Codex AI Korea Community Leader on Facebook, HPE Sr. HPC&AI PreSales Solution Architect, Former Microsoft Sr. Technical Evangelist,

대한민국 서울
Joined January 2009
On Saturday before @OpenAI DevDay there was DevDay Exchange Community Hackathon Berlin hosted by @maxjendrall and @paw_lean. Over 250 Builders came together to use Codex to “just build things”. It was amazing to meet so many great people and it was a pleasure to host the mini-workshops. Thanks @GreeChivet, @mrlesk, and @artur_wala for giving spontaneous talks! Also happy to finally meet @reach_vb and @paw_lean from OpenAI and the amazing Ambassadors in person: @mrlesk ,@artur_wala , @laraavci_ , @janpfrenger and of course host @maxjendrall. Thanks everyone that joined! Looking forward to DevDay today!
1
3
12
198
synabreu retweeted
#NVIDIAGTC Berlin: 젠슨 황 CEO의 키노트에서 공개된 NVIDIA의 AI 미래 전략을 한눈에 알아보세요! 🌍✨ 유럽 기술 생태계에 약 100억 달러를 투자하며 AI의 저변을 확장하는 NVIDIA의 비전을 블로그에서 자세히 읽어보세요 🔗 nvda.ws/4snD5Ax 🏭 AI 팩토리: AI 팩토리 구축 기간을 획기적으로 단축하는 DSX POD 공개 🤖 AI 에이전트: OpenShell Reference Architecture for Safe AI Agents로 안전한 에이전트 개발 지원 🌐 오픈 모델: 최첨단 오픈 모델, Agent Knowledge Foundation과 Kumo, CUDA-X 제공 ⚙️ 산업 혁신: 의료, 통신, 제조 등 다양한 산업 분야에서 AI 적용 확대 🚗 피지컬 AI: Hyperion과 Alpamayo로 자율주행 생태계 확장하고, Isaac GR00T 기반 휴머노이드 개발 지원
2
1
3
169
NVIDIA's Vera Rubin NVL72 could train large mixture-of-experts AI models using 75% fewer GPUs than Grace Blackwell. Training a 10T-parameter model on 100T tokens in one month would just require roughly 16,000 Rubin GPUs, compared with 64,000 GB200 GPUs.
8
5
2
58
12,912
synabreu retweeted
Nvidia also reduced the NVLink bandwidth per GPU from 1.8 TB/s (3.6TB/s bidi) to 1.5 TB/s (3 TB/s bidi) AMD now has a higher HBM bandwidth (23.3 TB/s) as well as a higher scale-up bandwidth (1.8 TB/s)
Holy smoke NVIDIA has officially lowered the HBM4 pin speed. 11.7-> 9.3Gbps
34
36
7
404
77,344
synabreu retweeted
Congrats to the winners of the AI Grand Prix in Singapore 🏆 Everyone had 24 hours to build, with a combination of individual challenges and a team project. Big thanks to @Coupang and @Carousell for the partnership.
2
3
25
1,930
synabreu retweeted
机器人已经开始学会拥抱人类了! 马克斯·普朗克研究所和苏黎世联邦理工推出 HuggieBot 2.0。 身高 1.75 米,配备压力传感器、加热装置,还能根据人体动作调整拥抱力度。 刚开始抱人像叉车,几秒后竟然学会了搂肩膀。 是不是以后连情绪价值,都要靠机器人提供了?🤣
385
420
182
2,429
590,897
PROFIT ALERT🚨: AMD @vllm_project can generate up to $3/hr/chip in pure profit serving the open-source Kimi K3 model, even after accounting for the rapid increase in chip rental prices post-Claude Code. Kimi K3 2.8T is a great model for AMD, as it has over 2.8 trillion parameters that can take advantage of AMD's 288GB per chip. B200 CANNOT fit Kimi K3 in a single server, so it has to use tensor parallelism or pipeline parallelism for communication across 400Gbit/s InfiniBand/Ethernet, which is 18x slower than the BW within an NVLink domain.
51
18
11
333
37,882
synabreu retweeted
243 people signed up for a 60-person AI meetup in my hometown. I honestly didn't expect this.. After attending OpenAI DevDay in San Francisco, I wanted to bring that same energy back to Suwon, South Korea. Yesterday, 59 of us came together. Developers, designers, creators, students, and people who had never written a line of code. We shared what we'd built with Codex, tried live AI demos, and connected over our love of AI. I was worried people might feel awkward meeting strangers. Instead, their biggest complaint was that we didn't have enough time to talk. That meant more to me than anything. AI communities don't have to exist only in major tech hubs. Sometimes, all people need is a place to find each other. And this is just the beginning. ❤️ Huge thanks to OpenAI, our speakers, volunteers, and everyone who made this possible!
8
4
22
2,130
synabreu retweeted
One bottleneck for the AI buildout is skilled labor US manufacturers are working existing staff longer and paying up for new ones: - Hours per worker are outpacing headcount growth in 7 out of 10 sectors - Workers who switch jobs are getting ~10% pay increases, about double the ~5% for those who stick around Charts of the Week: a16z.news/p/charts-of-the-we…
Since 2019, imports of AI hardware have grown faster than US production in every category US production vs. imports: - Computers: +46% vs. +366% - Comms equipment: +87% vs. +175% - Semis: +76% vs. +131% - Grid & electrical equipment: -7% vs. +69% Charts of the Week: a16z.news/p/charts-of-the-we…
53
53
8
361
50,920
Finding it very educational and interesting to learn about the hardware layer of GPUs: how they are structured, the obvious advantages and disadvantages bs CPUs. This is from Modal’s excellent “GPU Glossary” print book @can gave me (the PDF is free here: modal.com/gpu-glossary)
56
148
5
1,544
70,689
vLLM 101 > Install vLLM, serve a model > Predict how many users fit on your GPU > Pick the one or two flags that matter for your traffic > Decide from a measurement when speculative decoding, FP8, or a compile level pays > Debug a slow or broken server aiengineeringfromscratch.com…
2
32
1
261
10,919
This week’s Paper Club is all about inference. For every FLOP spent training a model, roughly six go to serving it each year — and getting that part right has produced over $220 billion in market cap in the last decade. But inference is much more than calling model.forward. Every token has to move through a complicated stack of routing, caching, scheduling, kernels, memory, and hardware, all while balancing speed, cost, and quality. We brought together researchers and builders from @togethercompute, @ollama, @luminal_ai, and @sgl_project & @radixark to take us through that stack from end to end. We’ll see how a token gets from an API request to a GPU and back, why the same open model can perform differently depending on who serves it, and how new approaches to compilers and caching are making inference faster and more efficient. 00:00 - Why inference matters more than training 08:24 - Three kinds of inference innovation 12:14 - Dan Fu (@realDanFu): the lifecycle of an inference request 42:18 - Jeff Morgan (@jmorgan): not all open model tokens are the same 1:04:31 - Joe Fioti (@joefioti): compiling models with search, not heuristics 1:30:30 - Liangsheng Yin (@lsyincs): SGLang and memory for the agent era
41
51
15
316
50,270
This question was asked in AI Engineering interviews at OpenAI, xAI, Mistral AI, Amazon, Apple, NVIDIA, Together AI, and Character .AI. Question: What is the KV cache, and what are its memory implications at scale? Derive the formula. Let's answer it step by step. KV Cache is a memory where an LLM saves the Key and Value of the tokens it has already processed, so that it does not compute them again for every new token. An LLM generates text one token at a time. To predict the next token, the attention layer needs the Key and Value of all the previous tokens. Without a cache, the model computes them again at every step. For 100 tokens, that is 2 + 3 + ... + 100 = 5,049 Key and Value computations. With KV Cache, it is 101. Why do we cache only Key and Value, and not Query? The Query is needed only for the current token. The Keys and Values of the past tokens are needed at every future step. Now, let's derive the memory formula. For one token, in one layer, in one head, we store a Key vector and a Value vector. Each has head_dim numbers. So: KV cache per token = 2 x layers x kv_heads x head_dim x bytes_per_number Here: - 2 is because we store both the Key and the Value - layers is the number of Transformer layers - kv_heads is the number of Key and Value heads - head_dim is the size of each head - bytes_per_number is 2 for FP16 Total KV cache = per token x sequence length x number of users in the batch Let's take a model close to Llama 2 7B: 32 layers, 32 heads, head_dim 128, FP16. Per token = 2 x 32 x 32 x 128 x 2 = 524,288 bytes = 0.5 MB - A chat of 4,000 tokens needs 2 GB. - A document of 100,000 tokens needs 50 GB, just for one user. - A GPU has a fixed memory, and a big part of it is already taken by the model weights. Now, the implications at scale: - The cache grows linearly with the length of the text and with the number of users. It decides how many users one GPU can serve at the same time. - For every new token, the model reads the full cache from memory. A bigger cache means slower generation. And this is how we reduce it, term by term: - kv_heads: Grouped-Query Attention shares one Key and Value head across many Query heads. Llama 2 70B uses 8 KV heads for 64 Query heads, which makes the cache 8 times smaller. - bytes_per_number: quantize the cache to FP8, and it becomes 2 times smaller. - Wasted memory: Paged Attention stores the cache in small blocks, so that memory is not reserved and left empty. - sequence length: keep a recent window of tokens plus the first few attention sinks. I have shared the detailed blogs in the comments.
4
5
33
1,174
synabreu retweeted
Power is one of the AI buildout's biggest bottlenecks, and US capacity to make electrical equipment is shrinking US factory capacity since 2019: - Comms equipment: +110% - Semis: +77% - Computers: +16% - Electrical equipment: -9% Electrical equipment prices are up 69%, the biggest jump of the four categories Charts of the Week: a16z.news/p/charts-of-the-we…
58
75
14
481
79,371
synabreu retweeted
Jev 应用又燃爆了 🔥 Browser Use 的 7 秒订机票浏览器、tamaratran 的零损耗压缩、dzhng 的问一句找代码、jarrodwatts 的每个区块一次决策、realZachi 的 SQL 里直接问人话……全网玩家把 TypeSafe 的 Jev 决策核玩成了下一代「极速浏览器 Agent + 不丢细节的上下文 + 省钱找代码 + 链上交易脑 + 会听人话的数据库」: 1️⃣ browser-use/jev-ultrafast(github.com/browser-use/jev-u…) Browser Use × TypeSafe 的极速浏览器 Agent:Jev 一次请求同时选操作和目标元素,只有需要打字时才叫小模型写字;苏黎世到伦敦的 Google Flights 搜索 7.1 秒跑完。 "决策交给 Jev,浏览器快到飞起"! 2️⃣ tamaratran/fast-jev-compaction(github.com/tamaratran/fast-j…) Claude Code 插件:用 Jev 给每个工具调用和结果打分,过期的删掉或截断,留下的一字不改,替换掉会丢细节的摘要式压缩。 "压缩上下文,一个字都不篡改"! 3️⃣ dzhng/jevgrep(github.com/dzhng/jevgrep) 问"这功能在哪实现"就直接给你相关文件、阅读线索和原文代码片段,Jev 负责判断相关性;作者的 10 题 SWE-bench 对比里,成功题数和基线一样(8/10),成本约低 30%。 "同样聪明,少花三成"! 4️⃣ jarrodwatts/jev-trader(github.com/jarrodwatts/jev-t…) Monad 上的做市实验:Jev 盯着 Kuru 的 MON-USDC 订单簿,每个区块约 300 毫秒给出一次买或卖,挂只做 Maker 的限价单赚价差;默认先 dry-run 模拟成交。 "每个区块,一次判断"! 5️⃣ realZachi/pg-jev(github.com/realZachi/pg-jev) PostgreSQL 扩展:WHERE 里直接写人话条件,比如"这个客户是不是很生气",每行交给 Jev 判断并返回概率,不用索引、不用向量,还能和 JOIN、GROUP BY 一起用。 "SQL 终于听得懂人话了"!
4
68
2
494
28,061
A fun realization I had recently: with Blackwell (B200 and B300), we are basically back to solving classic NUMA problems inside a single GPU package. To software, a B200 looks like one big unified GPU. But physically it is two silicon dies connected by NV-HBI. And while that cross-die link is fast, local HBM is still noticeably closer. If you ignore this, memory-heavy workloads like MoE layers spend half their time pulling weights across the link, which burns latency and power for no good reason. Pay attention to MegaMoE in DeepGEMM. In fact, CUDA doesn’t have an API to tell you which SM sits on which die, so just measure it directly with a few lines of pointer chasing. 1. Slice the weights in half onto physical memory for each die, and run a persistent scheduler where SMs pull from their local die first. 2. Only steal work across dies if there are at least two full waves of tasks left. Why? Otherwise, paying the transit latency for small leftovers just isn't worth it. Then, 4D TMA descriptor can do coordinate routing so the inner loop stays completely clean. The payoff is ~100 W of package power saved and 5-10% higher sustained clocks. (Which can be hundreds of thousands of $$ saved in real deployment).
12
41
2
410
21,335
Anthropic 最近开始建议企业「少用点 Subagent」,甚至把一些专家 Agent 重新合并回主 Agent Loop。 他们在多个企业项目中发现,单 Agent + Skills 的效果经常比复杂的多 Agent 架构更好。有个客户改成单 Loop 后,运行速度甚至快了约 2 倍。 原因很容易理解。 多个 Agent 之间反复交接任务,每次都要传递和总结 Context,信息容易丢失,延迟和成本也跟着增加。 Anthropic 现在更推荐让一个主 Agent 负责规划和执行,需要时再动态加载 Skills 和 Tools,把业务流程和领域知识留在可复用的组件里。 不过文章里有个细节值得关注。 他们曾把客服系统里的 Subagent 合并,延迟确实降低了,却让一个原本能完成的任务失败了,因为主 Agent 漏掉了向物流专家确认送达时间这一步。 所以作者强调,每合并一个 Subagent,都要用端到端 Eval 验证,尤其要检查哪些原本通过的任务突然失败了。 当然,并行研究、独立验证、Context 隔离这些场景,Subagent 依然有价值。 这样看来以后设计 Multi-Agent,可能得先问问自己,每个 Subagent 真的需要独立的 Context 和执行循环吗? Anthropic 还开源了一套迁移工具,可以帮你分析现有架构,逐步合并 Subagent,并比较改动前后的质量、成本和延迟。很推荐做 Agent 工程的朋友试试。 原文:claude.com/resources/article…
102
247
110
2,414
572,854
synabreu retweeted
Europe has spent generations mastering science, engineering, and manufacturing. That knowledge and expertise can now power AI of its own. “Let’s work together to build Europe’s AI economy and put AI to work.” — @JensenHuang at GTC Berlin
127
101
32
1,111
94,289
🇰🇿황회장 카자흐스탄 가서 AI 제국 세우겠다고 선언함 ㅋ 엔비디아 $NVDA 젠슨 황이 카자흐스탄 대통령 만나서 "카자흐스탄을 피지컬 AI 중심지로 만들자"고 들이박음 왜 하필 카자흐스탄이냐 싶을 텐데, 황회장 논리가 존나 직관적임 • 피지컬 AI 돌리려면 전력(에너지) 무식하게 처먹음 • 수학, 과학, 기술 인재 갈아 넣어야 함 • 카자흐스탄은 땅덩어리에 에너지 넘쳐나고 공돌이 인재 풀도 빵빵하다고 침 마르도록 찬양함 #Kazakhstan 단순히 립서비스인 줄 알았는데 이미 1년 전부터 현지 기업들 꽉 잡고 빌드업 치고 있었음. • Firebird AI KZ, 카자흐텔레콤이랑 각 잡고 협력 확대 중 • 카자흐스탄 최초 테크 유니콘인 힉스필드(Higgsfield)에는 엔비디아가 직접 돈까지 꽂았다고 공식 인증 때림 • 토카예프 대통령도 싱글벙글하면서 우리 기업 폼 미쳤다고 맞장구침 황회장 특유의 "이것은 긴 여정의 시작일 뿐" 시전하면서 데이터센터랑 피지컬 AI 생태계 중앙아시아까지 싹 다 엔비디아 천하로 만들겠다는 야망 제대로 보여줌 ㅋㅋㅋ 빅테크들 전력난에 허덕이는데 에너지 빵빵한 중앙아시아 먼저 선점해서 인프라 빨아먹겠다는 가죽자켓 성님의 큰 그림인 듯. 매수/매도 추천아님
18
39
16
273
26,988
Good data showing that NVIDIA AI infrastructure is a durable, investable asset that retains value. New applications and workloads keep landing on our fungible platform, increasing demand because of its productivity. Chart by @a16z
GPUs are aging like fine wine, with rental rates up across the board since January 1st Approximate change YTD: - H200: +160% - B200: +120% - RTX PRO 6000: +65% - H100: +35% Even the 6-year-old A100 rents for more than it did at the start of the year Charts of the Week: a16z.news/p/charts-of-the-we…
75
211
30
1,628
465,059