SelaSayer ๐Ÿฆ“/ ๐Ÿ™…โ€โ™€๏ธ๐Ÿ‡๐Ÿฆ–/ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ (@selasayer) header
SelaSayer ๐Ÿฆ“/ ๐Ÿ™…โ€โ™€๏ธ๐Ÿ‡๐Ÿฆ–/ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ (@selasayer) profile picture

Cramping from the Irony. Adult Human Female. British Employment Tribunals are the future. Progressivism has shit the bed. Free Your Speech.

Joined August 2025
Photo by SelaSayer ๐Ÿฆ“/ ๐Ÿ™…โ€โ™€๏ธ๐Ÿ‡๐Ÿฆ–/ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ (@selasayer)Photo by SelaSayer ๐Ÿฆ“/ ๐Ÿ™…โ€โ™€๏ธ๐Ÿ‡๐Ÿฆ–/ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ (@selasayer)Photo by SelaSayer ๐Ÿฆ“/ ๐Ÿ™…โ€โ™€๏ธ๐Ÿ‡๐Ÿฆ–/ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ (@selasayer)Photo by SelaSayer ๐Ÿฆ“/ ๐Ÿ™…โ€โ™€๏ธ๐Ÿ‡๐Ÿฆ–/ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ (@selasayer)Photo by SelaSayer ๐Ÿฆ“/ ๐Ÿ™…โ€โ™€๏ธ๐Ÿ‡๐Ÿฆ–/ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ (@selasayer)Photo by SelaSayer ๐Ÿฆ“/ ๐Ÿ™…โ€โ™€๏ธ๐Ÿ‡๐Ÿฆ–/ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ (@selasayer)Photo by SelaSayer ๐Ÿฆ“/ ๐Ÿ™…โ€โ™€๏ธ๐Ÿ‡๐Ÿฆ–/ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ (@selasayer)Photo by SelaSayer ๐Ÿฆ“/ ๐Ÿ™…โ€โ™€๏ธ๐Ÿ‡๐Ÿฆ–/ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ (@selasayer)Photo by SelaSayer ๐Ÿฆ“/ ๐Ÿ™…โ€โ™€๏ธ๐Ÿ‡๐Ÿฆ–/ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ (@selasayer)Photo by SelaSayer ๐Ÿฆ“/ ๐Ÿ™…โ€โ™€๏ธ๐Ÿ‡๐Ÿฆ–/ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ (@selasayer)
Thank, I haven't laughed so hard in ages.
A MtF โ€œtranswomanโ€ posted this recently on the โ€œwomenโ€ subreddit: โ€œCis women must realize that they hold privilege over trans women, and that frequently they are oppressors to trans women. They must realize that they dish out patriarchal violence against trans women.โ€ โ€œYou have made me lose faith in sisterhood and solidarity amidst a shared struggle. Cis women can truly be the men of women โ€ฆ Just as bad as them.โ€ And also, โ€œNo, I am not biologically male and no, I was not socialized male. Both of these are TERF dogwhistles.โ€ ๐Ÿคก
1
49
Man displays ignorance of women to women in a condescending fashion, gets suplexed in the comments, pretends the women call their own vulvas vaginas all the time, like men do.
unavailable
2
1
169
SelaSayer ๐Ÿฆ“/ ๐Ÿ™…โ€โ™€๏ธ๐Ÿ‡๐Ÿฆ–/ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ retweeted
What would trans women be if they didnโ€™t have gender dysphoria?
unavailable
3
2
38
931
SelaSayer ๐Ÿฆ“/ ๐Ÿ™…โ€โ™€๏ธ๐Ÿ‡๐Ÿฆ–/ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ retweeted
The Supreme Court Review published an article with erroneous citations propping up a fake definition of sex. I asked its editor, @WilliamBaude, to issue a correction. He ignored me. Then the authors admitted error. Now can we get that correction?
New from me Link โฌ
38
1
130
1,952
SelaSayer ๐Ÿฆ“/ ๐Ÿ™…โ€โ™€๏ธ๐Ÿ‡๐Ÿฆ–/ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ retweeted
Soothe yourself with this. Beautiful.
Hail on slate. This is very calming to me, I love it.
1
1
3
115
X does not want me. My account was locked for no reason, I now have a spam label, and I haven't gotten a notification in days. I'm not doing this anymore. Keep fighting the good fight! See you on the other side.
1
49
SelaSayer ๐Ÿฆ“/ ๐Ÿ™…โ€โ™€๏ธ๐Ÿ‡๐Ÿฆ–/ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ retweeted
Every medical institution involved in "Affirming Care" based on WPATH's (obviously) insane guidelines (including the NHS), harmed and experimented on children and the vulnerable, based entirely on the opinions of a few aging transvestites. They deserve to be sued into oblivion.
๐Ÿšจ WPATH has conceded in court that its "Standards of Care" is merely an opinion. WPATH says it represents one side of an unsettled scientific debate marked by uncertainty โ€” and physicains & orgs that rely on WPATH as the standard of care must bear "independent responsibility."/1
14
103
8
331
5,574
SelaSayer ๐Ÿฆ“/ ๐Ÿ™…โ€โ™€๏ธ๐Ÿ‡๐Ÿฆ–/ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ retweeted
Replying to @LeorSapir
WPATH caving on the "medical consensus," the ACLU caving on self-ID in sports, it's almost as though we're on our way to winning.
6
8
140
1,452
SelaSayer ๐Ÿฆ“/ ๐Ÿ™…โ€โ™€๏ธ๐Ÿ‡๐Ÿฆ–/ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ retweeted
Iโ€™m a gay man and a psychiatrist. Iโ€™ve watched the explosion of rapid-onset gender dysphoria cases, especially in teenage girls. Iโ€™ve seen the desistance data, the comorbidities, the regret, and the sterilizing effects of blockers + cross-sex hormones. And I have never supported medicalizing children. Not once. Never. Kids cannot consent to infertility, loss of sexual function, or permanent alteration of healthy bodies. โ€œAffirmationโ€ is not neutral care โ€” it is an ideological intervention that locks many of them onto a medical pathway most would have grown out of. Being gay does not require me to pretend that sex is a spectrum or that a distressed 13-year-old girl is actually a boy. It requires the opposite: protecting same-sex attracted and gender-nonconforming kids from a medical fad that pathologizes them. I will not shut up.
553
4,398
184
23,377
407,168
SelaSayer ๐Ÿฆ“/ ๐Ÿ™…โ€โ™€๏ธ๐Ÿ‡๐Ÿฆ–/ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ retweeted
This is the culmination of a massive effort that others have put in to pave the way. They didn't do it a decade ago when there was a chance of it backfiring at great personal cost. I'm happy enough to see it, but let's not pretend that it was a simple singlehanded takedown.
All it took to collapse an entire sect of gender ideology was two alpha males declaring they identify as women and entering the WNBA draft. Iโ€™m going to show you the genius of what they just did. The two ex-NBA players Enes Kanter Freedom and Royce White didnโ€™t argue against the absurd premise that gender is fluid. Thatโ€™s a losing play. The better play is to enter the illusion and destroy it by taking the illusion to the logical extreme. So thatโ€™s exactly what they did. They embraced the premise that gender is fluid and took it to the logical extreme by declaring for the WNBA draft. Now they are forcing liberals to face the absurdity of their own ideology. Gender ideologyโ€™s core claim is that sex is irrelevant and identity is sovereign. โ€œTrans women are women.โ€ Self-ID is enough. Now the WNBA, which is in many ways a major liberal institution, faces a big dilemma. They have to either: A: Allow the two to enter the WNBA draft. Admit โ€œwomanโ€ is just a feeling (This is absurd and destroys the product). or B: Draw a line and say they donโ€™t qualify. That concedes self-ID is not enough and biology matters. This would be a public abandonment of the liberal doctrine. Either path burns the ideology to the ground, which is hilarious. Take notes everyone. Two dudes literally just made one of the greatest persuasion plays of the decade.
20
65
2
580
18,504
SelaSayer ๐Ÿฆ“/ ๐Ÿ™…โ€โ™€๏ธ๐Ÿ‡๐Ÿฆ–/ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ retweeted
Replying to @DarrigoMelanie
Youโ€™re so transphobic. I suppose youโ€™re going to say the same thing about him? Do you really think people have to jump through hoops to make you comfortable with their identity? Maybe heโ€™s kidding, maybe not, but youโ€™ve just made things so much worse. Now people have to prove things to you?
3
31
343
2,861
SelaSayer ๐Ÿฆ“/ ๐Ÿ™…โ€โ™€๏ธ๐Ÿ‡๐Ÿฆ–/ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ retweeted
The โ€œtrans are a small minorityโ€ argument is abject nonsense. Under self-ID, โ€œtransโ€ is not a small subset of people. It is anyone. Anyone, for any reason, at any time.
56
273
8
1,542
16,042
SelaSayer ๐Ÿฆ“/ ๐Ÿ™…โ€โ™€๏ธ๐Ÿ‡๐Ÿฆ–/ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ retweeted
John Oliver did not "debunk" HeCheated. In fact, he did not even mention it. HeCheated does not rely on "crowdsourcing." There is no evidence here presented to show this. It's a claim the author has simply thrown out. HeCheated does not use SheWon to gather any results at all. Every result is taken directly from an independent source. That is another false claim. Including both elite and amateur sport does not discredit the validity of information. That is simply the author's opinion that amateur athletics are not important enough to warrant data collection. They go on to criticize the publishing of this data. Again, that does not discredit the accuracy of the results but is simply the author's opinion on the methods of presentation. All results in the HeCheated database are already available on separate athletic databases where their full names, location, and schools are already publicly presented. The final paragraph, again, simply is author criticism of the fact that school and athlete names are listed, as is common practice for every single athlete who participates in sports in the USA. The only attempt they make to cast doubt on the results is by saying that HeCheated does not provide detailed information on each athlete, essentially doxxing athletes by listing past work histories, schools, family members, etc. But they offer no examples of athletes they believe have been wrongly added to the list. They leave out the fact that HeCheated has explicitly written in the about section that anyone who would like more information on any athlete may contact the site privately. They are claiming HeCheated doxes, but then criticize HeCheated for not doxxing, a very contradictory position. So in short, there is absolutely nothing there that has done the slightest to discredit the accuracy and validity of the information on the site. Like I said, it's an opinion piece written by someone who really doesn't like the fact that this info has been collected.
3
91
2
587
6,252
SelaSayer ๐Ÿฆ“/ ๐Ÿ™…โ€โ™€๏ธ๐Ÿ‡๐Ÿฆ–/ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ retweeted
Replying to @StaceyVaughn
The response to this stunt shows exactly how people who say a "woman is anyone who says they are a woman" don't actually believe their own nonsense either.
4
39
669
3,367
SelaSayer ๐Ÿฆ“/ ๐Ÿ™…โ€โ™€๏ธ๐Ÿ‡๐Ÿฆ–/ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ retweeted
What I love about us is that, despite the hideous pervasiveness of the ideology that we're fighting, we've managed to retain our wonderful senses of humour. This place makes me laugh every day. Thank you, all you very funny people โค๏ธโค๏ธโค๏ธ
16
12
2
498
8,893
17M views. I don't know if this is going to be good for women's sports and the WNBA or not, but they are going to have to make some decisions.
After careful consideration and reviewing the current eligibility guidelines, Iโ€™m officially declaring myself a @WNBA prospect. If simply declaring who you are is all thatโ€™s required, then I meet every single requirement necessary to compete in the WNBA. My team and I have carefully examined the WNBAโ€™s eligibility criteria and governing framework surrounding self-identification and inclusion. Based on the current guidelines, I can and am officially declaring my eligibility for the upcoming WNBA draft in April 2027. I know my presence on the court will stir up strong opinions. I am definitely not here to mock, make fun of, or disrespect any community or personal choices. Iโ€™m simply asking that the current rules be applied equally to everyone โ€” the rules that represent the very values many WNBA players and coaches have publicly advocated for. My team and I are prepared to ensure these guidelines are applied equally, consistently, and without exception, and I look forward to the #WNBA honoring its stated principles. See you at training camp. enesfreedom.com
1
1
62
SelaSayer ๐Ÿฆ“/ ๐Ÿ™…โ€โ™€๏ธ๐Ÿ‡๐Ÿฆ–/ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ retweeted
This all day long ๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿ‘‡
EHRC Code: Why the Toilet Debate Is a Distraction The campaign to reduce the Supreme Court ruling and the EHRC Code to a debate about lavatories is not confusion. It is strategy. Behind the toilet door lies the systematic dismantling of womenโ€™s rights, funded, organised and prosecuted against women who should have been defended years ago. A conjuring trick requires misdirection. The audience must watch one hand while the other does the work. Keep that principle in mind as you scroll through the endless, repetitive, deliberately narrowed argument about public lavatories, and the entire campaign snaps suddenly into focus. The toilet is not the argument. The toilet is the frame. It has been chosen with great care, because it achieves three things at once. It makes womenโ€™s objections appear mean, petty, almost obsessive. It reduces a broad legal settlement about womenโ€™s fundamental rights to a single, intimate, emotionally charged doorway. And it places women permanently on the defensive, forever justifying the existence of the boundary rather than those demanding its removal. The question is always โ€œwhy are you so obsessed with where people go to the toilet?โ€, never โ€œwhy is your campaign not about building new facilities for transgender use, but specifically about access to womenโ€™s existing ones?โ€ On 21 May 2026, the Equality and Human Rights Commissionโ€™s updated draft Code of Practice for services, public functions and associations was laid before Parliament. The Code does not create new law. It provides clarity about existing law, and clarity is precisely what a decade of institutional cowardice had denied women. It applies to women-only domestic violence refuges. It applies to single-sex hospital wards. It applies to communal changing rooms. It applies to intimate personal care. It applies to competitive sport. It applies to womenโ€™s right to meet, organise and associate as women. But to hear the ultra-liberals tell it, this is only about toilets. It isnโ€™t. It is about whether women retain the right to define, organise and protect themselves as a sex class, or whether every boundary they fought for can be dissolved by male declaration and institutional cowardice. The toilet door is merely where they want you looking while the rest of womenโ€™s rights are carried out the back. The toilet is the distraction. Women are the target. heartlandstribune.com/trans-โ€ฆ #womensrights
3
12
35
1,521