Marcos Pereira

the undisputable fact is that it is getting easier to get into the market, the cost of entry is lower so there is going to be a flood of simple apps it's going to be impossible to become profitable with any tool that can be prompted for easily so to be future proof one has to - build things that the model can't build without your help (this is going to get harder and harder) - have ideas and context and real life experience that models don't have, and be fast enough that no one can catch up with you by copying you (or make it hard to copy) - accumulate assets that can't be copied or stolen: data, community, bureaucratic/policy advantages (which are a bad thing but likely to stick around)

I’m afraid you are wrong. It does not matter what I do with the tokens, the only variable here is maximizing the occupation rate of my attention now you could say I could spend more attention on less tokens, but that is degrowth doomer mentality the entire point of this era is maximizing human potential, this is why you exist in the first place the only benchmark that matters is how many tokens I can spend while producing high quality, useful code we can define non-wasteful code by that which I would end up with regardless of how long it would take me to obtain it now every human will have a different number of tokens where their attention is maximized, and granted I am likely in the top 10% at the very least, but at the same time I am also on your most expensive plan but you need to stop thinking about this in terms of how many tokens you need to produce something useful. Remember what you were put on this universe for: improving human welfare by maximizing individual potential and that means maximizing the % of individuals that can fully occupy their attention by subscribing to one of your plans, assuming an optimal zero-waste workflow (as defined earlier) we can go further and talk about optimizing for how much it costs to fully occupy one’s attention, which interestingly (we live in a simulation) is less the younger and less experienced you are (so difficulty scales elegantly in the game of life), but for now let’s just assume that $200 should be a fair value for a motivated capable individual. The question here is all about how much you agree with this assumption. I wrote this is with absolutely zero AI to be clear. I type out every single character on here, thanks for your time!