
Eminent Raporteur. Esquire. #Ultracon.
Vancouver Island, B.C.
Joined March 2011
- Tweets17.9K
- Following1.3K
- Followers581
- Likes45.4K
Owned because people forgot that the ultra-wealthy are usually the innovators.
Name one? How about a few?
Rockefeller lowered the cost of kerosene through efficient refining and distribution.
Ford made automobiles affordable through mass production.
Carnegie reduced steel production costs through industrial innovation.
Walton lowered retail prices through bulk purchasing and efficient logistics.
Dell made computers cheaper by eliminating retail intermediaries.
Kamprad made furniture affordable through flat-pack manufacturing and distribution.
Bezos intensified retail competition through Amazon.
Koum made international messaging practically free through WhatsApp.
Page and Brin made search, navigation, email, and translation available without direct charges.
And that's barely scratching the surface.
In fact, it would be considerably more challenging to find a billionaire who earned their fortune through voluntary trade without lowering costs, improving quality, increasing productivity, or making something more accessible.
That's how fortunes are generally made in competitive markets. You create value for others, and the more people you serve, the greater your potential reward.
You don't even have to buy from these businesses to benefit. Their competitors must improve their offerings or risk losing customers.
These clout chasers destroy their credibility daily without so much as flinching.
They enjoy the accumulated benefits of capitalist innovation while confidently demanding evidence that any of it ever happened.
The economic illiteracy would be impressive if it weren't so commonplace.
Warren Smith retweeted
Global life expectancy.
The first dip is Mao. The second dip is Fauci.
(Hat tip @mattwridley)
🤖 Made with AI
This is what BC should have done but instead the morons in government gave us darkness until 9:30 am in December.
I remember when the Justin Trudeau government attempted to 'name-blind' hire public servants in order to avoid hiring-bias but they cancelled it soon after cause the mix was too white.
That's DEI in its true form. It has nothing to do with merit.
Warren Smith retweeted
Elbows up! Young people need to simply work harder and stop their complaining! Everything is fine in this country.
Oh well.
Nobody said it would be easy.
B.C. First Nations chief warns ripping up DRIPA is a ‘declaration of war’
globalnews.ca/news/12121663/…
Exactly.
Well said.
The problem British Columbia faces is that we have already given the Chiefs everything that they want. And so the only real options are to bribe them again, a short term fix, which just tightens the noose, or to fight them. I don’t mean that literally of course.
Doerksen will be tempted to listen to his liberal advisors and do what Christy Clark did which was bribe them – the largest payouts we had ever seen in exchange for pipeline consents. Or he can draw a line in the sand and basically apologize for the false promises of the past, return control to the people of this province, and reestablish democratic governance. that doesn’t mean giving up on indigenous people here. he can pledge to deal with the actual problems holding back first nations communities. And that is the perpetuation of historic grievances which perpetuates victim culture rather than the rewarding of those who overcome cycles of abuse and dependence. Financial and political support would focus not on those who complain the loudest, but on communities that create goods and services that are valuable to their own communities and the broader British Columbian public.
I've noticed a media concession of sorts that Conservatives are heading for a majority win tomorrow.
I've also noticed an effort to hold them to a minority with posts like the following...
Green Leader Emily Lowan has issued a statement saying a B.C. Conservative government would be "disastrous," after an NDP statement suggested she had openness to supporting minority rule by the Conservatives after Saturday's election.
cheknews.ca/greens-leader-lo…
Yes
Let’s be clear:
If I’m not going to sleep with you, I don’t need to know anything about your sexuality.
And children—who are not going to sleep with anyone—certainly don’t.
Your sexuality is not sacred. It’s not a personality, it’s not a protected class of performance art, and it’s not the center of anyone’s moral universe but your own. Unless we are in a relationship, I am not obligated to acknowledge, affirm, or be exposed to your private desires—especially not in public, and especially not in front of children.
This used to be understood. Now it’s called hate.
No, We Don’t Owe You an Audience
Sexuality belongs in the private realm. It is intimate by definition. If you feel compelled to wear your kink on your sleeve—or on a float, or in a first-grade classroom—you are not inviting understanding, you are demanding submission. You are violating others’ right not to participate.
Consent doesn’t vanish because your fetish is “progressive.” If anything, the burden is higher.
No one consents to being flashed on the subway. No one consents to a stranger’s arousal. No one consents to a stranger telling their child about masturbation, kink, gender identity, or pornographic categories under the guise of “inclusive sex ed.” Yet all of this is happening now—in public parks, in classrooms, in televised programming.
It is not tolerance. It is invasion.
Children Are Not Here to Validate You
Children are not queer. Children are not sexual. Children do not need to “see themselves represented” in a spectrum of adult desire. This idea—that identity is only valid if sexualized and mirrored—is narcissism, not pedagogy.
There is no legitimate reason to initiate a child into the language of sexual preference, gender identity, or alternative lifestyles. The only people who benefit from that dynamic are those looking to normalize boundary violations.
Let me state it plainly:
Children who are not going to have sex do not need to be exposed to sexuality.
Period.
Any adult who insists otherwise is not confused. They are grooming.
Public Fetishism Is Not Liberation
There is a vast difference between being gay and demanding the right to simulate sex acts in front of children. Between being transgender and insisting on teaching kindergartners about breast removal. Between being proud of who you are and insisting the whole world observe your kink play in the street.
This is not diversity. This is decay.
Men in dog masks being walked on leashes by their lovers are not brave—they are forcing strangers into their psychodrama. This is exhibitionism, and when children are present, it becomes criminal exhibitionism.
We used to know this. Peeping, flashing, voyeurism—these were considered red flags. Dangerous behaviors. Early signs of escalation. Now they’re filmed, hashtagged, and funded by public grants.
Stop Calling It Love—It’s Entitlement
This is not about who you love. It’s about how you demand to be seen. If you need the entire public to witness, applaud, and adapt to your sexuality, you’re not a pioneer—you’re an emotional colonizer.
Love does not demand a captive audience. It does not parade past toddlers. It does not demand that schools teach four-year-olds about “preferred pronouns.” Love protects children. Love guards modesty. Love waits.
And if you can’t wait—if you need to be seen, affirmed, and obeyed—you’re not talking about love. You’re talking about power.
Consent Applies to Culture, Too
We teach children that consent is sacred—so why are we failing to apply that lesson to public life?
No child consents to drag queen story hour.
No parent consents to leather harnesses on city floats.
No woman consents to being exposed to male sexuality in the ladies’ room, or in the school library, or anywhere she cannot opt out.
Consent is not just for sex. It’s for everything.
Attention. Language. Presence. Ideology. Imagery.
And we are done pretending we don’t notice when it’s violated.
The boundary is back.
And we are drawing it in bold.
She's so awesome.
MUST WATCH - OneBC leader @Dallas_Brodie was on CBC this morning to discuss our platform. The CBC tried every trick in the book to try and skew the narrative, but it backfires spectacularly!
I'm expected to believe that a grass fire just devastated the Canadian military?
Major General Wade Rutland, higher headquarters for units training at CFB Wainwright, confirmed that four Canadian Armed Forces members died and many others were injured in a rapidly spreading grass fire during a training exercise by 3 PPCLI on October 17
“The Soldiers of the Canadian army suffered a terrible loss during a training activity at Canadian Forces Base Wainwright at approximately 4:00pm yesterday,” Rutland said. “During the conduct of a training, a grass fire ignited in the training area. The cause of this fire is under active investigation.”
The fallen, as named by Rutland:
Private Aiden Goulding, 3 PPCLI, North Vancouver, BC
Private Sean Farrell, 3 PPCLI, Prince Albert, SK
Private Hayden Leichmark, 3 PPCLI, Langley, BC
Sergeant Morgan Wong, Loyal Edmonton Regiment, Edmonton, AB
He noted multiple training activities were underway. “Uncommonly strong winds caused the fire to spread rapidly and shift direction towards the range administrative area. The fire did originate within the training area and did cross established fire guards before being contained in conjunction with municipal authorities.”Reports of explosions were addressed directly: “Certainly we do not believe this to be as a result of any oil and gas infrastructure nor any outside interference.”
“Unfortunately, I can confirm four Canadian Armed Forces members are deceased and many others injured. Casualties have been evacuated to a multitude of medical facilities to receive the best care our system has to offer.”
Rutland thanked medical personnel, first responders, STARS, air ambulance crews, and military aviation teams for their rapid response. The Canadian Forces National Investigation Service, 1st Military Police Regiment Incident Response Team, RCMP, and CAF Fire Marshal team members are investigating.
“Our top priority at this time is care of soldiers and families. At this time, we ask that families be respected during this very difficult time. Armed Forces is providing support to affected families through the chain of command, chaplain services and other available support resources.”
“Our thoughts are with the families and loved ones of those we lost and with the injured members still receiving care. We stand with the teammates, friends and units affected by this terrible tragedy. The well being of our people is our highest priority.”
OMG.
Nothing more powerful than a testimonial.
Perfectly scripted. Straight from the heart.
Eby won't attack her in the debate. He'd rather boldly poach her supporters as internal polling rolls in.
“I’ve voted Green before, but the risk of a Conservative government is too high. This time, I’m voting BC NDP.” – Melanie McCollum, former Green voter in Courtenay."
We risk losing progress and continuing the work on far too many priorities if we do not come together to stop Conservative chaos and cuts.
bcndp.ca/releases/eby-invite…
🤡
Today, I got vaccinated against the flu and COVID-19 at the Wellness Pharmacy in my neighbourhood. The pharmacist did a great job. Everyone should check out the Get Vaccinated getvaccinated.gov.bc.ca/s/bo… and book their appointments. (1/6)
Warren Smith retweeted
lol whatever. Never ever give up your guns.
#BREAKING: Ringleader of Toronto 18 terror plot no longer shows signs of extremism, granted full parole, board says cp24.com/local/toronto/2026/…
Exactly
Warren Smith retweeted
Grand Chief Stewart Phillip’s Union of B.C. Indian Chiefs received $3.01 million from the NDP #BCGov between April 2025 and April 2026, according to public accounts. #bcpoli


























