building @altoslabs |Previously founding team @retrobio_ and group lead @genentech | PhD at @nyugrossman and postdoc @genentech

San Diego, CA
Joined February 2013
alright. this should be interesting
New news: Life Biosciences will present first-in-human data from the Phase 1 trial of ER-100 in optic neuropathies at the Eyecelerator Conference in New Orleans, Oct, 8, 2026, 2:10PM CT 👀
77
oh this is getting even more juicy and entertaining nytimes.com/2026/09/27/scien…
anyone who has worked in science and spent enough time in a wet lab knows not to get excited too quickly over preliminary results. the fact that @AnthropicAI announced the discovery of a "potential" new enzyme is both exciting and ridiculous to me i can only assume they rushed and put out these preliminary results without wet lab validation just to clear out the speculation that they're secretly working on “drug development” and that we're all going to die
19
alright if someone is working to slow down or reverse cognitive decline or dementia, @peterthiel might be your investor
new @peterthiel interview on immortality "it's not clear that there are any natural limits" "it's not that transhumanism is too weird and too extreme, from a real christian pov it's that it didn't go far enough" "I wouldn't find it acceptable to be uploaded in a computer program that simulated me; I don't think it would be me"
2
152
The Belmonte team (a few missing) at Altos lab in sunny San Diego. #timetobuild
2
102
so great to see this official @genentech video on their perspective about aging, lifespan and healthspan. back in 2018 when I joined Genentech as a postdoc, they probably already had a vision of aging as a therapeutic modality, which is probably why they recruited Bulck institute faculty Heinrich Jasper. unclear if they have a pipeline targeting age-related diseases but after this official PR video, you can draw your own conclusions. m.youtube.com/watch?v=9kT9RA…
3
155
anyone who has worked in science and spent enough time in a wet lab knows not to get excited too quickly over preliminary results. the fact that @AnthropicAI announced the discovery of a "potential" new enzyme is both exciting and ridiculous to me i can only assume they rushed and put out these preliminary results without wet lab validation just to clear out the speculation that they're secretly working on “drug development” and that we're all going to die
The group behind such hits as: “We’re All Going To Die” and “Regulate Me Now” are building a wet lab in SF. I do not recommend this.
1
1
133
ArsenalBio has probably been the company to watch in the CAR-T field. Top notch founders and incredible smart team, which ended up not being enough. Despite people telling me I’m crazy or that this tech will not work, I’ve been a believer in in vivo cell reprogramming for a few years now, and it looks like ArsenalBio may have concluded that in vivo CAR-T is probably the way to go. fiercebiotech.com/biotech/ar…
1
3
256
i had to comment on @friedberg’s Science corner on the Moderna melanoma vaccine on the last episode of @theallinpod. although i agree that the cost of this new therapy might be high, the real price of the drug is still not disclosed. there are some speculations that the vaccine might be around 500k per dose which sounds a lot. however, the mRNA vaccine is given with keytruda (pembrolizumab), which already costs roughly $150k–220k, so that’s one of the reasons why this treatment might be so costly. nonetheless, i do hope that the final price of the drug is not close to 500k because that it is a lot of money. so i do agree with @friedberg on this. however, my real frustration with this science corner is that @friedberg made it sound that this new technology is way simpler than it actually is. first , it is true that Moderna’s approach is personalized. each vaccine is specific to every patient because Moderna and Merck identify neoantigens through next-generation sequencing, and these neoantigens may elicit an immune response. however, and this is where @friedberg is inaccurate, the identification of neoantigens is not straightforward and is actually hard to get right. in fact, that’s why Moderna and Merck use an AI-driven algorithm that predicts up to 34 neoantigens, and Moderna includes all of them in the vaccine. so there is no way that someone who has access to some tumor cells, sequences them, identifies mutations, synthesizes peptides (as he gave the example), and injects them could potentially mimic these vaccines. that in my opinion flat-out won’t work. also, the manufacturing process is far more complex than it sounds. initially one would need to obtain a tumor biopsy, perform next-generation sequencing, run the proprietary algorithm to select and rank up to 34 reactive neoantigens tailored to the patient’s HLA type, design and synthesize a single mRNA encoding those neoantigens under GMP conditions, encapsulate it in lipid nanoparticles, run full quality control, and deliver the finished doses. all within a tight window so patients don’t wait for too long. again, i do hope that the cost of these drugs are cheaper so more people can afford this, but there is no way that someone would go to Montana and print some peptides and then cure cancer.
2
82
oh yeah and some people still think vaccines don’t work
Breaking News: Two unvaccinated people in Pennsylvania died from measles, the first deaths from the disease this year in the U.S., as a large outbreak there continues to spread. nyti.ms/4qCojov
112
Belmonte, reik, Serrano = epigenetic reprogramming and partial reprogramming
Another high-profile recruit leaves Altos Labs. Of six notable hires, 1/2 half have departed (horvath, walter, levine.) 1/2 remain (belmonte, reik, serrano) To me, the phrase "i've made the decision to move on" signals difficulty/discontent, what do you think?
1
3
170
I don’t think one company will solve reprogramming. But rather all the companies will uniquely solve different aspects of it. Btw, we need more reprogramming companies ;)
Gonna ruffle some feathers: Altos is not likely to solve reprogramming. Yes they have (way) more money, yes they have more Nobel prizes, yes Hal Barron and Juan Carlos are really good. But that’s also the problem. It’s naturally exciting when MegaBucks get aimed at problems we care about, and I certainly hope they succeed. But MegaCos in frontier science usually do not work. Why is that? First, a clear vision is rare. That’s not a knock on their leadership, but a result of how many unknowns biotechs operate with. And for aging that’s worse than average: What’s our path to clinic? What’s our measurement? What even is aging? Companies that start small solve this by evolving the vision through iteration. But when someone hands you two billion dollars, they expect a vision off the bat. Second, you’re now committed to your original vision, but at the frontier, you’re still doing science rather than engineering. And lots of money is way less useful there - the right way to spend $2B would be to NOT spend it, do science with a fraction of it, then scale when you have something working. But again, when someone hands you two billion dollars, they don’t want you to sit on it. The investors (and hot shot hires) have expectations and you’d better start making breakthroughs. Third, now that you have lots of hot shots hired and are scaling up, you hit bureaucracy and politics immediately. Decisions need meetings, egos create resistance, everything becomes less nimble and harder to iterate. Which is doubly costly when you’re trying to find your way. All in all, @newlimit have a better shot at reprogramming (though they’re now facing the risks of lots of money too!). I’m afraid Altos will stall out, lose people, then lose funder interest. This isn’t to say we shouldn’t throw serious money at important opportunities, we should! But do it with ten different teams/bets of $20M each, let them try things, then double down when something is working. And when evaluating a new bet, ask first how clear the vision is 👁️
1
3
188
what’s your go-to chemical modification for in vivo gRNA stability?
71
Cool! So basically in the aged brain microglia = monocyte/microglia derived from HSCs?
Just out @ScienceMagazine We just learned a lot new about human brain aging via hippocampus single cell multi-omics: —it's not linear —the microglia are not of embryonic origin (current dogma) as we age; they are replaced by microglia with signatures like blood immune cells and are pro-inflammatory —there's astrocyte loss science.org/doi/10.1126/scie…
2
99
Simón Vidal retweeted
Levi's Stadium hosts the Super Bowl today. Next door? The viral substation behind the NFL's wildest injury theory. Can EMF from this substation contribute to soft tissue injuries? Let science settle this! $100K in research funding is live and the proposals are rolling in👇
4
19
1
52
48,986
Yep. I thought the same when I watched this! I mean probably by the “outside” you would think that our body ages at the same rate but when you look at the organ or cellular level this is completely not true!
Elon is quite wrong here, on the synchronicity of aging. It's not that sync! But also uncorrelated random processed can still give rise to something that looks like a pattern, and evolution plays a role in homogenising rates at which things break xitter.cf/i/status/2014497407820…
1
2
839
This is very cool! People should the lead on this. 100k funding!!
Does exposure to EMF from an electrical substation impact the injury risk of NFL players? ⚡️🤔 Announcing $100K in funding to test @living_energy's viral hypothesis about why the 49ers are the NFL's most injured team. 4-8 grants. Preregistration required. RFP in comments👇
88
Simón Vidal retweeted
⭐ Do you have a bold idea you are excited about but never had the funding to try? ⭐ I am super excited to share that we are launching FIVE pilot funding grants for junior researchers across some of the most exciting areas in biomedical research with @ResearchHub & @ResearchHubF. So, if you are working in genomics, aging, neuroscience, AI vascular biology or related areas, this is a great opportunity to start 2026 with something independent! This round includes five separate grants (super easy to apply!). Each is meant to help you try out something new, re-analyze existing data, or launch a side project that could grow into something bigger. We have available funding for: • Aging and Longevity research. $10'000 • Vascular Biology. $10'000 • Neuroscience. $10'000 • Genomics and Proteomics. $5'000 • AI Tools and AI Agents for Biomedical Research. $5'000 Deadline: Applications close February 15, 2026. Application details are in the comments! If you have been waiting for a low barrier way to test a bold idea or explore a new direction, this is exactly that kind of projects we like to support with @ResearchHub & @ResearchHubF. Please share it among your network!
1
11
4
19
7,592