CalgaryRecall (@CalgaryRecall) header
CalgaryRecall (@CalgaryRecall) profile picture

Tagging in unwelcome accounts is and auto soft or hard block

Joined April 2023
Photo by CalgaryRecall (@CalgaryRecall)Photo by CalgaryRecall (@CalgaryRecall)Photo by CalgaryRecall (@CalgaryRecall)Photo by CalgaryRecall (@CalgaryRecall)Photo by CalgaryRecall (@CalgaryRecall)Photo by CalgaryRecall (@CalgaryRecall)Photo by CalgaryRecall (@CalgaryRecall)Photo by CalgaryRecall (@CalgaryRecall)Photo by CalgaryRecall (@CalgaryRecall)Photo by CalgaryRecall (@CalgaryRecall)
this HERO made a dashboard! this is how we get some citizen led transparency trackingourcash.github.io/YY… Thanks @old_man_AB
1
20
55
748
🫣
Pantazopoulos is my Councillor and I went to his Budget townhall on Monday, at the time I thought he was a big step up from Richard Pootsman, at least he's calling for transparency and accountability but then I see this nonsense. Absolutely disappointed...
1
1
52
wyness sets the record straight 🙏
Replying to @CalgaryRecall
9 months for the $1.75 million. Then an additional $36,000 fix fee for march to June
1
3
107
uh ohh bearimy
was it 17 months of work for 1.75 million or was it 9 months of work?
1
5
152
thought this same reply as Adam and almost typed it actually very deeply concerning to hear a board member in charge of billions and millions of lives to be this illiterate terrifying actually
1
2
98
was it 17 months of work for 1.75 million or was it 9 months of work?
The Bearspaw water review authorized by the previous Council cost $2.3M, exceeding its original $1M to $2M estimate. Our Council backed Councillor Wyness's motion to release the costs publicly. Calgarians deserve transparency, even when the numbers are uncomfortable.
1
1
1
7
272
ok, previous council hired the panel but where is this council & mayor's accountability with respect to panel results? the buck stops with the CAO instead he was gifted hundreds of thousands of bucks and thompson was promoted no accountability, that part is on you not previous
The Bearspaw water review authorized by the previous Council cost $2.3M, exceeding its original $1M to $2M estimate. Our Council backed Councillor Wyness's motion to release the costs publicly. Calgarians deserve transparency, even when the numbers are uncomfortable.
1
1
4
164
when did triple charging become "investing" we are not stupid over 3 billion missing
Replying to @CalgaryRecall
In the words of Farkas "we are investing BILLIONS of dollars into our water infrastructure" JFC is there a f*cking end to this money pit?
4
5
167
CalgaryRecall retweeted
This is how you negotiate.
J’ai pris note aujourd’hui de la nouvelle offre de Mark Carney d’obtenir le droit de m’assoir à sa table d’honneur à titre de spectateur, sans droit de parole ni droit de négocier au nom du Québec. Cette proposition revient à demander au Québec de rentrer dans les rangs, avec la vassalisation et l’invisibilisation du Québec que cela implique, en échange d’obtenir de meilleurs sièges de spectateurs pour regarder la partie. Comme premier ministre, je refuserai toujours que le Québec soit réduit au rôle de spectateur lorsqu’il s’agit de représenter et protéger les intérêts économiques et politiques des Québécois. La réalité est que nous sommes devant une stratégie de marginalisation du Québec sur la scène internationale et de subordination des champs de compétence du Québec à la volonté du fédéral. Je note à cet effet que tous les chefs de partis de l’Assemblée nationale ont indiqué hier que s’ils étaient dans la position de premier ministre et devant un tel sommet sur le territoire du Québec, ils s’attendraient à prendre la parole et à participer à part entière. À Ottawa, le chef de l'opposition officielle ainsi que le chef du Bloc Québécois ont également appuyé notre demande. J’ai donc pris la plume et j’ai écrit aux représentants de l’Union européenne pour leur rappeler que des ententes qui impliquent l’Europe et le Québec doivent forcément passer par le gouvernement du Québec, et à plus forte raison si le sommet se tient sur notre territoire. Le refus de nous donner la parole à titre d’hôte pour souhaiter la bienvenue à nos invités y est également mentionné. Je lance donc l’invitation pour une discussion bilatérale dans un meilleur contexte qui permettrait au Québec de ne pas être exclu. À ce titre, j’enverrai le diplomate en chef du Québec, Pascal Paradis, pour ouvrir ces canaux de discussion pour la suite.
34
65
2
406
8,286
who knew? @djkelly thank you for serving, please let us know about your medals!
Honoured to help redicate the Calgary Cenotaph to recognize the 40,000 Canadians who served in Afghanistan, including 158 who never came home. A new plaque honours their sacrifice. Thank-you to John Tyrell and the Calgary Salutes committee for their tireless work to preserve our military heritage.
1
2
316
is he telling Calgarians the Independent Bearspaw water panel was 17 months of work when it was 9 months of work? 🍿🤥🤦‍♂️
Farkas is on the Calgary subreddit grovelling to his online supporters. He should be explaining the water panel situation to taxpayers - not wasting time on a useless echochamber. The incompetence is astounding.
1
8
20
437
1:1 correspondence between the spenders and votes that stink do we have a squad nickname? The Gold-Plated Eight? let's workshop this nickname!
2
6
277
we did the research and did not feel comfortable with connections we found
NDP Johnny P seems a lot different than what he ran on. #yyccc
3
12
306
people will not put up with these increases
Replying to @nate_for_8
Explain to your constituents why you voted for a 75% water hike.
2
14
61
1,008
bad news: the water guys was promoted
Unbelievable waste of my tax dollars. Someone should be fired.
2
6
209
1752/hr 9 months fluff report about "culture" and zero accountability, no firings (go figure) not even reprimands? 3.6 billion infrastructure money MIA no inspections or pipes 74% water hike 6.5 billion triple charged for infra water restrictions, meters, snitch line & cut offs
4
22
2
53
859
only 9 months of works cost over 2 MILLION dollars yyccc
$1752 PER HOUR who approved this CAO ADMIN FARKAS?
7
25
427
bribery-to influence a neutral party kickback-overpayment for bias graft-inflated funds conflict of interest-financial compromise of objectivity corrupt fact finder-overpay to skew testimony regulatory capture-neutral watchdog becomes political line the pockets-to ensure favor
1
3
136
the Chair of the Independent Review panel was paid 1752/per hour wonder where CAO duckworth will work after Dec
8
11
247