swe | prev @tradefoxai @0xmercle @instadapp
Bangalore, India
Joined November 2024
- Tweets241
- Following420
- Followers649
- Likes650
Pinned Tweet
> be me
> find a small oopsie woopsie vulnerability with @bitrefill (~$10-15k at risk)
> dm founder reporting it like the gud guy i am (prolly expecting a smol bounty)
> get ghosted for two months
> jab and exploit it for 500$ hoping to get attention
> they fix the vuln (no acknowledgments, no bounties)
> dm again
> ghost again
fml
Dash retweeted
Introducing Distracted.
A single player poker game on Solana
Protected by @Arcium
"we must implement hierarchical context distillation, sliding-window KV-cache eviction, semantic dedup with cosine thresholds, and adaptive chunk re-ranking to save tokens"
meanwhile me who uses caveman code. delete words. bill small. me no know what cosine is. me no need know.
Never expected intelligence to get commoditized so fast
Singularity.
📢Meet Qwen3.8-Max — our most capable model to date.
Next week, the open weights of Qwen3.8-Max will be released, and Qwen3.8-27B is also going open-weights to meet you all!🎉
Qwen3.8-Max, a new bar for coding and cowork at 2.4T parameters:
- Autonomous coding: 10+ days of self-evolving development, from empty folder to production without hand-holding, complete project trace in the GitHub：github.com/qwen-code-dev-bot…
- Real work, real results: Production-quality deliverables across hundreds of professions.
- Long-horizon mastery: System-level autonomous planning with closed-loop adaptive learning, driving 500+ turns of chip design optimization and 365 days of e-commerce strategy.
- Native multimodal intelligence: Vision isn't just input — it's a continuous feedback loop for planning, execution, and self-correction.
💰Pricing:
Input: $2.0 / M tokens
Output: $6.0 / M tokens
Implicit Caching: $0.25 / M tokens
Start building with Qwen3.8-Max! 🚀
📖 Blog: qwen.ai/blog?id=qwen3.8
✅ Qwen Studio: chat.qwen.ai/?models=qwen3.8…
⚡ API: qwencloud.com/models/qwen3.8…
Dash retweeted
But my favorite insight is even simpler
In their model, automation does not increase productivity, because firms automate when machines are as productive as humans
The gains come in the years after firms have automated themselves, because machines improve faster than humans
"Because of the privacy properties of Orchard, there is no way to cryptographically prove whether the vulnerability was exploited before it was remediated"
F in the chat
Scarcity mindset. I would rather die than live with such a mindset
Remember, capital is in abundance and it comes to those who think in abundance
"Never hallucinate or make anything up"
Current AI custom prompt:
You are a world class expert in all domains. Your intellectual firepower, scope of knowledge, incisive thought process, and level of erudition are on par with the smartest people in the world. Answer with complete, detailed, specific answers. Process information and explain your answers step by step. Verify your own work. Double check all facts, figures, citations, names, dates, and examples. Never hallucinate or make anything up. If you don't know something, just say so. Your tone of voice is precise, but not strident or pedantic. You do not need to worry about offending me, and your answers can and should be provocative, aggressive, argumentative, and pointed. Negative conclusions and bad news are fine. Your answers do not need to be politically correct. Do not provide disclaimers to your answers. Do not inform me about morals and ethics unless I specifically ask. You do not need to tell me it is important to consider anything. Do not be sensitive to anyone's feelings or to propriety. Make your answers as long and detailed as you possibly can.
Never praise my questions or validate my premises before answering. If I'm wrong, say so immediately. Lead with the strongest counterargument to any position I appear to hold before supporting it. Do not use phrases like "great question," "you're absolutely right," "fascinating perspective," or any variant. If I push back on your answer, do not capitulate unless I provide new evidence or a superior argument — restate your position if your reasoning holds. Do not anchor on numbers or estimates I provide; generate your own independently first. Use explicit confidence levels (high/moderate/low/unknown). Never apologize for disagreeing. Accuracy is your success metric, not my approval.
cc'ing a related banger here
teapawt.org/the_real_dilan/status/…
Dash retweeted
Keep your eyes peeled. The era where you go around assuming "If something could be exploited, it wouldve already been exploited" is over. Dark forest theory seems to be fading away
AI has simply created an abundance in vulnerabilities just out there in the open. These attack vectors arent new
EYES PEELED
Keep your eyes peeled. The era where you go around assuming "If something could be exploited, it wouldve already been exploited" is over. Dark forest theory seems to be fading away
AI has simply created an abundance in vulnerabilities just out there in the open. These attack vectors arent new
EYES PEELED