Simon Adlington retweeted
Bridget Phillipson is calling for restrictions on NDAs being used to silence people over misconduct allegations. Well, Bridget, put your money where your mouth is. What happened with former Labour Chief Whip Nick Brown? Why was he suspended, and why has the public never been told the nature of the complaint? Will Labour commit to transparency over its own disciplinary processes, or is this another case of one rule for the Labour Party and another for everyone else?
@bphillipsonMP
Simon Adlington retweeted
During negotiations in the United States, an incident reportedly took place that left the American delegation literally speechless.
When Ukrainian representatives learned that sanctions against Putin were being lifted and that Washington was demanding an end to strikes on Russian oil refineries, Kyrylo Budanov allegedly responded in extremely harsh terms.
As the meeting was drawing to a close and participants were heading toward the exit, Budanov reportedly threw these words straight in the Americans’ faces:
“Now we’re going to fucking burn every Russian oil refinery and port to the fucking ground. Every last one!”
According to the account, the Americans were so stunned that they couldn't find anything to say in response.
No objections, no threats, no usual diplomatic language. Just silence.
Washington received an unmistakable message: Ukraine has no intention of asking anyone's permission to defend itself against Russian aggression.
mykhailorohoza.substack.com
Simon Adlington retweeted
Iran Has Warned Us. MI5 Has Warned Us. Is Anyone in Government Listening?
For the second time in little more than a month, American military aircraft have been moved from a British airbase amid reports of an Iranian threat. Nine refuelling tankers left RAF Mildenhall for Scotland, Germany and Spain, while three Ospreys moved to RAF Lakenheath. According to the Wall Street Journal, US officials received fresh intelligence concerning Iran, prompting security at both Suffolk bases to be raised to FPCON Charlie.
This follows the suspected Iranian-linked operation at RAF Fairford in September. Five British nationals were initially arrested near the base, which had housed American bombers used against Iran. Nouman Essghir and Mohmed Ahmad Abdulkarim have since been charged with national-security offences. One is accused of assisting a foreign intelligence service believed to be Iran. A court heard allegations involving reconnaissance, vehicles and more than £65,000 in funds. The allegations await trial.
Britain has been warned repeatedly. MI5 has identified more than twenty potentially lethal Iran-backed plots involving assassination, kidnapping and intimidation. The IRGC has declared that bases used against Iran are legitimate targets. Iranian officials have reportedly boasted that Channel smuggling routes are more useful than missiles because operatives can enter Britain and await instructions. So ministers can hardly say the danger was unforeseeable.
Yet the Government continues receiving and dispersing illegal arrivals from countries where independent verification of identity and background can be exceptionally difficult. Around two-thirds of small-boat arrivals in the year to June came from Eritrea, Sudan, Afghanistan, Somalia and Iran. Fingerprints cannot reveal an undisclosed past when dependable records are unavailable. A hostile operative absent from accessible databases may pass through screening undetected. What extra safeguards followed the warnings about Iranian exploitation of Channel routes? The public deserves an answer.
The danger extends beyond immigration. Mildenhall supports American air operations across Europe, while Fairford accommodates strategic bombers. Their security matters to Britain's defence and NATO. The reported movements raise a troubling question: can Britain provide the protection its closest ally needs on British soil?
Washington's concern about Britain's handling of migration and public safety is already on record. In November 2025, the US State Department instructed diplomats to monitor migration-related crime and governments' responses, including in Britain. That was an extraordinary signal of scrutiny between allies. Now American commanders are reportedly taking precautions against another Iranian threat at a British base. Ministers should consider what this succession of warnings does to Britain's standing.
The Ministry of Defence responded that aircraft routinely move for operational reasons. Of course sensitive intelligence cannot be disclosed. But secrecy must not become a substitute for accountability. We have heard about Iranian intimidation of dissidents, alleged influence networks, covert plots and attempts to exploit border weaknesses. Yet all ministers seem able to offer is another assurance that national security is taken seriously. What the public has not heard is a convincing account of how those vulnerabilities are being closed.
A government warned about hostile-state activity has a duty to show that its safeguards match the threat. After Fairford and now Mildenhall, another bland statement will not do. Ministers must explain what has changed, how arrivals are screened when records cannot be trusted, and how allied forces are protected. Britain cannot afford to discover the limits of its defences only after an attack.
"US moves KC-135 Stratotankers out of RAF Mildenhall over Iran threat, just weeks after RAF Fairford security incident."
Simon Adlington retweeted
The Andy Burnham who's promising rape and serious sexual offence teams will be set up in every police force must be different to the Andy Burnham who presided over the abolition of the Greater Manchester sex crime unit when he was Mayor of Manchester.
bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-ma…
Abu Dhabi Andy @andyburnham supporter of modern day slavery, whilst engaging in conversation about Britains past. Hypocritical
I wish I was surprised. In not suprised tgat our illegitimate PM Abu Dhabi Andy is a man with zero talent, a devised morality of the adult child relationship endorsing Fabian Society, and a very fragile ego.
26
Simon Adlington retweeted
For the many UK politicians @UKLabour and journalists @BBC who don't know anything about UK trade, here are the highlights:
1. The UK is now predominantly a service exporter. 57% of UK exports are services, which are not affected by EU 'red tape'.
2. UK goods exports have dropped from almost 70% of our total exports in 1997 to just 43% in 2025. This trend began long before Brexit and is tied to Net Zero mandates, high UK energy prices, and EV mandates.
3. Machinery and transport goods, such as cars and aircraft parts, are 42% of all UK goods exports. This is by far the UK's largest export sector, although it is also falling. It was 50% of UK exports in 2000. But if the UK joins the EU's CBAM, companies in this sector will see their imported material costs rise, making their exports even less competitive.
4. Chemicals are the UK's second-largest export sector. They account for 19% of UK goods exports, but this share is shrinking due to UK and EU energy costs and Net Zero regulations. These will increase if the UK joins the EU ETS.
5. Miscellaneous Manufactures account for 11% of UK goods exports. This is still the UK's third-largest export sector, even though it includes many goods the UK no longer makes because of our high Carbon taxes, which will increase if the UK signs up to the EU's even higher ETS on November 20th.
6. Fuels account for 9% of UK exports. This is still the UK's 4th largest goods export sector, even though the current and previous governments are/were trying to destroy it with bans on new exploration and ultra-high taxes.
7. Material Manufactures account for 8% of UK goods exports. This sector includes iron, steel, aluminium, ceramics, and glass manufacturing - industries that have gone, or are going, out of business in the UK because of high UK energy costs, which will rise if the UK joins the EU ETS.
8. These five sectors make up almost 90% of UK exports. The other 5 industry sectors are insignificant. But the government and our journalists think the UK is New Zealand and that the only goods we export are food and live animals to the EU. We don't! UK food and live animal exports to the EU were just 1.3% of the UK's total exports.
9. The government is about to sacrifice all of the export industries listed above to slightly reduce the IMPORT costs of a handful of Supermarkets, at least two of which are privately owned German companies.
These savings will not be passed on to UK shoppers because the government has also increased wages again, and supermarket energy costs will increase if we join the EU's ETS.
10. UK exports of food and live animals will not increase because we are paying farmers to not produce them, this has nothing to do with EU red tape. Instead we are paying farmers to plant trees and wildflowers or plaster their farmland with solar panels. (54% of UK electricity is coming from gas today, 12% from solar and 3% from wind.)
11. Write to your MP and tell him to #StoptheReset.
If you don't stop this, don't complain when all of our goods export industries have closed because of EU higher carbon taxes, EU higher carbon import tariffs, and the cost of complying with the EU's new packaging and process regulations.
Simon Adlington retweeted
The Free Speech Union exposed that all five members of the Working Group tasked with drafting the official definition of Islamophobia had troubling links to Islamist organisations, including the Muslim Council of Britain and MEND.
The Working Group held a consultation so people could help shape what became the “anti-Muslim hostility” definition. Given the public interest, the FSU asked which groups and individuals had been consulted.
Shadow Justice Secretary Nick Timothy submitted a Freedom of Information request. The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) replied that it had deleted all the responses — in what appears to be against the Government’s own data policy.
The FSU then threatened Angela Rayner’s department with legal action.
Now the department’s most senior civil servant says the responses do exist and remain on its data system, but the department will not disclose who was consulted.
So what is going on? Were we told the responses had been deleted to conceal the fact that Islamist extremists had the chance to influence the definition?
We are now told that an Islamophobia tsar will be announced imminently. Given Rayner and her department’s record, who on earth could it be?
Simon Adlington retweeted
Over 60 Muslim men raped Scarlett West from the age of 14.
None have been convicted. Her father stood as Restore Britain’s candidate for Greater Manchester mayor.
There was no national outrage, no wave of arrests, and no accountability.
Russell Brand, by contrast, is facing the full force of the justice system over an allegation involving touching a woman’s breast 15 years ago. If the evidence shows he is a predator, he should be punished.
That is how a functioning system works.
The same system has produced nothing for Scarlett. The men who systematically raped and trafficked her as a child remain free.
This is not an isolated failure. It is a pattern in which certain offenders are pursued relentlessly while others walk amongst us.
Where are the 60 Muslim men who raped a child?
Disgraceful.
Simon Adlington retweeted
Yesterday, I exposed how the Contempt of Court Act has been used to prevent the British public from hearing evidence in grooming gang trials.
The response was entirely predictable. The same familiar voices, including those who have spent years defending the institutions implicated in the grooming gangs scandal, rushed to justify the silence.
They claimed the reporting bans were necessary to protect fair trials. Without them, juries would be prejudiced, convictions overturned and victims forced to give evidence again.
It's just not true.
My next dispatch follows the evidence, dismantles the excuses and reveals how a law intended to protect fair trials has resulted in censorship and delay of public scrutiny of the institutions that failed over a hundred thousand children.
🔴 SIGN UP HERE
👉 redwallandtherabble.co.uk
I don't expect the likes of Justice Secretary Alex Norris or the Attorney General is Ellie Reeves KC MP to help right this wrong. Why would a Labour Party politician intervene? But the silence from the opposition tells its own story.
There are no paywalls to access any of my work. I share all my content for free. Read it. Make your own mind up. Share it if you have the courage to do so. And ask yourself why those defending the restrictions never seem to mention the evidence against their arguments.
Raja Miah MBE
Simon Adlington retweeted
Dacă Polonia fuge de sub escortă, hegemonia germană în Europa e nulă. Polonia e, deja, prea departe pentru a mai fi recuperată cu mijloace obișnuite. Tot ce merge spre faliment în UE, urcă spre autonomie în Polonia: economia e puternică, moneda e stabilă iar forța militară e reală. Poate mai important, nervul național e viu, într-o țară care își detestă geografia și își cunoaște blestemul prin grija vecinilor.
Cine trăiește între Germania și Rusia moare frecvent și învie numai cu prețul unui curaj misterios. Unii l-au numit „nebunie poloneză”. Însă, nimeni nu i-a descoperit formula și n-a putut imita această trăire națională furibundă care a scos o nație din toate ororile și a doborît, pe parcurs comunismul.
Astăzi, Polonia e cea mai mare putere a Estului iar Estul e marea excepție nealiniată la mortificarea îmbrățișată și recomandată tuturor de Vest.
Aceste divergențe de mentalitate și caracter în fișa pacientului, sînt sursele izbucnirii de banditism a liberalismului stîngist european, în execuția comandoului Tusk – Primul Ministru filo-german și euro-fanatic al Poloniei.
Tusk a încercat să pună mîna pe Curta Constiutuțională a țării și, prin asta, pe centrul de putere juridică și legalitate care pilotează mersul unei democrații, menținînd-o sau scoțînd-o din realitate. Înhățată de o ideologie care nu se recunoaște decît pe ea însăși, Curtea poate deveni un super-partid care elimină orice partid nealiniat, face liniște și pune capăt dezbaterii, scoate în afara legii un Președinte ales sau reface votul alegătorilor.
Cu alt cuvinte și aceleași tehnici, Curtea Constituțională poloneză poate fi românizată. Modelul București 2024 poate fi transformat în platforma europeană de relansare a stîngii liberale, în 2026.
Modelul a fost pus la lucru cu tot respectul pentru banditismul unui putsch sud-american.
Primul Ministru Donald Tusk a așteptat ca Președintele Karol Nawrocki să urce în avion pentru o vizită în străinătate și apoi a lovit. Cu două zile înainte, poliția primise ordinul de dotare cu armament de război, pentru a face față unor „tulburări” pe care, în nesfîrșita lui clarviziune, numai Tusk le-a prevăzut. În consecință, argumentele invocate, acum, de Tusk și de Comisia Europană sînt penibile. Da, conflictul e juridic și trebuia să rămînă așa. Nimeni nu poate susține că apără democrația și legalitatea, în timp ce pune la cale o lovitură de stat. Cine apare în fața băncii, noaptea, cu automatul în mînă și cu cagulă pe cap nu e un depunător sosit să depună o reclamație.
Nawrocki a întors din drum avionul care îl purta spre Africa, a aterizat la Varșovia și a intrat în sediul Curții, unde se pregătea îndepărtarea judecătorilor. Dar povestea nu se va termina aici. Pentru că miza e mult mai mare iar distribuția e mult mai vastă. Pe rol e, de fapt, viitorul lumii europene.
Disperarea obscenă a atacului lansat de Tusk e împrumutată de la liderii sistemului european la putere.
Crema progresistă a Europei simte că sistemul se clatină. Lumea conducătoare s-a baricadat în spatele cenzurii și într-o retorică pseudo-democratică mai plictisitoare decît un mesaj telefonic automat. Acolo unde are, încă, o bază internă complice, sistemul încearcă să lovească preventiv.
Sondajele spun că alegerile de anul viitor vor fi cîștigate de dreapta și Polonia va ieși de sub control. Cu asta, sistemul ar pierde orice pondere pe noua hartă geo-politică, unde Polonia e o forță militară și economică mult mai credibilă decît cadavrele de carton ale puterilor tradiționale. Tot în următoarele 12 luni, alegerile ar putea aduce sau menține la putere dreapta, în Franța, Spania și Italia. În paralel, Germania e paralizată de încercarea de a-și transforma statul în frauda care blochează opoziția. Pe margine, Marea Britanie își vede harnic de propriul faliment.
Traian Ungureanu, fost europarlamentar
Simon Adlington retweeted
It remains absolutely astonishing that Danny Tommo is in prison BEFORE his trial, for MONTHS.
I won't forget it, and nor should you.
Simon Adlington retweeted
I actively made sure my kids did NOT join the Army. I spent 16 years in the British Army. 9 Op tours. Shot in Iraq, Military Cross. I had to buy my own body armour, find scrap metal plates as armour for our land rovers. Persecuted in the Iraq inquiry by my own government.
‘Give us a reason to fight and die for Britain again.’
@Alexarmstrong reacts to Defence Secretary Wes Streeting warning Britain has just over 1,000 days to prepare for war.
Simon Adlington retweeted
A Simple List of Key Allegations Involving South Yorkshire Police Officers.
- A 12-year-old White girl was raped in the back of a marked police car by a serving Pakistani police officer
- A police officer helped facilitate the kidnapping of a child and her detention in a rape house for 10 weeks
- Police officers supplied Class A drugs to grooming gang members. In return for access to victims? Or to help drug their victims? Both?
- Child victims of gang rape were violently assaulted in police custody, including being beaten while locked in cells
- Police officers ripped up written statements made by children begging for help
- Officers blackmailed victims for 'sex', threatening to return them to gang members if they did not comply
- Operation Linden (2022) examined 47 current and former officers, finding 8 cases for misconduct, 6 for gross misconduct, but no criminal prosecutions or dismissals - only internal disciplinary actions such as written warnings or management directives.
- Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) conducted a five-year investigation reviewing 265 serious allegations. During this time, not one single officer was prosecuted. Zilch!!!
The Rotherham scandal is no longer just about the Pakistani Rape Gangs. It is about a police force that enabled abuse, officers who took part in it, and the IOPC that protected them.
Yet despite the overwhelming evidence against @syptweet and @policeconduct , the Home Secretary @YvetteCooperMP, remains silent and is refusing to instruct the National Crime Agency take over the investigation.
Why? In what world can this cover up continue?
_________
The truth about the Pakistani Rape Clans in Britain isn't just uncomfortable. It's a national shame.
For those new to me, I'm Raja Miah MBE. I spent six years leading a small team that exposed how politicians protected the rape gangs.
I need your support. Here’s the reality:
There are NO paywalls to access any of my work. All of my content is shared for free. Though tens of thousands engage with my work each week, most still haven’t signed up to my newsletter, Red Wall and the Rabble.
The numbers are embarrassingly low. If we’re serious about pushing this over the line, that has to change.
Sign up here:
redwallandtherabble.co.uk
If you’ve found value in what I do, if my work matters to you, please consider helping me keep going.
Buy me a coffee:
BuyMeACoffee.com/recusantnin…
Or support via PayPal:
paypal.me/RecusantNine
I don’t have corporate sponsors. I don’t have a party machine behind me. I don't have corrupt police officers that will dawn raid the homes of those we oppose or friends in the legacy media that will publish slurs.
What I have is more powerful. I have you - ordinary people who understand what’s at stake and why this fight matters.
Thank you for standing with me.
- Raja 🙏
Simon Adlington retweeted
A Labour MP has publicly demanded that the @BBC cancel me as a contributor. And when you look at who he is and what he has chosen to scrutinise, it gets rather interesting.
Labour MP David Taylor has been publicly outspoken against Iran. He has also defended Labour Friends of Israel in Parliament and has been in support of the proscription of Palestine Action.
He has now written directly to the BBC Director-General challenging the decision to invite me onto @bbcsml Sunday Morning Live.
He questioned whether I was suitable to appear, asked whether the BBC should review its editorial decision, and questioned whether by giving me a platform the BBC was “lending credibility” to me as a commentator on Iran and the Middle East.
So let's be clear about what happened.
This wasn't simply an MP criticising something I said.
He was questioning why the BBC had given me a platform in the first place.
And he didn't keep his intervention private.
He published the letter himself.
I was on Sunday Morning Live to discuss whether full-face coverings should be banned in public.
I wasn't there to discuss Iran.
Yet Taylor's letter focuses heavily on my views on Iran and Israel, old social media posts, some fake, and my visits to Iran - ultimately questioning whether I should have been given a platform at all.
Taylor has chosen to scrutinise my political views, my commentary on Iran and my visits to Iran.
But where is the same scrutiny of politicians, commentators and public figures who regularly appear on national television despite travelling to Israel on sponsored or organised political delegations and maintaining documented relationships with pro-Israel organisations?
Where are the letters to the BBC questioning whether they should be given a platform?
I am not saying travelling to Israel is inherently improper. I am not equating a visit to Israel with a visit to Iran.
I am asking why the standard appears to be different when it comes to me.
My appearance generated thousands of likes and hundreds of comments across my social media.
People clearly wanted to hear the discussion.
But a sitting Labour MP has gone to the BBC Director-General to question whether I should have been given that platform.
He says in his letter that “both freedom of expression and open public debate are essential.”
I agree.
But freedom of expression and open public debate cannot mean politicians deciding which voices are sufficiently acceptable to appear on British television.
I am perfectly happy to be challenged on anything I have actually said.
What I will not accept is political disagreement being turned into a question of whether I should be given a voice at all.
The Telegraph is now preparing an article about this. I have given them a full statement in response, and they have told me they intend to treat the article fairly.
So im putting these deep concerns into the public domain too.
I've published the letter. Read it.
Look at exactly what a sitting MP asked the BBC to consider about me.
Then ask yourself why my voice has attracted this particular level of scrutiny.
And if you think that raises legitimate questions about political pressure, editorial independence and selective scrutiny, share this far and wide.
Simon Adlington retweeted
I was hoping to be able to announce this in my own time – but the media rumour mill is swirling, I'm being contacted by various reporters and others, and I don't like denying the truth, so ...
I wrote my first "Economic Agenda" column in The Sunday Telegraph 27 years ago, under the editorship of Dominic Lawson – filling-in occasionally during the late-1990s, before being given my own weekly slot from 2003.
Since then, while I've been heavily involved in television, and am perhaps better known as a broadcaster, penning "Economic Agenda" for The Sunday Telegraph each week has been the backbone of my journalistic life.
On Thursday, the @Telegraph rang to tell me my column is being scrapped.
I was asked, and have agreed, to write "Economic Agenda" until the end of November, as per my contract. After that, my Sunday Telegraph column will be no more.
Why this decision has been made, and whether or not my columns were any good, is for others to judge.
All I will say is that, as the first person in my family to attend university, sustaining a weekly column in a leading national newspaper for a quarter of a century has been a source of enormous pride for myself and my family.
Lots of people have been asking me about the future of "Planet Normal" - the hugely-popular Telegraph podcast which I co-created and co-present with the brilliant @AllisonPearson
"Planet Normal" has, over the last 330 weekly episodes, also become a major part of my professional life and my broader identity.
With Allison reportedly leaving the Telegraph as well, there is a lot of speculation about whether or not the podcast will continue to impart "news and views from beyond the bubble" with our usual blend of sharp analysis, humour and occasional outrage !
Well, I am delighted to confirm that Co-Pilot Pearson and myself are deeply committed to our joint podcast – and, above all, to our beloved listeners.
We will, as and when notice periods allow, continue our voyages through space every Thursday – perhaps to "Planet Normal", or maybe to another part of the solar system – so we can "gaze down each week at the madness of Planet Earth", as we have done since the Spring of 2020.
So citizens of Planet Normal, stand ready ! The "rocket-of-right-thinking", the "flying refuge of reasoned views", will soon be launched once again 🚀🪐👨🏭👱♀️🎙️📺
I poured my heart and soul into "Economic Agenda" and "Planet Normal". The Telegraph's decision to scrap them is obviously a huge personal blow. But I will always be grateful for the opportunities the paper has given me.
Above all, I would like to thank the illustrious list of successive Telegraph business editors I've worked with since the late-1990s, many of whom have become and remain good friends - including @Peston @RobertsDan @larmitstead @neilbenet @benjaminmarlow @cg_williams @kamalahmednews @MarkKleinmanSky @jamesrquinn (sorry if I've forgotten anyone, it's been a long time!)
On Friday, even though I almost always write my column from elsewhere, and despite being extremely disappointed by the paper's decision, I decided to go into the Telegraph and write today's column sitting in the newsroom.
I am glad I did - as being at the heart of the paper at such a difficult time allowed for lots of conversations, with everyone from junior production staff to senior reporters and executives, which reminded me that journalism, despite being an industry at the whim of seemingly endless and often brutal commercial and technological upheaval, is not only hugely important to our country, but full of talented, decent people.
See picture below, having just filed my piece, as I was heading out the door ...
Simon Adlington retweeted
This post had been shared over 2,000 times on Facebook. It had been viewed by over 100,000 people on Facebook in under 12hrs. It has now been removed by Facebook and my page has been restricted.
I have appealed their decision as I do not believe the image in any way shows 'children in a sexual way' as Facebook claims.
Going off my past interactions with Facebook, the chances of it going back up are not high. I will leave it to you to decide what is going on.
From the outset, we have had to fight to remain on both Facebook and (until recently) X. Even YouTube removed videos of mine in the lead up to securing the national inquiry. This is why I urge every one who follows my work to sign up to the newsletter.
Raja Miah MBE
THEY RAPED MORE THAN 1,000 CHILDREN IN TELFORD. SOME WERE 11. LUCY LOWE WAS 14 WHEN SHE HAD A CHILD BY THE MAN WHO WAS ABUSING HER. SHE WAS 15 AND PREGNANT AGAIN WHEN HE SET FIRE TO HER HOME AND BURNED HER TO DEATH WITH HER MOTHER, HER SISTER AND HER UNBORN CHILD. AFTER HER MURDER THE MEN USED HER NAME TO KEEP THE OTHER GIRLS QUIET, TELLING THEM THEY WOULD BE NEXT IF THEY EVER SPOKE.
The police and the council knew what was being done to those girls and left them to it for another twenty years. When the truth finally came out, the Labour leader of the council wrote to the Home Secretary to stop an inquiry. The man who tried to stop it went on to become MP. He has now been promoted to Labour Government Whip.
In July 2022, Tom Crowther KC's independent inquiry concluded that an estimate of up to 1,000 children sexually exploited over three decades was reasonable, and recorded that those who knew the cases called that figure conservative.
The police, the council and the other agencies had the warning signs in front of them for years and did nothing with them. The girls were written off as prostitutes and blamed for what grown men did to them. Crowther found that nervousness about race had discouraged investigations. The girls had told him the men were Pakistani. He wrote their word down once, as their description, and then gave his own finding as men of "southern Asian heritage". The nervousness he found in the police and the council runs through his own report.
The police knew who the men were. The council knew which girls were being passed between them. Lucy Lowe's murder told the girls of Telford who were thinking of speaking exactly what it would cost them.
Then the council leader tried to stop anyone looking. On 22 September 2016, Shaun Davies, the Labour leader of Telford and Wrekin Council, wrote to the Home Secretary that "we do not feel at this time that a further inquiry is necessary". For two years the council found reasons to say no.
Lucy Allan, Telford's MP at the time, listed them in the Commons. The national inquiry would cover Telford. An inquiry would cost too much. Ofsted had given the council a good report. There was nothing to see. Only after sustained pressure from survivors and campaigners did Telford commission Crowther's investigation.
THE INQUIRY TELFORD GOT HAD NO POWER TO COMPEL A SINGLE WITNESS. THE DETECTIVE WHO RAN THE LUCY LOWE CASE AND THE COUNCIL'S CHIEF EXECUTIVE STAYED AWAY FROM IT.
The survivors asked for a statutory inquiry with the power to summon witnesses. Davies gave them one without it. Crowther took evidence from 170 witnesses.
- Eleven people refused to give evidence, provided very limited evidence, or refused permission for their contact details to be passed to Crowther's inquiry.
- Another 20 people could not be interviewed. Seven could not be located despite repeated attempts. Another 13 had known contact details but failed to respond despite repeated attempts.
- Victor Brownlees, chief executive of Telford & Wrekin Council from 2009 to 2011 and formerly acting director of children's services, declined to meet the inquiry. He submitted a very brief statement by email and said he had retained no council documents after leaving.
- Clive Harding, a West Mercia Police Detective Chief Inspector who led the Lucy Lowe triple murder investigation, declined to speak to the inquiry. He argued that the original investigation records contained everything relevant. Crowther wrote to him again, but Harding did not reply.
- Geoff Harding, a retired West Mercia Police Detective Chief Inspector who subsequently worked for Telford & Wrekin Council as an Integrated Services Manager supporting children and families, declined to meet the inquiry. He submitted a very short written summary through West Mercia Police. Crowther described his inability to recall relevant child sexual exploitation cases as remarkable.
- Shropshire Council, whose predecessor had responsibility for children's social services in Telford until 1998, provided responses Crowther described as potentially combative. A request for historical taxi licensing information remained partially outstanding when he published his report, although Crowther did not believe the council had deliberately withheld documents.
Crowther said the four witnesses he named for staying away did not materially affect his conclusions. I do not accept that. Davies himself admitted to Parliament on 21 January 2025 that people the inquiry wanted to talk to did not come forward.
An inquiry that 31 people could refuse, dodge or vanish from, that a former chief executive could answer by email, and that a neighbouring council could stonewall was the inquiry Shaun Davies chose for Telford's children.
AND TELFORD TODAY.
In July 2024, Shaun Davies became Telford's Labour MP. In May 2026, he was appointed Assistant Government Whip. On 22 July 2026, he was promoted to Government Whip, formally Junior Lord of the Treasury. The man who argued against a further inquiry into the rape of Telford's children enforces discipline among Labour MPs.
Anne Longfield chairs a statutory inquiry with the power to compel the witnesses Crowther could not. Telford is not on her list. On 17 July 2025 the council's Labour leader, Lee Carter, passed a motion that welcomed any role the inquiry might give Telford and wrote to the Home Secretary to say so. He did not demand a local investigation. Neither has Shaun Davies.
If Longfield has any desire to expose the cover up, she must name Telford herself. Maybe I can help her.
Last night, I drove to Telford to meet with a whistleblower. What I know now will destroy the council. It will also expose the Labour Party's part in the rape gang cover up in a way nothing before it has. When it is published, Longfield will have to name Telford. It is my intention to publish this weekend.
Raja Miah MBE
_________
You know what we are up against. The mainstream media will not touch my work. Institutions I investigate do not volunteer their records. Politicians do not suddenly decide to hold themselves to account.
And yet, despite every attempt to stop us, we forced the national inquiry. We did that because enough ordinary people refused to go away.
But getting the inquiry was never the end of this campaign. In many ways it was only the beginning. Now we have to watch where it goes, what it investigates, which places it avoids, which witnesses it calls, which records it obtains and whether the same institutions that failed these children are allowed to control the story again.
Nobody else is going to do that work for us. And I cannot do it indefinitely working on my own. That is why I keep talking about 50,000 committed subscribers.
It is not a vanity number. I did not pluck it out of the air. With fifty thousand people with me means when we uncover something important, it does not depend on a newspaper editor, a television producer or an algorithm deciding whether you are allowed to see it.
It gives us reach they cannot easily shut down.
But there is another reason. I need to build a proper backroom operation around this work. At the moment I am investigating, researching, writing, publishing, producing the videos, running the newsletter, dealing with the technology and then starting again. It is unsustainable.
I need people behind me who can take care of the technical and production work so that I can spend my time doing the thing I do best. That is why we have been pushing so hard for new paid subscribers.
🔴 SIGN UP HERE
👉 redwallandtherabble.co.uk
If you read my work and want it to continue, I need your help. Sign up for free. There are no paywalls to access any of my work. If you can afford the £3 a month or £30 for the year, please become a paid subscriber.
We forced the inquiry. Now we need the numbers to make sure they cannot control what happens next. Unfortunately, we are reaching the end of the road where I can continue working this way.
The paid subscriptions have stalled. The audience is growing, but the number of people actually standing behind the work is not growing with it. Over a million people engaged in my content this week. Only a small fraction followed up with a subscription to my newsletter This is becoming impossible to sustain.
🔴 SIGN UP HERE
👉 redwallandtherabble.co.uk
Have a look around you. No on else in this country is doing the work that I do, never mind for nearly a decade. All I'm asking in return is that you sign up to a newsletter and add weight to our ability to take on the government. Is that too much to ask?
Raja Miah MBE



































