Pinned Tweet
Replying to @donwinslow
The Democratic Party cut through all the laws in America to get after the Devil Trump himself. What will they do when the Devil Trump turns round on them? Where will they hide, all the laws being flat?
How will you stand, in the winds that will follow?
TWTicktockevil retweeted
western civilization is kind of an oxymoron but the rest of the world was mapping the stars, exploring mathematics and creating trade empires. A knights suit of armor is an engineering marvel in the same sense a machine gun is; A product of a sad hyper violent society
TWTicktockevil retweeted
As Samuel Huntington pointed out, while Westerners like to forget that the superiority of Western civilization is first the product of superiority in the application of organized violence, non-Westerners never ever forget it.
TWTicktockevil retweeted
Replying to @TomDohertyfilm
The books the film is based on were an attempt (in the post civil war south) to preserve the folk tales of former slaves. Those tales were Americanized versions of folk tales from Africa. Disney was trying to bring those tales to the big screen.
TWTicktockevil retweeted
Replying to @TomDohertyfilm
I agree, except about the commentary—those film scholars have been too silent, antagonistic, biased or agnostic to comment with credibility. A movie scholar or new documentary with objective views on Song of the South would be welcome. Maltin’s qualified, and he’s been outspoken, if only on occasion. At this point, someone with a strong, clear and concise view on the film deserves attention. You may be better suited to the task.
TWTicktockevil retweeted
It really is past due time to release a restored version of SONG OF THE SOUTH theatrically, followed by a 4K disk, with wrapround commentary from, say, Leonard Maltin, Jacqueline Stewart, and/or Donald Bogle. Baskett is so good in this film, it's shameful to erase him from American film history.
TWTicktockevil retweeted
Huge mistake by NVIDIA.
Affair with head of HR? Pay her, keep her, keep him. If she wants to depart, make it easy and help her land a comparable job.
The rest is between him and his wife.
Chinese Honey Pot? If he didn't know, that's not a firing offense either. Build in some safeguards to avoid entanglements with foreign strangers. He accepts or he resigns. Accept the Govt's help.
If he knew, that's a different matter but the Feds will be leading the way -- follow them.
NVIDIA just made themselves vulnerable to market forces.
Or maybe everyone is happy with him moving to join Elon. I'm sure Elon would welcome some equity contribution and world's best engineering to his varied projects.
TWTicktockevil retweeted
“With guns in the hands of the public, there may be tragedies, but without them, there will be genocides"
This is historically irrefutable.
TWTicktockevil retweeted
Food stamp advocate SELF-DESTRUCTS as Rep. Brandon Gill presses her on why taxpayers pay for Coca-Cola.
She tries to dodge the question. Then Gill pulls out the receipts, and she sits there in stunned silence.
GILL: “Should SNAP dollars be spent on sodas?”
WITNESS: “I am happy to talk about hunger and nutrition, but not dictate what Americans should or should not eat or may have access to.”
GILL: “I’m asking if tax dollars should be used to pay for sodas.”
“Do they need sugary sodas to survive?”
WITNESS: “Some of them do…”
GILL: “You think they need Coca-Cola to survive?”
“I’m giving you the opportunity to say yes or no.”
WITNESS: “I will not answer for individuals and their… choices.”
GILL: “What does SNAP stand for?”
WITNESS: “It’s a Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.”
GILL: “What’s nutritional about Coca-Cola?”
WITNESS: “I am not a nutritionist.”
Then Gill asks who’s paying her, and she freezes like a deer in headlights.
GILL: “Is your organization funded by organizations that make money from food stamps?”
[awkward silence]
GILL: “Do organizations who profit off of food stamps fund your organization or businesses?”
WITNESS: “I mean, in the, in the, I, I can’t comment to that.”
GILL: “Does General Mills fund your organization?”
WITNESS: “I don’t have access to that information.”
GILL: “I do. It’s right here. They do fund your organization. […] Yes, and they’re profiting off of your advocacy. Do you think that that’s a conflict of interest?”
[more silence]
GILL: “I think most people think that’s a conflict of interest. I know you don’t want to answer.”
Always follow the money.
CONTEXT: USDA’s own study found soft drinks were the #1 purchase in SNAP households, beating milk, ground beef, and everything else in the store.
TWTicktockevil retweeted
Part of the reason we’ll never be able to curb SNAP fraud is because big companies won’t let us put an end to their cash cow.
It was a mistake to get the federal government involved in welfare.
Food stamp advocate SELF-DESTRUCTS as Rep. Brandon Gill presses her on why taxpayers pay for Coca-Cola.
She tries to dodge the question. Then Gill pulls out the receipts, and she sits there in stunned silence.
GILL: “Should SNAP dollars be spent on sodas?”
WITNESS: “I am happy to talk about hunger and nutrition, but not dictate what Americans should or should not eat or may have access to.”
GILL: “I’m asking if tax dollars should be used to pay for sodas.”
“Do they need sugary sodas to survive?”
WITNESS: “Some of them do…”
GILL: “You think they need Coca-Cola to survive?”
“I’m giving you the opportunity to say yes or no.”
WITNESS: “I will not answer for individuals and their… choices.”
GILL: “What does SNAP stand for?”
WITNESS: “It’s a Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.”
GILL: “What’s nutritional about Coca-Cola?”
WITNESS: “I am not a nutritionist.”
Then Gill asks who’s paying her, and she freezes like a deer in headlights.
GILL: “Is your organization funded by organizations that make money from food stamps?”
[awkward silence]
GILL: “Do organizations who profit off of food stamps fund your organization or businesses?”
WITNESS: “I mean, in the, in the, I, I can’t comment to that.”
GILL: “Does General Mills fund your organization?”
WITNESS: “I don’t have access to that information.”
GILL: “I do. It’s right here. They do fund your organization. […] Yes, and they’re profiting off of your advocacy. Do you think that that’s a conflict of interest?”
[more silence]
GILL: “I think most people think that’s a conflict of interest. I know you don’t want to answer.”
Always follow the money.
CONTEXT: USDA’s own study found soft drinks were the #1 purchase in SNAP households, beating milk, ground beef, and everything else in the store.
TWTicktockevil retweeted
A father and son body broker duo charged with the “largest substance abuse treatment fraud scheme ever prosecuted” after bilking $1.6 BILLION
Just as I told you, they are bussing in addicts from all over the country to LA to receive fake substance abuse “treatment” billed to private insurance companies. YOU pay to keep the zombies drugged up and terrorizing our streets and ruining our city.
mynewsla.com/crime/2026/11/1…
TWTicktockevil retweeted
“I recently went through aggressive cancer treatment. I’m in remission now… Still, I lost my hair and have a lot of residual health issues. He’s more understanding about them than I ever could have imagined. Also, he’s sweet, funny, affectionate, and very into me. But there are some things I can’t stop thinking about. I’ve come to the extremely ugly realization that, while I love my boyfriend, I want to marry someone richer.”
Oh my gosh. It would have been one thing if it was just “I’m not feeling the spark.” They are a pretty new couple. But to say “While I love my boyfriend, I want to marry someone richer”…
We live in a messed up world.
TWTicktockevil retweeted
This might be oversharing but I've been doing a lot of soul-searching with respect to family recently and this post of people sharing happy memories with their families is so alien to me.
My mom told me she wanted to divorce my dad when I was around 9 years old. It took her another 9 years to make good on that promise formally but in those interim 9 years there was nothing resembling a normal marriage or family in my household. My dad was permanently exiled to the guest bedroom. My mom would scream at my dad on a routine basis, mostly about money (I watched their marriage go from fine to apocalyptic more or less over night after my dad was laid off). On some level I internalized that love was transactional to ruinous effect later in life.
I hated the family dynamic. I hated it more when my mom would try to make us do things as a family. I recall one Christmas in particular she wanted us to decorate the tree together. As a young child I could not reconcile my mom's decision to terminate the family unit with what I felt was a pantomime of normal family life. I felt like she was trying to have her cake and eat it too. "What do you mean you want us to do this all together, you rejected the family and decided to end it."
I didn't want to participate in what I felt was a "sham" family. Today I would describe it in Baudrillard's language of Simulacra. From the outside we looked like a family. There was a dad, a mom, a son, a daughter. But the actual heart of it, the core, the connections were gone. Destroyed. But the "zombie family" limped on, absent of anything that made it real, but maintaining the outer form, the "sign" of a family, hence the "Simulacrum."
My revulsion to this hollowed out "zombie family," and the generally tense environment that existed whenever my parents were in the room together saw me retreat into my room. It was the only place I had any control over. Retreat became a habit, but so did leaving me alone. "He's moody, he wants to be left alone." And so they did. And leaving me alone became normal. Very normal. Eventually it became more or less total.
From the time my mom decided to break up the family it didn't take long before I de facto had no real relationship with her whatsoever. It was different with my dad. First of all, I am my dad. I am very much so my father's son. He was still taking me to sport practice multiple times a week and my disposition is naturally inclined towards him because we are so similar. I felt the way my mom treated him was egregiously unjust. The truth is I hated her for it. And her more or less total disengagement from me once I started to withdraw to my room exacerbated things.
But on another level I was just a hurt child. I didn't understand. I watched her throw away her wedding vows, seemingly over money. I saw very up close how devastating this was for my father, who was trying so hard. As my father's son my mother's rejection of my father also felt like a rejection of me. Like, if my dad was so bad my mom felt she had to destroy our family over it, it implied she felt she made an enormous mistake in marrying him, which implied that I too was a mistake. A feeling easily reinforced by her behavior towards me. I am somewhat "eccentric." Even when things were "normal" she could get furious at me for not being however she thought I should be.
But to a young child your mother is your creator. In this respect she takes on an aspect of "God." To feel rejected in this way feels akin to being rejected by God. I felt like unconditional love was a lie. When I was neglected alone in my room for years it only reinforced that feeling of having been abandoned by God. Of being excluded from love.
To this day I feel like I don't experience "being loved" like most people do. It's hard to say because I can't know other people's inner worlds, but it somehow feels "mute" or "dampened." Like whatever part of the nervous system is responsible for that atrophied. Maybe that's hyperbolic, but that's how I experience, or more accurately how I don't experience it.
It took me a very long time and devastating experiences later in life with characteristics of "echoes" of this past to fully dig into it. I'm not sure I will ever get a chance at a happy family life now. But suffice to say the last genuinely "happy" memory I have of my mother is so far in the past, and so buried under significantly more memories of misery, as to feel basically meaningless. In some respects I feel like I didn't really have a mother.
Things remain strained to this day. I tried to have a conversation about these things with her in the interest of attempting to mend a bridge that maybe isn't burnt, but is dangerously without maintenance at risk of total collapse. She ran away from it because she didn't want to have a heavy conversation.
There's another layer to this which is her enthusiastic celebration of the destruction of our nation. She is a die hard faithful "Progressive" and over time I've come to understand that her only real principle is whatever the Democrat party tells her. She has in more recent years told me to my face that they had to discriminate against people like me and that I should just accept it for "the cause." I see in her modern politics the same ideology that allowed her to throw our family away, as well as the entitlement to then be shocked when I didn't want to play pretend family afterwards.
It's a deep wound that did immeasurable damage and it gave me a new appreciation for the prior generation for whom divorce was rare. One more Chesterton's Fence torn down with no consideration for what lay beyond it.
I hope one day it might get better but I have increasingly little expectation that it will. Some things can't be mended. And so I have to just make the best of it. There is no alternative, but it does hurt.
TWTicktockevil retweeted
If you have a refrigerator with food, you are rich enough to be afraid of socialism.
TWTicktockevil retweeted
So my dad is 83 and he’s always talked about Song of the South as his favorite movie from his childhood. Still bums him out that he can’t watch it.
When I’d bring up the controversy around it, he’d go “Nobody was talking like that back then.”
And as I get older, I do often wonder if erasure is ever the best course of action for unflattering history.
TWTicktockevil retweeted
Don’t stop talking about this, DEMAND a nationwide audit into Midterms
The likelihood of the election results are 0.00001%, effectively 1 in trillions
Again, THE LIKELIHOOD OF THE MIDTERM RESULTS NOT BEING FRAUD IS “1 IN TRILLIONS”
TWTicktockevil retweeted
If a politician or civil servant has knowingly placed dangerous third world rapists among our women and children, a Restore Britain Government will send those people to prison.
If we need more prisons, we’ll build them.
TWTicktockevil retweeted
After listening to the Commentary Podcast regarding the failed effort to impeach Sec. Def. Hegseth, I have the following comment:
As a GENERAL proposition, I enjoy listening to @jpodhoretz on some issues involving politics.
But he is absolutely CLUELESS on matters involving the law -- not that he lets that slow him down on making legal judgments, such as his stunningly stupid claim that the First Amendment and office as a Senator provided some form of magic shield for Mark Kelly under the UCMJ, to which he remains subject as a retired officer drawing a pension and remaining subject to recall to active duty.
When this issue first arose, there was no shortage of former military attorneys -- and I am not one -- who set forth very plainly that while those issues might be relevant to any defense in a court martial action, they do not prevent a retired officer from being subject to possible disciplinary proceedings.
It is the remit of the Secretary of War/Defense to evaluate the conduct of retired officers at a time of war when their conduct impacts the manner in which that war is being carried out.
That's all Hegseth did.
As it true with too many things, @jpod allows his dislike to dominate his pronouncements on issues where he has zero experience to opine.
I'm not going to argue with him about matters involving the history of the Jewish people or the Jewish homeland.
But he should show as much consideration by leaving his "legal pronouncements" out of Commentary.




































