Poole, Dorset
Joined January 2020
Stuart Gilham retweeted
Wow... that's SO not how discovery rules work The prosecution don't get to decide what will assist... they are called to give everything collected as part of the investigation INCLUDING and ESPECIALLY anything that might be exculpatory
NEW FOI INFO - The CPS admits its lawyers ruled that the obstetric records in the Lucy Letby case largely could NOT assist the defence, so withheld them. Numerous obstetricians post-trial have pointed to the vital nature of these notes. (1/8)
10
26
1
84
2,510
Stuart Gilham retweeted
These disclosures can hardly come as any real surprise. The decision was, as I have always said, a complete and utter travesty and undermines what the #LucyLetby Trial Jury were told regarding the risk status of many of the indictment cases. The babies were NOT well and stable.
NEW FOI INFO - The CPS admits its lawyers ruled that the obstetric records in the Lucy Letby case largely could NOT assist the defence, so withheld them. Numerous obstetricians post-trial have pointed to the vital nature of these notes. (1/8)
10
25
1
87
2,096
Stuart Gilham retweeted
Safety in numbers: John Gibbs said #luctletby was wrong, it wasn’t a Gang of Four, it was a Gang of Seven that suspected her of murder. Stephen Brearey said the Gang of Seven created strength to take on the managers. But was ganging up on her strength or cowardice?
4
7
1
43
1,043
Stuart Gilham retweeted
Pls RT: When a doctor's error causes the needless deaths of our children or loved one it changes our lives forever. When they lie, falsify medical records & cover up, it destroys our family life, as we have to fight for truth, justice, accountability & learning. RIP Robbie xx
Our niece has sent us this very special photo of Robbie & Ian with their twin cousins Beverly & Vicky in between them. It's impossible to put into words how much we love & miss them both and how losing them has changed our lives. RIP Robbie and Ian xx Love Mammy and Daddy. xx
5
31
2
48
1,216
All this to say: you are 100% correct that this undermines the Baby K case. Don't take it from me. That was the conclusion of the Special Crime Division of the Crown Prosecution Service.
3
4
36
1,126
Day 40 of the trial of Lucy Letby, as far as I can tell Professor Sally Kinsey introduces the concept of 'paradoxical' air embolism. Allegedly she would later turn ghostly white when she found out that "Jayaram's rash" was never recorded in his notes.
5
5
1
53
1,726
Aaaaaand Cultists' Choice award goes to... International Man of Mystery alleged former policeman Sargeant Joe! Not only did he fight the IRA in Northern Ireland as a member of the Irish guards as a youngster he managed to do it 20 years before all the other Irish guards too!🏆
4
5
1
25
780
TBT. The wise, late appeal court judge William Davis casts doubts over the legitimacy of Dr Ravi Jayaram's testimony. It remains to be seen if the CCRC and future appeal court will extend these doubts to lurid descriptions of stunning pink rashes.
9
28
104
4,409
Stuart Gilham retweeted
Replying to @MargotDA33
I think Ravi ("pique their interest") Jayaram had a vague recollection of Baby K. It was never raised during the HR grievance. Post HR verdict the memory was upgraded to the point that it gave him "nightmares forever". #Letby
2
3
21
250
If one were to give Dr Brearey a taste of his own stats medicine. Ignore the issues with discrepant notes and lack of coroner reporting . To what extent can the procedure be justified as medically indicated ... then there's the reckless manner of execution
3
8
2
33
1,204
Stuart Gilham retweeted
"There's nothing that I can offer you to take away that worry and fear". I interviewed @legalmarkmc for @NineteenNu45407 about how Lucy Letby is doing and what he might say to reassure nurses who worry they might be falsely accused after Thirlwall. youtu.be/Tm1f-Uj_btQ?si=3F4O…
4
25
2
60
8,878
Stuart Gilham retweeted
Quiz of the day: What can you decipher ?? RCPCH notes - some clear references for example: a) on INQ0010124_0001- ‘core data (?) of one nurse - paediatrician (Brearey) sees as elephant in the room. Lucy Letby’ b) INQ001024_0006 ‘Steve (Brearey) - Things all ok till last June (2015) … identified one nurse present at all collapses’ c) INQ0010124_0009 ‘needed to put the nurse on day shifts not nights … keep a watch … No u/e (unexpected) collapses at night when she was on nights but collapses happened daytime … children senior manager O? was very defensive and pointed to docs (Drs?) who were there for all of them etc. All happy with (Letby) practices, record keeping and competences. Young no ( only parties?) children so always stepped up … perfectly nice. Good in a crisis. Always there’ So - over to you to decipher what else RCPCH wrote in their notes on Thirlwall: No prizes but will send a photo of Maris Piper …
5
3
15
732
When a narcissist-led group scapegoats an individual it is one of the most painful, destructive, debilitating, harmful experiences known to humanity. It often has the impact of war-based torture. The sense of isolation, depletion & pain is profound & may result in suicide.
45
151
20
889
20,306
Stuart Gilham retweeted
Dr Stephen Brearey breaks his silence. His interview on BBC Radio 4 this morning. Intro by Judith Moritz. #LucyLetby youtu.be/p4YKxLXE48I?si=lWeQ…
11
11
5
39
3,542
Does he regret withholding crucial information about his failed needle procedure to the Coroner, which was his statutory duty to report? 🤔 🤷‍♀️ #LucyLetby
11
64
9
198
5,330
Stuart Gilham retweeted
I'm just leaving this here #Letby
10
34
6
99
4,816
Stuart Gilham retweeted
This man really is disgraceful, I can’t believe anyone thinks he’s credible. Anyway I’m sure he enjoyed his dinner ☠️
2
3
41
2,520
Stuart Gilham retweeted
'even when you know it’s there.' That's the important bit isn't it ...they would know it's there because it's seen on echo, ct or x ray. If not seen anywhere, then there is no evidence at all that it is there. You can't just hypothesise it up when it's convenient....
2
5
1
13
792
Stuart Gilham retweeted
For instance, in just ONE example of the panel, see page 8 & READ attached drive.google.com/file/d/1aV4… How does it compare to Dr. Evans, retired 2009, unqualified in neonatology & unlicensed when he wrote his reports? #Letby
1
3
1
9
196