacity online and make it accessible. New data centers will remain essential but building more cannot be the only answer That's why making better use of existing compute could become an increasingly important part of the equation moving forward. io.net/blog/the-physical-lim…
2
6
73
Imagine owning the platform and still "Boosting" your own post to get attention. When the algorithm is yours and the reach still isn't enough, you know it's all about the Indian market 😂
1
4
51
Remember, when a man doesn't deal with his demons, his sons will become them and his daughters will marry them
4
46
A few months ago, 3B tokens/day on OpenRouter would have looked like a pretty serious number. Today, @ionet is pushing 20B+ and that's pretty interesting the same underlying compute is suddenly doing nearly 7x the work no giant GPU count headline, no new fleet to point at, that's a serious level of scaling tbh. Just better utilization, better optimization and more useful work coming out of the hardware already there. Maybe, this kind of infrastructure progress can look boring on a dashboard until you zoom out and see what changed. Quietly, the numbers are starting to tell a pretty interesting story.
Over 20B tokens processed on OpenRouter in a single day. In July, we were serving around 3B a day. Same machines. More output. This is what optimisation and a better tech stack look like. Built on io.net.
11
290
This is where the compute story gets really interesting to me 👀 better price discovery can make compute easier to finance and hedge. That can bring more capital toward useful capacity, which creates more supply and usage data, more usage then improves pricing again. more compute → more usage → better data → better pricing → more capital → more compute. ngl, that loop could be a big deal for AI infrastructure.
AI compute is starting to look less like a commodity and more like something that can be priced, financed and traded. The pieces are already showing up. 1. Compute markets @akashnet, @spheron, @AethirCloud, @ionet, @hyperbolic_labs, @nosana_ai, @rendernetwork, @vast_ai, @runpod and @computeexchange are making GPU capacity easier to source. The problem is still pricing. An H100 hour isn't really the same everywhere. Location, setup, latency and reliability all change what that hour is worth. 2. Price discovery @silicondata and @OrnnExchange are working on GPU price benchmarks. This matters because you can't build a proper futures market without having a reference price. CME is preparing H100 and B200 futures based on Silicon Data indexes, while ICE is working with Ornn on cash-settled compute futures. 3. Financing @USDai_Official and @gaib_ai are taking the next step: using GPU infrastructure and its expected revenue as the basis for financing. USDai currently reports $398M TVL, $283M in collateral and 13 active GPU-backed loans. That's where compute starts becoming something that can support credit, not just workloads. 4. Usage rights @AskVenice and @0G_labs are working on transferable access to AI services. Venice's DIEM, for example, represents daily API credit rather than ownership of a GPU. The problem here is portability. A useful compute asset eventually needs to work across providers, not just inside one application. 5. Derivatives CME, ICE, @Lighter_xyz, @bitget and @tradexyz are already testing markets around future GPU prices. That creates an obvious use case: AI companies can hedge rising compute costs. GPU providers can hedge falling rental income. Traders take the other side. The question is whether real hedgers eventually provide the demand, rather than most of the volume coming from traders. 6. What is still missing Collateral and settlement are harder. You can't store an unused December GPU hour and sell it next year. The resource expires. That makes compute different from most financial assets and makes the way these contracts are collateralized important. Stablecoins and systems like x402 could eventually handle the other side: an agent buying compute by the request, job or model call and settling automatically. We're not at the finished market yet. But the pieces are starting to connect: compute → price → financing → usage rights → derivatives → settlement. That's the part I'm watching. If this develops properly, compute won't just be something AI companies pay for. It becomes something markets can price, finance and hedge.
6
129
Most of the times people look at decentralized Al and ask, "which token wins?" but the bigger story is the stack: COMPUTE, DATA, STORAGE, VERIFICATION, PRIVACY, COORDINATION and AGENTS. understand and learn what each layer solves and you'll see where decentralized Al is actually being built. This is a great post to begin with 👇
Layers of Decentralized AI 👇 2026: ~$21B MC 2030: ~$80B (~40% CAGR est.) $NEAR → Confidential AI Intents $TRAC → Verifiable Knowledge Graph $NIL → Inference Under Encryption $SERV → Multi-Agent Orchestration $TAO → Open Market For Intelligence $QUBIC → Mining Redirected To AI $VVV → Private, Uncensored Inference $FET → The AGI Alliance $GRASS → AI's Web-Data Layer $GRT → Indexing Every Chain $IO → GPU Network For AI $FIL → Verifiable Storage Market $EIGEN → Restaking For Verification Seven layers. One stack. 21 ways to own it. The compute is real. The winners aren't decided.
10
263
Read this piece and it made me think of something which is common in creators journey too. . . . . . . . . It says, $31.6T going into AI infra by 2050 and people still can't get a GPU when they actually need one. The obvious take is simple that we just don't have enough chips, more DATA CENTERS, more H100s, that's the version we keep hearing but the messier part is quieter. A lot of those GPUs already exist, some are reserved, powered on and just sitting there. Locked into long term commitments while the actual job might only need them for 48 hours. Spread across clouds, on-prem setups and different regions that don't really talk to each other it's like empty seats on a flight that's still showing sold out. And it got me thinking about how we do this as creators too we assume the answer is always more, more POSTS, more VIDEOS, more OUTPUT. Meanwhile, the audience we already have is sitting there.... - old work isn't getting discovered - distribution is scattered - attention gets stranded, just like those GPUs. Maybe the hard part isn't always creating more, instead it's getting better at connecting what's already there with the moment it can actually be useful. Think about it for once. io.net/blog/the-30-trillion-…
1
8
182
crossing 15B tokens in a day is the obvious headline here.... but the line about running 2-3 experiments every week caught my attention more because from the outside, you mostly see the big numbers. You don't see all the little changes, tests, failed ideas, pricing shifts, new models, different workloads, etc that eventually add up to that number. 15B is the headline, the consistency behind it is probably the harder part.
500M tokens a day in March 2026. 15B tokens a day yesterday. That is daily volume across @ionet hosted models on @OpenRouter, served on an almost same mix of H100, H200 and B300 GPUs since Day 1. Along the way, we became day zero launch partners for open source reasoning models including @Zai_org, @Kimi_Moonshot, @Alibaba_Qwen , Nemotron, @MiniMax_AI and GPT OSS. Nvidia has built something useful with the recent Nemotron 3.5 Lightning. A fast, capable and efficient open model, with weights, datasets and recipes that give teams like ours room to optimise. Yesterday, the OpenRouter provider token share showed @ionet at 64% token share for Nemotron 3.5 Lightning, the largest provider share. Effective prices per million tokens: Input: $0.0335 Output: $0.179 Our volumes and price reflect both usage and affordability. We are serving this workload profitably on an inference stack built and operated end to end in house. Our small team still runs two to three experiments every week. We track tool calling changes, frontier lab updates and what communities on vLLM and Sglang are discussing, then test what matters on our own workloads. Demand changes with time zones and days of the week. Launch excitement fades. New providers arrive and price wars start. You get used to revisiting your assumptions. With GPU rental costs rising, compute efficiency and reliable tool calling matter more. A low token price only helps if the task gets done correctly. Open models are becoming capable enough to build around and economical enough to serve at scale. There is a lot of engineering behind making both true at once. Thank you @NVIDIA and the Nemotron team, @OpenRouter and @alexatallah for allowing providers like ourselves to work seamlessly, and our engineers, who know how much work sits behind a neat row in a pricing table.
1
14
333
Still 200+ days left, make them count !!
2
51
This is probably the part of DePIN that gets overlooked a decentralized network can have thousands of nodes and still struggle to prove that anyone actually needs what it's providing. but revenue starts answering that question. @ionet now is leading DePIN in revenue, with multiple large enterprise deals already deploying and a pipeline several times larger than its current footprint and then @Gaurav_ionet drops the line about potentially owning data centers. That's interesting, because decentralized infrastructure doesn't necessarily mean owning nothing. It can mean building an open network where owned capacity and distributed capacity coexist, while the network handles the messy part of matching real demand with available compute. It's a much more interesting DePIN thesis than simply counting nodes.
We are already leading DePIN in revenue. In coming weeks, the gap goes exponential. 📈 Multiple massive enterprise deals just closed and are deploying right now. We arent talking incremental growth, the new pipeline is multiple Xs larger than our entire current footprint. Demand is scaling so violently I feel its time for IO to own our own data centers :) . The floodgates are open. Don't blink. 🚀 <Image attached from depin pulse.>
1
14
294
Looking forward to get in the OG club
Different Masks, Same Club🎭 Behind every mask lies a bigger story Apply for WL: zcash.club/tasks
56
Applied for the @zaddrnet whitelist 🫡 2,800 shielded faces on zcash Privacy isn’t just a feature here, it’s the damn whole point. Hoping for the best 🤞
Nice to not meet you. 2,800 faces on @Zcash . Every face is public. Every owner isn't. Whitelist is open. Apply early. zaddr.net/apply
3
4
140
saw your post and applied, thanks @Akasheth_ 🤝
1
27